FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2109246354> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2109246354 endingPage "1237" @default.
• W2109246354 startingPage "1230" @default.
• W2109246354 abstract "Background Computed tomographic (CT) angiography provides high sensitivity for the detection of coronary stenosis, while its specificity is relatively low. The aim of this study was to determine the incremental value of coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) by transthoracic echocardiography when used with CT angiography for detecting stenosis of the major coronary arteries compared with invasive quantitative coronary angiography. Methods Sixty patients who underwent CFVR measurement before coronary angiography were retrospectively selected, and the cutoff value of CFVR to predict diameter stenosis > 70% was determined using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Second, CFVR measurement and CT angiography were prospectively performed in 50 patients who were scheduled to undergo coronary angiography. CT angiography using a 64–detector row scanner and CFVR measurement in the proximal to middle portions of the three major coronary arteries by transthoracic echocardiography were performed on the same day, <48 hours before invasive angiography. Results The cutoff values of CFVR were determined to be 2.0 for the left anterior descending coronary artery and 2.1 for the circumflex and right coronary arteries. Using these determined cutoff values, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value of CFVR to identify diameter stenosis ≥ 70% stenosis on invasive quantitative coronary angiography were determined to be 84%, 87%, 66%, and 95%, respectively, and those of CT angiography were 91%, 80%, 58%, and 97%, respectively, in the prospective study with 50 patients. The combination of ≥70% stenosis on CT angiography and impaired CFVR was 94% specific for ≥70% stenosis, while the presence of <70% stenosis on CT angiography and preserved CFVR was 100% specific for the exclusion of ≥70% stenosis on invasive quantitative coronary angiography. Conclusions When the results of CT angiography and CFVR are concordant, the combination is highly accurate in the detection and exclusion of coronary stenosis. CFVR measurement in addition to CT angiography could be helpful in identifying false-positive CT angiographic results. Computed tomographic (CT) angiography provides high sensitivity for the detection of coronary stenosis, while its specificity is relatively low. The aim of this study was to determine the incremental value of coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) by transthoracic echocardiography when used with CT angiography for detecting stenosis of the major coronary arteries compared with invasive quantitative coronary angiography. Sixty patients who underwent CFVR measurement before coronary angiography were retrospectively selected, and the cutoff value of CFVR to predict diameter stenosis > 70% was determined using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Second, CFVR measurement and CT angiography were prospectively performed in 50 patients who were scheduled to undergo coronary angiography. CT angiography using a 64–detector row scanner and CFVR measurement in the proximal to middle portions of the three major coronary arteries by transthoracic echocardiography were performed on the same day, <48 hours before invasive angiography. The cutoff values of CFVR were determined to be 2.0 for the left anterior descending coronary artery and 2.1 for the circumflex and right coronary arteries. Using these determined cutoff values, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value of CFVR to identify diameter stenosis ≥ 70% stenosis on invasive quantitative coronary angiography were determined to be 84%, 87%, 66%, and 95%, respectively, and those of CT angiography were 91%, 80%, 58%, and 97%, respectively, in the prospective study with 50 patients. The combination of ≥70% stenosis on CT angiography and impaired CFVR was 94% specific for ≥70% stenosis, while the presence of <70% stenosis on CT angiography and preserved CFVR was 100% specific for the exclusion of ≥70% stenosis on invasive quantitative coronary angiography. When the results of CT angiography and CFVR are concordant, the combination is highly accurate in the detection and exclusion of coronary stenosis. CFVR measurement in addition to CT angiography could be helpful in identifying false-positive CT angiographic results." @default.
• W2109246354 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2109246354 creator A5000322274 @default.
• W2109246354 creator A5007919399 @default.
• W2109246354 creator A5019753658 @default.
• W2109246354 creator A5034331168 @default.
• W2109246354 creator A5044400015 @default.
• W2109246354 creator A5045305420 @default.
• W2109246354 creator A5055816880 @default.
• W2109246354 creator A5059425294 @default.
• W2109246354 creator A5059478700 @default.
• W2109246354 creator A5070478862 @default.
• W2109246354 creator A5072062005 @default.
• W2109246354 creator A5081749381 @default.
• W2109246354 creator A5088958527 @default.
• W2109246354 date "2014-11-01" @default.
