FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2111961455> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2111961455 endingPage "7" @default.
• W2111961455 startingPage "3" @default.
• W2111961455 abstract "No AccessPerspectives on Voice and Voice DisordersArticle1 Jul 2007Perception of Dysphonic Vocal Quality: Some Thoughts and Research Update Sona Patel, and Rahul Shrivastav Sona Patel Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of FloridaGainesville, FL Google Scholar More articles by this author and Rahul Shrivastav Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of FloridaGainesville, FL Google Scholar More articles by this author https://doi.org/10.1044/vvd17.2.3 SectionsAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationTrack Citations ShareFacebookTwitterLinked In References Camacho, A., & Shrivastav, R. (2006). Predicting changes in breathiness resulting from variations in aspiration noise and open quotient using a loudness model.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119(5), 3339. Google Scholar Deliyski, D. (1993). Acoustic model and evaluation of pathological voice production. Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Speech Communication and Technology, EUROSPEECH, Germany, 1969–1972. Google Scholar Gerratt, B. R., Kreiman, J., Antonanzas-Barroso, N., & Berke, G. (1993). Comparing internal and external standards in voice quality judgments.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36(1), 14–20. ASHAWireGoogle Scholar Gerratt, B. R., & Kreiman, J. (2001). Measuring voice quality with speech synthesis.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 110(5), 2560–2566. Google Scholar Karajalainen, M. (1996). A binaural auditory model for sound quality measurements and spatial hearing studies.Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP-96), 2, 985–988. Google Scholar Kewley-Port, D., & Zheng, Y. (1998). Auditory models of formant frequency discrimination for isolated vowels.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 103(3), 1654–1666. Google Scholar Kreiman, J., & Gerratt, B. (1998). Validity of rating scale measures of voice quality.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 104(3), 1598–1608. Google Scholar Patel, S., Shrivastav, R., & Eddins, D. (2006). Perceptual judgments of breathy voice quality using rating scale, magnitude estimation, and a matching task.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119(5), 3340. Google Scholar Parducci, A., & Wedell, D. H. (1986). The category effect with rating scales: Number of categories, number of stimuli, and method of presentation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12(4), 496–516. Google Scholar Poulton, E. C. (1989). Bias in quantifying judgments. Hove, United Kingdom: Erlbaum. Google Scholar Shrivastav, R. (2003). The use of an auditory model in predicting perceptual ratings of breathy voice quality.Journal of Voice, 17(4), 502–512. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Shrivastav, R. (2006, June). Acoustic cues for the perception of roughness. Paper presented at the 35th Annual Symposium of the Voice Foundation: Care of the Professional Voice, Philadelphia. Google Scholar Shrivastav, R., Camacho, A., & Patel, S. (2006). Evaluating a model to estimate breathiness in vowels.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 120(5), 3248. Google Scholar Shrivastav, R., & Sapienza (2003). Objective measures of voice quality obtained using an auditory model.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 114(4), 2217–2224. Google Scholar Shrivastav, R., Sapienza, C., & Nandur, V. (2005). Application of psychometric theory to the measurement of voice quality using rating scales.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 48(2), 323–335. ASHAWireGoogle Scholar Additional Resources FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research63:2 (385-392)26 Feb 2020Reliability and Validity of the Kannada Version of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of VoiceDhanshree R. Gunjawate, Rohit Ravi and Srividya Bhagavan Volume 17Issue 2July 2007Pages: 3-7 Get Permissions Add to your Mendeley library History Published in issue: Jul 1, 2007 Metrics Topicsasha-topicsasha-sigsasha-article-typesCopyright & Permissions© 2007 American Speech-Language-Hearing AssociationPDF downloadLoading ..." @default.
• W2111961455 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2111961455 creator A5037925338 @default.
• W2111961455 creator A5083267494 @default.
• W2111961455 date "2007-07-01" @default.
• W2111961455 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2111961455 title "Perception of Dysphonic Vocal Quality: Some Thoughts and Research Update" @default.
• W2111961455 cites W1971853996 @default.
• W2111961455 cites W1989432763 @default.
• W2111961455 cites W1990485849 @default.
• W2111961455 cites W2002720121 @default.
• W2111961455 cites W2004704947 @default.
• W2111961455 cites W2048484272 @default.
• W2111961455 cites W2069284976 @default.
• W2111961455 cites W2102406615 @default.
• W2111961455 cites W2160876478 @default.
• W2111961455 doi "https://doi.org/10.1044/vvd17.2.3" @default.
• W2111961455 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
• W2111961455 type Work @default.
• W2111961455 sameAs 2111961455 @default.
• W2111961455 citedByCount "22" @default.
• W2111961455 countsByYear W21119614552012 @default.
• W2111961455 countsByYear W21119614552013 @default.
• W2111961455 countsByYear W21119614552014 @default.
• W2111961455 countsByYear W21119614552016 @default.
• W2111961455 countsByYear W21119614552017 @default.
• W2111961455 countsByYear W21119614552018 @default.
• W2111961455 countsByYear W21119614552020 @default.
• W2111961455 countsByYear W21119614552021 @default.
• W2111961455 countsByYear W21119614552022 @default.
• W2111961455 countsByYear W21119614552023 @default.
• W2111961455 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2111961455 hasAuthorship W2111961455A5037925338 @default.
• W2111961455 hasAuthorship W2111961455A5083267494 @default.
• W2111961455 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2111961455 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2111961455 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2111961455 hasConcept C158215666 @default.
• W2111961455 hasConcept C2779530757 @default.
• W2111961455 hasConcept C2779581591 @default.
• W2111961455 hasConcept C28490314 @default.
• W2111961455 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2111961455 hasConcept C548259974 @default.
• W2111961455 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2111961455 hasConcept C79018884 @default.
• W2111961455 hasConceptScore W2111961455C111472728 @default.
• W2111961455 hasConceptScore W2111961455C138885662 @default.
• W2111961455 hasConceptScore W2111961455C15744967 @default.
• W2111961455 hasConceptScore W2111961455C158215666 @default.
• W2111961455 hasConceptScore W2111961455C2779530757 @default.
• W2111961455 hasConceptScore W2111961455C2779581591 @default.
• W2111961455 hasConceptScore W2111961455C28490314 @default.
• W2111961455 hasConceptScore W2111961455C41008148 @default.
• W2111961455 hasConceptScore W2111961455C548259974 @default.
• W2111961455 hasConceptScore W2111961455C71924100 @default.
• W2111961455 hasConceptScore W2111961455C79018884 @default.
• W2111961455 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2111961455 hasLocation W21119614551 @default.
• W2111961455 hasOpenAccess W2111961455 @default.
• W2111961455 hasPrimaryLocation W21119614551 @default.
• W2111961455 hasRelatedWork W1522167645 @default.
• W2111961455 hasRelatedWork W2041953438 @default.
• W2111961455 hasRelatedWork W2042636429 @default.
• W2111961455 hasRelatedWork W2097792871 @default.
• W2111961455 hasRelatedWork W2142288659 @default.
• W2111961455 hasRelatedWork W2229758860 @default.
• W2111961455 hasRelatedWork W2234010359 @default.
• W2111961455 hasRelatedWork W2377560707 @default.
• W2111961455 hasRelatedWork W2486564268 @default.
• W2111961455 hasRelatedWork W2804641738 @default.
• W2111961455 hasVolume "17" @default.
• W2111961455 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2111961455 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2111961455 magId "2111961455" @default.
• W2111961455 workType "article" @default.