Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2109825083> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2109825083 endingPage "1133" @default.
- W2109825083 startingPage "1130" @default.
- W2109825083 abstract "Cancer recurrence after complete resection of the primary tumor is dreaded by patients and physicians alike. Intensive follow-up after curative resection is considered a marker of good practice and frequently perceived as an antidote against recurrence by patients and families. In the United States, there is abiding faith in frequent imaging and blood tests as the best tools for the job. Thoughtful practice, clinical guidelines, retrospective reviews of prospectively gathered data, and clinical trials of follow-up have focused on the number, frequency, and sequence of modalities. A different perspective on which to predicate follow-up of patients with curatively treated cancer is to consider whether meaningful treatment options exist for recurrence. In cancers for which there are meaningful treatment options, it is reasonable to expect that moreintensive follow-up may improve survival. This commentary discusses this perspective in the context of the established literature in patients with colorectal and breast cancers, two cancers considered to have effective treatments for metastatic and recurrent disease as compared with non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and pancreatic cancer, which do not." @default.
- W2109825083 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2109825083 creator A5013083505 @default.
- W2109825083 creator A5036125003 @default.
- W2109825083 creator A5065922220 @default.
- W2109825083 creator A5066180989 @default.
- W2109825083 date "2013-03-20" @default.
- W2109825083 modified "2023-10-12" @default.
- W2109825083 title "Rational Follow-Up After Curative Cancer Resection" @default.
- W2109825083 cites W1512863196 @default.
- W2109825083 cites W1525318852 @default.
- W2109825083 cites W1859842203 @default.
- W2109825083 cites W1970702320 @default.
- W2109825083 cites W1978801520 @default.
- W2109825083 cites W1995210370 @default.
- W2109825083 cites W1996121381 @default.
- W2109825083 cites W1998498727 @default.
- W2109825083 cites W2005438200 @default.
- W2109825083 cites W2029554868 @default.
- W2109825083 cites W2036611968 @default.
- W2109825083 cites W2041394993 @default.
- W2109825083 cites W2043790067 @default.
- W2109825083 cites W2047213739 @default.
- W2109825083 cites W2049314747 @default.
- W2109825083 cites W2053700486 @default.
- W2109825083 cites W2060274755 @default.
- W2109825083 cites W2070325739 @default.
- W2109825083 cites W2070872488 @default.
- W2109825083 cites W2074996049 @default.
- W2109825083 cites W2080497228 @default.
- W2109825083 cites W2092851581 @default.
- W2109825083 cites W2094905849 @default.
- W2109825083 cites W2096838484 @default.
- W2109825083 cites W2100471896 @default.
- W2109825083 cites W2112491858 @default.
- W2109825083 cites W2115431563 @default.
- W2109825083 cites W2115878591 @default.
- W2109825083 cites W2116274195 @default.
- W2109825083 cites W2117873981 @default.
- W2109825083 cites W2123344367 @default.
- W2109825083 cites W2124589535 @default.
- W2109825083 cites W2140827053 @default.
- W2109825083 cites W2143028356 @default.
- W2109825083 cites W2145653040 @default.
- W2109825083 cites W2146792579 @default.
- W2109825083 cites W2147016542 @default.
- W2109825083 cites W2157982120 @default.
- W2109825083 cites W4254706341 @default.
- W2109825083 cites W79871703 @default.
- W2109825083 doi "https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2012.46.4438" @default.
- W2109825083 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23358986" @default.
- W2109825083 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
- W2109825083 type Work @default.
- W2109825083 sameAs 2109825083 @default.
- W2109825083 citedByCount "27" @default.
- W2109825083 countsByYear W21098250832013 @default.
- W2109825083 countsByYear W21098250832014 @default.
- W2109825083 countsByYear W21098250832015 @default.
- W2109825083 countsByYear W21098250832016 @default.
- W2109825083 countsByYear W21098250832017 @default.
- W2109825083 countsByYear W21098250832018 @default.
- W2109825083 countsByYear W21098250832019 @default.
- W2109825083 countsByYear W21098250832020 @default.
- W2109825083 countsByYear W21098250832021 @default.
- W2109825083 countsByYear W21098250832022 @default.
- W2109825083 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2109825083 hasAuthorship W2109825083A5013083505 @default.
- W2109825083 hasAuthorship W2109825083A5036125003 @default.
- W2109825083 hasAuthorship W2109825083A5065922220 @default.
- W2109825083 hasAuthorship W2109825083A5066180989 @default.
- W2109825083 hasBestOaLocation W21098250831 @default.
- W2109825083 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
- W2109825083 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W2109825083 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W2109825083 hasConcept C159110652 @default.
- W2109825083 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
- W2109825083 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2109825083 hasConceptScore W2109825083C121608353 @default.
- W2109825083 hasConceptScore W2109825083C126322002 @default.
- W2109825083 hasConceptScore W2109825083C141071460 @default.
- W2109825083 hasConceptScore W2109825083C159110652 @default.
- W2109825083 hasConceptScore W2109825083C61434518 @default.
- W2109825083 hasConceptScore W2109825083C71924100 @default.
- W2109825083 hasIssue "9" @default.
- W2109825083 hasLocation W21098250831 @default.
- W2109825083 hasLocation W21098250832 @default.
- W2109825083 hasOpenAccess W2109825083 @default.
- W2109825083 hasPrimaryLocation W21098250831 @default.
- W2109825083 hasRelatedWork W2002120878 @default.
- W2109825083 hasRelatedWork W2003938723 @default.
- W2109825083 hasRelatedWork W2047967234 @default.
- W2109825083 hasRelatedWork W2118496982 @default.
- W2109825083 hasRelatedWork W2364998975 @default.
- W2109825083 hasRelatedWork W2369162477 @default.
- W2109825083 hasRelatedWork W2439875401 @default.
- W2109825083 hasRelatedWork W4238867864 @default.
- W2109825083 hasRelatedWork W2519357708 @default.
- W2109825083 hasRelatedWork W2525756941 @default.