FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2111829714> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2111829714 endingPage "142" @default.
• W2111829714 startingPage "142" @default.
• W2111829714 abstract "Context Comprehensive evaluation of biodiversity conservation programs is essential for informing their development as well as the design of future programs. Such evaluations should not be limited to whether targets have been met, but should also assess the cost and efficiency of meeting targets, and any factors contributing to success or failure. Aims We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of individual-species conservation programs, and the biological and operational factors affecting these. We used the species action plans (SAPs) within the UK Biodiversity Action Plan as our case study. Methods We used cost–effectiveness analysis, cost–utility analysis and threat-reduction assessment to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of individual SAPs. Then we used statistical models to investigate the relative importance of biological and operational factors affecting cost, effectiveness and efficiency. Key results Conservation plan success was affected by both biological and operational factors. Invertebrate plans tended to be less effective, whereas vertebrate plans were less efficient. Plans for widely distributed species with longer generation times tended to be less efficient. Of the three different evaluation approaches, cost-effectiveness analysis offered the best combination of ease of data collection and accuracy of data content. Conclusions The most successful SAPs concerned species with short generation times and narrow distributions. Operationally, the most successful SAPs were concise and focussed and showed clear lines of responsibility for implementation. Implications Techniques such as cost–effectiveness analysis, cost-utility analysis and threat reduction assessment should be used to inform decisions on maximising the rate of return on conservation investments, although broader ecological implications and socio-cultural benefits should also be considered. The success of conservation plans is influenced by both biological and operational factors. Because biological factors cannot be controlled or altered, where species exhibit characteristics that are likely to make their conservation less effective or efficient, it is critical that operational factors are optimised. High-quality data are necessary to underpin prioritisation decisions, and monitoring to deliver reliable data on both the benefits and costs of conservation should form a core component of conservation programs." @default.
• W2111829714 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2111829714 creator A5031689481 @default.
• W2111829714 creator A5043292755 @default.
• W2111829714 creator A5055573223 @default.
• W2111829714 creator A5058727595 @default.
• W2111829714 date "2013-01-01" @default.
• W2111829714 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2111829714 title "Biological and operational determinants of the effectiveness and efficiency of biodiversity conservation programs" @default.
• W2111829714 cites W1557316254 @default.
• W2111829714 cites W1972575751 @default.
• W2111829714 cites W1973438790 @default.
• W2111829714 cites W1993029276 @default.
• W2111829714 cites W1994727945 @default.
• W2111829714 cites W2000704081 @default.
• W2111829714 cites W2002349511 @default.
• W2111829714 cites W2025455835 @default.
• W2111829714 cites W2027133828 @default.
• W2111829714 cites W2042570762 @default.
• W2111829714 cites W2044581197 @default.
• W2111829714 cites W2045187594 @default.
• W2111829714 cites W2052186858 @default.
• W2111829714 cites W2055951545 @default.
• W2111829714 cites W2059143645 @default.
• W2111829714 cites W2070562208 @default.
• W2111829714 cites W2071404418 @default.
• W2111829714 cites W2078088722 @default.
• W2111829714 cites W2094447701 @default.
• W2111829714 cites W2096305305 @default.
• W2111829714 cites W2111292227 @default.
• W2111829714 cites W2114461748 @default.
• W2111829714 cites W2124033961 @default.
• W2111829714 cites W2131845989 @default.
• W2111829714 cites W2137937626 @default.
• W2111829714 cites W2153423917 @default.
• W2111829714 cites W2156188484 @default.
• W2111829714 cites W2162658013 @default.
• W2111829714 cites W2286680964 @default.
• W2111829714 cites W2405166751 @default.
• W2111829714 cites W4237454407 @default.
• W2111829714 cites W4241039393 @default.
• W2111829714 doi "https://doi.org/10.1071/wr12073" @default.
• W2111829714 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W2111829714 type Work @default.
• W2111829714 sameAs 2111829714 @default.
• W2111829714 citedByCount "13" @default.
• W2111829714 countsByYear W21118297142013 @default.
• W2111829714 countsByYear W21118297142014 @default.
• W2111829714 countsByYear W21118297142015 @default.
• W2111829714 countsByYear W21118297142016 @default.
• W2111829714 countsByYear W21118297142017 @default.
• W2111829714 countsByYear W21118297142019 @default.
• W2111829714 countsByYear W21118297142022 @default.
• W2111829714 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2111829714 hasAuthorship W2111829714A5031689481 @default.
• W2111829714 hasAuthorship W2111829714A5043292755 @default.
• W2111829714 hasAuthorship W2111829714A5055573223 @default.
• W2111829714 hasAuthorship W2111829714A5058727595 @default.
• W2111829714 hasConcept C107826830 @default.
• W2111829714 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W2111829714 hasConcept C112930515 @default.
• W2111829714 hasConcept C11644782 @default.
• W2111829714 hasConcept C127454912 @default.
• W2111829714 hasConcept C130217890 @default.
• W2111829714 hasConcept C133425853 @default.
• W2111829714 hasConcept C134560507 @default.
• W2111829714 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2111829714 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W2111829714 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2111829714 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W2111829714 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W2111829714 hasConcept C3019080777 @default.
• W2111829714 hasConcept C39432304 @default.
• W2111829714 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2111829714 hasConcept C515549039 @default.
• W2111829714 hasConcept C68359772 @default.
• W2111829714 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2111829714 hasConceptScore W2111829714C107826830 @default.
• W2111829714 hasConceptScore W2111829714C111919701 @default.
• W2111829714 hasConceptScore W2111829714C112930515 @default.
• W2111829714 hasConceptScore W2111829714C11644782 @default.
• W2111829714 hasConceptScore W2111829714C127454912 @default.
• W2111829714 hasConceptScore W2111829714C130217890 @default.
• W2111829714 hasConceptScore W2111829714C133425853 @default.
• W2111829714 hasConceptScore W2111829714C134560507 @default.
• W2111829714 hasConceptScore W2111829714C144133560 @default.
• W2111829714 hasConceptScore W2111829714C151730666 @default.
• W2111829714 hasConceptScore W2111829714C162324750 @default.
• W2111829714 hasConceptScore W2111829714C18903297 @default.
• W2111829714 hasConceptScore W2111829714C2779343474 @default.
• W2111829714 hasConceptScore W2111829714C3019080777 @default.
• W2111829714 hasConceptScore W2111829714C39432304 @default.
• W2111829714 hasConceptScore W2111829714C41008148 @default.
• W2111829714 hasConceptScore W2111829714C515549039 @default.
• W2111829714 hasConceptScore W2111829714C68359772 @default.
• W2111829714 hasConceptScore W2111829714C86803240 @default.
• W2111829714 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2111829714 hasLocation W21118297141 @default.

• next