FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2111034353> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2111034353 abstract "To reapply 1985 Office of Population Census and Surveys (OPCS) disability survey methods, modified as necessary, to a sample of children to ascertain presence of disability. To compare OPCS-based prevalence with prevalence based on carer's views and medical records.Analytical study. Setting Community Child Health Department in UK.Principal carers of 100 children aged 5-15, selected from a district special needs register. Main outcome measures Comparable information about disability from three sources and diagnosis from carers and medical records.Medical records of 46% contained a diagnosis. Carers were always aware of this, although a single question did not always elicit their knowledge. OPCS-derived threshold disability criteria in categories of Hand function, Personal care, Consciousness and Continence gave prevalence results similar to medical records and carers. OPCS criteria yielded higher prevalence of disability in the areas of Locomotion (8%), Communication (14%) and Hearing (18%). Carers, OPCS and medical records disagreed markedly about prevalence of disabilities of Vision, probably because of the use of differing definitions. OPCS learning criteria were judged unsuitable and standard attainment targets (SATs) were substituted. These provided similar prevalence figures to carers and medical records. OPCS behaviour criteria were also unsuitable and were replaced by the General Health and Behaviour Questionnaire (GHBQ). This found an increased prevalence of problems compared with carers and doctors.Diagnostic labels have limited use when collecting data about disabled children. Doubt is cast on the validity of some of the 1985 OPCS threshold criteria, and reassessment is suggested before their future use. Further work is needed on the use of SATs and GHBQ in the benchmarking of disability. To collect population data it would be easier and at least equally effective (with caution in the case of Vision) to ask carers directly rather than applying descriptive thresholds and external judgements. Similar information could be obtained from medical records, however, they are likely to be out of date." @default.
• W2111034353 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2111034353 creator A5029120616 @default.
• W2111034353 creator A5034943670 @default.
• W2111034353 date "2005-01-18" @default.
• W2111034353 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2111034353 title "Ascertaining the prevalence of childhood disability" @default.
• W2111034353 cites W1964395517 @default.
• W2111034353 cites W1975859850 @default.
• W2111034353 cites W1986111834 @default.
• W2111034353 cites W2008543593 @default.
• W2111034353 cites W2025802167 @default.
• W2111034353 cites W2060134026 @default.
• W2111034353 cites W2072667400 @default.
• W2111034353 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2214.2005.00462.x" @default.
• W2111034353 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15658970" @default.
• W2111034353 hasPublicationYear "2005" @default.
• W2111034353 type Work @default.
• W2111034353 sameAs 2111034353 @default.
• W2111034353 citedByCount "14" @default.
• W2111034353 countsByYear W21110343532012 @default.
• W2111034353 countsByYear W21110343532015 @default.
• W2111034353 countsByYear W21110343532019 @default.
• W2111034353 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2111034353 hasAuthorship W2111034353A5029120616 @default.
• W2111034353 hasAuthorship W2111034353A5034943670 @default.
• W2111034353 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W2111034353 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2111034353 hasConcept C15107229 @default.
• W2111034353 hasConcept C195910791 @default.
• W2111034353 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2111034353 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W2111034353 hasConcept C52130261 @default.
• W2111034353 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2111034353 hasConcept C74909509 @default.
• W2111034353 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2111034353 hasConceptScore W2111034353C118552586 @default.
• W2111034353 hasConceptScore W2111034353C126838900 @default.
• W2111034353 hasConceptScore W2111034353C15107229 @default.
• W2111034353 hasConceptScore W2111034353C195910791 @default.
• W2111034353 hasConceptScore W2111034353C2908647359 @default.
• W2111034353 hasConceptScore W2111034353C512399662 @default.
• W2111034353 hasConceptScore W2111034353C52130261 @default.
• W2111034353 hasConceptScore W2111034353C71924100 @default.
• W2111034353 hasConceptScore W2111034353C74909509 @default.
• W2111034353 hasConceptScore W2111034353C99454951 @default.
• W2111034353 hasLocation W21110343531 @default.
• W2111034353 hasLocation W21110343532 @default.
• W2111034353 hasOpenAccess W2111034353 @default.
• W2111034353 hasPrimaryLocation W21110343531 @default.
• W2111034353 hasRelatedWork W1216819468 @default.
• W2111034353 hasRelatedWork W1881052951 @default.
• W2111034353 hasRelatedWork W2131066859 @default.
• W2111034353 hasRelatedWork W2289283781 @default.
• W2111034353 hasRelatedWork W2348318532 @default.
• W2111034353 hasRelatedWork W2497895264 @default.
• W2111034353 hasRelatedWork W2624752861 @default.
• W2111034353 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2111034353 hasRelatedWork W3137969535 @default.
• W2111034353 hasRelatedWork W2724584161 @default.
• W2111034353 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2111034353 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2111034353 magId "2111034353" @default.
• W2111034353 workType "article" @default.