FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2108806553> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2108806553 endingPage "291" @default.
• W2108806553 startingPage "282" @default.
• W2108806553 abstract "An earthquake of magnitude of 7.6 (Mw 7.6) occurred in Bhuj, India on January 26, 2001. This event inflicted damages of varying extents to a large number of small to moderate size multi-zone earth dams in the vicinity of the epicenter. Some of the distress was due to the liquefaction of saturated alluvium in foundation. Liquefaction was relatively localized for the majority of these dams because the earthquake struck in the middle of a prolonged dry season when the reservoirs behind these dams were nearly empty and shallow alluvium soils underneath the downstream portions of the dams were partly dry. Otherwise, liquefaction of foundation soils would have been more extensive and damage to these dams more significant. Six such dams have been examined in this paper. Four of these facilities, Chang, Shivlakha, Suvi, and Tapar were within the 50 km of epicenter region. These dams underwent free-field ground motion with peak ground accelerations between 0.28g to 0.52g. Of these Chang Dam underwent severe slumping, whereas Shivlakha, Suvi, and Tapar Dams were affected severely especially over the upstream sections. Fatehgadh Dam and Kaswati Dam were affected relatively less severely. Foundation conditions underneath these dams were first examined for assessing liquefaction potential. A limited amount of subsurface information available from investigations undertaken prior to the earthquake indicates that, although the foundation soils within the top 2.0 to 2.5 m underneath these dams were susceptible to liquefaction, Bhuj Earthquake did not trigger liquefaction because of lack of saturation of these layers underneath the downstream portions of these dams. These dams were then analyzed using a simple sliding block procedure using appropriate estimates of undrained soil strength parameters. The results of this analysis for these structures were found to be in general agreement with the observed deformation patterns." @default.
• W2108806553 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2108806553 creator A5076912048 @default.
• W2108806553 creator A5079005174 @default.
• W2108806553 creator A5091050118 @default.
• W2108806553 date "2005-08-01" @default.
• W2108806553 modified "2023-09-29" @default.
• W2108806553 title "Analysis of earth dams affected by the 2001 Bhuj Earthquake" @default.
• W2108806553 cites W1968864321 @default.
• W2108806553 cites W2026446435 @default.
• W2108806553 cites W2026620425 @default.
• W2108806553 cites W2104881092 @default.
• W2108806553 cites W2166095666 @default.
• W2108806553 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2005.06.002" @default.
• W2108806553 hasPublicationYear "2005" @default.
• W2108806553 type Work @default.
• W2108806553 sameAs 2108806553 @default.
• W2108806553 citedByCount "51" @default.
• W2108806553 countsByYear W21088065532012 @default.
• W2108806553 countsByYear W21088065532013 @default.
• W2108806553 countsByYear W21088065532014 @default.
• W2108806553 countsByYear W21088065532015 @default.
• W2108806553 countsByYear W21088065532016 @default.
• W2108806553 countsByYear W21088065532017 @default.
• W2108806553 countsByYear W21088065532018 @default.
• W2108806553 countsByYear W21088065532019 @default.
• W2108806553 countsByYear W21088065532020 @default.
• W2108806553 countsByYear W21088065532021 @default.
• W2108806553 countsByYear W21088065532022 @default.
• W2108806553 countsByYear W21088065532023 @default.
• W2108806553 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2108806553 hasAuthorship W2108806553A5076912048 @default.
• W2108806553 hasAuthorship W2108806553A5079005174 @default.
• W2108806553 hasAuthorship W2108806553A5091050118 @default.
• W2108806553 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2108806553 hasConcept C127313418 @default.
• W2108806553 hasConcept C165205528 @default.
• W2108806553 hasConcept C26148502 @default.
• W2108806553 hasConcept C37914503 @default.
• W2108806553 hasConcept C39432304 @default.
• W2108806553 hasConceptScore W2108806553C121332964 @default.
• W2108806553 hasConceptScore W2108806553C127313418 @default.
• W2108806553 hasConceptScore W2108806553C165205528 @default.
• W2108806553 hasConceptScore W2108806553C26148502 @default.
• W2108806553 hasConceptScore W2108806553C37914503 @default.
• W2108806553 hasConceptScore W2108806553C39432304 @default.
• W2108806553 hasIssue "3-4" @default.
• W2108806553 hasLocation W21088065531 @default.
• W2108806553 hasOpenAccess W2108806553 @default.
• W2108806553 hasPrimaryLocation W21088065531 @default.
• W2108806553 hasRelatedWork W1968702681 @default.
• W2108806553 hasRelatedWork W1969245073 @default.
• W2108806553 hasRelatedWork W2031573214 @default.
• W2108806553 hasRelatedWork W2092739438 @default.
• W2108806553 hasRelatedWork W2371527909 @default.
• W2108806553 hasRelatedWork W2772196783 @default.
• W2108806553 hasRelatedWork W3016255354 @default.
• W2108806553 hasRelatedWork W3036915269 @default.
• W2108806553 hasRelatedWork W3109652668 @default.
• W2108806553 hasRelatedWork W4220883378 @default.
• W2108806553 hasVolume "80" @default.
• W2108806553 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2108806553 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2108806553 magId "2108806553" @default.
• W2108806553 workType "article" @default.