FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2109488085> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2109488085 endingPage "245" @default.
• W2109488085 startingPage "230" @default.
• W2109488085 abstract "Research Article| September 01, 2000 Analysis of fluid flow constraints in regional-scale reflux dolomitization: constant versus variable-flux hydrogeological models Gareth D. Jones; Gareth D. Jones School of Geographical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK, BS8 1SS 1Present address: Exxon Mobil International, St. Catherine’s House, London, WC2, UK. Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Benjamin J. Rostron Benjamin J. Rostron Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2E3 Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology (2000) 48 (3): 230–245. https://doi.org/10.2113/48.3.230 Article history received: 24 Nov 1999 accepted: 27 Apr 2000 first online: 02 Mar 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share MailTo Twitter LinkedIn Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation Gareth D. Jones, Benjamin J. Rostron; Analysis of fluid flow constraints in regional-scale reflux dolomitization: constant versus variable-flux hydrogeological models. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology 2000;; 48 (3): 230–245. doi: https://doi.org/10.2113/48.3.230 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyBulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology Search Advanced Search Abstract The origin of replacement dolomites in the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin (WCSB) remains controversial and problematic. In order to meet the considerable magnesium mass-balance requirements, a wide range of groundwater-flow systems, encompassing all diagenetic settings, has been invoked to explain their formation. One of the previously proposed dolomitizing flow systems is reflux circulation.Reflux circulation occurs in response to differences in fluid density controlled by variations in salinity. The restriction and evaporation of seawater can result in the generation of dense platform-top brines. These brines are potential dolomitizing fluids that can descend into underlying pore networks under the influence of gravity.We used a numerical groundwater flow model to investigate the fluid-flow constraints of reflux dolomitization in carbonate platforms. Specifically, we investigated the sensitivity of the pattern and magnitude of fluid flux to the platform-top (seawater) boundary condition, the concentration of platform-top brines and critical hydraulic parameters (permeability and permeability anisotropy).The pre-existing model of reflux employed in the WCSB has an unrealistic uniform distribution of fluid flux, which we have termed the “constant flux” model, or CFM. In contrast to the CFM, our simulations of reflux circulation incorporate a more realistic platform-top seawater boundary condition, which is open, rather than closed, to flow. Open-topped models generate spatially dependent fluid-flux distributions and are termed here “variable-flux” models, or VFM. Results with the VFM, for an optimal parameter configuration designed to maximize lateral flow, indicate that almost all refluxing brines discharge within 30 km of the brine’s source. The spatial distribution of dolomitization times calculated using the VFM demonstrate that the CFM grossly underestimates dolomitization times for most of the platform, but overestimates dolomitization times close to the brine source where fluid flux is greatest. Calculated dolomitization times with our optimal parameter configuration indicate that a region within 15 km of the brine source could be dolomitized in the 16 Ma maximum time constraint available in the WCSB during the Devonian. Regions beyond 15 km from the brine source remain undolomitized. With our VFM it is difficult to reconcile how reflux circulation could pervasively dolomitze Devonian WCSB carbonate platforms with length scales of tens to hundreds of kilometres.The differences in the flow fields and corresponding calculated dolomitization times between the VFM and CFM models clearly demonstrate the inadequacy of the pre-existing CFM. Thus, the proposal that regional-scale reflux dolomitization accounts for most of the Devonian dolostones in the WCSB is unsubstantiated. Furthermore dolomitization times calculated using the CFM cannot be applied to other dolomites of reflux origin in the geological record. You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access." @default.
• W2109488085 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2109488085 creator A5039313259 @default.
• W2109488085 creator A5072114459 @default.
• W2109488085 date "2000-09-01" @default.
• W2109488085 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2109488085 title "Analysis of fluid flow constraints in regional-scale reflux dolomitization: constant versus variable-flux hydrogeological models" @default.
• W2109488085 cites W1481565714 @default.
• W2109488085 cites W1511964533 @default.
• W2109488085 cites W1597125523 @default.
• W2109488085 cites W1819913903 @default.
• W2109488085 cites W1832252794 @default.
• W2109488085 cites W1836191376 @default.
• W2109488085 cites W1869293329 @default.
• W2109488085 cites W1983149641 @default.
