Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2109704191> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 57 of
57
with 100 items per page.
- W2109704191 endingPage "e2" @default.
- W2109704191 startingPage "e1" @default.
- W2109704191 abstract "Pacemaker dermatitis is caused by skin compression by the generator itself or type 4 delayed hypersensitive reaction.1Raja Y. Desai P.V. Glennon P.E. Pacemaker-mediated dermatitis.Europace. 2008; 10: 1354Crossref PubMed Scopus (4) Google ScholarThere are very few reports of pacemaker dermatitis clearly caused by external stimulus,2Sakakibara Y. Delayed pinpoint exposure of a pacemaker following seatbelt trauma.Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1997; 20: 370-371Crossref PubMed Scopus (11) Google Scholar and no report was found where backpack strap friction was identified as a culprit. As people live longer, more active lives, this case may have clinical importance.Case PresentationA 72-year-old man received permanent pacemaker implantation (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) at our institution in 2010 due to sick sinus syndrome (Rubenstein III). No complications were seen during and post procedure. In April 2012 he experienced itching in his left anterior chest wall where the pacemaker was implanted. Soon, rash and heat sensation appeared at the same point. After 2 weeks, ulceration and exposure of the generator occurred. Ulcers were seen in 2 parts, the upper lateral area and the lower lateral area of the pocket, as shown in the Figure, panel A. Pocket infection was suspected, and generator removal was performed. However, infection control with antibiotics was not possible, and lead extraction was performed. After the lead extraction, another permanent pacemaker was implanted in the right anterior chest.The risk factors for pacemaker infection have been reported, and they include diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, thin subcutaneous tissue, age, and history of pacemaker infection.3Baddour L.M. Epstein E.A. Erickson C.C. et al.Update on cardiovascular implantable electronic device infections and their management: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association.Circulation. 2010; 121: 458-477Crossref PubMed Scopus (795) Google Scholar The only relevant risk in this patient was age, so it was reasonable to think about another factor involved in this pacemaker infection.We assessed the possibility of contact dermatitis, but his patch test for each component of the Medtronic pacemaker was negative. From the appearance of ulceration, there were 2 ulcers in the same longitudinal line. Then we suspected that the cause of dermatitis was strap friction. The patient used to carry a backpack while walking 3 times a week and its weight was 2 kg (4.4 pounds) to 10 kg (22 pounds). The alignment corresponded perfectly with the backpack strap as shown in the Figure, panel C and D. Compression by backpack strap and their position in lateral line of the chest wall could provoke skin stretch and friction between the generator and the skin. Thereby, inflammation of subcutaneous tissue seemed to cause thinning of the skin and eventual exposure of the generator. This case reinforces that common activities of daily life have the potential to cause such complications, and the strap-induced dermatitis could have been avoided if we screened the risk of daily activities. We must know patient habits and their daily activities, and sometimes take their lifestyle modification into account to prevent adverse occurrences. The patient has remained free of complications since the second permanent pacemaker implantation 2 years ago. Pacemaker dermatitis is caused by skin compression by the generator itself or type 4 delayed hypersensitive reaction.1Raja Y. Desai P.V. Glennon P.E. Pacemaker-mediated dermatitis.Europace. 2008; 10: 1354Crossref PubMed Scopus (4) Google Scholar There are very few reports of pacemaker dermatitis clearly caused by external stimulus,2Sakakibara Y. Delayed pinpoint exposure of a pacemaker following seatbelt trauma.Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1997; 20: 370-371Crossref PubMed Scopus (11) Google Scholar and no report was found where backpack strap friction was identified as a culprit. As people live longer, more active lives, this case may have clinical importance. Case PresentationA 72-year-old man received permanent pacemaker implantation (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) at our institution in 2010 due to sick sinus syndrome (Rubenstein III). No complications were seen during and post procedure. In April 2012 he experienced itching in his left anterior chest wall where the pacemaker was implanted. Soon, rash and heat sensation appeared at the same point. After 2 weeks, ulceration and exposure of the generator occurred. Ulcers were seen in 2 parts, the upper lateral area and the lower lateral area of the pocket, as shown in the Figure, panel A. Pocket infection was suspected, and generator removal was performed. However, infection control with antibiotics was not possible, and lead extraction was performed. After the lead extraction, another permanent pacemaker was implanted in the right anterior chest.The risk factors for pacemaker infection have been reported, and they include diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, thin subcutaneous tissue, age, and history of pacemaker infection.3Baddour L.M. Epstein E.A. Erickson C.C. et al.Update on cardiovascular implantable electronic device infections and their management: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association.Circulation. 