FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2108807529> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2108807529 endingPage "218" @default.
• W2108807529 startingPage "207" @default.
• W2108807529 abstract "Aid coordination has assumed a prominent place on health policy agendas. This paper synthesizes the findings of research undertaken to explore the changing practices of aid coordination across a number of countries. It begins by reviewing the key issues giving rise to increased attention to aid coordination in the health sector. The second section describes, assesses and compares the strengths and weaknesses of the dominant mechanisms or instruments which were found to be employed to coordinate health sector aid in the case studies. From this analysis, four factors become clear. First, in many countries, coordination mechanisms have been introduced as a part of an incremental process of trying out different approaches--there is no one model that stands out at any one time. Secondly, some instruments function largely for consultation, predominantly coordinating inputs, while others are more directive and operational, and are used to manage inputs, processes and outputs. Third, many of the mechanisms have not excelled, although, fourth, it is difficult to judge the effectiveness or impact of aid coordination. It is therefore argued that concern with the effectiveness of aid coordination arrangements must give way to a broader analysis of the processes, outputs and outcomes governing the use of both external and domestic resources, focusing on institutional characteristics, the distribution and nature of influence among the actors, and the interests which they pursue through the aid regime. These factors varied considerably across the countries indicating that aid management is context dependent and subject to continuing changes. Finally, the paper looks at the findings in the light of the introduction of sector-wide approaches.This paper examines the need for better coordination of external resources through a discourse on the effectiveness of aid and good government. The review of key issues, allowing increased attention to aid coordination in the health sector, presents the first section. The second section describes, assesses, and compares the strengths and weaknesses of the dominant mechanisms found to be utilized, to coordinate health sector aid in the case studies. The case studies include the low-income, high aid-dependent countries of Bangladesh, Cambodia, Mozambique, and Zambia. Four factors were clear in the analysis. First, coordination mechanisms in many countries have been introduced as a part of an incremental process after trying out several approaches. Second, some instruments function largely for consultation, predominantly coordinating inputs; while, others are more directive and operational. Third, many of the mechanisms have not excelled, although judging the effectiveness or impact of aid coordination was difficult. Finally, the paper ends by suggesting that experience and analysis of different coordination mechanisms has shifted the effect of the policy environment on coordination of aid inputs per se to the management of processes, through which domestic and external resources are deployed." @default.
• W2108807529 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2108807529 creator A5008136050 @default.
• W2108807529 creator A5008907977 @default.
• W2108807529 creator A5025524707 @default.
• W2108807529 creator A5067532404 @default.
• W2108807529 date "1999-09-01" @default.
• W2108807529 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2108807529 title "Health sector development: from aid coordination to resource management" @default.
• W2108807529 cites W123514111 @default.
• W2108807529 cites W1487555428 @default.
• W2108807529 cites W1527947709 @default.
• W2108807529 cites W1564296375 @default.
• W2108807529 cites W1595109627 @default.
• W2108807529 cites W1833422094 @default.
• W2108807529 cites W1859119060 @default.
• W2108807529 cites W1965141769 @default.
• W2108807529 cites W1971879025 @default.
• W2108807529 cites W1986748440 @default.
• W2108807529 cites W1994532225 @default.
• W2108807529 cites W2001045315 @default.
• W2108807529 cites W2001748934 @default.
• W2108807529 cites W2005512694 @default.
• W2108807529 cites W2005850736 @default.
• W2108807529 cites W2005888557 @default.
• W2108807529 cites W2007961674 @default.
• W2108807529 cites W2019169059 @default.
• W2108807529 cites W2025635908 @default.
• W2108807529 cites W2040219948 @default.
• W2108807529 cites W2043111508 @default.
• W2108807529 cites W2078793186 @default.
• W2108807529 cites W2091986457 @default.
• W2108807529 cites W2092875341 @default.
• W2108807529 cites W2101821130 @default.
• W2108807529 cites W2114635105 @default.
• W2108807529 cites W2117907817 @default.
• W2108807529 cites W2121570040 @default.
• W2108807529 cites W2129156318 @default.
• W2108807529 cites W2132892537 @default.
• W2108807529 cites W2153522157 @default.
• W2108807529 cites W2156752275 @default.
• W2108807529 cites W2169511365 @default.
• W2108807529 cites W2170161477 @default.
• W2108807529 cites W2288840667 @default.
• W2108807529 cites W2330715223 @default.
• W2108807529 cites W2330825625 @default.
• W2108807529 cites W2549796911 @default.
• W2108807529 cites W2803000990 @default.
• W2108807529 cites W3125364203 @default.
• W2108807529 cites W579046960 @default.
• W2108807529 cites W60245382 @default.
• W2108807529 cites W630904274 @default.
• W2108807529 cites W648732726 @default.
• W2108807529 cites W659023025 @default.
• W2108807529 cites W768415044 @default.
• W2108807529 doi "https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/14.3.207" @default.
• W2108807529 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10621238" @default.
• W2108807529 hasPublicationYear "1999" @default.
• W2108807529 type Work @default.
• W2108807529 sameAs 2108807529 @default.
• W2108807529 citedByCount "89" @default.
• W2108807529 countsByYear W21088075292012 @default.
• W2108807529 countsByYear W21088075292013 @default.
• W2108807529 countsByYear W21088075292014 @default.
• W2108807529 countsByYear W21088075292015 @default.
• W2108807529 countsByYear W21088075292016 @default.
• W2108807529 countsByYear W21088075292017 @default.
• W2108807529 countsByYear W21088075292018 @default.
• W2108807529 countsByYear W21088075292019 @default.
• W2108807529 countsByYear W21088075292020 @default.
• W2108807529 countsByYear W21088075292021 @default.
• W2108807529 countsByYear W21088075292022 @default.
• W2108807529 countsByYear W21088075292023 @default.
• W2108807529 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2108807529 hasAuthorship W2108807529A5008136050 @default.
• W2108807529 hasAuthorship W2108807529A5008907977 @default.
• W2108807529 hasAuthorship W2108807529A5025524707 @default.
• W2108807529 hasAuthorship W2108807529A5067532404 @default.
• W2108807529 hasBestOaLocation W21088075291 @default.
• W2108807529 hasConcept C100001284 @default.
• W2108807529 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W2108807529 hasConcept C14036430 @default.
• W2108807529 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2108807529 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W2108807529 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2108807529 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2108807529 hasConcept C195094911 @default.
• W2108807529 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W2108807529 hasConcept C206345919 @default.
• W2108807529 hasConcept C21547014 @default.
• W2108807529 hasConcept C2778449271 @default.
• W2108807529 hasConcept C2778454966 @default.
• W2108807529 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W2108807529 hasConcept C2779547435 @default.
• W2108807529 hasConcept C31258907 @default.
• W2108807529 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W2108807529 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2108807529 hasConcept C50522688 @default.

• next