FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2109777726> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2109777726 endingPage "16" @default.
• W2109777726 startingPage "16" @default.
• W2109777726 abstract "No AccessPerspectives on Hearing and Hearing Disorders: Research and DiagnosticsArticle1 Sep 2007Perceptual Considerations for Multichannel Compression Hearing Aids Amyn M. Amlani Amyn M. Amlani Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of North TexasDenton, TX Google Scholar More articles by this author https://doi.org/10.1044/hhd11.1.16 SectionsAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationTrack Citations ShareFacebookTwitterLinked In References American National Standards Institute. (1997). ANSIS3. 5-1997 Methods for the calculation of the speech intelligibility index. New York: Author. Google Scholar Amlani, A. M., Ahumada, A. G., & Miller, K. D. (2007). Effect of age, hearing sensitivity and competing noise on encoding-processing capacity. Unpublished manscript. Google Scholar Barfod, J. (1978). Multichannelcompressionhearingaids:Experimentsand considerationson clinicalapplicability.Scandinavian Audiology. Supplement, 6, 315–339. Google Scholar Borden, G. J., Harris, K. S., & Raphael, L. J. (Eds.). (2003). Speech science primer: Physiology, acoustics, and perception of speech (4th ed.). Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Google Scholar Byrne, D., Dillon, H., Ching, T., Katsch, R., & Keidser, G. (2001). NAL-NL1 procedure for fitting nonlinear hearing aids: Characteristics and comparisons with other procedures.Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 12, 37–51. MedlineGoogle Scholar Byrne, D., & Walker, G. (1982). The ef-fects of multichannel compression and expansion on perceived quality of speech.Australian Journal of Audiology, 4, 1–9. Google Scholar Cienkowski, K. M. (2003, May/June). Auditory aging: A look at hearing loss in older adults.Hearing Loss: The Journal of Self Help for Hard of Hearing People. Retrieved July 10, 2007, from http://www.shhh.org/magazine/mag-mayjun03.asp Google Scholar Cornelisse, L. E., Seewald, R. C., & Jamieson, D. G. (1995). The input/output formula: A theoretical approach to the fitting of personal amplification devices.Journalofthe Acoustical Society of America, 97, 1854–1864. Google Scholar Crain, T. R., & Yund, E. W. (1995). The effect of multichannel compression on vowel and stop-consonant discrimination in normal-hearing and hearing-impairedsubjects.Ear and Hearing, 16, 529–543. Google Scholar Dallos, P. (1992). The active cochlea.Journal of Neuroscience, 12, 4575–4585. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar Dallos, P. (1997). Outer hair cells: The insidestory.Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and Laryngology Supplement, 168, 16–22. Google Scholar DeGennaro, S., Braida, L., & Durlach, N. (1986). Multichannel syllabic compression for severely impaired listeners.Journal of Rehabilitative Research and Development, 23, 17–24. Google Scholar Dillier, N., Frolich, T., Kompis, M., Bogli, H., & Lai, W. (1993). Digital signal processing (DSP) applications for multiband loudness correction digital hearing aids and cochlear implants.Journal of Rehabilitative Research and Development, 30, 95–109. Google Scholar Dreschler, W. (1988). Theeffectofspecific compressionsettingsonphoneme identificationinhearing-impaired subjects.Scandinavian Audiology, 17, 35–43. Google Scholar Dubno, J. R., & Dirks, D. D. (1989). Audi-tory filter characteristics and con-sonantrecognitionforhearing-im-pairedlisteners.Journal of theAcous-tic Society of America, 85, 1666–1675. Google Scholar Dubno, J. R., & Shaefer, A. B. (1995). Frequency selectivity and consonant recognition for hearing-impaired listeners with equivalent masked thresholds.Journal of the AcousticSocietyof America, 97, 1165–1174. Google Scholar Edwards, B. W. (2000). Beyondamplification: Signalprocessingtechniques for improving speech intelligibilityinnoisewithhearingaids.Seminar in Hearing, 21, 137–156. Google Scholar Festen, J. M., van Dijkhuizen, J. N., & Plomp, R. (1990). Considerations on adaptive gain and frequency response in hearing aids.Acta Otolaryngologica Supplement, 469, 196–201. Google Scholar Florentine, M., Buus, S., Scharf, B., & Zwicker, E. (1980). Frequency selectivity in normally-hearing and hearing-impaired observers.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 23, 646–649. LinkGoogle Scholar Franck, B. A., van Kreveld-Bos, C. S., Dreschler, W. A., & Verschuure, H. (1999). Evaluation of spectral enhancement in hearing aids, com-binedwithphonemecompression.