FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2110578891> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2110578891 endingPage "689" @default.
• W2110578891 startingPage "684" @default.
• W2110578891 abstract "Ole-ain't: Trialkyl oxonium salts are universal reagents for native-ligand stripping of carboxylate- (e.g., oleate-), phosphonate-, and amine-passivated nanocrystal thin films and dispersions to give bare or BF4−/DMF-passivated surfaces. Meerwein-activated PbSe nanocrystal thin films (see picture) show hole mobilities of about 2–4 cm2 V−1 s−1, which suggest applications of this process in fabricating high-performance devices. Native coordinating ligands acquired during the chemical synthesis of colloidal nanocrystals are optimized primarily for their ability to exert control over nanocrystal size, composition, morphology, and dispersibility, and not necessarily for their final application.1 In general, they are hydrophobic and highly insulating, and constitute a significant barrier for charge or ion transport in devices configured therefrom. Bare nanocrystal surfaces, while desirable for many applications, can be difficult to obtain reliably and without undesirable consequences. For example, removal of native ligands from nanocrystal dispersions usually results in aggregation or etching,2 while in thin films their chemical displacement (e.g., by hydrazine or formic acid) often gives inefficient removal of surface ligands.3 Thermal treatments inevitably leave behind an undesirable residue, require lengthy annealing times, or result in particle sintering.4 Nevertheless, these approaches have demonstrated that near-bare nanocrystal surfaces are useful in a broad spectrum of advanced energy applications, from light-emitting diodes to field-effect transistors and photovoltaics.5, 6 Dispersions of bare nanocrystals would also be useful as nanoinks and for facilitating their transfer into polar media for biomedical applications and catalysis.7 In pursuit of a universal reagent for producing stable dispersions or thin films of ligand-stripped nanocrystals with retention of their physical properties, we show here that this can be uniquely achieved by using Meerwein’s and other trialkyl oxonium salts.8 Recently, NOBF4 was proposed as a general reagent for stripping of oleate ligands from metal oxides, metals, dielectrics, and some semiconductors.9 While this technique is quite effective for certain nanocrystals, it is not applicable to materials with limited chemical stability, which include most metal chalcogenides and some important oxides, such as both doped and undoped ZnO,10 presumably due to the oxidative ability and Lewis acidity of the nitrosonium cation.11 Acids such as HBF4 and HPF6 have also been explored recently12 for removal of native ligands; however, as acids etch many nanocrystals, their utility as general ligand-stripping agents has not been demonstrated. We hypothesized that these problems could be overcome by employing nonoxidizing and nonacidic reagents that would undergo targeted reactions with coordinating ligands and render them incapable of interacting with the nanocrystal surface. In related work by us and others,13 reactive ligand exchange was possible by using trimethylsilylating agents which react with oxoanionic ligands to produce noncoordinating trimethylsilyl esters. While extremely useful for placing unique functionality at the nanocrystal surface, this approach does not yield a “bare” surface. By employing trialkyl oxonium salts instead, we proposed to exploit their superior alkylating character to rapidly and efficiently remove a broad spectrum of native ligand types while leaving the surface of the nanocrystal bare, with ligands (e.g., BF4− or PF6−) weakly coordinating through electrostatic interactions in their place (Scheme 1). Since trialkyl oxonium salts are unreactive toward inorganic constituents such as chalcogenides, we hoped to achieve a broader substrate scope, and pave the way to more robust chemical treatments to activate nanocrystal surfaces. Reactive ligand stripping of carboxylate-, phosphonate-, and amine-passivated nanocrystals with trialkyloxonium salts. a) NC=CdSe, CdSe/CdS, PbSe, TiO2, α-Fe2O3, ZnO, doped NaYF4, etc. b) NC=CdSe, CdSe/ZnS, etc. c) NC=doped In2O3, Ag, FePt, etc. As a test case to evaluate the applicability