FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2110365541> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2110365541 endingPage "130" @default.
• W2110365541 startingPage "123" @default.
• W2110365541 abstract "ABSTRACTMany institutions in higher education are experimenting with teaching approaches to undergraduate courses. Online resources may provide a number of advantages to students as compared to in-class approaches. Research regarding the effectiveness of approaches is mixed and still accumulating. This paper discusses the use of a teaching approach for a Managerial Economics class. Identical multiple-choice questions from previous semesters are used to compare student performance in classes versus traditionally taught classes. Results suggest that student performance is lower in classes as compared to traditional classes. The differing student performance suggests that the complexity of material in some courses may not be suitable for a approach.Keywords: Economics, business, teaching, instruction, instructionJEL Classification: A22 ; M00PsycINFO Classification: 3530FoR Code: 1301; 1501IntroductionThere has been an increasing use of technology in higher education. Many institutions have experimented with hybrid or flipped courses which substitute online exercises and resources for class time. Overall, such approaches have generally shown mixed results (Akkoyunlu & Soylu, 2008; Ginns 8i Ellis, 2007; Love, Hodge, Grandgenett, & Swift, 2014).Online resources may present several advantages over traditional lecture and discussion. First, students can utilize online resources at a time of their choosing. Second, online assignments often have multiple attempts. Third, online assignments are by default open-book. Fourth, students can engage in discussion with other students for online assignments.If the online resources work as predicted, a approach could increase student learning at the same time that it decreases instructor time for delivering lecture in the classroom. Thus, this approach could be beneficial for both parties. The approach may also reduce cost if more students could be served with this approach. The primary Research Question is whether a teaching approach could improve student learning in a Managerial Economics class. The method for evaluating this question is to compare student performance on identical multiple-choice questions from previous semesters (taught by the same instructor). Other secondary topics of interest are overall student satisfaction with a course, and the potential increased load on the instructor for preparation and administration. This paper discusses the results of this trial.Literature ReviewHybrid or blended learning seeks to improve learning through a combination of face-to-face instructional time and online instructional time (Garrison 8i Kanuka, 2004). Blended learning can take a number of forms but relies on basic educational principles (Garrison 8i Vaughan, 2008). Effective practices in blended learning have also been identified (Mortera-Gutierrez, 2006).Hybrid or blended approaches have been used in a variety of business courses, including graduate business courses (Chen & Jones, 2007). As mentioned above, the overall results from or blended courses have been mixed as far as student performance, and that is the case in the field of business as well. A approach for an undergraduate accounting course improved student performance (Dowling, Godfrey, & Gyles, 2003). A approach to introductory economics showed no change in student performance (Olitsky, & Cosgrove, 2014). In an undergraduate microeconomics course, student performance was weaker in a section as compared to a face-to-face section (Verhoeven, & Rudchenko, 2013).Other studies have looked at student perception and satisfaction with courses. In the study of a marketing planning course versus the traditional, students preferred the traditional course (Haytko, 2001). A study in undergraduate economics showed the availability of online tools in a blended course improved student motivation (Van Der Merwe, 2007). …" @default.
• W2110365541 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2110365541 creator A5041555740 @default.
• W2110365541 date "2014-07-01" @default.
• W2110365541 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2110365541 title "A Hybrid Approach to Teaching Managerial Economics" @default.
• W2110365541 cites W1574922254 @default.
• W2110365541 cites W2005861674 @default.
• W2110365541 cites W2007180528 @default.
• W2110365541 cites W2009014446 @default.
• W2110365541 cites W2096775778 @default.
• W2110365541 cites W2110715908 @default.
• W2110365541 cites W2114003275 @default.
• W2110365541 cites W2153047960 @default.
• W2110365541 cites W2157637541 @default.
• W2110365541 cites W2166939925 @default.
• W2110365541 cites W2167887186 @default.
• W2110365541 cites W2170537165 @default.
• W2110365541 cites W2279173313 @default.
• W2110365541 cites W2303186088 @default.
• W2110365541 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W2110365541 type Work @default.
• W2110365541 sameAs 2110365541 @default.
• W2110365541 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W2110365541 countsByYear W21103655412015 @default.
• W2110365541 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2110365541 hasAuthorship W2110365541A5041555740 @default.
• W2110365541 hasConcept C10050518 @default.
• W2110365541 hasConcept C145420912 @default.
• W2110365541 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W2110365541 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2110365541 hasConcept C2777212361 @default.
• W2110365541 hasConcept C2778156053 @default.
• W2110365541 hasConcept C2986087404 @default.
• W2110365541 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2110365541 hasConcept C49774154 @default.
• W2110365541 hasConcept C538133343 @default.
• W2110365541 hasConceptScore W2110365541C10050518 @default.
• W2110365541 hasConceptScore W2110365541C145420912 @default.
• W2110365541 hasConceptScore W2110365541C154945302 @default.
• W2110365541 hasConceptScore W2110365541C15744967 @default.
• W2110365541 hasConceptScore W2110365541C2777212361 @default.
• W2110365541 hasConceptScore W2110365541C2778156053 @default.
• W2110365541 hasConceptScore W2110365541C2986087404 @default.
• W2110365541 hasConceptScore W2110365541C41008148 @default.
• W2110365541 hasConceptScore W2110365541C49774154 @default.
• W2110365541 hasConceptScore W2110365541C538133343 @default.
• W2110365541 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2110365541 hasLocation W21103655411 @default.
• W2110365541 hasOpenAccess W2110365541 @default.
• W2110365541 hasPrimaryLocation W21103655411 @default.
• W2110365541 hasRelatedWork W1487840694 @default.
• W2110365541 hasRelatedWork W2019298073 @default.
• W2110365541 hasRelatedWork W2148192033 @default.
• W2110365541 hasRelatedWork W2185265136 @default.
• W2110365541 hasRelatedWork W2247637302 @default.
• W2110365541 hasRelatedWork W2418518817 @default.
• W2110365541 hasRelatedWork W2510167343 @default.
• W2110365541 hasRelatedWork W2564085624 @default.
• W2110365541 hasRelatedWork W2587371250 @default.
• W2110365541 hasRelatedWork W2744641112 @default.
• W2110365541 hasRelatedWork W2944554733 @default.
• W2110365541 hasRelatedWork W2946360660 @default.
• W2110365541 hasRelatedWork W2995881830 @default.
• W2110365541 hasRelatedWork W3012260371 @default.
• W2110365541 hasRelatedWork W3020649172 @default.
• W2110365541 hasRelatedWork W3022363650 @default.
• W2110365541 hasRelatedWork W3034303413 @default.
• W2110365541 hasRelatedWork W3209500894 @default.
• W2110365541 hasRelatedWork W332603171 @default.
• W2110365541 hasRelatedWork W2595735903 @default.
• W2110365541 hasVolume "8" @default.
• W2110365541 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2110365541 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2110365541 magId "2110365541" @default.
• W2110365541 workType "article" @default.