FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2110147962> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2110147962 endingPage "455" @default.
• W2110147962 startingPage "438" @default.
• W2110147962 abstract "This study investigates the effect of high-level executives' professional experience, expertise, and role in a specific functional area such as finance or corporate development on their reasoning processes when making managerial decisions. Chief Financial Officers (CFOs) and Vice-Presidents of Corporate Development (VPs) in the diversified foods industry were tape recorded as they thought aloud while evaluating four restaurant chains which were candidates for corporate acquisition. The experiment was designed so that these four acquisition candidates varied with respect to key financial and profitability data and such measures of a firm's strategic business position as product concept, markets, distribution channels, labor relations, and managerial expertise and loyalty. The attributes of financial performance and strategic position embedded in the descriptions of candidate firms were validated by an expert panel. The executives also provided rating-scale evaluations of the strategic, financial, and overall desirability of the four candidate firms. The taped thought processes (verbal protocols) were analyzed to determine whether CFOs and VPs differed when evaluating the overall desirability of the acquisition candidates in their use of such lines of reasoning as assessments of the candidate's competitive environment, financial strength, management, operations, and the potential financial, managerial, and operational synergies offered by the proposed acquisition. The probability of generating these assessments during the evaluation process did not appear to be related to expertise based on experience or organizational role. When the protocols were analyzed with respect to specific business issues identified by CFOs and VPs when evaluating acquisition candidates, however, there was a role/experience effect. Overall ratings of candidate-firm desirability were straightforward functions of the executive's ratings of the candidate's strategic position and financial performance. On average, VPs tended to be more optimistic in their evaluations than CFOs. There is modest statistical evidence that VPs and CFOs differ in the emphasis they place on strategic and financial ratings in evaluating a candidate's overall promise. VPs tend to take a balanced view in forming their overall ratings, whereas CFOs place the predominant weight on financial matters. The similarity in lines of reasoning used by CFOs and VPs presents evidence of shared expertise at the corporate level. The difference in the attention that CFOs and VPs place on specific business issues suggests that collectively these different perspectives constitute an adaptive survival mechanism which evolves in successful organizations. The mechanism complements the shared expertise and protects organizations from making flawed strategic decisions. Analyzing these role/experience-based differences has value in developing an understanding of how organizations do and should integrate recommendations from executive officers of various functional areas." @default.
• W2110147962 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2110147962 creator A5036135359 @default.
• W2110147962 date "1994-08-01" @default.
• W2110147962 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2110147962 title "Reasoning in the Executive Suite: The Influence of Role/Experience-Based Expertise on Decision Processes of Corporate Executives" @default.
• W2110147962 cites W1557160543 @default.
• W2110147962 cites W1566728042 @default.
• W2110147962 cites W1606540910 @default.
• W2110147962 cites W1708874574 @default.
• W2110147962 cites W1978682914 @default.
• W2110147962 cites W1984350042 @default.
• W2110147962 cites W2034568866 @default.
• W2110147962 cites W2035120113 @default.
• W2110147962 cites W2041656211 @default.
• W2110147962 cites W2045300586 @default.
• W2110147962 cites W2053154970 @default.
• W2110147962 cites W2091785129 @default.
• W2110147962 cites W2100501090 @default.
• W2110147962 cites W2114249383 @default.
• W2110147962 cites W2129779112 @default.
• W2110147962 cites W2138894380 @default.
• W2110147962 cites W2140389187 @default.
• W2110147962 cites W2148145622 @default.
• W2110147962 cites W2149123875 @default.
• W2110147962 cites W2329375110 @default.
• W2110147962 cites W2568476927 @default.
• W2110147962 cites W2785566321 @default.
• W2110147962 cites W2889200856 @default.
• W2110147962 cites W2910641471 @default.
• W2110147962 cites W630912408 @default.
• W2110147962 cites W645419893 @default.
• W2110147962 cites W2018415007 @default.
• W2110147962 doi "https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.3.438" @default.
• W2110147962 hasPublicationYear "1994" @default.
• W2110147962 type Work @default.
• W2110147962 sameAs 2110147962 @default.
• W2110147962 citedByCount "93" @default.
• W2110147962 countsByYear W21101479622012 @default.
• W2110147962 countsByYear W21101479622013 @default.
• W2110147962 countsByYear W21101479622014 @default.
• W2110147962 countsByYear W21101479622015 @default.
• W2110147962 countsByYear W21101479622016 @default.
• W2110147962 countsByYear W21101479622017 @default.
• W2110147962 countsByYear W21101479622018 @default.
• W2110147962 countsByYear W21101479622019 @default.
• W2110147962 countsByYear W21101479622020 @default.
• W2110147962 countsByYear W21101479622021 @default.
• W2110147962 countsByYear W21101479622022 @default.
• W2110147962 countsByYear W21101479622023 @default.
• W2110147962 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2110147962 hasAuthorship W2110147962A5036135359 @default.
• W2110147962 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
• W2110147962 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W2110147962 hasConcept C129361004 @default.
• W2110147962 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2110147962 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
• W2110147962 hasConcept C198082294 @default.
• W2110147962 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
• W2110147962 hasConcept C2776967331 @default.
• W2110147962 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2110147962 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2110147962 hasConcept C90673727 @default.
• W2110147962 hasConcept C98045186 @default.
• W2110147962 hasConceptScore W2110147962C10138342 @default.
• W2110147962 hasConceptScore W2110147962C111919701 @default.
• W2110147962 hasConceptScore W2110147962C129361004 @default.
• W2110147962 hasConceptScore W2110147962C144133560 @default.
• W2110147962 hasConceptScore W2110147962C162853370 @default.
• W2110147962 hasConceptScore W2110147962C198082294 @default.
• W2110147962 hasConceptScore W2110147962C2524010 @default.
• W2110147962 hasConceptScore W2110147962C2776967331 @default.
• W2110147962 hasConceptScore W2110147962C33923547 @default.
• W2110147962 hasConceptScore W2110147962C41008148 @default.
• W2110147962 hasConceptScore W2110147962C90673727 @default.
• W2110147962 hasConceptScore W2110147962C98045186 @default.
• W2110147962 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2110147962 hasLocation W21101479621 @default.
• W2110147962 hasOpenAccess W2110147962 @default.
• W2110147962 hasPrimaryLocation W21101479621 @default.
• W2110147962 hasRelatedWork W1986338457 @default.
• W2110147962 hasRelatedWork W2066844180 @default.
• W2110147962 hasRelatedWork W2387188077 @default.
• W2110147962 hasRelatedWork W25115902 @default.
• W2110147962 hasRelatedWork W2984525013 @default.
• W2110147962 hasRelatedWork W3125099825 @default.
• W2110147962 hasRelatedWork W3132513730 @default.
• W2110147962 hasRelatedWork W4253553932 @default.
• W2110147962 hasRelatedWork W4285147705 @default.
• W2110147962 hasRelatedWork W4293192099 @default.
• W2110147962 hasVolume "5" @default.
• W2110147962 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2110147962 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2110147962 magId "2110147962" @default.
• W2110147962 workType "article" @default.