2010; 121: 458-477Crossref PubMed Scopus (795) Google Scholar The only relevant risk in this patient was age, so it was reasonable to think about another factor involved in this pacemaker infection.We assessed the possibility of contact dermatitis, but his patch test for each component of the Medtronic pacemaker was negative. From the appearance of ulceration, there were 2 ulcers in the same longitudinal line. Then we suspected that the cause of dermatitis was strap friction. The patient used to carry a backpack while walking 3 times a week and its weight was 2 kg (4.4 pounds) to 10 kg (22 pounds). The alignment corresponded perfectly with the backpack strap as shown in the Figure, panel C and D. Compression by backpack strap and their position in lateral line of the chest wall could provoke skin stretch and friction between the generator and the skin. Thereby, inflammation of subcutaneous tissue seemed to cause thinning of the skin and eventual exposure of the generator. This case reinforces that common activities of daily life have the potential to cause such complications, and the strap-induced dermatitis could have been avoided if we screened the risk of daily activities. We must know patient habits and their daily activities, and sometimes take their lifestyle modification into account to prevent adverse occurrences. The patient has remained free of complications since the second permanent pacemaker implantation 2 years ago. A 72-year-old man received permanent pacemaker implantation (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) at our institution in 2010 due to sick sinus syndrome (Rubenstein III). No complications were seen during and post procedure. In April 2012 he experienced itching in his left anterior chest wall where the pacemaker was implanted. Soon, rash and heat sensation appeared at the same point. After 2 weeks, ulceration and exposure of the generator occurred. Ulcers were seen in 2 parts, the upper lateral area and the lower lateral area of the pocket, as shown in the Figure, panel A. Pocket infection was suspected, and generator removal was performed. However, infection control with antibiotics was not possible, and lead extraction was performed. After the lead extraction, another permanent pacemaker was implanted in the right anterior chest. The risk factors for pacemaker infection have been reported, and they include diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, thin subcutaneous tissue, age, and history of pacemaker infection.3Baddour L.M. Epstein E.A. Erickson C.C. et al.Update on cardiovascular implantable electronic device infections and their management: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association.Circulation. 2010; 121: 458-477Crossref PubMed Scopus (795) Google Scholar The only relevant risk in this patient was age, so it was reasonable to think about another factor involved in this pacemaker infection. We assessed the possibility of contact dermatitis, but his patch test for each component of the Medtronic pacemaker was negative. From the appearance of ulceration, there were 2 ulcers in the same longitudinal line. Then we suspected that the cause of dermatitis was strap friction. The patient used to carry a backpack while walking 3 times a week and its weight was 2 kg (4.4 pounds) to 10 kg (22 pounds). The alignment corresponded perfectly with the backpack strap as shown in the Figure, panel C and D. Compression by backpack strap and their position in lateral line of the chest wall could provoke skin stretch and friction between the generator and the skin. Thereby, inflammation of subcutaneous tissue seemed to cause thinning of the skin and eventual exposure of the generator. This case reinforces that common activities of daily life have the potential to cause such complications, and the strap-induced dermatitis could have been avoided if we screened the risk of daily activities. We must know patient habits and their daily activities, and sometimes take their lifestyle modification into account to prevent adverse occurrences. The patient has remained free of complications since the second permanent pacemaker implantation 2 years ago." @default.
- W2109704191 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2109704191 creator A5028767757 @default.
- W2109704191 creator A5041029803 @default.
- W2109704191 creator A5060620693 @default.
- W2109704191 creator A5079756189 @default.
- W2109704191 date "2015-09-01" @default.
- W2109704191 modified "2023-10-03" @default.
- W2109704191 title "Pacemaker Dermatitis Induced by Backpack Strap Friction" @default.
- W2109704191 cites W1966322011 @default.
- W2109704191 cites W2088204370 @default.
- W2109704191 cites W2164443464 @default.
- W2109704191 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2015.05.015" @default.
- W2109704191 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26071826" @default.
- W2109704191 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
- W2109704191 type Work @default.
- W2109704191 sameAs 2109704191 @default.
- W2109704191 citedByCount "2" @default.
- W2109704191 countsByYear W21097041912019 @default.
- W2109704191 countsByYear W21097041912023 @default.
- W2109704191 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2109704191 hasAuthorship W2109704191A5028767757 @default.
- W2109704191 hasAuthorship W2109704191A5041029803 @default.
- W2109704191 hasAuthorship W2109704191A5060620693 @default.
- W2109704191 hasAuthorship W2109704191A5079756189 @default.
- W2109704191 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
- W2109704191 hasConcept C16005928 @default.
- W2109704191 hasConcept C2780345887 @default.
- W2109704191 hasConcept C66938386 @default.
- W2109704191 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2109704191 hasConceptScore W2109704191C127413603 @default.
- W2109704191 hasConceptScore W2109704191C16005928 @default.
- W2109704191 hasConceptScore W2109704191C2780345887 @default.
- W2109704191 hasConceptScore W2109704191C66938386 @default.
- W2109704191 hasConceptScore W2109704191C71924100 @default.
- W2109704191 hasIssue "9" @default.
- W2109704191 hasLocation W21097041911 @default.
- W2109704191 hasLocation W21097041912 @default.
- W2109704191 hasOpenAccess W2109704191 @default.
- W2109704191 hasPrimaryLocation W21097041911 @default.
- W2109704191 hasRelatedWork W1572898627 @default.
- W2109704191 hasRelatedWork W2158982542 @default.
- W2109704191 hasRelatedWork W2357598413 @default.
- W2109704191 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
- W2109704191 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
- W2109704191 hasRelatedWork W3110063992 @default.
- W2109704191 hasRelatedWork W4285152105 @default.
- W2109704191 hasRelatedWork W4297184974 @default.
- W2109704191 hasRelatedWork W4311253224 @default.
- W2109704191 hasRelatedWork W4378741294 @default.
- W2109704191 hasVolume "128" @default.
- W2109704191 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2109704191 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2109704191 magId "2109704191" @default.
- W2109704191 workType "article" @default.