FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2109630926> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2109630926 endingPage "648" @default.
• W2109630926 startingPage "638" @default.
• W2109630926 abstract "Statement of problem Because polymer-based interim restorative materials are weak, even well-made restorations sometimes fail before the definitive restoration is ready for insertion. Therefore, knowing which fabrication procedures and service conditions affect mechanical properties is important, particularly over an extended period. Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of thermal treatment, surface sealing, thermocycling, storage media, storage temperature, and age on autopolymerizing poly(methylmethacrylate) and bis-acryl interim restorative materials. Outcome measures were flexural strength, Vickers surface microhardness, and impact strength. Material and methods Flexural strength and microhardness of poly(methylmethacrylate) (Jet Acrylic) and 2 bis-acryl-composite resin (Protemp 3 Garant and Integrity) interim restorative materials were evaluated as affected by storage media, storage temperature, storage time, thermocycling, postpolymerization thermal treatment, or application of a surface sealer. In total, 2880 beam specimens (25×2×2 mm) were fabricated. Mechanical property analyses were made at 10 days, 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year after specimen preparation. Flexural strength was determined by using a 3-point bending test in a universal testing machine with a 1 kN load cell at a crosshead speed of 5.0 mm min-1. Fracture specimens were recovered and used for determining Vickers microhardness. Measurements were made with a 0.1 N load and 15 second dwell time. Three microhardness measurements were made for each specimen, and the mean was used for reporting Vickers microhardness. Notched impact specimens (64×12.7×6.35 mm) were fabricated from Jet, Protemp 3 Garant, and Integrity interim restorative materials, yielding 288 impact specimens. Impact strengths were assessed at 10 days, 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year with a 2 J pendulum. The effects of the various experimental treatments were determined and rank ordered with analysis of variance, F ratios, and least square means differences Student t tests (α=.05). Results All experimental treatments investigated had significant effects on flexural strength, with material (P<.001) and thermocycling (P<.001) being dominant. Moreover, all experimental treatments investigated had a significant overall impact on Vickers microhardness with material (P<.001) and Palaseal glaze (P<.001) showing large effects. Material (P<.001) and age (P=.010) had a significant effect on impact strength. Conclusions Mechanical properties of some interim polymeric materials can be improved by postpolymerization heat treatments or surface glazing. This procedure may extend the useful lifetime of some bis-acryl interim restorations. Because polymer-based interim restorative materials are weak, even well-made restorations sometimes fail before the definitive restoration is ready for insertion. Therefore, knowing which fabrication procedures and service conditions affect mechanical properties is important, particularly over an extended period. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of thermal treatment, surface sealing, thermocycling, storage media, storage temperature, and age on autopolymerizing poly(methylmethacrylate) and bis-acryl interim restorative materials. Outcome measures were flexural strength, Vickers surface microhardness, and impact strength. Flexural strength and microhardness of poly(methylmethacrylate) (Jet Acrylic) and 2 bis-acryl-composite resin (Protemp 3 Garant and Integrity) interim restorative materials were evaluated as affected by storage media, storage temperature, storage time, thermocycling, postpolymerization thermal treatment, or application of a surface sealer. In total, 2880 beam specimens (25×2×2 mm) were fabricated. Mechanical property analyses were made at 10 days, 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year after specimen preparation. Flexural strength was determined by using a 3-point bending test in a universal testing machine with a 1 kN load cell at a crosshead speed of 5.0 mm min-1. Fracture specimens were recovered and used for determining Vickers microhardness. Measurements were made with a 0.1 N load and 15 second dwell time. Three microhardness measurements were made for each specimen, and the mean was used for reporting Vickers microhardness. Notched impact specimens (64×12.7×6.35 mm) were fabricated from Jet, Protemp 3 Garant, and Integrity interim restorative materials, yielding 288 impact specimens. Impact strengths were assessed at 10 days, 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year with a 2 J pendulum. The effects of the various experimental treatments were determined and rank ordered with analysis of variance, F ratios, and least square means differences Student t tests (α=.05). All experimental treatments investigated had significant effects on flexural strength, with material (P<.001) and thermocycling (P<.001) being dominant. Moreover, all experimental treatments investigated had a significant overall impact on Vickers microhardness with material (P<.001) and Palaseal glaze (P<.001) showing large effects. Material (P<.001) and age (P=.010) had a significant effect on impact strength. Mechanical properties of some interim polymeric materials can be improved by postpolymerization heat treatments or surface glazing. This procedure may extend the useful lifetime of some bis-acryl interim restorations." @default.