of our approach, we investigated the utility of Meerwein’s salt (Et3OBF4) for reactive ligand stripping of oleate-passivated lead selenide nanocrystals (PbSe-OA), which has been especially problematic for reasons that remain elusive.2b, 4e Nevertheless, PbSe is an exceptionally important electronic material due to its large Bohr radius, narrow band gap, and efficient multiple-exciton generation.14 Native ligand removal from PbSe nanocrystal thin films would not only be highly desirable for next-generation device applications, but would also provide a unique opportunity to develop a comprehensive analytical framework to evaluate the stripping process, which would help elucidate the mechanistic aspects of this and related chemistries that have not emerged from previous studies.3a, 5 Ligand-stripping reactions on ordered films of PbSe-OA deposited on Si substrates were studied by immersion of the films in dilute solutions of Et3OBF4 in acetonitrile (MeCN) (50 mM). In addition, we also studied ligand stripping in the presence of two highly polar cosolvents, N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) and hexamethylphosphoramide (HMPA), to determine whether these molecules would weakly coordinate through their oxygen atoms to the bare nanocrystal surfaces. Trialkyl oxonium salts are well known to react with both DMF and HMPA to yield activated species which should also serve as efficient alkylating agents.15 The SEM and TEM images of the initial and oleate-stripped films are shown in Figure 1. For the reaction of PbSe-OA and Et3OBF4 in MeCN, 1 M DMF in MeCN, or 1 M HMPA in MeCN (Figure 1 and Figure S2 of the Supporting Information), the stripped films exhibited visibly decreased interparticle spacing, consistent with oleate removal.16 For comparison, treating PbSe-OA on Si with NOBF4 in MeCN resulted in complete destruction of the structural integrity of the particles (Supporting Information, Figure S2). Analysis of the Et3OBF4-treated nanocrystal films by energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) revealed drastic reduction in the carbon signal relative to PbSe-OA (Figure 2 a). Notably, no fluorine was detected. For the film treated with NOBF4, EDS revealed only Se and background levels of C and O (Supporting Information, Figure S3). This confirmed the oxidizing potential of NOBF4 when used for PbSe, as the absence of Pb shown by EDS suggested oxidation of Se2− to Se0 with concomitant formation of soluble [Pb(MeCN)n](BF4)2. SEM images of a) an ordered superlattice of PbSe-OA and b) a bare PbSe thin film after treatment with Et3OBF4 in DMF/MeCN. Scale bars are 50 nm. TEM images of c) PbSe-OA and d) PbSe-OA treated with Et3OBF4 in MeCN. Scale bars are 10 nm for the lower-magnification images and 2 nm for the high-resolution inset. a) EDS of thin films of nanocrystalline PbSe-OA (black) and PbSe-OA treated with Et3OBF4 in MeCN (gray) obtained at 5 kV and scaled to Se for comparison. b) FTIR spectra for thin films of nanocrystalline PbSe-OA (black) and resulting films after Et3OBF4 ligand stripping in MeCN (gray) and DMF/MeCN (black dots) on double-side-polished Si substrates. We next sought to identify any molecules left on the stripped PbSe surface, which can be studied by FTIR spectroscopy (Figure 2 b). As expected, PbSe-OA nanocrystal thin films exhibited diagnostic signals for oleate ligands around 2900 cm−1 (symmetric and antisymmetric CH stretches) and 1450 cm−1 (symmetric and antisymmetric carbonyl stretches).5b After treatment with Et3OBF4 in MeCN, these signals were completely absent. Surprisingly, no stretching band attributable to BF4− was present at 1080 cm−1. Also, for PbSe-OA thin films treated with Meerwein-activated DMF, signals attributed to surface-adsorbed DMF were not present, as no carbonyl stretching band was observed around 1650 cm−1.9, 17 Collectively, the absence of signals attributable to BF4− and solvent molecules by EDS and FTIR analysis suggested that the cosolvent and counterion were not involved in passivation of stripped PbSe nanocrystal surfaces. We surmised that these results could be due to desorption of Pb adatoms upon ligand stripping, as others have reported on the lability of excess surface Pb atoms under certain conditions.18 Indeed, inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES) revealed that PbSe-OA nanocrystals