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106, 1452–1464. Google Scholar Gatehouse, S., Naylor, G., & Elberling, C. (2003). Benefits from hearing aids in relation to the interaction between the user and the environment.International Journal of Audiology, 42,(Suppl.), S77–S85. MedlineGoogle Scholar Hedrick, M., & Rice, T. (2000). Effectof a single-channelwidedynamicrange compression circuitonperception of stopconsonantplaceofarticulation.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 43, 1174–1184. AbstractGoogle Scholar Hedrick, M., & Younger, M. S. (2001). Perceptual weighting of relative amplitude and formant transition cues in aided CVsyllables.Journal of Speech and Hearing, 44, 964–974. AbstractGoogle Scholar Hickson, L. M. H. (1994). Compression amplificationinhearingaids.American Journal of Audiology, 3, 51–65. LinkGoogle Scholar Jenstad, L. M., & Souza, P. E. (2005). Quantifyingtheeffectofcompression hearing aid release time on speech acousticsand intelligibility.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 48, 651–667. AbstractGoogle Scholar Kuk, F. (2002). Considerations in modern multichannel nonlinear hearing aids.In M. Valente (Ed.), Hearing aids: Standards, options, and limitations (2nd ed., pp. 178–213). New York: Thieme Medical Publishers. Google Scholar Kuk, F. K., & Ludvigsen, C. (1999). Variables affecting the use of prescriptive formulae to fit modern nonlinear hearing aids.Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 10, 458–465. Google Scholar Kuk, F., & Ludvigsen, C. (2003). Chang-ingwiththetimes:Choiceofstimuli for hearing aid verification.Hearing Review, 10(9), 24–28, 56–57. Google Scholar Kuk, F., Ludvigsen, C., & Kaulberg, T. (2002). Understanding feedback and digital feedback cancellation strategies.Hearing Review, 9(2), 36–41, 48. Google Scholar Kuk, F., Ludvigsen, C., Paludan-Muller, C. (2002). Improving hearing aid performance in noise: Challenges and strategies.Hearing Journal, 55(4), 34–56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Leijon, A. (2004, August). Can pure tone real ear measures be used to predict hearing aid gain for speech? Poster presentation at the International Hearing Aid Conference, Lake Tahoe, NV. Google Scholar Lindholm, J., Dorman, M., Taylor, B., & Hannley, M. (1988). Stimulus factors influencing the identification of voiced stop consonants by nor-mal-hearingandhearing-impaired adults.Journal of theAcoustical Society of America, 83, 1608–1614. Google Scholar Lunner, T. (2003). Cognitive function in relationtohearingaiduse.International Journal of Audiology, 42, (Suppl.), S49-S58. Google Scholar Mangold, S., & Leijon, A. (1979). Pro-grammablehearingaidwithmulti-channelcompression.Scandinavian Audiology, 8, 121–126. Google Scholar Moore, B. C. J. (1985). Frequency selectivity and temporal resolution in normal and hearing-impaired listeners.British Journal Audiology, 19, 189–201. Google Scholar Moore, B. C. J. (1990). Howdowegain by gain control in hearing aids?.Acta Otolaryngologica Supplement, 469, 250–256. Google Scholar Moore, B. C. J. (2000). Use of a loudness model for hearing aid fitting. IV. Fitting hearing aids with multichannel compression so as to re-store“normal”loudnessforspeech at different levels.British Journal of Audiology, 34, 165–177. Google Scholar Moore, B. C. J., & Glasberg, B. R. (1986). Acomparisonoftwo-channeland single-channel compression hearing aids.Audiology, 25, 210–226. Google Scholar Moore, B. C. J., Glasberg, B. R., & Stone, M. A. (1999). Use of a loudness modelforhearing aidfitting. III. A generalmethod forderiving initial fittings for hearing aids with mul-tichannelcompression.BritishJour-nal of Audiology, 33, 241–258. Google Scholar Moore, B. C., Laurence, R. F., & Wright, D. (1985). Improvementsinspeech intelligibility in quiet and in noise produced by two-channel com-pressionhearingaids.British Journal of Audiology, 19, 175–187. Google Scholar Nelson, D. A. (1991). High-levelpsycho-physical tuning curves: Forward masking in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 34, 1233–1249. AbstractGoogle Scholar Olsen, L., Müsch, H., & Struck, C. (2001). Digitalsolutionsforfeedback control.Hearing Review, 8(5), 44–49. Google Scholar Plomp, R. (1988). The negative effect of amplitude compression in multi-channelhearingaidsinthelightof the modulation-transfer function.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 83, 2322–2327. Google Scholar Preminger, J. E., & Wiley, T. L. (1985). Frequency selectivity and consonant intelligibilityinsensorineural hearing loss.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 28, 197–206. AbstractGoogle Scholar Richie, C., Kewley-Port, D., & Coughlin, M. (2003). Discriminationandiden-tificationofvowelsbyyoung, hear-ing-impaired adults.Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 114, 2923–2933. Google Scholar Rose, J. E., Hind, J. E., Anderson, D. J., & Brugge, J. F. (1971). Someeffectsof stimulus intensity on response of the auditory nerve fibers in the squirrel monkey.Journal of Neuro-physiology, 34, 685–699. Google Scholar Rosen, S. (1992). Temporal information in speech: Acoustic, auditory and linguistic aspects.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: SeriesB: Biological Sciences, 336, 367–373. Google Scholar Scollie, S., Seewald, R., Cornelisse, L., Moodie, S., Bagatto, M., Laurna-garay, D., Beaulac, S., & Pumford, J. (2005). The desiredsensation level multistage input/output algorithm.Trends in Amplification, 9, 159–197. Google Scholar Sellick, P. M., Patuzzi, R., & Johnstone, B. M. (1982). Measurement ofbasilar membrane motion in the guinea pig using the Mössbauer technique.Journal of theAcoustical Society of America, 72, 131–141. Google Scholar Souza, P. E. (2002). Effects of compression on speech acoustics, intelligi-bility, andsound quality.Trendsin Amplification, 6, 131–165. Google Scholar Souza, P. (2004). New hearing aids for older listeners.Hearing Journal, 57(3), 10, 12, 16–17. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Souza, P. E., & Turner, C. W. (1998). Multichannel compression, tem-poralcuesandaudibility.Journalof Speech, Language, HearingResearch, 41, 315–326. AbstractGoogle Scholar Sreenivas, C., Fourakis, M., & Davidson, S. (1997, April). Effect of varying release times on speech perception using syllabic compression. Poster presentedattheannualmeeting of theAmericanAcademyofAudiology, Fort Lauderdale, FL. Google Scholar Stelmachowicz, P. G., Kopun, J., Mace, A., Lewis, D., & Nittrouter, S. (1995). Theperceptionofamplifiedspeech by listeners with hearing loss: Acoustic correlates.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 105, 412–422. Google Scholar Trine, T. D., & Van Tasell, D. (2002). Digitalhearingaiddesign:Factvs. fantasy.The Hearing Journal, 55(2), 36–38, 40–42. Google Scholar Turner, C. W., Chi, S., & Flock, S. (1999). Limiting spectral resolution in speech for listeners with senso-rineural hearing loss.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42, 773–784. AbstractGoogle Scholar Turner, C., Fabry, D., Barrett, S., & Horwitz, A. (1992). Detection and recognition of stop consonants by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 35, 942–949. LinkGoogle Scholar Turner, C. W., & Henn, C. C. (1989). The relation between vowel recognition and measures of frequency resolution.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 32, 49–58. LinkGoogle Scholar Turner, C., & Robb, M. P. (1987). Audibility and recognition of stop consonants in normal and hearing-impaired subjects.Journal of theAcoustical Society of America, 81, 1566–1573. Google Scholar Van Tasell, D., Solis, D., Kirby, V. M., & Widen, G. P. (1987). Speech waveform envelope cues for consonant recognition.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 82, 1152–1161. Google Scholar Villchur, E. (1973). Signal processing to improve speech intelligibility in perceptive deafness.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 53, 1646–1657. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Walden, B. E., Surr, R. K., Cord, M. T., & Pavlovic, C. V. (1999). A clinical trial of the Resound IC4 hearing device.American Journal of Audiology, 8, 65–78. LinkGoogle Scholar White, M. W. (1986). Compression sys-temsforhearingaidsandcochlear prostheses.Journal ofRehabilitation Research and Development, 23, 25–39. Google Scholar Woods, W. S., VanTasell, D. J., Rickert, M. E., & Trine, T. D. (2006). SII and fit-to-target analysis of compression system performance as a function of number of compression channels.International Journal of Audiology, 45, 630–644. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Yund, E., & Buckles, K. (1995a). Enhanced speechperceptionatlowsignal-to-noiseratioswithmultichannelcom-pressionhearingaids.Journalof the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 1224–1240. Google Scholar Yund, E., & Buckles, K. (1995b). Multi-channelcompressionhearingaids: Effect of number of channels on speechdiscriminationinnoise.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 1206–1223. Google Scholar Additional Resources FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 11Issue 1September 2007Pages: 16-22 Get Permissions Add to your Mendeley library History Published in issue: Sep 1, 2007 Metrics Topicsasha-sigsasha-topicsasha-article-typesCopyright & Permissions© 2007 American Speech-Language-Hearing AssociationLoading ..." @default.