• W2109630926 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2109630926 creator A5002573181 @default.
• W2109630926 creator A5009816716 @default.
• W2109630926 date "2014-09-01" @default.
• W2109630926 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W2109630926 title "Contribution of postpolymerization conditioning and storage environments to the mechanical properties of three interim restorative materials" @default.
• W2109630926 cites W1979342188 @default.
• W2109630926 cites W1994271813 @default.
• W2109630926 cites W1997407279 @default.
• W2109630926 cites W2016419223 @default.
• W2109630926 cites W2016672900 @default.
• W2109630926 cites W2017063869 @default.
• W2109630926 cites W2023553495 @default.
• W2109630926 cites W2024909338 @default.
• W2109630926 cites W2027080861 @default.
• W2109630926 cites W2050799486 @default.
• W2109630926 cites W2053677126 @default.
• W2109630926 cites W2060812356 @default.
• W2109630926 cites W2071544042 @default.
• W2109630926 cites W2077064083 @default.
• W2109630926 cites W2096108496 @default.
• W2109630926 cites W2099673302 @default.
• W2109630926 cites W2104526156 @default.
• W2109630926 cites W2113485646 @default.
• W2109630926 cites W2154708655 @default.
• W2109630926 cites W2157484450 @default.
• W2109630926 cites W2166439548 @default.
• W2109630926 cites W2168218064 @default.
• W2109630926 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.04.008" @default.
• W2109630926 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24831742" @default.
• W2109630926 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W2109630926 type Work @default.
• W2109630926 sameAs 2109630926 @default.
• W2109630926 citedByCount "24" @default.
• W2109630926 countsByYear W21096309262015 @default.
• W2109630926 countsByYear W21096309262016 @default.
• W2109630926 countsByYear W21096309262017 @default.
• W2109630926 countsByYear W21096309262018 @default.
• W2109630926 countsByYear W21096309262020 @default.
• W2109630926 countsByYear W21096309262021 @default.
• W2109630926 countsByYear W21096309262022 @default.
• W2109630926 countsByYear W21096309262023 @default.
• W2109630926 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2109630926 hasAuthorship W2109630926A5002573181 @default.
• W2109630926 hasAuthorship W2109630926A5009816716 @default.
• W2109630926 hasConcept C133392424 @default.
• W2109630926 hasConcept C159985019 @default.
• W2109630926 hasConcept C165720898 @default.
• W2109630926 hasConcept C178405089 @default.
• W2109630926 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W2109630926 hasConcept C87976508 @default.
• W2109630926 hasConceptScore W2109630926C133392424 @default.
• W2109630926 hasConceptScore W2109630926C159985019 @default.
• W2109630926 hasConceptScore W2109630926C165720898 @default.
• W2109630926 hasConceptScore W2109630926C178405089 @default.
• W2109630926 hasConceptScore W2109630926C192562407 @default.
• W2109630926 hasConceptScore W2109630926C87976508 @default.
• W2109630926 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2109630926 hasLocation W21096309261 @default.
• W2109630926 hasLocation W21096309262 @default.
• W2109630926 hasOpenAccess W2109630926 @default.
• W2109630926 hasPrimaryLocation W21096309261 @default.
• W2109630926 hasRelatedWork W2025687592 @default.
• W2109630926 hasRelatedWork W2042892459 @default.
• W2109630926 hasRelatedWork W2057164293 @default.
• W2109630926 hasRelatedWork W2366934632 @default.
• W2109630926 hasRelatedWork W2392184981 @default.
• W2109630926 hasRelatedWork W2771163941 @default.
• W2109630926 hasRelatedWork W2944045227 @default.
• W2109630926 hasRelatedWork W3031704482 @default.
• W2109630926 hasRelatedWork W3045670837 @default.
• W2109630926 hasRelatedWork W3217218598 @default.
• W2109630926 hasVolume "112" @default.
• W2109630926 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2109630926 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2109630926 magId "2109630926" @default.
• W2109630926 workType "article" @default.