FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2112323863> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2112323863 endingPage "231" @default.
• W2112323863 startingPage "226" @default.
• W2112323863 abstract "Provision and funding of healthcare in Britain today is undergoing one of the most profound revolutions in the 58 year history of the National Health Service. Clinicians and managers are being presented with a series of organizational reforms that affect how care to their patients is delivered and funded. Choose and book, practice-based commissioning, and payment by results are new concepts that introduce a more business focused healthcare economy. The evidence base for these initiatives, and the benefits that they will deliver, has not yet been made explicit.Healthcare outcome assessment is an essential aspect of reforming health provision successfully. Currently, the NHS records outcome based on measures of activity and process, such as waiting times and the number of patients treated. What really matters to patients is the outcome of their healthcare intervention, what effect it will have on their wellbeing, and the length of their life.1Since 1991 there has been a series of changes to funding within the NHS.2 The latest reform to be introduced is PbR which, the Department of Health assures, will:`... reward efficiency and quality in providing services; support greater patient choice and more responsive services; and enable PCTs [primary care trusts] to concentrate on quality and quantity rather than price'.3These are laudable aims for any healthcare reimbursement structure. Nevertheless, it would be unwise to adopt too narrow a definition of quality. Too much concern with the technical management of illness, and too little attention to prevention, rehabilitation, coordination and continuity of care, will result in a poorer outcome for the overall health community that the reforms are meant to improve.4Most observers recognize that biomedical measures such as clinical or laboratory indices do not provide a complete representation of the effect of a treatment on an individual.5 These measures, while important in their own right, are being supplemented by measures of constructs that focus on issues of importance to the patient such as functional status, health-related quality of life and emotional well being.6 Compared with concrete measures like blood pressure, constructs such as pain relief, walking ability or depression are complex to measure. They generally require the use of patient-based outcome measures, where the patient gives his or her opinion on the construct in question.7Measuring outcome remains the ultimate validation of the effectiveness and quality of healthcare. Only by systematically recording the outcomes using methods that are appropriate to the patient group under consideration can a healthcare system promote quality in all activities.8 However, payment by results will fail to meet the objectives set out by the Department of Health if the wrong outcomes are measured. We aim to examine the introduction of the payment by results policy within the history of healthcare outcome measurement and suggest how the policy may actually match its purported outcome." @default.
• W2112323863 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2112323863 creator A5013046461 @default.
• W2112323863 creator A5013859527 @default.
• W2112323863 date "2006-05-01" @default.
• W2112323863 modified "2023-09-28" @default.
• W2112323863 title "Payment by results or payment by outcome? The history of measuring medicine" @default.
• W2112323863 cites W1504720742 @default.
• W2112323863 cites W1504725074 @default.
• W2112323863 cites W1564663008 @default.
• W2112323863 cites W1887688080 @default.
• W2112323863 cites W1966396663 @default.
• W2112323863 cites W1978036313 @default.
• W2112323863 cites W1982490010 @default.
• W2112323863 cites W1984758617 @default.
• W2112323863 cites W1988045941 @default.
• W2112323863 cites W1994298317 @default.
• W2112323863 cites W1997594901 @default.
• W2112323863 cites W2002312627 @default.
• W2112323863 cites W2010776757 @default.
• W2112323863 cites W2016982139 @default.
• W2112323863 cites W2037197338 @default.
• W2112323863 cites W2041241404 @default.
• W2112323863 cites W2047038086 @default.
• W2112323863 cites W2073381151 @default.
• W2112323863 cites W2074918723 @default.
• W2112323863 cites W2076952539 @default.
• W2112323863 cites W2078753097 @default.
• W2112323863 cites W2081096070 @default.
• W2112323863 cites W2084447457 @default.
• W2112323863 cites W2086921698 @default.
• W2112323863 cites W2094909983 @default.
• W2112323863 cites W2112446377 @default.
• W2112323863 cites W2113302164 @default.
• W2112323863 cites W2115787220 @default.
• W2112323863 cites W2119190724 @default.
• W2112323863 cites W2119731464 @default.
• W2112323863 cites W2122444570 @default.
• W2112323863 cites W2123140860 @default.
• W2112323863 cites W2123366978 @default.
• W2112323863 cites W2151553578 @default.
• W2112323863 cites W2154755618 @default.
• W2112323863 cites W2156070597 @default.
• W2112323863 cites W2156524107 @default.
• W2112323863 cites W2160199284 @default.
• W2112323863 cites W2160352973 @default.
• W2112323863 cites W2166295451 @default.
• W2112323863 cites W2167534987 @default.
• W2112323863 cites W2412916823 @default.
• W2112323863 cites W2596975613 @default.
• W2112323863 cites W2941787107 @default.
• W2112323863 cites W582073496 @default.
• W2112323863 cites W2105552450 @default.
• W2112323863 cites W372789814 @default.
• W2112323863 doi "https://doi.org/10.1258/jrsm.99.5.226" @default.
• W2112323863 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/1457759" @default.
• W2112323863 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16672755" @default.
• W2112323863 hasPublicationYear "2006" @default.
• W2112323863 type Work @default.
• W2112323863 sameAs 2112323863 @default.
• W2112323863 citedByCount "12" @default.
• W2112323863 countsByYear W21123238632013 @default.
• W2112323863 countsByYear W21123238632014 @default.
• W2112323863 countsByYear W21123238632019 @default.
• W2112323863 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2112323863 hasAuthorship W2112323863A5013046461 @default.
• W2112323863 hasAuthorship W2112323863A5013859527 @default.
• W2112323863 hasBestOaLocation W21123238632 @default.
• W2112323863 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W2112323863 hasConcept C144237770 @default.
• W2112323863 hasConcept C145097563 @default.
• W2112323863 hasConcept C148220186 @default.
• W2112323863 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2112323863 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2112323863 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2112323863 hasConcept C2522767166 @default.
• W2112323863 hasConcept C2781332184 @default.
• W2112323863 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2112323863 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2112323863 hasConceptScore W2112323863C136764020 @default.
• W2112323863 hasConceptScore W2112323863C144237770 @default.
• W2112323863 hasConceptScore W2112323863C145097563 @default.
• W2112323863 hasConceptScore W2112323863C148220186 @default.
• W2112323863 hasConceptScore W2112323863C162324750 @default.
• W2112323863 hasConceptScore W2112323863C17744445 @default.
• W2112323863 hasConceptScore W2112323863C199539241 @default.
• W2112323863 hasConceptScore W2112323863C2522767166 @default.
• W2112323863 hasConceptScore W2112323863C2781332184 @default.
• W2112323863 hasConceptScore W2112323863C41008148 @default.
• W2112323863 hasConceptScore W2112323863C71924100 @default.
• W2112323863 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W2112323863 hasLocation W21123238631 @default.
• W2112323863 hasLocation W21123238632 @default.
• W2112323863 hasLocation W21123238633 @default.
• W2112323863 hasOpenAccess W2112323863 @default.
• W2112323863 hasPrimaryLocation W21123238631 @default.
• W2112323863 hasRelatedWork W2090449468 @default.
• W2112323863 hasRelatedWork W2091584073 @default.

• next