stripped with Et3OBF4 have a nearly equimolar ratio of Pb:Se (0.97:1.00), while the initial sample had the expected lead-rich ratio of 1.22:1.00. To explore the homogeneity in ligand stripping using this technique, we investigated the composition across the initial and treated PbSe films by nano-IR.19 AFM images on the micrometer scale were obtained on approximately 200 nm-thick films assembled layer-by-layer on ZnSe prisms (Figure 3). Infrared spectra of the initial and stripped films were obtained at random points across the films by irradiation through the prism and analysis of the wavelength-dependent thermal expansion pulse measured by the AFM cantilever tip. The initial PbSe-OA film showed the expected CH absorptions around 2900 cm−1. Upon oleate stripping with Et3OBF4, significantly reduced absorption was observed uniformly across the treated film. The ability to remove insulating ligands quickly and homogeneously with no subsequent annealing should present robust, new paths for fabricating large-area thin-film devices by relatively simple and fast solution processing. AFM images of approximately 200 nm-thick films of a) nanocrystalline PbSe-OA and b) nanocrystalline PbSe-OA treated with Et3OBF4 in MeCN. Images are 8×14 μm and 4×8 μm in size, respectively. c) Nano-IR analysis of PbSe-OA (black) and treated (gray) films obtained at various points on each film (white crosses) showing uniform composition. We next determined whether Meerwein’s treatment had caused significant change to the size or structure of PbSe nanocrystals. To elucidate any changes in crystallinity, XRD patterns were collected for the PbSe films. As shown in Figure 4 a, diffraction patterns for both initial and ligand-stripped PbSe particles were consistent with a rock-salt structure. The Scherrer formula was then used to calculate crystallite size (Table 1). The initial coherent domain size, calculated to be 10.1 nm, was similar after ligand stripping (9.5–7.9 nm). Considering the many factors contributing to broadening of diffraction peaks, the corresponding absorption spectra were also obtained (Figure 4 b and c). Calculation of PbSe diameter from the first exciton peak20 (Table 1) revealed less than 0.1 nm difference in size after stripping, that is, neither fusing nor etching of oleate-stripped particles had occurred, aside from the noted loss of excess surface Pb adatoms evident by ICP-AES analysis. a) XRD patterns of PbSe-OA nanocrystals before and after ligand stripping. i) PbSe-OA and PbSe-OA treated with Et3OBF4 in ii) MeCN, iii) DMF/MeCN, and iv) HMPA/MeCN. Peaks were assigned according to JCPDS file 01-078-1903. b) Absorbance of PbSe-OA in tetrachloroethylene solution. c) Diffuse reflectance of thin films: PbSe-OA (black) and PbSe after treatment with Et3OBF4 in MeCN (gray), DMF/MeCN (black dots), and HMPA/MeCN (gray dots). Film Size [nm] σ [S cm−1] Carrier concentration [cm−3] Mobility [cm2 V−1 s−1] PbSe-OA 7.0 (10.1) n.d.[d] n.d.[d] n.d.[d] MeCN 7.1 (9.5) 1.5×10−2 2.3×1016 4.1 DMF/MeCN 7.1 (7.9) 5.8×10−2 1.4×1018 2.6 HMPA/MeCN 7.1 (8.3) 2.7×10−2 6.9×1017 2.5 Due to the efficient removal of insulating oleate ligands, we anticipated favorable effects on the electronic properties of the treated films. As expected, the initial PbSe-OA films were not conductive, even after extensive washing with MeCN. Conversely, oleate-stripped PbSe films were found to exhibit p-type conductivity, with σ=(1.5–5.8)×10−2 S cm−1 (Table 1) when measured in air. These values are comparable to those of PbSe-OA films treated with amines on exposure to air (σ=1×10−3 to 5×10−1 S cm−1), which resulted in highly conductive p-type films due to evaporation of absorbed amine molecules and subsequent doping by oxygen, hydroxyl, and water.3a, 21 This demonstrates the ability to rapidly increase transport in films of chalcogenide nanocrystals without annealing, sintering, etching, or the use of hazardous chemical treatments, such as anhydrous hydrazine, which is an enabling technique in thin-film solution processing. Dispersions of stripped nanocrystals, which are useful for numerous applications from nanoinks for device fabrication to biomolecular passivation, could also be obtained by using trialkyl oxonium salts (Figure 5). Typically, a dispersion of nanocrystals in hexanes (1–20 mg mL−1) was added to trimethyloxonium tetrafluoroborate (Me3OBF4) dissolved in MeCN (1–100 mM) to form a biphasic solution. After vortexing for a few seconds, the bare nanocrystals precipitated and could be isolated after addition of chloroform followed by pelleting them under centrifugation. The pellet was washed with additional portions of chloroform to remove excess Me3OBF4 and methyl oleate before redispersing the solid residue in DMF. This procedure substantially avoids contamination of the nanocrystal dispersion by the exogenous stripping agent, which is generally not afforded by other strategies whereby direct transfer to coordinating solvents (e.g., DMF) is implemented. A broad spectrum of nanocrystals including TiO2, α-Fe2O3, tin-doped indium oxide (ITO), aluminum-doped zinc oxide (AZO), CdSe/ZnS core/shell quantum dots, CdSe/CdS quantum dot/quantum rods, upconverting NaYF4:Yb/Tm, Ag, and FePt nanocrystals passivated by either oleate, phosphonate, or amine ligands were successfully stripped and redispersed in DMF. The resulting dispersions were stable for months at concentrations in excess of about 50 mg mL−1. Stripping of nanocrystal dispersions by using trialkyl oxonium salts with PF6− as counterion yielded similar results, while using SbCl6− was less successful, attributed to the ability of this anion to function as an oxidant,11 which again points to the sensitivity of some classes of nanocrystals to oxidizing conditions. Dispersions of BF4−/DMF passivated nanocrystals. From left to right: ITO, AZO, TiO2, α-Fe2O3, CdSe/ZnS (λem=545 nm), CdSe/ZnS (λem=605 nm), CdSe/CdS quantum dot/quantum rods (λem=619 nm), upconverting NaYF4:Yb/Tm, and Ag nanocrystals. As with the reactions performed on thin films, it was important to determine whether the solution-phase approach was complete in its stripping of native surface ligands and that it avoided irreversible particle fusing and etching. The TEM images of the initial and treated nanocrystals (Supporting Information, Figures S6–S8) showed that their quality was retained after stripping. In general, no aggregation was observed by dynamic light scattering (DLS) of stripped nanocrystal dispersions in DMF. For example, oleylamine-passivated ITO nanocrystals with initial hydrodynamic size of 18 nm in hexanes exhibited a hydrodynamic size of 14 nm after treatment with Me3OBF4 (Supporting Information, Figure S9), consistent with loss of ligands with long carbon chains. Additionally, representative absorbance spectra confirmed no etching had occurred (Supporting Information, Figure S10). Unlike the PbSe nanocrystal films, dispersions of stripped nanocrystals were found by FTIR to contain adsorbed BF4− and DMF (Supporting Information, Figure S11-S14), consistent with similar dispersions produced by using NOBF4. What distinguishes the Meerwein’s approach from NOBF4, however, is that, for the first time, one can produce metal chalcogenide nanocrystal dispersions, which demonstrates the mildness of the procedure. For example, two different samples of CdSe/ZnS core/shell nanocrystals stripped of phosphonate ligands and re-passivated with oleate had nearly identical photoluminescence, which is exceptionally sensitive to size (i.e., no etching occurred), retention of cationic surface adatoms, and the extent of passivation of surface traps (Supporting Information, Figure S15). Films of nanocrystals passivated by BF4− and DMF exhibited decreased interparticle spacing relative to their oleate-passivated counterparts (Supporting Information, Figure S16–S17), which should provide excellent opportunities in nanoink applications, where large-area nanocrystal-based active layers are required. In summary, Meerwein’s and related trialkyl oxonium salts have been presented as a universal class of reagents for ligand stripping of carboxylate-, phosphonate-, and amine-passivated nanocrystals. Most significantly, quantitative ligand removal was readily obtained for several important semiconductor types, including PbSe, doped ZnO, and CdSe-based heterostructures. In the atypical case of PbSe, no evidence of surface passivation by either BF4− or solvent molecules was detected by FTIR and EDS, while supporting ICP-AES data indicated that desorption of PbII adatoms accompanies ligand removal. This result may explain why PbSe nanocrystals have been particularly difficult to keep dispersed once their native ligands