FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2112910080> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2112910080 abstract "Rapid development of financial markets particularly stock markets has been a main feature of many emerging markets. The conventionally held view, which has a basis in the seminal work of Schumpeter (1911), is that the stock market development is beneficial to the economy since it provides liquidity and an avenue for risk sharing and diversification, allows efficient allocation of resources to productive investment, reduces information and transaction costs and, consequently allows firms to undertake profitable investments. This view has been supported by various early empirical studies noting a positive relation between stock market development and economic growth. It has also been supported by recent studies utilizing advanced time series econometrics and finding the causal influences of stock market development on economic performance. Still, against this view and empirical evidence, some have also noted potential detrimental effects of stock market development through saving reduction, facilitation of counterproductive corporate takeovers, attraction of speculative inflows and reversal of financial capitals. The questions as to whether the stock market development influences macroeconomic performance and whether it can be employed as a development policy strategy are particularly relevant for emerging or developing economies. Over the past years, these economies have attempted to promote their stock markets with the objective of improving resource allocation and, consequently, of propelling their economic growth. However, after especially the liberalization of their financial markets, they have been exposed to sharp swings and wide fluctuations of their market performance, which may have inflicted detrimental impacts on macroeconomic performance. In this regards, the 1997/1998 Asian crisis, which started in Thailand and propagated to other Asian economies, is a good example. In looking at whether stock market development contributes to macroeconomic performance, existing studies have mainly looked at the relation between stock market development indicators and measures of economic performance using a linear regression model or has ascertained the causal relations that run from the stock market development indicators to macroeconomic variables using such approached as Granger causality, vector error correction modeling (VECM) and vector autoregressive modeling (VAR). While it is essential to document a strong relation between them, the linear regression model is not sufficient to establish causation. Moreover, the employment of a dynamic model such as the VAR or VECM and the finding of a causal pattern that runs from the stock market development to economic growth are not sufficient for policy prescription. This stems from the fact their relation or causal influences may shift due to the shift in regimes, signifying that the stock market development cannot be employed as a policy variable. In short, their relations are the subject of the well-known Lucas critique. In this paper, we utilize a 4-variable framework and quarterly data from 1993 to 2007 to examine the stock market and macroeconomic performance relation for Thailand. To this end, we first evaluate the causal patterns between a measure of stock market development and measures of macroeconomic performance, which is essential to evaluate whether stock market development 'causes' growth. Then, we assess whether the relations between the two main variables, i.e. measures of stock market development and macroeconomic performance, are structurally invariant to policy shifts. Hence, in addition to using standard time-series econometrics of cointegration and vector autoregressions (VAR), we alo examine within the error correction setting the superexogeneity of the stock market development. More specifically, to make a strong case for promotion of the stock market as a development strategy, the stock market development must be superexogenous since their relationship is structurally invariant to policy shifts and, accordingly, circumventing the famous Lucas critique in making policy recommendation. The cointegration test results suggest the presence of a long run relationship among the variables, namely, real gross domestic product (GDP), market capitalization ratio, investment ratio, and the aggregate price level. Further, the impulse-response functions and variance decompositions simulated from the estimated VAR models clearly indicate positive and sizeable contributions of stock market development to real GDP as well as investment ratio. Finally, the superexogeneity test indicates that the stock market development is superexogenous in the system. Thus, the relation between economic development and stock market development is structurally invariant to policy shifts. In the case of Thailand, there is a strong case for policy prescription to promote the development of its stock market as a catalyst to economic growth.http://dx.doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.22.3.513" @default.
• W2112910080 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2112910080 creator A5024460222 @default.
• W2112910080 date "2011-07-27" @default.
• W2112910080 modified "2023-09-22" @default.
• W2112910080 title "Stock Market Development and Macroeconomic Performance in Thailand" @default.
• W2112910080 cites W1521170536 @default.
• W2112910080 cites W1538491468 @default.
• W2112910080 cites W1566672184 @default.
• W2112910080 cites W1567674592 @default.
• W2112910080 cites W1587141723 @default.
• W2112910080 cites W1601128533 @default.
• W2112910080 cites W1606377008 @default.
• W2112910080 cites W1714264005 @default.
• W2112910080 cites W1966910378 @default.
• W2112910080 cites W1970294372 @default.
