FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2108750110> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2108750110 endingPage "694" @default.
• W2108750110 startingPage "693" @default.
• W2108750110 abstract "We appreciated Dr Graham et al's 2 recent articles on arthroereisis [Graham ME, Jawrani NT, Chikka A. Extraosseous talotarsal stabilization using HyProCure® in adults: a 5-year retrospective follow-up. J Foot Ankle Surg 51(1):23–29, 2012; Graham ME, Jawrani NT. Extraosseous talotarsal stabilization devices: a new classification system. J Foot Ankle Surg 51(5):613–619, 2012]. Articles and research are needed to validate collective findings that this is an important procedure for flexible flatfoot and talotarsal dislocation. We applaud Dr Graham et al's articles and coding guidelines, which could potentially be applied to all subtalar implants.We do, however, have a few questions and comments about these articles.Article 1 (1Graham M.E. Jawrani N.T. Chikka A. Extraosseous talotarsal stabilization using HyProCure® in adults: a 5-year retrospective follow-up.J Foot Ankle Surg. 2012; 51: 23-29Google Scholar)1.In the article about HyProCure® used in extraosseous talotarsal stabilizion (1Graham M.E. Jawrani N.T. Chikka A. Extraosseous talotarsal stabilization using HyProCure® in adults: a 5-year retrospective follow-up.J Foot Ankle Surg. 2012; 51: 23-29Google Scholar),Graham et al mentioned that the removal rate was 6%. However, if the 9 revision cases are added, it would indicate a total of 14% having additional surgery. Would that be correct?2.Also in this article, Graham et al (1Graham M.E. Jawrani N.T. Chikka A. Extraosseous talotarsal stabilization using HyProCure® in adults: a 5-year retrospective follow-up.J Foot Ankle Surg. 2012; 51: 23-29Google Scholar) stated that the pivot point shifts anterior and medially due to partial dislocation of the talus. Do the authors have any references or research to document this statement? It is our understanding that the pivot point would stay the same in mild to moderate cases with only the subtalar axis being altered (lowered with pronation).3.Finally, regarding this article (1Graham M.E. Jawrani N.T. Chikka A. Extraosseous talotarsal stabilization using HyProCure® in adults: a 5-year retrospective follow-up.J Foot Ankle Surg. 2012; 51: 23-29Google Scholar), if an object is positioned on both sides of a pivot point 180° to each other, mechanically we believe one would risk blocking all motion about that pivot joint.Article 2 (2Graham M.E. Jawrani N.T. Extraosseous talotarsal stabilization devices: a new classification system.J Foot Ankle Surg. 2012; 51: 613-619Google Scholar)1.In the article by Graham and Jawrani regarding a new classification system for extraosseous talotarsal stabilization devices (2Graham M.E. Jawrani N.T. Extraosseous talotarsal stabilization devices: a new classification system.J Foot Ankle Surg. 2012; 51: 613-619Google Scholar), we found it interesting that they referenced the French anatomist Farabeuf and his claims regarding foot biomechanics. We subsequently paid to have this work translated into English. Graham and Jawrani stated, “it is advocated that the ‘cruciate pivot point’ is the ideal location where the excessive anterior-medical-plantar displacement of the talus within the tarsal mechanism should be eliminated or minimized,” and they referenced Farabeuf. The person who interpreted Farabeuf's treatise for us could not find that statement. Can Graham and Jawrani provide further information on who advocates this?2.Also in this article (2Graham M.E. Jawrani N.T. Extraosseous talotarsal stabilization devices: a new classification system.J Foot Ankle Surg. 2012; 51: 613-619Google Scholar), Graham and Jawrani stated that after they cut the interosseous ligament, they insert the implant and the ligament heals back. Do they have any evidence that this occurs? We have observed that when the anterior talofibular ligament is torn at the lateral ankle, it doesn't always heal, and it often requires surgical repair.3.Graham and Jawrani (2Graham M.E. Jawrani N.T. Extraosseous talotarsal stabilization devices: a new classification system.J Foot Ankle Surg. 2012; 51: 613-619Google Scholar) also stated that the medial cylindrical portion of the implant offers no resistance to talar motion. The calcaneus is the primary component moving as the talus is in the ankle mortise. If an object is placed too far into the Calais tarsi toward the tarsal canal, doesn't this risk limiting adduction of the calcaneal beak and resultant supination?4.In regard to the “cruciate pivot point,” Graham and Jawrani (2Graham M.E. Jawrani N.T. Extraosseous talotarsal stabilization devices: a new classification system.J Foot Ankle Surg. 2012; 51: 