FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2111633435> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2111633435 endingPage "476" @default.
• W2111633435 startingPage "469" @default.
• W2111633435 abstract "Retrospective single-centre series have shown the feasibility of sentinel lymph-node (SLN) identification in endometrial cancer. We did a prospective, multicentre cohort study to assess the detection rate and diagnostic accuracy of the SLN procedure in predicting the pathological pelvic-node status in patients with early stage endometrial cancer.Patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I-II endometrial cancer had pelvic SLN assessment via cervical dual injection (with technetium and patent blue), and systematic pelvic-node dissection. All lymph nodes were histopathologically examined and SLNs were serial sectioned and examined by immunochemistry. The primary endpoint was estimation of the negative predictive value (NPV) of sentinel-node biopsy per hemipelvis. This is an ongoing study for which recruitment has ended. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00987051.From July 5, 2007, to Aug 4, 2009, 133 patients were enrolled at nine centres in France. No complications occurred after injection of technetium colloid and no anaphylactic reactions were noted after patent blue injection. No surgical complications were reported during SLN biopsy, including procedures that involved conversion to open surgery. At least one SLN was detected in 111 of the 125 eligible patients. 19 of 111 (17%) had pelvic-lymph-node metastases. Five of 111 patients (5%) had an associated SLN in the para-aortic area. Considering the hemipelvis as the unit of analysis, NPV was 100% (95% CI 95-100) and sensitivity 100% (63-100). Considering the patient as the unit of analysis, three patients had false-negative results (two had metastatic nodes in the contralateral pelvic area and one in the para-aortic area), giving an NPV of 97% (95% CI 91-99) and sensitivity of 84% (62-95). All three of these patients had type 2 endometrial cancer. Immunohistochemistry and serial sectioning detected metastases undiagnosed by conventional histology in nine of 111 (8%) patients with detected SLNs, representing nine of the 19 patients (47%) with metastases. SLN biopsy upstaged 10% of patients with low-risk and 15% of those with intermediate-risk endometrial cancer.SLN biopsy with cervical dual labelling could be a trade-off between systematic lymphadenectomy and no dissection at all in patients with endometrial cancer of low or intermediate risk. Moreover, our study suggests that SLN biopsy could provide important data to tailor adjuvant therapy.Direction Interrégionale de Recherche Clinique, Ile-de-France, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris." @default.
• W2111633435 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2111633435 creator A5004309131 @default.
• W2111633435 creator A5006421563 @default.
• W2111633435 creator A5016448481 @default.
• W2111633435 creator A5016660726 @default.
• W2111633435 creator A5025793594 @default.
• W2111633435 creator A5031943683 @default.
• W2111633435 creator A5039031691 @default.
• W2111633435 creator A5045904002 @default.
• W2111633435 creator A5060565441 @default.
• W2111633435 creator A5064291277 @default.
• W2111633435 creator A5071567585 @default.
• W2111633435 date "2011-05-01" @default.
• W2111633435 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2111633435 title "Detection rate and diagnostic accuracy of sentinel-node biopsy in early stage endometrial cancer: a prospective multicentre study (SENTI-ENDO)" @default.
• W2111633435 cites W1573036624 @default.
• W2111633435 cites W1852146320 @default.
• W2111633435 cites W1965734230 @default.
• W2111633435 cites W1968152837 @default.
• W2111633435 cites W1972279398 @default.
• W2111633435 cites W1985981032 @default.
• W2111633435 cites W1993887103 @default.
• W2111633435 cites W1996737225 @default.
• W2111633435 cites W1999837848 @default.
• W2111633435 cites W2007160797 @default.
• W2111633435 cites W2017148657 @default.
• W2111633435 cites W2017236485 @default.
• W2111633435 cites W2017542350 @default.
• W2111633435 cites W2030111691 @default.
• W2111633435 cites W2036578197 @default.
• W2111633435 cites W2037971125 @default.
• W2111633435 cites W2039390019 @default.
• W2111633435 cites W2044508203 @default.
• W2111633435 cites W2048618944 @default.
• W2111633435 cites W2053208603 @default.
• W2111633435 cites W2062490682 @default.
• W2111633435 cites W2067575733 @default.
• W2111633435 cites W2069004496 @default.
• W2111633435 cites W2074746911 @default.
• W2111633435 cites W2076291631 @default.
• W2111633435 cites W2088559059 @default.
• W2111633435 cites W2090255585 @default.
• W2111633435 cites W2093344360 @default.
• W2111633435 cites W2095608019 @default.
• W2111633435 cites W2097409147 @default.
• W2111633435 cites W2105263683 @default.
• W2111633435 cites W2113593590 @default.
• W2111633435 cites W2128772530 @default.
• W2111633435 cites W2132434084 @default.
• W2111633435 cites W2146745078 @default.
• W2111633435 cites W2147101451 @default.
• W2111633435 cites W2159307123 @default.
• W2111633435 cites W2159649991 @default.
• W2111633435 cites W2166074462 @default.
• W2111633435 cites W2168188256 @default.
• W2111633435 cites W2168351513 @default.
• W2111633435 cites W2394702334 @default.
• W2111633435 cites W3141784093 @default.
• W2111633435 cites W4238777579 @default.
• W2111633435 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(11)70070-5" @default.
• W2111633435 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21489874" @default.
• W2111633435 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W2111633435 type Work @default.
• W2111633435 sameAs 2111633435 @default.
• W2111633435 citedByCount "417" @default.
• W2111633435 countsByYear W21116334352012 @default.
• W2111633435 countsByYear W21116334352013 @default.
• W2111633435 countsByYear W21116334352014 @default.
• W2111633435 countsByYear W21116334352015 @default.
• W2111633435 countsByYear W21116334352016 @default.
• W2111633435 countsByYear W21116334352017 @default.
• W2111633435 countsByYear W21116334352018 @default.
• W2111633435 countsByYear W21116334352019 @default.
• W2111633435 countsByYear W21116334352020 @default.
• W2111633435 countsByYear W21116334352021 @default.
• W2111633435 countsByYear W21116334352022 @default.
• W2111633435 countsByYear W21116334352023 @default.
• W2111633435 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2111633435 hasAuthorship W2111633435A5004309131 @default.
• W2111633435 hasAuthorship W2111633435A5006421563 @default.
• W2111633435 hasAuthorship W2111633435A5016448481 @default.
• W2111633435 hasAuthorship W2111633435A5016660726 @default.
• W2111633435 hasAuthorship W2111633435A5025793594 @default.
• W2111633435 hasAuthorship W2111633435A5031943683 @default.
• W2111633435 hasAuthorship W2111633435A5039031691 @default.
• W2111633435 hasAuthorship W2111633435A5045904002 @default.
• W2111633435 hasAuthorship W2111633435A5060565441 @default.
• W2111633435 hasAuthorship W2111633435A5064291277 @default.
• W2111633435 hasAuthorship W2111633435A5071567585 @default.
• W2111633435 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2111633435 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2111633435 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2111633435 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2111633435 hasConcept C146357865 @default.
• W2111633435 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W2111633435 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
• W2111633435 hasConcept C168563851 @default.

• next