FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2108725095> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2108725095 endingPage "1116" @default.
• W2108725095 startingPage "1110" @default.
• W2108725095 abstract "Background: First-generation autologous chondrocyte implantation has limitations, and introducing new effective cell sources can improve cartilage repair. Purpose: This study was conducted to compare the clinical outcomes of patients treated with first-generation autologous chondrocyte implantation to patients treated with autologous bone marrow–derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs). Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Seventy-two matched (lesion site and age) patients underwent cartilage repair using chondrocytes (n = 36) or BMSCs (n = 36). Clinical outcomes were measured before operation and 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months after operation using the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) Cartilage Injury Evaluation Package, which included questions from the Short-Form Health Survey, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective knee evaluation form, Lysholm knee scale, and Tegner activity level scale. Results: There was significant improvement in the patients’ quality of life (physical and mental components of the Short Form-36 questionnaire included in the ICRS package) after cartilage repair in both groups (autologous chondrocyte implantation and BMSCs). However, there was no difference between the BMSC and the autologous chondrocyte implantation group in terms of clinical outcomes except for Physical Role Functioning, with a greater improvement over time in the BMSC group ( P = .044 for interaction effect). The IKDC subjective knee evaluation ( P = .861), Lysholm ( P = .627), and Tegner ( P = .200) scores did not show any significant difference between groups over time. However, in general, men showed significantly better improvements than women. Patients younger than 45 years of age scored significantly better than patients older than 45 years in the autologous chondrocyte implantation group, but age did not make a difference in outcomes in the BMSC group. Conclusion: Using BMSCs in cartilage repair is as effective as chondrocytes for articular cartilage repair. In addition, it required 1 less knee surgery, reduced costs, and minimized donor-site morbidity." @default.
• W2108725095 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2108725095 creator A5000158968 @default.
• W2108725095 creator A5005619215 @default.
• W2108725095 creator A5023200882 @default.
• W2108725095 creator A5036255446 @default.
• W2108725095 creator A5054426924 @default.
• W2108725095 date "2010-04-14" @default.
• W2108725095 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2108725095 title "Autologous Bone Marrow–Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Versus Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation" @default.
• W2108725095 cites W1522229466 @default.
• W2108725095 cites W1544751778 @default.
• W2108725095 cites W1957489746 @default.
• W2108725095 cites W1968746947 @default.
• W2108725095 cites W1970031521 @default.
• W2108725095 cites W1970821370 @default.
• W2108725095 cites W1975775804 @default.
• W2108725095 cites W1988592246 @default.
• W2108725095 cites W1990226086 @default.
• W2108725095 cites W1995122819 @default.
• W2108725095 cites W2026458998 @default.
• W2108725095 cites W2027245388 @default.
• W2108725095 cites W2031049439 @default.
• W2108725095 cites W2042217942 @default.
• W2108725095 cites W2042511089 @default.
• W2108725095 cites W2046362994 @default.
• W2108725095 cites W2054013148 @default.
• W2108725095 cites W2057208793 @default.
• W2108725095 cites W2057315313 @default.
• W2108725095 cites W2065497694 @default.
• W2108725095 cites W2066698555 @default.
• W2108725095 cites W2067079430 @default.
• W2108725095 cites W2071586034 @default.
• W2108725095 cites W2088564623 @default.
• W2108725095 cites W2101383983 @default.
• W2108725095 cites W2104475936 @default.
• W2108725095 cites W2109265709 @default.
• W2108725095 cites W2113457553 @default.
• W2108725095 cites W2125050513 @default.
• W2108725095 cites W2130468346 @default.
• W2108725095 cites W2134683691 @default.
• W2108725095 cites W2135903352 @default.
• W2108725095 cites W2142501474 @default.
• W2108725095 cites W2166841062 @default.
• W2108725095 cites W2223297936 @default.
• W2108725095 cites W2258554676 @default.
• W2108725095 cites W2298045585 @default.
• W2108725095 cites W33535528 @default.
• W2108725095 cites W4243257494 @default.
• W2108725095 cites W4253987619 @default.
• W2108725095 cites W4292806894 @default.
• W2108725095 doi "https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546509359067" @default.
• W2108725095 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20392971" @default.
• W2108725095 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W2108725095 type Work @default.
• W2108725095 sameAs 2108725095 @default.
• W2108725095 citedByCount "494" @default.
• W2108725095 countsByYear W21087250952012 @default.
• W2108725095 countsByYear W21087250952013 @default.
• W2108725095 countsByYear W21087250952014 @default.
• W2108725095 countsByYear W21087250952015 @default.
• W2108725095 countsByYear W21087250952016 @default.
• W2108725095 countsByYear W21087250952017 @default.
• W2108725095 countsByYear W21087250952018 @default.
• W2108725095 countsByYear W21087250952019 @default.
• W2108725095 countsByYear W21087250952020 @default.
• W2108725095 countsByYear W21087250952021 @default.
• W2108725095 countsByYear W21087250952022 @default.
• W2108725095 countsByYear W21087250952023 @default.
• W2108725095 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2108725095 hasAuthorship W2108725095A5000158968 @default.
• W2108725095 hasAuthorship W2108725095A5005619215 @default.
• W2108725095 hasAuthorship W2108725095A5023200882 @default.
• W2108725095 hasAuthorship W2108725095A5036255446 @default.
• W2108725095 hasAuthorship W2108725095A5054426924 @default.
• W2108725095 hasConcept C105702510 @default.
• W2108725095 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2108725095 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2108725095 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2108725095 hasConcept C198826908 @default.
• W2108725095 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W2108725095 hasConcept C2776164576 @default.
• W2108725095 hasConcept C2777870964 @default.
• W2108725095 hasConcept C2780007613 @default.
• W2108725095 hasConcept C2780550940 @default.
• W2108725095 hasConcept C2781403057 @default.
• W2108725095 hasConcept C28328180 @default.
• W2108725095 hasConcept C2911091166 @default.
• W2108725095 hasConcept C3020332539 @default.
• W2108725095 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
• W2108725095 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2108725095 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2108725095 hasConceptScore W2108725095C105702510 @default.
• W2108725095 hasConceptScore W2108725095C126322002 @default.
• W2108725095 hasConceptScore W2108725095C141071460 @default.
• W2108725095 hasConceptScore W2108725095C142724271 @default.
• W2108725095 hasConceptScore W2108725095C198826908 @default.
• W2108725095 hasConceptScore W2108725095C204787440 @default.

• next