613-619Google Scholar) referenced Henke and Henle, but we do not see references for them. Can they please provide these references?We thank Graham et al for their articles (1Graham M.E. Jawrani N.T. Chikka A. Extraosseous talotarsal stabilization using HyProCure® in adults: a 5-year retrospective follow-up.J Foot Ankle Surg. 2012; 51: 23-29Google Scholar, 2Graham M.E. Jawrani N.T. Extraosseous talotarsal stabilization devices: a new classification system.J Foot Ankle Surg. 2012; 51: 613-619Google Scholar) and look forward to them clarifying these issues and questions on this important topic. We appreciate their work and activities surrounding arthroereisis/talotarsal dislocation. We appreciated Dr Graham et al's 2 recent articles on arthroereisis [Graham ME, Jawrani NT, Chikka A. Extraosseous talotarsal stabilization using HyProCure® in adults: a 5-year retrospective follow-up. J Foot Ankle Surg 51(1):23–29, 2012; Graham ME, Jawrani NT. Extraosseous talotarsal stabilization devices: a new classification system. J Foot Ankle Surg 51(5):613–619, 2012]. Articles and research are needed to validate collective findings that this is an important procedure for flexible flatfoot and talotarsal dislocation. We applaud Dr Graham et al's articles and coding guidelines, which could potentially be applied to all subtalar implants. We do, however, have a few questions and comments about these articles. Article 1 (1Graham M.E. Jawrani N.T. Chikka A. Extraosseous talotarsal stabilization using HyProCure® in adults: a 5-year retrospective follow-up.J Foot Ankle Surg. 2012; 51: 23-29Google Scholar)1.In the article about HyProCure® used in extraosseous talotarsal stabilizion (1Graham M.E. Jawrani N.T. Chikka A. Extraosseous talotarsal stabilization using HyProCure® in adults: a 5-year retrospective follow-up.J Foot Ankle Surg. 2012; 51: 23-29Google Scholar),Graham et al mentioned that the removal rate was 6%. However, if the 9 revision cases are added, it would indicate a total of 14% having additional surgery. Would that be correct?2.Also in this article, Graham et al (1Graham M.E. Jawrani N.T. Chikka A. Extraosseous talotarsal stabilization using HyProCure® in adults: a 5-year retrospective follow-up.J Foot Ankle Surg. 2012; 51: 23-29Google Scholar) stated that the pivot point shifts anterior and medially due to partial dislocation of the talus. Do the authors have any references or research to document this statement? It is our understanding that the pivot point would stay the same in mild to moderate cases with only the subtalar axis being altered (lowered with pronation).3.Finally, regarding this article (1Graham M.E. Jawrani N.T. Chikka A. Extraosseous talotarsal stabilization using HyProCure® in adults: a 5-year retrospective follow-up.J Foot Ankle Surg. 2012; 51: 23-29Google Scholar), if an object is positioned on both sides of a pivot point 180° to each other, mechanically we believe one would risk blocking all motion about that pivot joint. 1.In the article about HyProCure® used in extraosseous talotarsal stabilizion (1Graham M.E. Jawrani N.T. Chikka A. Extraosseous talotarsal stabilization using HyProCure® in adults: a 5-year retrospective follow-up.J Foot Ankle Surg. 2012; 51: 23-29Google Scholar),Graham et al mentioned that the removal rate was 6%. However, if the 9 revision cases are added, it would indicate a total of 14% having additional surgery. Would that be correct?2.Also in this article, Graham et al (1Graham M.E. Jawrani N.T. Chikka A. Extraosseous talotarsal stabilization using HyProCure® in adults: a 5-year retrospective follow-up.J Foot Ankle Surg. 2012; 51: 23-29Google Scholar) stated that the pivot point shifts anterior and medially due to partial dislocation of the talus. Do the authors have any references or research to document this statement? It is our understanding that the pivot point would stay the same in mild to moderate cases with only the subtalar axis being altered (lowered with pronation).3.Finally, regarding this article (1Graham M.E. Jawrani N.T. Chikka A. Extraosseous talotarsal stabilization using HyProCure® in adults: a 5-year retrospective follow-up.J Foot Ankle Surg. 2012; 51: 23-29Google Scholar), if an object is positioned on both sides of a pivot point 180° to each other, mechanically we believe one would risk blocking all motion about that pivot joint. Article 2 (2Graham M.E. Jawrani N.T. Extraosseous talotarsal stabilization devices: a new classification system.J Foot Ankle Surg. 2012; 51: 613-619Google Scholar)1.In the article by Graham and Jawrani regarding a new classification system for extraosseous talotarsal stabilization devices (2Graham M.E. Jawrani N.T. Extraosseous talotarsal stabilization devices: a new classification system.J Foot Ankle Surg. 2012; 