• W2109488085 cites W1988614324 @default.
• W2109488085 cites W1996137722 @default.
• W2109488085 cites W1998984266 @default.
• W2109488085 cites W1999772449 @default.
• W2109488085 cites W2017918382 @default.
• W2109488085 cites W2023259204 @default.
• W2109488085 cites W2035835737 @default.
• W2109488085 cites W2038938645 @default.
• W2109488085 cites W2046227467 @default.
• W2109488085 cites W2047040515 @default.
• W2109488085 cites W2077847644 @default.
• W2109488085 cites W2078575433 @default.
• W2109488085 cites W2110028434 @default.
• W2109488085 cites W2114467243 @default.
• W2109488085 cites W2121699921 @default.
• W2109488085 cites W2159337285 @default.
• W2109488085 cites W2159638171 @default.
• W2109488085 cites W2169964049 @default.
• W2109488085 cites W2210034862 @default.
• W2109488085 cites W2321431019 @default.
• W2109488085 cites W2517847674 @default.
• W2109488085 cites W268878467 @default.
• W2109488085 cites W306294254 @default.
• W2109488085 doi "https://doi.org/10.2113/48.3.230" @default.
• W2109488085 hasPublicationYear "2000" @default.
• W2109488085 type Work @default.
• W2109488085 sameAs 2109488085 @default.
• W2109488085 citedByCount "27" @default.
• W2109488085 countsByYear W21094880852013 @default.
• W2109488085 countsByYear W21094880852014 @default.
• W2109488085 countsByYear W21094880852015 @default.
• W2109488085 countsByYear W21094880852016 @default.
• W2109488085 countsByYear W21094880852020 @default.
• W2109488085 countsByYear W21094880852021 @default.
• W2109488085 countsByYear W21094880852023 @default.
• W2109488085 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2109488085 hasAuthorship W2109488085A5039313259 @default.
• W2109488085 hasAuthorship W2109488085A5072114459 @default.
• W2109488085 hasConcept C109007969 @default.
• W2109488085 hasConcept C114793014 @default.
• W2109488085 hasConcept C127313418 @default.
• W2109488085 hasConcept C146588470 @default.
• W2109488085 hasConcept C161191863 @default.
• W2109488085 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W2109488085 hasConcept C2778755073 @default.
• W2109488085 hasConcept C2778805511 @default.
• W2109488085 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2109488085 hasConcept C58640448 @default.
• W2109488085 hasConcept C63662990 @default.
• W2109488085 hasConceptScore W2109488085C109007969 @default.
• W2109488085 hasConceptScore W2109488085C114793014 @default.
• W2109488085 hasConceptScore W2109488085C127313418 @default.
• W2109488085 hasConceptScore W2109488085C146588470 @default.
• W2109488085 hasConceptScore W2109488085C161191863 @default.
• W2109488085 hasConceptScore W2109488085C205649164 @default.
• W2109488085 hasConceptScore W2109488085C2778755073 @default.
• W2109488085 hasConceptScore W2109488085C2778805511 @default.
• W2109488085 hasConceptScore W2109488085C41008148 @default.
• W2109488085 hasConceptScore W2109488085C58640448 @default.
• W2109488085 hasConceptScore W2109488085C63662990 @default.
• W2109488085 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2109488085 hasLocation W21094880851 @default.
• W2109488085 hasOpenAccess W2109488085 @default.
• W2109488085 hasPrimaryLocation W21094880851 @default.
• W2109488085 hasRelatedWork W1999327878 @default.
• W2109488085 hasRelatedWork W2014934319 @default.
• W2109488085 hasRelatedWork W2087301472 @default.
• W2109488085 hasRelatedWork W2098328438 @default.
• W2109488085 hasRelatedWork W2101196023 @default.
• W2109488085 hasRelatedWork W2105944172 @default.
• W2109488085 hasRelatedWork W2138905419 @default.
• W2109488085 hasRelatedWork W2316325731 @default.
• W2109488085 hasRelatedWork W2323731194 @default.
• W2109488085 hasRelatedWork W3140158564 @default.
• W2109488085 hasVolume "48" @default.
• W2109488085 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2109488085 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2109488085 magId "2109488085" @default.
• W2109488085 workType "article" @default.