FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2112345643> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2112345643 abstract "Over the years, the definition of implant failure has varied, with some investigators accounting for all implants placed, while others discard failures that occurred before clinical loading. The influence of stresses transmitted to various bone densities, by different prosthetic appliances as well as the method used to determine failures, needs to be clearly understood. This paper reports on the influence of two different methods of determining 36-month survival of implants used to support different dental prostheses.More than 2,900 implants with six different designs were placed in 829 patients at 32 study centers and followed for 3 years. The first method of determining survival accounted for all failures from placement through 36 months, while the second method counted only failures from post-loading of the prosthesis to 36 months. Survival curves were used to determine differences in survival outcomes for the two methods.For the maxillary single-tooth prosthetic application, implant survival from placement to 36 months was 94.7% when all failures were counted and increased to 98.3% with the post-loading method. For upper completely edentulous applications, implant survival was 85.3% with all failures counted and 95.6% with the post-loading method. This 10.3% difference is clinically important. The survival for implants in lower completely edentulous applications increased by 4.4% simply by using the post-loading approach. Implants used for upper posterior, partially edentulous applications involved only hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated implants, and the survival rates were similar (96.4% for all implants and 98.2% for the post-loading method). The difference in reported survival rates for implants in the lower posterior, partially edentulous application was 5.8%. Since failures tended to occur in the earlier phases of treatment, the post-loading approach always resulted in more favorable survival data. With the post-loading approach, valuable information related to implant performance before loading is lost. In all comparisons, HA-coated implant survival was always better than non-HA implants. Clinical investigators should clearly state the method used for determining failures. For all implants included in the study, survival curves illustrated different failure patterns for each method of determining overall survival.Reporting of implant survival rates based on the post-loading method provides more favorable survival rates; however, accounting for all implants provides a more accurate method of determining survival." @default.
• W2112345643 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2112345643 creator A5055182584 @default.
• W2112345643 creator A5058325186 @default.
• W2112345643 date "2000-12-01" @default.
• W2112345643 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W2112345643 title "Influence of Two Different Approaches to Reporting Implant Survival Outcomes for Five Different Prosthodontic Applications" @default.
• W2112345643 cites W1977608516 @default.
• W2112345643 cites W1982239608 @default.
• W2112345643 cites W1990925345 @default.
• W2112345643 cites W2009031998 @default.
• W2112345643 cites W205345867 @default.
• W2112345643 cites W2055213718 @default.
• W2112345643 cites W2056773589 @default.
• W2112345643 cites W2071564049 @default.
• W2112345643 cites W2094382234 @default.
• W2112345643 cites W2475370377 @default.
• W2112345643 doi "https://doi.org/10.1902/annals.2000.5.1.90" @default.
• W2112345643 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11885186" @default.
• W2112345643 hasPublicationYear "2000" @default.
• W2112345643 type Work @default.
• W2112345643 sameAs 2112345643 @default.
• W2112345643 citedByCount "30" @default.
• W2112345643 countsByYear W21123456432012 @default.
• W2112345643 countsByYear W21123456432013 @default.
• W2112345643 countsByYear W21123456432014 @default.
• W2112345643 countsByYear W21123456432015 @default.
• W2112345643 countsByYear W21123456432016 @default.
• W2112345643 countsByYear W21123456432017 @default.
• W2112345643 countsByYear W21123456432018 @default.
• W2112345643 countsByYear W21123456432019 @default.
• W2112345643 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2112345643 hasAuthorship W2112345643A5055182584 @default.
• W2112345643 hasAuthorship W2112345643A5058325186 @default.
• W2112345643 hasConcept C10515644 @default.
• W2112345643 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2112345643 hasConcept C194887381 @default.
• W2112345643 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W2112345643 hasConcept C2776283816 @default.
• W2112345643 hasConcept C2778715743 @default.
• W2112345643 hasConcept C2780338112 @default.
• W2112345643 hasConcept C2781411149 @default.
• W2112345643 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W2112345643 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2112345643 hasConceptScore W2112345643C10515644 @default.
• W2112345643 hasConceptScore W2112345643C141071460 @default.
• W2112345643 hasConceptScore W2112345643C194887381 @default.
• W2112345643 hasConceptScore W2112345643C199343813 @default.
• W2112345643 hasConceptScore W2112345643C2776283816 @default.
• W2112345643 hasConceptScore W2112345643C2778715743 @default.
• W2112345643 hasConceptScore W2112345643C2780338112 @default.
• W2112345643 hasConceptScore W2112345643C2781411149 @default.
• W2112345643 hasConceptScore W2112345643C29694066 @default.
• W2112345643 hasConceptScore W2112345643C71924100 @default.
• W2112345643 hasLocation W21123456431 @default.
• W2112345643 hasLocation W21123456432 @default.
• W2112345643 hasOpenAccess W2112345643 @default.
• W2112345643 hasPrimaryLocation W21123456431 @default.
• W2112345643 hasRelatedWork W1212303506 @default.
• W2112345643 hasRelatedWork W1575658306 @default.
• W2112345643 hasRelatedWork W1920245171 @default.
• W2112345643 hasRelatedWork W1958056875 @default.
• W2112345643 hasRelatedWork W1969880263 @default.
• W2112345643 hasRelatedWork W1976937409 @default.
• W2112345643 hasRelatedWork W1995336629 @default.
• W2112345643 hasRelatedWork W2029664948 @default.
• W2112345643 hasRelatedWork W2036510514 @default.
• W2112345643 hasRelatedWork W2055213718 @default.
• W2112345643 hasRelatedWork W2064824280 @default.
• W2112345643 hasRelatedWork W2066152762 @default.
• W2112345643 hasRelatedWork W2088930221 @default.
• W2112345643 hasRelatedWork W2092340788 @default.
• W2112345643 hasRelatedWork W2150628622 @default.
• W2112345643 hasRelatedWork W2173536781 @default.
• W2112345643 hasRelatedWork W2177546955 @default.
• W2112345643 hasRelatedWork W2178112242 @default.
• W2112345643 hasRelatedWork W2185641081 @default.
• W2112345643 hasRelatedWork W7061034 @default.
• W2112345643 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2112345643 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2112345643 magId "2112345643" @default.
• W2112345643 workType "article" @default.