FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2112753655> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2112753655 abstract "As a profession, we can do a great deal more for the least among us. But women are not the least among us—women are half of us, and there is considerable evidence that biomedical research is not serving them well [8, 11]. That concern drove the 2014 research symposium called Sex Differences in Musculoskeletal Disease and Science, which was cosponsored by the Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons®, the parent society of Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®. We are proud to present selected papers from that symposium in this issue of CORR®.We have covered this topic before [7]. Our editors work with the authors of each paper we publish to determine whether subanalyses by sex and gender are appropriate, and, when appropriate, to frame each paper’s discussion in the context of this important topic. The contents of this month’s sex-differences symposium in CORR® demonstrate not only that it is possible, but also why it is so necessary to evaluate sex and gender in orthopaedic research. This month’s Editor’s Spotlight paper evaluates the impact of gender on a topic that may not come right to mind as we think about orthopaedic outcomes: How men and women experience disability differently after war injuries.Fig. 1Jessica C. Rivera MD.The history of orthopaedic surgery has not been written in ink, but rather in the blood of conflicts past. Sadly, we continue to update that history. As blood continues to be spilled in ongoing conflicts around the world, we continue to learn hard lessons about trauma care from them. Nearly 100 years ago, World War I made clear that even short delays in resuscitation after severe injury substantially increase the risk of death [13]. More recent conflicts helped clarify the best approaches to caring for patients with battlefield amputations [1], as well as the often-devastating functional and emotional sequelae of these injuries [2]. We continue to improve the care of patients with some of the most common orthopaedic injuries—such as open fractures—based on lessons learned during wartime [5]. This topic is both so foundational and so current that CORR® will run a symposium called “Lessons Learned after a Decade of War” next month.But left unstudied in most of the science on battlefield injury—as in so many other important areas of biomedical research [8, 11]—is the question of how war wounds affect not only the men who fight our battles but also the women. In particular, we need to know more about how the lingering impact of these injuries (residual disability) affects men and women differently.Enter the work of Jessica C. Rivera MD and her colleagues. In “Disability after Deployment Injury: Are Women and Men Service Members Different?” Dr. Rivera and her team from the US Army Institute of Surgical Research and the San Antonio Military Medical Center analyzed women and men injured during deployments between 2001 and 2011. Using a registry, they found that women were less likely to develop chronic or neurogenic pain, but they experienced more severe posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and had a lower likelihood of returning to active duty than men after deployment-related injuries. During the period in question, women were excluded from frontline combat units. Despite this, the high levels of disability experienced by military women suggest that much more attention should be directed to caring for them, and that gender-focused studies of injury prevention, protection, and postinjury care to mitigate disability indeed warrant specific study.As in so many other areas of orthopaedic surgery, it is not difficult to imagine that the lessons learned here during war will transfer into our efforts to prevent and treat peacetime civilian disability in industrial, occupational, and law enforcement settings, both for men and women. Join me in going behind the discovery on that topic and others with the first author of this paper, Dr. Rivera, in the Take-5 interview that follows. I almost missed the opportunity to interview Dr. Rivera because of duties related to her recent military deployment, so please join me also in thanking Dr. Rivera for her service." @default.
• W2112753655 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2112753655 creator A5046851940 @default.
• W2112753655 date "2015-08-01" @default.
• W2112753655 modified "2023-09-28" @default.
• W2112753655 title "Editor's Spotlight/Take 5: Disability after Deployment Injury: Are Women and Men Service Members Different?" @default.
• W2112753655 cites W1584793850 @default.
• W2112753655 cites W1995364683 @default.
• W2112753655 cites W2017165870 @default.
• W2112753655 cites W2042870589 @default.
• W2112753655 cites W2044301122 @default.
• W2112753655 cites W2072668066 @default.
• W2112753655 cites W2072944527 @default.
• W2112753655 cites W2121072935 @default.
• W2112753655 cites W2177990499 @default.
• W2112753655 cites W2271671986 @default.
• W2112753655 cites W2320749930 @default.
• W2112753655 cites W2415650248 @default.
• W2112753655 doi "https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-015-4389-4" @default.
• W2112753655 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/4488227" @default.
• W2112753655 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26066065" @default.
• W2112753655 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W2112753655 type Work @default.
• W2112753655 sameAs 2112753655 @default.
• W2112753655 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W2112753655 countsByYear W21127536552015 @default.
• W2112753655 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2112753655 hasAuthorship W2112753655A5046851940 @default.
• W2112753655 hasBestOaLocation W21127536551 @default.
• W2112753655 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W2112753655 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2112753655 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2112753655 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W2112753655 hasConcept C41458344 @default.
• W2112753655 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2112753655 hasConcept C74909509 @default.
• W2112753655 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2112753655 hasConceptScore W2112753655C151730666 @default.
• W2112753655 hasConceptScore W2112753655C17744445 @default.
• W2112753655 hasConceptScore W2112753655C199539241 @default.
• W2112753655 hasConceptScore W2112753655C2779343474 @default.
• W2112753655 hasConceptScore W2112753655C41458344 @default.
• W2112753655 hasConceptScore W2112753655C71924100 @default.
• W2112753655 hasConceptScore W2112753655C74909509 @default.
• W2112753655 hasConceptScore W2112753655C86803240 @default.
• W2112753655 hasLocation W21127536551 @default.
• W2112753655 hasLocation W21127536552 @default.
• W2112753655 hasLocation W21127536553 @default.
• W2112753655 hasLocation W21127536554 @default.
• W2112753655 hasOpenAccess W2112753655 @default.
• W2112753655 hasPrimaryLocation W21127536551 @default.
• W2112753655 hasRelatedWork W129962397 @default.
• W2112753655 hasRelatedWork W185502661 @default.
• W2112753655 hasRelatedWork W1894100485 @default.
• W2112753655 hasRelatedWork W1900478183 @default.
• W2112753655 hasRelatedWork W1902028946 @default.
• W2112753655 hasRelatedWork W1968847932 @default.
• W2112753655 hasRelatedWork W1988632514 @default.
• W2112753655 hasRelatedWork W1994322360 @default.
• W2112753655 hasRelatedWork W2005122357 @default.
• W2112753655 hasRelatedWork W2015507422 @default.
• W2112753655 hasRelatedWork W2053622394 @default.
• W2112753655 hasRelatedWork W2089786749 @default.
• W2112753655 hasRelatedWork W2109476043 @default.
• W2112753655 hasRelatedWork W2269103683 @default.
• W2112753655 hasRelatedWork W2291026829 @default.
• W2112753655 hasRelatedWork W2297147526 @default.
• W2112753655 hasRelatedWork W2528366234 @default.
• W2112753655 hasRelatedWork W315998661 @default.
• W2112753655 hasRelatedWork W1985100511 @default.
• W2112753655 hasRelatedWork W2185508086 @default.
• W2112753655 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2112753655 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2112753655 magId "2112753655" @default.
• W2112753655 workType "article" @default.