51: 613-619Google Scholar), we found it interesting that they referenced the French anatomist Farabeuf and his claims regarding foot biomechanics. We subsequently paid to have this work translated into English. Graham and Jawrani stated, “it is advocated that the ‘cruciate pivot point’ is the ideal location where the excessive anterior-medical-plantar displacement of the talus within the tarsal mechanism should be eliminated or minimized,” and they referenced Farabeuf. The person who interpreted Farabeuf's treatise for us could not find that statement. Can Graham and Jawrani provide further information on who advocates this?2.Also in this article (2Graham M.E. Jawrani N.T. Extraosseous talotarsal stabilization devices: a new classification system.J Foot Ankle Surg. 2012; 51: 613-619Google Scholar), Graham and Jawrani stated that after they cut the interosseous ligament, they insert the implant and the ligament heals back. Do they have any evidence that this occurs? We have observed that when the anterior talofibular ligament is torn at the lateral ankle, it doesn't always heal, and it often requires surgical repair.3.Graham and Jawrani (2Graham M.E. Jawrani N.T. Extraosseous talotarsal stabilization devices: a new classification system.J Foot Ankle Surg. 2012; 51: 613-619Google Scholar) also stated that the medial cylindrical portion of the implant offers no resistance to talar motion. The calcaneus is the primary component moving as the talus is in the ankle mortise. If an object is placed too far into the Calais tarsi toward the tarsal canal, doesn't this risk limiting adduction of the calcaneal beak and resultant supination?4.In regard to the “cruciate pivot point,” Graham and Jawrani (2Graham M.E. Jawrani N.T. Extraosseous talotarsal stabilization devices: a new classification system.J Foot Ankle Surg. 2012; 51: 613-619Google Scholar) referenced Henke and Henle, but we do not see references for them. Can they please provide these references?We thank Graham et al for their articles (1Graham M.E. Jawrani N.T. Chikka A. Extraosseous talotarsal stabilization using HyProCure® in adults: a 5-year retrospective follow-up.J Foot Ankle Surg. 2012; 51: 23-29Google Scholar, 2Graham M.E. Jawrani N.T. Extraosseous talotarsal stabilization devices: a new classification system.J Foot Ankle Surg. 2012; 51: 613-619Google Scholar) and look forward to them clarifying these issues and questions on this important topic. We appreciate their work and activities surrounding arthroereisis/talotarsal dislocation. 1.In the article by Graham and Jawrani regarding a new classification system for extraosseous talotarsal stabilization devices (2Graham M.E. Jawrani N.T. Extraosseous talotarsal stabilization devices: a new classification system.J Foot Ankle Surg. 2012; 51: 613-619Google Scholar), we found it interesting that they referenced the French anatomist Farabeuf and his claims regarding foot biomechanics. We subsequently paid to have this work translated into English. Graham and Jawrani stated, “it is advocated that the ‘cruciate pivot point’ is the ideal location where the excessive anterior-medical-plantar displacement of the talus within the tarsal mechanism should be eliminated or minimized,” and they referenced Farabeuf. The person who interpreted Farabeuf's treatise for us could not find that statement. Can Graham and Jawrani provide further information on who advocates this?2.Also in this article (2Graham M.E. Jawrani N.T. Extraosseous talotarsal stabilization devices: a new classification system.J Foot Ankle Surg. 2012; 51: 613-619Google Scholar), Graham and Jawrani stated that after they cut the interosseous ligament, they insert the implant and the ligament heals back. Do they have any evidence that this occurs? We have observed that when the anterior talofibular ligament is torn at the lateral ankle, it doesn't always heal, and it often requires surgical repair.3.Graham and Jawrani (2Graham M.E. Jawrani N.T. Extraosseous talotarsal stabilization devices: a new classification system.J Foot Ankle Surg. 2012; 51: 613-619Google Scholar) also stated that the medial cylindrical portion of the implant offers no resistance to talar motion. The calcaneus is the primary component moving as the talus is in the ankle mortise. If an object is placed too far into the Calais tarsi toward the tarsal canal, doesn't this risk limiting adduction of the calcaneal beak and resultant supination?4.In regard to the “cruciate pivot point,” Graham and Jawrani (2Graham M.E. Jawrani N.T. Extraosseous talotarsal stabilization devices: a new classification system.J Foot Ankle Surg. 2012; 51: 613-619Google Scholar) referenced Henke and Henle, but we do not see references for them. Can they please provide these references? We thank Graham et al for their articles (1Graham M.E. Jawrani N.T. Chikka A. Extraosseous talotarsal stabilization using HyProCure® in adults: a 5-year retrospective follow-up.J Foot Ankle Surg. 2012; 51: 23-29Google Scholar, 2Graham M.E. Jawrani N.T. Extraosseous talotarsal stabilization devices: a new classification system.J Foot Ankle Surg. 2012; 51: 613-619Google Scholar) and look forward to them clarifying these issues and questions on this important topic. We appreciate their work and activities surrounding arthroereisis/talotarsal dislocation. ReplyThe Journal of Foot and Ankle SurgeryVol. 