FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2109709274> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2109709274 endingPage "42" @default.
• W2109709274 startingPage "29" @default.
• W2109709274 abstract "In China, a large acreage of cultivated land is devoted to relay intercropping of winter wheat and cotton. Wheat is sown in strips with interspersed bare soil in October and harvested in June of the next year, while cotton is sown in the interspersed paths in the wheat crop in April and harvested before the next wheat sowing in October. This paper addresses the question how strip width and number of plant rows per strip of wheat or cotton affect light interception (LI) and light use efficiency (LUE) of both component crops. Field experiments were carried out in three consecutive years: 2002, 2003 and 2004. Light interception and productivity were estimated in monocultures of wheat and cotton and four intercropping designs differing in strip and path width as well as number of rows per strip. The intercrop systems were identified by the number of rows per strip of wheat and cotton, respectively, as 3:1, 3:2, 4:2 and 6:2. Total light interception over a season was calculated from LAI measurements, using a model for light interception in a row crop. The spatial distribution and diurnal course of light in intercrops were also measured with sensors. Wheat monocrops intercepted 618 MJ m−2 photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) from 18 March to harvest in 2002, 337 MJ m−2 from 29 April to harvest in 2003, and 457 MJ m−2 from 13 April to harvest in 2004. Averaged over 3 years, wheat in the four intercrops (3:1, 3:2, 4:2 and 6:2, respectively) intercepted 83, 71, 73 and 75% as much PAR as the sole wheat. From sowing to harvest, cotton monocrops intercepted 491 MJ m−2 PAR in 2002, 426 MJ m−2 in 2003, and 415 MJ m−2 in 2004. Cotton in the four intercrops (3:1, 3:2, 4:2 and 6:2, respectively) intercepted 73, 93, 86 and 67% as much PAR as the sole cotton. LUE of wheat was 2.12 ± 0.14 g total dry matter MJ−1 PAR during the reproductive period, while that of cotton was 1.33 ± 0.02 g dry matter MJ−1 PAR over the whole growing period. No differences in LUE of wheat or cotton were found between systems. The analysis indicates that the high productivity of intercrops, compared to monocultures, can be fully explained by an increase in accumulated light interception per unit cultivated area. The component crops are thus complementary in their interception of light over space and time. The model results indicate that light interception can be modified by choice of the number of crop rows per strip and strip width. The best distribution of light is attained in systems with narrow strips, a high proportion of border rows, and high planting densities of cotton. Suggestions for system improvement are given." @default.
• W2109709274 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2109709274 creator A5009236904 @default.
• W2109709274 creator A5030494462 @default.
• W2109709274 creator A5043063084 @default.
• W2109709274 creator A5047864348 @default.
• W2109709274 creator A5084704941 @default.
• W2109709274 creator A5085461068 @default.
• W2109709274 date "2008-04-01" @default.
• W2109709274 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2109709274 title "Light interception and utilization in relay intercrops of wheat and cotton" @default.
• W2109709274 cites W1963900920 @default.
• W2109709274 cites W1968779125 @default.
• W2109709274 cites W1970404974 @default.
• W2109709274 cites W1973600008 @default.
• W2109709274 cites W1977082215 @default.
• W2109709274 cites W1994529053 @default.
• W2109709274 cites W2012381678 @default.
• W2109709274 cites W2013959037 @default.
• W2109709274 cites W2016314481 @default.
• W2109709274 cites W2022075581 @default.
• W2109709274 cites W2024437736 @default.
• W2109709274 cites W2034973194 @default.
• W2109709274 cites W2041039396 @default.
• W2109709274 cites W2041941784 @default.
• W2109709274 cites W2052465773 @default.
• W2109709274 cites W2057890560 @default.
• W2109709274 cites W2061632729 @default.
• W2109709274 cites W2078518767 @default.
• W2109709274 cites W2080123217 @default.
• W2109709274 cites W2080344679 @default.
• W2109709274 cites W2080386041 @default.
• W2109709274 cites W2083692254 @default.
• W2109709274 cites W2087140807 @default.
• W2109709274 cites W2092220858 @default.
• W2109709274 cites W2093703719 @default.
• W2109709274 cites W2101021012 @default.
• W2109709274 cites W2105956709 @default.
• W2109709274 cites W2118476033 @default.
• W2109709274 cites W2166982439 @default.
• W2109709274 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2007.12.014" @default.
• W2109709274 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
• W2109709274 type Work @default.
• W2109709274 sameAs 2109709274 @default.
• W2109709274 citedByCount "221" @default.
• W2109709274 countsByYear W21097092742012 @default.
• W2109709274 countsByYear W21097092742013 @default.
• W2109709274 countsByYear W21097092742014 @default.
• W2109709274 countsByYear W21097092742015 @default.
• W2109709274 countsByYear W21097092742016 @default.
• W2109709274 countsByYear W21097092742017 @default.
• W2109709274 countsByYear W21097092742018 @default.
• W2109709274 countsByYear W21097092742019 @default.
• W2109709274 countsByYear W21097092742020 @default.
• W2109709274 countsByYear W21097092742021 @default.
• W2109709274 countsByYear W21097092742022 @default.
• W2109709274 countsByYear W21097092742023 @default.
• W2109709274 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2109709274 hasAuthorship W2109709274A5009236904 @default.
• W2109709274 hasAuthorship W2109709274A5030494462 @default.
• W2109709274 hasAuthorship W2109709274A5043063084 @default.
• W2109709274 hasAuthorship W2109709274A5047864348 @default.
• W2109709274 hasAuthorship W2109709274A5084704941 @default.
• W2109709274 hasAuthorship W2109709274A5085461068 @default.
• W2109709274 hasConcept C101000010 @default.
• W2109709274 hasConcept C118518473 @default.
• W2109709274 hasConcept C131366478 @default.
• W2109709274 hasConcept C135598885 @default.
• W2109709274 hasConcept C137580998 @default.
• W2109709274 hasConcept C157005057 @default.
• W2109709274 hasConcept C168741863 @default.
• W2109709274 hasConcept C183688256 @default.
• W2109709274 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W2109709274 hasConcept C2776366211 @default.
• W2109709274 hasConcept C2781208722 @default.
• W2109709274 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2109709274 hasConcept C39432304 @default.
• W2109709274 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2109709274 hasConcept C59822182 @default.
• W2109709274 hasConcept C61270487 @default.
• W2109709274 hasConcept C6557445 @default.
• W2109709274 hasConcept C77088390 @default.
• W2109709274 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2109709274 hasConceptScore W2109709274C101000010 @default.
• W2109709274 hasConceptScore W2109709274C118518473 @default.
• W2109709274 hasConceptScore W2109709274C131366478 @default.
• W2109709274 hasConceptScore W2109709274C135598885 @default.
• W2109709274 hasConceptScore W2109709274C137580998 @default.
• W2109709274 hasConceptScore W2109709274C157005057 @default.
• W2109709274 hasConceptScore W2109709274C168741863 @default.
• W2109709274 hasConceptScore W2109709274C183688256 @default.
• W2109709274 hasConceptScore W2109709274C18903297 @default.
• W2109709274 hasConceptScore W2109709274C2776366211 @default.
• W2109709274 hasConceptScore W2109709274C2781208722 @default.
• W2109709274 hasConceptScore W2109709274C33923547 @default.
• W2109709274 hasConceptScore W2109709274C39432304 @default.
• W2109709274 hasConceptScore W2109709274C41008148 @default.
• W2109709274 hasConceptScore W2109709274C59822182 @default.

• next