FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2110136709> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2110136709 endingPage "2331" @default.
• W2110136709 startingPage "2331" @default.
• W2110136709 abstract "Since the ratification of the constitution, intellectual property law in the United States has always been, in part, constitutional law. Among the enumerated powers that Article I of the Constitution vests in Congress is the power to create certain intellectual property rights. To a remarkable extent, scholars who have examined the Constitution's Copyright Clause have reached a common position. With striking unanimity, these scholars have called for aggressive judicial review of the constitutionality of congressional legislation in this area. The champions of this position - we refer to them as the IP Restrictors - represent a remarkable array of constitutional and intellectual property scholars. In this terms's Eldred v. Aschroft, leading IP Restrictor Lawrence Lessig, representing petitioner Eric Eldred, sought to convince the Supreme Court that the IP Restrictors' view of the Copyright Clause was the correct one. By a vote of 7-2, the Supreme Court rejected Eldred's claim and upheld the statute. But while the Court rejected the IP Restrictors' vision, it did not offer a satisfactory competing conception of the Copyright Clause and how the courts should construe it. Critically, even though the standard of review was of central significance, the Court applied a deferential form of rational basis scrutiny without explaining why this was the appropriate standard. This paper develops the case for deferential review of congressional legislation in the area of intellectual property and, at a deeper level, offers a new paradigm for understanding the Copyright Clause. We propose that from the vantage point of constitutional law, intellectual property should be treated as a form of constitutional property. Deference to congressional judgments is warranted because congressional legislation affecting intellectual property is analytically similar to congressional legislation affecting other forms of property. Courts subject congressional legislation affecting traditional forms of property to deferential review because of concerns about institutional competence and respect for majoritarian decisionmaking. These two concerns in conjunction with proper regard for holistic constitutional interpretation should also lead courts to deferential review of congressional legislation affecting intellectual property. In developing our position, we draw on constitutional history and, in particular, the lessons of Lochner v. New York. In defense of their vision of the Constitution, the IP Restrictors and the dissenters in Eldred make claims about the original understanding that, to an astonishing extent, echo those made by proponents of Lochner-era jurisprudence. We argue, however, that these claims fail for two reasons. First, the IP Restrictors and the dissenters disregard the limited scope of judicial review at the time of the Founding. Additionally, the IP Restrictors and dissenters disregard the range of views among the Founders about monopolies." @default.
• W2110136709 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2110136709 creator A5069073191 @default.
• W2110136709 creator A5087012220 @default.
• W2110136709 date "2003-06-01" @default.
• W2110136709 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2110136709 title "Eldred and Lochner: Copyright Term Extension and Intellectual Property as Constitutional Property" @default.
• W2110136709 doi "https://doi.org/10.2307/3657478" @default.
• W2110136709 hasPublicationYear "2003" @default.
• W2110136709 type Work @default.
• W2110136709 sameAs 2110136709 @default.
• W2110136709 citedByCount "7" @default.
• W2110136709 countsByYear W21101367092012 @default.
• W2110136709 countsByYear W21101367092018 @default.
• W2110136709 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2110136709 hasAuthorship W2110136709A5069073191 @default.
• W2110136709 hasAuthorship W2110136709A5087012220 @default.
• W2110136709 hasBestOaLocation W21101367092 @default.
• W2110136709 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2110136709 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2110136709 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2110136709 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2110136709 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2110136709 hasConcept C189950617 @default.
• W2110136709 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
• W2110136709 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W2110136709 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2110136709 hasConcept C2778029271 @default.
• W2110136709 hasConcept C34974158 @default.
• W2110136709 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2110136709 hasConcept C61797465 @default.
• W2110136709 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W2110136709 hasConceptScore W2110136709C111472728 @default.
• W2110136709 hasConceptScore W2110136709C121332964 @default.
• W2110136709 hasConceptScore W2110136709C138885662 @default.
• W2110136709 hasConceptScore W2110136709C162324750 @default.
• W2110136709 hasConceptScore W2110136709C17744445 @default.
• W2110136709 hasConceptScore W2110136709C189950617 @default.
• W2110136709 hasConceptScore W2110136709C190253527 @default.
• W2110136709 hasConceptScore W2110136709C199360897 @default.
• W2110136709 hasConceptScore W2110136709C199539241 @default.
• W2110136709 hasConceptScore W2110136709C2778029271 @default.
• W2110136709 hasConceptScore W2110136709C34974158 @default.
• W2110136709 hasConceptScore W2110136709C41008148 @default.
• W2110136709 hasConceptScore W2110136709C61797465 @default.
• W2110136709 hasConceptScore W2110136709C62520636 @default.
• W2110136709 hasIssue "8" @default.
• W2110136709 hasLocation W21101367091 @default.
• W2110136709 hasLocation W21101367092 @default.
• W2110136709 hasLocation W21101367093 @default.
• W2110136709 hasLocation W21101367094 @default.
• W2110136709 hasLocation W21101367095 @default.
• W2110136709 hasOpenAccess W2110136709 @default.
• W2110136709 hasPrimaryLocation W21101367091 @default.
• W2110136709 hasRelatedWork W2092330142 @default.
• W2110136709 hasRelatedWork W2269968969 @default.
• W2110136709 hasRelatedWork W2359216897 @default.
• W2110136709 hasRelatedWork W2748449745 @default.
• W2110136709 hasRelatedWork W2883149264 @default.
• W2110136709 hasRelatedWork W2951192745 @default.
• W2110136709 hasRelatedWork W2951628692 @default.
• W2110136709 hasRelatedWork W2976182755 @default.
• W2110136709 hasRelatedWork W3121240808 @default.
• W2110136709 hasRelatedWork W2087665910 @default.
• W2110136709 hasVolume "112" @default.
• W2110136709 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2110136709 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2110136709 magId "2110136709" @default.
• W2110136709 workType "article" @default.