FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2111098953> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2111098953 endingPage "358" @default.
• W2111098953 startingPage "347" @default.
• W2111098953 abstract "To (a) compare the performance of full-field digital mammography (FFDM), using hard-copy image reading, with that of screen-film mammography (SFM) within a UK screening program (screening once every 3 years) for women aged 50 years or older and (b) conduct a meta-analysis of published findings along with the UK data.The study complied with the UK National Health Service Central Office for Research Ethics Committee guidelines; informed patient consent was not required, since analysis was carried out retrospectively after data anonymization. Between January 2006 and June 2007, a London population-based screening center performed 8478 FFDM and 31 720 SFM screening examinations, with modality determined by the type of machine available at the screening site. Logistic regression was used to assess whether breast cancer detection rates and recall rates differed between screening modalities. For the meta-analysis, random-effects models were used to combine study-specific estimates, if appropriate.A total of 263 breast cancers were detected. After adjustment for age, ethnicity, area of residence, and type of referral, there was no evidence of differences between FFDM and SFM in terms of detection rates (0.68 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 0.47, 0.89] vs 0.72 [95% CI: 0.58, 0.85], respectively, per 100 screening mammograms; P = .74), recall rates (3.2% [95% CI: 2.8, 3.6] vs 3.4% [95% CI: 3.1, 3.6]; P = .44), positive predictive value (PPV) of an abnormal mammogram, or characteristics of detected tumors. Meta-analysis of data from eight studies showed a slightly higher detection rate for FFDM, particularly at 60 years of age or younger (pooled FFDM-SFM difference: 0.11 [95% CI: 0.04, 0.18] per 100 screening mammograms), but no clear modality differences in recall rates or PPVs.Within a routine screening program, FFDM with hard-copy image reading performed as well as SFM in terms of process indicators; the meta-analysis was consistent with FFDM yielding detection rates at least as high as those for SFM." @default.
• W2111098953 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2111098953 creator A5001854734 @default.
• W2111098953 creator A5031218806 @default.
• W2111098953 creator A5032932413 @default.
• W2111098953 creator A5043931345 @default.
• W2111098953 creator A5066190049 @default.
• W2111098953 creator A5070700054 @default.
• W2111098953 date "2009-05-01" @default.
• W2111098953 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W2111098953 title "Full-Field Digital versus Screen-Film Mammography: Comparison within the UK Breast Screening Program and Systematic Review of Published Data" @default.
• W2111098953 cites W1983190542 @default.
• W2111098953 cites W1990413141 @default.
• W2111098953 cites W1990725108 @default.
• W2111098953 cites W2021523624 @default.
• W2111098953 cites W2024400191 @default.
• W2111098953 cites W2034100736 @default.
• W2111098953 cites W2052029494 @default.
• W2111098953 cites W2060431433 @default.
• W2111098953 cites W2062752366 @default.
• W2111098953 cites W2065454481 @default.
• W2111098953 cites W2069809202 @default.
• W2111098953 cites W2070604640 @default.
• W2111098953 cites W2075502466 @default.
• W2111098953 cites W2107107168 @default.
• W2111098953 cites W2125435699 @default.
• W2111098953 cites W2125449863 @default.
• W2111098953 cites W2137953499 @default.
• W2111098953 cites W2163237523 @default.
• W2111098953 cites W2163416881 @default.
• W2111098953 doi "https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2512081235" @default.
• W2111098953 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19401569" @default.
• W2111098953 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
• W2111098953 type Work @default.
• W2111098953 sameAs 2111098953 @default.
• W2111098953 citedByCount "125" @default.
• W2111098953 countsByYear W21110989532012 @default.
• W2111098953 countsByYear W21110989532013 @default.
• W2111098953 countsByYear W21110989532014 @default.
• W2111098953 countsByYear W21110989532015 @default.
• W2111098953 countsByYear W21110989532016 @default.
• W2111098953 countsByYear W21110989532017 @default.
• W2111098953 countsByYear W21110989532018 @default.
• W2111098953 countsByYear W21110989532019 @default.
• W2111098953 countsByYear W21110989532020 @default.
• W2111098953 countsByYear W21110989532021 @default.
• W2111098953 countsByYear W21110989532022 @default.
• W2111098953 countsByYear W21110989532023 @default.
• W2111098953 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2111098953 hasAuthorship W2111098953A5001854734 @default.
• W2111098953 hasAuthorship W2111098953A5031218806 @default.
• W2111098953 hasAuthorship W2111098953A5032932413 @default.
• W2111098953 hasAuthorship W2111098953A5043931345 @default.
• W2111098953 hasAuthorship W2111098953A5066190049 @default.
• W2111098953 hasAuthorship W2111098953A5070700054 @default.
• W2111098953 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2111098953 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2111098953 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2111098953 hasConcept C149923435 @default.
• W2111098953 hasConcept C151956035 @default.
• W2111098953 hasConcept C156957248 @default.
• W2111098953 hasConcept C2777432617 @default.
• W2111098953 hasConcept C2778491387 @default.
• W2111098953 hasConcept C2780472235 @default.
• W2111098953 hasConcept C2781281974 @default.
• W2111098953 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2111098953 hasConcept C29456083 @default.
• W2111098953 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W2111098953 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W2111098953 hasConcept C530470458 @default.
• W2111098953 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2111098953 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2111098953 hasConceptScore W2111098953C121608353 @default.
• W2111098953 hasConceptScore W2111098953C126322002 @default.
• W2111098953 hasConceptScore W2111098953C144024400 @default.
• W2111098953 hasConceptScore W2111098953C149923435 @default.
• W2111098953 hasConceptScore W2111098953C151956035 @default.
• W2111098953 hasConceptScore W2111098953C156957248 @default.
• W2111098953 hasConceptScore W2111098953C2777432617 @default.
• W2111098953 hasConceptScore W2111098953C2778491387 @default.
• W2111098953 hasConceptScore W2111098953C2780472235 @default.
• W2111098953 hasConceptScore W2111098953C2781281974 @default.
• W2111098953 hasConceptScore W2111098953C2908647359 @default.
• W2111098953 hasConceptScore W2111098953C29456083 @default.
• W2111098953 hasConceptScore W2111098953C44249647 @default.
• W2111098953 hasConceptScore W2111098953C512399662 @default.
• W2111098953 hasConceptScore W2111098953C530470458 @default.
• W2111098953 hasConceptScore W2111098953C71924100 @default.
• W2111098953 hasConceptScore W2111098953C99454951 @default.
• W2111098953 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2111098953 hasLocation W21110989531 @default.
• W2111098953 hasLocation W21110989532 @default.
• W2111098953 hasOpenAccess W2111098953 @default.
• W2111098953 hasPrimaryLocation W21110989531 @default.
• W2111098953 hasRelatedWork W1126758768 @default.
• W2111098953 hasRelatedWork W2000845075 @default.
• W2111098953 hasRelatedWork W2029515485 @default.
• W2111098953 hasRelatedWork W2074544021 @default.

• next