have been removed by this or other methods. Nevertheless, rapid yet mild ligand stripping by Meerwein’s salt resulted in highly conductive PbSe films with hole mobilities as high as 4 cm2 V−1 s−1 without the need for additional treatments. All other nanocrystal compositions surveyed showed evidence for weak adsorption of anion and solvent species, consistent with the retention of surface adatoms. These surface-adsorbed species facilitated stable colloidal dispersions in polar solvents and were amenable to subsequent ligand modification. Collectively, these qualities make Meerwein’s and other trialkyl oxonium salts highly versatile chemical agents for control of nanocrystal solubility and surface properties, which should lead to improved manipulation of nanocrystal surface composition for desired applications. PbSe nanocrystals with average size (7.2±0.6 nm) and first absorption feature at 2137 nm were synthesized according to a slight modification of literature methods.22 See Supporting Information for detailed experimental procedures. PbSe ligand-stripping reactions were performed in a nitrogen dry box. Approximately 90–200 nm-thick nanocrystal films grown at an air/acetonitrile interface were first deposited on Si substrates. The PbSe films were then soaked in MeCN solutions of Et3OBF4 (50–100 mM) or NOBF4 (50 mM) for 5 min. Ligand stripping in the presence of cosolvents was carried out with 1 M DMF or HMPA in MeCN. All treated films were gently washed five times with 800 μL portions of MeCN followed by hexanes. The initial PbSe-OA films were routinely washed ten times with 800 μL portions of MeCN to ensure accurate comparisons with treated films, as oleate ligands can be removed by excessive washing under some conditions.23 Analogous samples were prepared under identical conditions on clean glass substrates for XRD, diffuse-reflectance measurements, and conductivity measurements. For conductivity measurements, two rounds of film deposition and treatment were performed on clean glass substrates to give approximately 200 nm-thick films largely devoid of through-film cracks. SEM images were recorded on a Zeiss Gemini Ultra-55 Analytical scanning electron microscope with a beam energy of 5 kV and an In-Lens detector. An inbuilt EDS detector was used for elemental analysis. XRD was performed on a Bruker Gadds-8 diffractometer with a CuKα source operating at 40 kV and 20 mA. FTIR spectra were obtained on a PerkinElmer Spectrum One FTIR Spectrometer on AgCl or double-side-polished Si substrates or on a ZnSe prism by using an HATR sampling accessory. Atomic emission spectroscopy was performed on a Varian 720-ES ICP optical emission spectrometer by using an argon plasma. Nano-IR measurements were obtained at Anasys Instruments, Santa Barbara, CA, on an Anasys Instruments NanoIR platform. Absorbance spectra were recorded on a Varian Cary 5000 UV/Vis/NIR spectrophotometer. Diffuse-reflectance spectra were determined on an ASD Inc. Quality Spec Pro UV/Vis spectrometer with MugLite attachment and Spectralon reference. Hall-effect measurements were obtained in air by using an Ecopia HMS-5000 Hall effect measurement system. Film thicknesses were determined on a Veeco Dektak 150 Surface Profilometer. Dynamic light scattering (DLS) data were obtained with a Malvern Zetasizer Nano ZS instrument. Detailed facts of importance to specialist readers are published as ”Supporting Information”. Such documents are peer-reviewed, but not copy-edited or typeset. They are made available as submitted by the authors. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article." @default.
• W2110578891 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2110578891 creator A5003246811 @default.
• W2110578891 creator A5012680865 @default.
• W2110578891 creator A5077085087 @default.
• W2110578891 creator A5078891200 @default.
• W2110578891 creator A5082572787 @default.
• W2110578891 creator A5088877550 @default.
• W2110578891 date "2011-12-06" @default.
• W2110578891 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2110578891 title "Exceptionally Mild Reactive Stripping of Native Ligands from Nanocrystal Surfaces by Using Meerwein’s Salt" @default.
• W2110578891 cites W1965860367 @default.
• W2110578891 cites W1968428628 @default.
• W2110578891 cites W1971713784 @default.
• W2110578891 cites W1981004018 @default.
