FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2108385423> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2108385423 endingPage "683" @default.
• W2108385423 startingPage "683" @default.
• W2108385423 abstract "Interruptions have been implicated as a cause of clinical errors, yet, to our knowledge, no empirical studies of this relationship exist. We tested the hypothesis that interruptions during medication administration increase errors.We performed an observational study of nurses preparing and administering medications in 6 wards at 2 major teaching hospitals in Sydney, Australia. Procedural failures and interruptions were recorded during direct observation. Clinical errors were identified by comparing observational data with patients' medication charts. A volunteer sample of 98 nurses (representing a participation rate of 82%) were observed preparing and administering 4271 medications to 720 patients over 505 hours from September 2006 through March 2008. Associations between procedural failures (10 indicators; eg, aseptic technique) and clinical errors (12 indicators; eg, wrong dose) and interruptions, and between interruptions and potential severity of failures and errors, were the main outcome measures.Each interruption was associated with a 12.1% increase in procedural failures and a 12.7% increase in clinical errors. The association between interruptions and clinical errors was independent of hospital and nurse characteristics. Interruptions occurred in 53.1% of administrations (95% confidence interval [CI], 51.6%-54.6%). Of total drug administrations, 74.4% (n = 3177) had at least 1 procedural failure (95% CI, 73.1%-75.7%). Administrations with no interruptions (n = 2005) had a procedural failure rate of 69.6% (n = 1395; 95% CI, 67.6%-71.6%), which increased to 84.6% (n = 148; 95% CI, 79.2%-89.9%) with 3 interruptions. Overall, 25.0% (n = 1067; 95% CI, 23.7%-26.3%) of administrations had at least 1 clinical error. Those with no interruptions had a rate of 25.3% (n = 507; 95% CI, 23.4%-27.2%), whereas those with 3 interruptions had a rate of 38.9% (n = 68; 95% CI, 31.6%-46.1%). Nurse experience provided no protection against making a clinical error and was associated with higher procedural failure rates. Error severity increased with interruption frequency. Without interruption, the estimated risk of a major error was 2.3%; with 4 interruptions this risk doubled to 4.7% (95% CI, 2.9%-7.4%; P < .001).Among nurses at 2 hospitals, the occurrence and frequency of interruptions were significantly associated with the incidence of procedural failures and clinical errors." @default.
• W2108385423 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2108385423 creator A5019615700 @default.
• W2108385423 creator A5045744680 @default.
• W2108385423 creator A5052369093 @default.
• W2108385423 creator A5067007569 @default.
• W2108385423 creator A5083888578 @default.
• W2108385423 date "2010-04-26" @default.
• W2108385423 modified "2023-10-10" @default.
• W2108385423 title "Association of Interruptions With an Increased Risk and Severity of Medication Administration Errors" @default.
• W2108385423 cites W1532066679 @default.
• W2108385423 cites W1571618219 @default.
• W2108385423 cites W1573779046 @default.
• W2108385423 cites W1601127599 @default.
• W2108385423 cites W1772159411 @default.
• W2108385423 cites W1948663377 @default.
• W2108385423 cites W1965120334 @default.
• W2108385423 cites W1968583858 @default.
• W2108385423 cites W1989759268 @default.
• W2108385423 cites W1991034690 @default.
• W2108385423 cites W2007132658 @default.
• W2108385423 cites W2017096199 @default.
• W2108385423 cites W2018444187 @default.
• W2108385423 cites W2028235879 @default.
• W2108385423 cites W2028542552 @default.
• W2108385423 cites W2031521801 @default.
• W2108385423 cites W2038432609 @default.
• W2108385423 cites W2040780700 @default.
• W2108385423 cites W2063477037 @default.
• W2108385423 cites W2063748437 @default.
• W2108385423 cites W2067033638 @default.
• W2108385423 cites W2067068312 @default.
• W2108385423 cites W2068142044 @default.
• W2108385423 cites W2071783141 @default.
• W2108385423 cites W2092276772 @default.
• W2108385423 cites W2107736498 @default.
• W2108385423 cites W2112043716 @default.
• W2108385423 cites W2127264449 @default.
• W2108385423 cites W2142120967 @default.
• W2108385423 cites W2148880117 @default.
• W2108385423 cites W2150546988 @default.
• W2108385423 cites W2151045537 @default.
• W2108385423 cites W2153928704 @default.
• W2108385423 cites W2162933269 @default.
• W2108385423 cites W2397209582 @default.
• W2108385423 cites W2917622048 @default.
• W2108385423 cites W58804484 @default.
• W2108385423 cites W75507663 @default.
• W2108385423 cites W82234358 @default.
• W2108385423 cites W1585800053 @default.
• W2108385423 doi "https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2010.65" @default.
• W2108385423 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20421552" @default.
• W2108385423 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W2108385423 type Work @default.
• W2108385423 sameAs 2108385423 @default.
• W2108385423 citedByCount "601" @default.
• W2108385423 countsByYear W21083854232012 @default.
• W2108385423 countsByYear W21083854232013 @default.
• W2108385423 countsByYear W21083854232014 @default.
• W2108385423 countsByYear W21083854232015 @default.
• W2108385423 countsByYear W21083854232016 @default.
• W2108385423 countsByYear W21083854232017 @default.
• W2108385423 countsByYear W21083854232018 @default.
• W2108385423 countsByYear W21083854232019 @default.
• W2108385423 countsByYear W21083854232020 @default.
• W2108385423 countsByYear W21083854232021 @default.
• W2108385423 countsByYear W21083854232022 @default.
• W2108385423 countsByYear W21083854232023 @default.
• W2108385423 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2108385423 hasAuthorship W2108385423A5019615700 @default.
• W2108385423 hasAuthorship W2108385423A5045744680 @default.
• W2108385423 hasAuthorship W2108385423A5052369093 @default.
• W2108385423 hasAuthorship W2108385423A5067007569 @default.
• W2108385423 hasAuthorship W2108385423A5083888578 @default.
• W2108385423 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2108385423 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W2108385423 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2108385423 hasConcept C194828623 @default.
• W2108385423 hasConcept C23131810 @default.
• W2108385423 hasConcept C2779328685 @default.
• W2108385423 hasConcept C2987276129 @default.
• W2108385423 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W2108385423 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W2108385423 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2108385423 hasConceptScore W2108385423C126322002 @default.
• W2108385423 hasConceptScore W2108385423C160735492 @default.
• W2108385423 hasConceptScore W2108385423C162324750 @default.
• W2108385423 hasConceptScore W2108385423C194828623 @default.
• W2108385423 hasConceptScore W2108385423C23131810 @default.
• W2108385423 hasConceptScore W2108385423C2779328685 @default.
• W2108385423 hasConceptScore W2108385423C2987276129 @default.
• W2108385423 hasConceptScore W2108385423C44249647 @default.
• W2108385423 hasConceptScore W2108385423C50522688 @default.
• W2108385423 hasConceptScore W2108385423C71924100 @default.
• W2108385423 hasIssue "8" @default.
• W2108385423 hasLocation W21083854231 @default.
• W2108385423 hasLocation W21083854232 @default.
• W2108385423 hasOpenAccess W2108385423 @default.

• next