• W2109777726 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2109777726 creator A5083351372 @default.
• W2109777726 date "2007-09-01" @default.
• W2109777726 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2109777726 title "Perceptual Considerations for Multichannel Compression Hearing Aids" @default.
• W2109777726 cites W1699632127 @default.
• W2109777726 cites W1968471946 @default.
• W2109777726 cites W1973295469 @default.
• W2109777726 cites W1995117235 @default.
• W2109777726 cites W2006187162 @default.
• W2109777726 cites W2011211523 @default.
• W2109777726 cites W201745378 @default.
• W2109777726 cites W2039709966 @default.
• W2109777726 cites W2040010579 @default.
• W2109777726 cites W2040406276 @default.
• W2109777726 cites W2045674501 @default.
• W2109777726 cites W2052539752 @default.
• W2109777726 cites W2057404337 @default.
• W2109777726 cites W2060226533 @default.
• W2109777726 cites W2060867570 @default.
• W2109777726 cites W2063393732 @default.
• W2109777726 cites W2068110880 @default.
• W2109777726 cites W2069084151 @default.
• W2109777726 cites W2073480463 @default.
• W2109777726 cites W2076377006 @default.
• W2109777726 cites W2085665259 @default.
• W2109777726 cites W2086591127 @default.
• W2109777726 cites W2091434755 @default.
• W2109777726 cites W2093860432 @default.
• W2109777726 cites W2114237429 @default.
• W2109777726 cites W2152862090 @default.
• W2109777726 cites W2153779949 @default.
• W2109777726 cites W2155586683 @default.
• W2109777726 cites W2166756233 @default.
• W2109777726 cites W2212718476 @default.
• W2109777726 cites W2315199527 @default.
• W2109777726 cites W2320513386 @default.
• W2109777726 cites W2330658129 @default.
• W2109777726 cites W2340213982 @default.
• W2109777726 cites W2404038780 @default.
• W2109777726 cites W2414068553 @default.
• W2109777726 cites W2414968750 @default.
• W2109777726 cites W2417571594 @default.
• W2109777726 cites W2906439456 @default.
• W2109777726 cites W2016621947 @default.
• W2109777726 doi "https://doi.org/10.1044/hhd11.1.16" @default.
• W2109777726 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
• W2109777726 type Work @default.
• W2109777726 sameAs 2109777726 @default.
• W2109777726 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2109777726 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2109777726 hasAuthorship W2109777726A5083351372 @default.
• W2109777726 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2109777726 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2109777726 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W2109777726 hasConcept C180016635 @default.
• W2109777726 hasConcept C26760741 @default.
• W2109777726 hasConcept C28490314 @default.
• W2109777726 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2109777726 hasConcept C548259974 @default.
• W2109777726 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2109777726 hasConcept C97355855 @default.
• W2109777726 hasConceptScore W2109777726C121332964 @default.
• W2109777726 hasConceptScore W2109777726C15744967 @default.
• W2109777726 hasConceptScore W2109777726C169760540 @default.
• W2109777726 hasConceptScore W2109777726C180016635 @default.
• W2109777726 hasConceptScore W2109777726C26760741 @default.
• W2109777726 hasConceptScore W2109777726C28490314 @default.
• W2109777726 hasConceptScore W2109777726C41008148 @default.
• W2109777726 hasConceptScore W2109777726C548259974 @default.
• W2109777726 hasConceptScore W2109777726C71924100 @default.
• W2109777726 hasConceptScore W2109777726C97355855 @default.
• W2109777726 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2109777726 hasLocation W21097777261 @default.
• W2109777726 hasOpenAccess W2109777726 @default.
• W2109777726 hasPrimaryLocation W21097777261 @default.
• W2109777726 hasRelatedWork W1966975529 @default.
• W2109777726 hasRelatedWork W1980685406 @default.
• W2109777726 hasRelatedWork W2033455249 @default.
• W2109777726 hasRelatedWork W2160354163 @default.
• W2109777726 hasRelatedWork W2300032333 @default.
• W2109777726 hasRelatedWork W2368779261 @default.
• W2109777726 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2109777726 hasRelatedWork W2794438528 @default.
• W2109777726 hasRelatedWork W2893763841 @default.
• W2109777726 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2109777726 hasVolume "11" @default.
• W2109777726 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2109777726 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2109777726 magId "2109777726" @default.
• W2109777726 workType "article" @default.