• W2110578891 cites W1990569264 @default.
• W2110578891 cites W1998483116 @default.
• W2110578891 cites W1999252429 @default.
• W2110578891 cites W1999780544 @default.
• W2110578891 cites W2006926470 @default.
• W2110578891 cites W2009967254 @default.
• W2110578891 cites W2012036400 @default.
• W2110578891 cites W2012768504 @default.
• W2110578891 cites W2015447425 @default.
• W2110578891 cites W2024383637 @default.
• W2110578891 cites W2029676994 @default.
• W2110578891 cites W2033982667 @default.
• W2110578891 cites W2040290957 @default.
• W2110578891 cites W2044690708 @default.
• W2110578891 cites W2047101262 @default.
• W2110578891 cites W2053867938 @default.
• W2110578891 cites W2056324400 @default.
• W2110578891 cites W2063074480 @default.
• W2110578891 cites W2065297129 @default.
• W2110578891 cites W2066682551 @default.
• W2110578891 cites W2070495445 @default.
• W2110578891 cites W2074458677 @default.
• W2110578891 cites W2076438172 @default.
• W2110578891 cites W2079743916 @default.
• W2110578891 cites W2084081139 @default.
• W2110578891 cites W2089785701 @default.
• W2110578891 cites W2099328555 @default.
• W2110578891 cites W2119931771 @default.
• W2110578891 cites W2135725094 @default.
• W2110578891 cites W2141017103 @default.
• W2110578891 cites W2141457340 @default.
• W2110578891 cites W2144949343 @default.
• W2110578891 cites W2154043118 @default.
• W2110578891 cites W2154321074 @default.
• W2110578891 cites W2160929596 @default.
• W2110578891 cites W2166503468 @default.
• W2110578891 cites W2172201846 @default.
• W2110578891 cites W2313151121 @default.
• W2110578891 cites W2313577924 @default.
• W2110578891 cites W2323929824 @default.
• W2110578891 cites W2326840516 @default.
• W2110578891 cites W2952169965 @default.
• W2110578891 cites W3103796498 @default.
• W2110578891 cites W37068196 @default.
• W2110578891 cites W4238678303 @default.
• W2110578891 cites W4239228637 @default.
• W2110578891 cites W4243806544 @default.
• W2110578891 cites W4253901341 @default.
• W2110578891 doi "https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201105996" @default.
• W2110578891 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22147424" @default.
• W2110578891 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W2110578891 type Work @default.
• W2110578891 sameAs 2110578891 @default.
• W2110578891 citedByCount "239" @default.
• W2110578891 countsByYear W21105788912012 @default.
• W2110578891 countsByYear W21105788912013 @default.
• W2110578891 countsByYear W21105788912014 @default.
• W2110578891 countsByYear W21105788912015 @default.
• W2110578891 countsByYear W21105788912016 @default.
• W2110578891 countsByYear W21105788912017 @default.
• W2110578891 countsByYear W21105788912018 @default.
• W2110578891 countsByYear W21105788912019 @default.
• W2110578891 countsByYear W21105788912020 @default.
• W2110578891 countsByYear W21105788912021 @default.
• W2110578891 countsByYear W21105788912022 @default.
• W2110578891 countsByYear W21105788912023 @default.
• W2110578891 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2110578891 hasAuthorship W2110578891A5003246811 @default.
• W2110578891 hasAuthorship W2110578891A5012680865 @default.
• W2110578891 hasAuthorship W2110578891A5077085087 @default.
• W2110578891 hasAuthorship W2110578891A5078891200 @default.
• W2110578891 hasAuthorship W2110578891A5082572787 @default.
• W2110578891 hasAuthorship W2110578891A5088877550 @default.
• W2110578891 hasConcept C159985019 @default.
• W2110578891 hasConcept C171250308 @default.
• W2110578891 hasConcept C175854130 @default.
• W2110578891 hasConcept C178790620 @default.
• W2110578891 hasConcept C179104552 @default.
• W2110578891 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W2110578891 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W2110578891 hasConcept C2776371256 @default.
• W2110578891 hasConcept C41952129 @default.
• W2110578891 hasConcept C75473681 @default.

• next