52Issue 5PreviewFollowing are my responses to the questions and comments from Drs. Hatch and Tower regarding the 2 articles (1,2). Full-Text PDF Extraosseous Talotarsal Stabilization Using HyProCure® in Adults: A 5-year Retrospective Follow-upThe Journal of Foot and Ankle SurgeryVol. 51Issue 1PreviewThe purpose of this retrospective study was to determine long-term functional outcomes and device tolerance achieved in adult patients who chose to undergo an extraosseous talotarsal stabilization procedure HyProCure® for the treatment of flexible talotarsal joint deformity. Eighty-three adult patients participated in this study. Postoperative subjective assessment of device performance was evaluated using Maryland Foot Scores, which were collected at a mean follow-up period of 51 months. The mean postoperative Maryland Foot Score was 88 out of 100; postoperatively, 52% of cases reported complete alleviation of foot pain, 69% of cases had no limitations on their foot functional abilities, and 80% of cases reported complete satisfaction with the appearance of their feet. Full-Text PDF Extraosseous Talotarsal Stabilization Devices: A New Classification SystemThe Journal of Foot and Ankle SurgeryVol. 51Issue 5PreviewDisplacement of the articular facets of talus on the tarsal mechanism, or partial talotarsal dislocation, is a condition seen in children, adult, and geriatric populations. A characteristic of this pathologic condition is a prolonged period of and excessive amount of pronation (hyperpronation) on weightbearing. The ill effects of this condition may lead to a multitude of other foot pathologies and to pathologies associated with the proximal lower extremity musculoskeletal structures. A variety of conservative and operative treatment options have been used to eliminate or minimize hyperpronation. Full-Text PDF" @default.
• W2108750110 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2108750110 creator A5016911151 @default.
• W2108750110 creator A5037795858 @default.
• W2108750110 date "2013-09-01" @default.
• W2108750110 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2108750110 title "Extraosseous Talotarsal Stabilization" @default.
• W2108750110 cites W2015238050 @default.
• W2108750110 cites W2142731142 @default.
• W2108750110 doi "https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2013.06.016" @default.
• W2108750110 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23972911" @default.
• W2108750110 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W2108750110 type Work @default.
• W2108750110 sameAs 2108750110 @default.
• W2108750110 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2108750110 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2108750110 hasAuthorship W2108750110A5016911151 @default.
• W2108750110 hasAuthorship W2108750110A5037795858 @default.
• W2108750110 hasBestOaLocation W21087501101 @default.
• W2108750110 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2108750110 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2108750110 hasConceptScore W2108750110C141071460 @default.
• W2108750110 hasConceptScore W2108750110C71924100 @default.
• W2108750110 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W2108750110 hasLocation W21087501101 @default.
• W2108750110 hasLocation W21087501102 @default.
• W2108750110 hasOpenAccess W2108750110 @default.
• W2108750110 hasPrimaryLocation W21087501101 @default.
• W2108750110 hasRelatedWork W2002120878 @default.
• W2108750110 hasRelatedWork W2003938723 @default.
• W2108750110 hasRelatedWork W2047967234 @default.
• W2108750110 hasRelatedWork W2118496982 @default.
• W2108750110 hasRelatedWork W2364998975 @default.
• W2108750110 hasRelatedWork W2369162477 @default.
• W2108750110 hasRelatedWork W2439875401 @default.
• W2108750110 hasRelatedWork W4238867864 @default.
• W2108750110 hasRelatedWork W2519357708 @default.
• W2108750110 hasRelatedWork W2525756941 @default.
• W2108750110 hasVolume "52" @default.
• W2108750110 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2108750110 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2108750110 magId "2108750110" @default.
• W2108750110 workType "article" @default.