• W2112910080 cites W1972520398 @default.
• W2112910080 cites W1986521369 @default.
• W2112910080 cites W2010802592 @default.
• W2112910080 cites W2019459021 @default.
• W2112910080 cites W2029350108 @default.
• W2112910080 cites W2029389005 @default.
• W2112910080 cites W2038341664 @default.
• W2112910080 cites W2044342553 @default.
• W2112910080 cites W2051438039 @default.
• W2112910080 cites W2051765232 @default.
• W2112910080 cites W2059240039 @default.
• W2112910080 cites W2070415786 @default.
• W2112910080 cites W2070720254 @default.
• W2112910080 cites W2078268972 @default.
• W2112910080 cites W2078618079 @default.
• W2112910080 cites W2087149933 @default.
• W2112910080 cites W2089363661 @default.
• W2112910080 cites W2090721684 @default.
• W2112910080 cites W2093030468 @default.
• W2112910080 cites W2093813869 @default.
• W2112910080 cites W2099744804 @default.
• W2112910080 cites W2109402558 @default.
• W2112910080 cites W2123793003 @default.
• W2112910080 cites W2124336047 @default.
• W2112910080 cites W2125204797 @default.
• W2112910080 cites W2138643950 @default.
• W2112910080 cites W2151670653 @default.
• W2112910080 cites W2161013047 @default.
• W2112910080 cites W2162405911 @default.
• W2112910080 cites W3121128947 @default.
• W2112910080 cites W3121177630 @default.
• W2112910080 cites W3122398539 @default.
• W2112910080 cites W3122812532 @default.
• W2112910080 cites W3124256291 @default.
• W2112910080 cites W3124550292 @default.
• W2112910080 doi "https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.22.3.513" @default.
• W2112910080 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W2112910080 type Work @default.
• W2112910080 sameAs 2112910080 @default.
• W2112910080 citedByCount "27" @default.
• W2112910080 countsByYear W21129100802012 @default.
• W2112910080 countsByYear W21129100802013 @default.
• W2112910080 countsByYear W21129100802014 @default.
• W2112910080 countsByYear W21129100802015 @default.
• W2112910080 countsByYear W21129100802016 @default.
• W2112910080 countsByYear W21129100802018 @default.
• W2112910080 countsByYear W21129100802019 @default.
• W2112910080 countsByYear W21129100802020 @default.
• W2112910080 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2112910080 hasAuthorship W2112910080A5024460222 @default.
• W2112910080 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
• W2112910080 hasConcept C121087249 @default.
• W2112910080 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2112910080 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2112910080 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W2112910080 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2112910080 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
• W2112910080 hasConcept C180916674 @default.
• W2112910080 hasConcept C183582576 @default.
• W2112910080 hasConcept C19244329 @default.
• W2112910080 hasConcept C204036174 @default.
• W2112910080 hasConcept C206913280 @default.
• W2112910080 hasConcept C2780299701 @default.
• W2112910080 hasConcept C2780762169 @default.
• W2112910080 hasConcept C556758197 @default.
• W2112910080 hasConcept C78519656 @default.
• W2112910080 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2112910080 hasConceptScore W2112910080C10138342 @default.
• W2112910080 hasConceptScore W2112910080C121087249 @default.
• W2112910080 hasConceptScore W2112910080C127413603 @default.
• W2112910080 hasConceptScore W2112910080C144133560 @default.
• W2112910080 hasConceptScore W2112910080C151730666 @default.
• W2112910080 hasConceptScore W2112910080C162324750 @default.
• W2112910080 hasConceptScore W2112910080C162853370 @default.
• W2112910080 hasConceptScore W2112910080C180916674 @default.
• W2112910080 hasConceptScore W2112910080C183582576 @default.
• W2112910080 hasConceptScore W2112910080C19244329 @default.
• W2112910080 hasConceptScore W2112910080C204036174 @default.
• W2112910080 hasConceptScore W2112910080C206913280 @default.
• W2112910080 hasConceptScore W2112910080C2780299701 @default.
• W2112910080 hasConceptScore W2112910080C2780762169 @default.
• W2112910080 hasConceptScore W2112910080C556758197 @default.
• W2112910080 hasConceptScore W2112910080C78519656 @default.
• W2112910080 hasConceptScore W2112910080C86803240 @default.

• next