• W2109246354 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2109246354 title "Incremental Value of Coronary Flow Velocity Reserve, Measured by Transthoracic Echocardiography, Compared with Computed Tomography Angiography Alone, for Detecting Flow-Limiting Coronary Stenoses" @default.
• W2109246354 cites W1260204519 @default.
• W2109246354 cites W149503956 @default.
• W2109246354 cites W1540562167 @default.
• W2109246354 cites W1572171310 @default.
• W2109246354 cites W1619893722 @default.
• W2109246354 cites W1964090065 @default.
• W2109246354 cites W1968509289 @default.
• W2109246354 cites W1972264330 @default.
• W2109246354 cites W1982453409 @default.
• W2109246354 cites W1990315777 @default.
• W2109246354 cites W1991264910 @default.
• W2109246354 cites W1998102970 @default.
• W2109246354 cites W2003720627 @default.
• W2109246354 cites W2004700244 @default.
• W2109246354 cites W2019229285 @default.
• W2109246354 cites W2020717917 @default.
• W2109246354 cites W2022790448 @default.
• W2109246354 cites W2035962569 @default.
• W2109246354 cites W2049773601 @default.
• W2109246354 cites W2051289288 @default.
• W2109246354 cites W2060089196 @default.
• W2109246354 cites W2072594707 @default.
• W2109246354 cites W2088118626 @default.
• W2109246354 cites W2089161547 @default.
• W2109246354 cites W2098955670 @default.
• W2109246354 cites W2099472642 @default.
• W2109246354 cites W2101637178 @default.
• W2109246354 cites W2105010133 @default.
• W2109246354 cites W2105371863 @default.
• W2109246354 cites W2108825542 @default.
• W2109246354 cites W2110772462 @default.
• W2109246354 cites W2114643866 @default.
• W2109246354 cites W2120212226 @default.
• W2109246354 cites W2123233546 @default.
• W2109246354 cites W2125856951 @default.
• W2109246354 cites W2132140123 @default.
• W2109246354 cites W2148431985 @default.
• W2109246354 cites W2149755434 @default.
• W2109246354 cites W2150010061 @default.
• W2109246354 cites W2164987356 @default.
• W2109246354 cites W2165300279 @default.
• W2109246354 cites W2193888110 @default.
• W2109246354 cites W2320707747 @default.
• W2109246354 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2014.08.002" @default.
• W2109246354 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25216766" @default.
• W2109246354 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W2109246354 type Work @default.
• W2109246354 sameAs 2109246354 @default.
• W2109246354 citedByCount "4" @default.
• W2109246354 countsByYear W21092463542016 @default.
• W2109246354 countsByYear W21092463542017 @default.
• W2109246354 countsByYear W21092463542020 @default.
• W2109246354 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2109246354 hasAuthorship W2109246354A5000322274 @default.
• W2109246354 hasAuthorship W2109246354A5007919399 @default.
• W2109246354 hasAuthorship W2109246354A5019753658 @default.
• W2109246354 hasAuthorship W2109246354A5034331168 @default.
• W2109246354 hasAuthorship W2109246354A5044400015 @default.
• W2109246354 hasAuthorship W2109246354A5045305420 @default.
• W2109246354 hasAuthorship W2109246354A5055816880 @default.
• W2109246354 hasAuthorship W2109246354A5059425294 @default.
• W2109246354 hasAuthorship W2109246354A5059478700 @default.
• W2109246354 hasAuthorship W2109246354A5070478862 @default.
• W2109246354 hasAuthorship W2109246354A5072062005 @default.
• W2109246354 hasAuthorship W2109246354A5081749381 @default.
• W2109246354 hasAuthorship W2109246354A5088958527 @default.
• W2109246354 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2109246354 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2109246354 hasConcept C164705383 @default.
• W2109246354 hasConcept C197321550 @default.
• W2109246354 hasConcept C2776820930 @default.
• W2109246354 hasConcept C2778742706 @default.
• W2109246354 hasConcept C2780007028 @default.
• W2109246354 hasConcept C2780643987 @default.
• W2109246354 hasConcept C58471807 @default.
• W2109246354 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2109246354 hasConceptScore W2109246354C126322002 @default.
• W2109246354 hasConceptScore W2109246354C126838900 @default.
• W2109246354 hasConceptScore W2109246354C164705383 @default.
• W2109246354 hasConceptScore W2109246354C197321550 @default.

• next