FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2112835087> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2112835087 endingPage "898" @default.
• W2112835087 startingPage "892" @default.
• W2112835087 abstract "Background: Recent biomechanical evidence suggests that the meniscus-suture interface contributes the most displacement to the transtibial pull-out repair for meniscal root tears. Therefore, optimization of surgical technique at the meniscus-suture interface may minimize displacement and improve the strength of meniscal root repairs. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to investigate the cyclic displacement and ultimate failure loads of 4 different meniscus-suture fixation techniques for posterior medial meniscal root repairs in human meniscus tissue. The hypothesis was that there would be no significant difference between the two simple sutures (TSS) technique and 3 other techniques in cyclic displacement or ultimate failure load. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: A total of 32 fresh-frozen, human, medial meniscal transplant specimens were randomly assigned to 4 meniscus-suture fixation techniques used for transtibial pull-out repair in posterior medial meniscal root tears (n = 8 per group). The suture techniques studied were (1) TSS, (2) modified Mason-Allen (MMA), (3) single double-locking loop (S-DLL), and (4) double double-locking loop (D-DLL). The menisci were subjected to a cyclic tensioning protocol representative of postoperative rehabilitation (10-30 N for 1000 cycles) and pulled to failure at a rate of 0.5 mm/s. Results: After 1000 cycles, the TSS group displaced the least (mean ± SD, 1.78 ± 0.64 mm), followed by the MMA (2.14 ± 0.65 mm), D-DLL (2.97 ± 0.57 mm), and S-DLL (3.81 ± 0.78 mm) groups. After 100, 500, and 1000 cycles, suture displacements using the TSS and MMA techniques were not significantly different ( P > .13), while the TSS technique resulted in significantly less displacement than the S-DLL and D-DLL ( P < .03) techniques. The ultimate failure loads of the MMA (325 ± 77 N) and D-DLL (320 ± 50 N) techniques were significantly greater than those of the TSS (192 ± 52 N) and S-DLL (217 ± 51 N) techniques ( P < .05). Conclusion: The TSS and MMA fixation techniques were not significantly different, while the TSS was significantly better at resisting displacement when compared with the S-DLL and D-DLL stitch configurations. The MMA and D-DLL techniques exhibited significantly greater failure loads than did the TSS and S-DLL techniques; however, all techniques demonstrated ultimate failure loads above the currently accepted rehabilitation force threshold. Clinical Relevance: The TSS fixation technique combines the lowest technical difficulty and the ability to resist displacement at time zero. The MMA technique, although more technically challenging, may provide an alternative means to resist displacement while enhancing the failure load." @default.
• W2112835087 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2112835087 creator A5024767719 @default.
• W2112835087 creator A5024923192 @default.
• W2112835087 creator A5037185854 @default.
• W2112835087 creator A5046344968 @default.
• W2112835087 creator A5056506528 @default.
• W2112835087 creator A5081364075 @default.
• W2112835087 date "2015-01-02" @default.
• W2112835087 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2112835087 title "Cyclic Displacement After Meniscal Root Repair Fixation" @default.
• W2112835087 cites W1969159472 @default.
• W2112835087 cites W1972039893 @default.
• W2112835087 cites W1973133617 @default.
• W2112835087 cites W1978541005 @default.
• W2112835087 cites W1982250844 @default.
• W2112835087 cites W1986038160 @default.
• W2112835087 cites W1999443410 @default.
• W2112835087 cites W2026545342 @default.
• W2112835087 cites W2078546883 @default.
• W2112835087 cites W2085650340 @default.
• W2112835087 cites W2106302274 @default.
• W2112835087 cites W2116660832 @default.
• W2112835087 cites W2122674110 @default.
• W2112835087 cites W2123842623 @default.
• W2112835087 cites W2126364510 @default.
• W2112835087 cites W2134074555 @default.
• W2112835087 cites W2140746062 @default.
• W2112835087 cites W2140899224 @default.
• W2112835087 cites W2148091399 @default.
• W2112835087 doi "https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546514562554" @default.
• W2112835087 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25556220" @default.
• W2112835087 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W2112835087 type Work @default.
• W2112835087 sameAs 2112835087 @default.
• W2112835087 citedByCount "57" @default.
• W2112835087 countsByYear W21128350872016 @default.
• W2112835087 countsByYear W21128350872017 @default.
• W2112835087 countsByYear W21128350872018 @default.
• W2112835087 countsByYear W21128350872019 @default.
• W2112835087 countsByYear W21128350872020 @default.
• W2112835087 countsByYear W21128350872021 @default.
• W2112835087 countsByYear W21128350872022 @default.
• W2112835087 countsByYear W21128350872023 @default.
• W2112835087 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2112835087 hasAuthorship W2112835087A5024767719 @default.
• W2112835087 hasAuthorship W2112835087A5024923192 @default.
• W2112835087 hasAuthorship W2112835087A5037185854 @default.
• W2112835087 hasAuthorship W2112835087A5046344968 @default.
• W2112835087 hasAuthorship W2112835087A5056506528 @default.
• W2112835087 hasAuthorship W2112835087A5081364075 @default.
• W2112835087 hasConcept C107551265 @default.
• W2112835087 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2112835087 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2112835087 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2112835087 hasConcept C146249460 @default.
• W2112835087 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2112835087 hasConcept C189178095 @default.
• W2112835087 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W2112835087 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
• W2112835087 hasConcept C2776164576 @default.
• W2112835087 hasConcept C2777327002 @default.
• W2112835087 hasConcept C2778275304 @default.
• W2112835087 hasConcept C2779162959 @default.
• W2112835087 hasConcept C2780423099 @default.
• W2112835087 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2112835087 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W2112835087 hasConcept C3018023364 @default.
• W2112835087 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2112835087 hasConcept C542102704 @default.
• W2112835087 hasConcept C61511704 @default.
• W2112835087 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2112835087 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2112835087 hasConceptScore W2112835087C107551265 @default.
• W2112835087 hasConceptScore W2112835087C126322002 @default.
• W2112835087 hasConceptScore W2112835087C141071460 @default.
• W2112835087 hasConceptScore W2112835087C142724271 @default.
• W2112835087 hasConceptScore W2112835087C146249460 @default.
• W2112835087 hasConceptScore W2112835087C15744967 @default.
• W2112835087 hasConceptScore W2112835087C189178095 @default.
• W2112835087 hasConceptScore W2112835087C204787440 @default.
• W2112835087 hasConceptScore W2112835087C2524010 @default.
• W2112835087 hasConceptScore W2112835087C2776164576 @default.
• W2112835087 hasConceptScore W2112835087C2777327002 @default.
• W2112835087 hasConceptScore W2112835087C2778275304 @default.
• W2112835087 hasConceptScore W2112835087C2779162959 @default.
• W2112835087 hasConceptScore W2112835087C2780423099 @default.
• W2112835087 hasConceptScore W2112835087C2908647359 @default.
• W2112835087 hasConceptScore W2112835087C29694066 @default.
• W2112835087 hasConceptScore W2112835087C3018023364 @default.
• W2112835087 hasConceptScore W2112835087C33923547 @default.
• W2112835087 hasConceptScore W2112835087C542102704 @default.
• W2112835087 hasConceptScore W2112835087C61511704 @default.
• W2112835087 hasConceptScore W2112835087C71924100 @default.
• W2112835087 hasConceptScore W2112835087C99454951 @default.
• W2112835087 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2112835087 hasLocation W21128350871 @default.
• W2112835087 hasLocation W21128350872 @default.

• next