Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2112933032> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2112933032 endingPage "CD006942" @default.
- W2112933032 startingPage "CD006942" @default.
- W2112933032 abstract "Intrauterine insemination (IUI) should logically be performed around the moment of ovulation. Since spermatozoa and oocytes have only limited survival times correct timing is essential. As it is not known which technique of timing for IUI results in the best treatment outcome, we compared different techniques for timing IUI and different time intervals.To evaluate the effectiveness of different synchronisation methods in natural and stimulated cycles for IUI in subfertile couples.We searched for all publications which described randomised controlled trials of the timing of IUI. We searched the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group Specialised Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library), (1966 to March 2009), EMBASE (1974 to March 2009) and Science Direct (1966 to March 2009) electronic databases. Furthermore, we checked the reference lists of all obtained studies and performed a handsearch of conference abstracts.Only truly randomised controlled trials comparing different timing methods for IUI were included. The following interventions were evaluated: detection of luteinising hormone (LH) in urine or blood, single test; human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) administration; combination of LH detection and hCG administration; basal body temperature chart; ultrasound detection of ovulation; gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist administration; or other timing methods.Two review authors independently selected the trials to be included according to the above mentioned criteria. We performed statistical analyses in accordance with the guidelines for statistical analysis developed by The Cochrane Collaboration.Ten studies were included comparing urinary LH surge versus hCG injection; recombinant hCG versus urinary hCG; and hCG versus a GnRH agonist. One study compared the optimum time interval from hCG injection to IUI. The results of these studies showed no significant differences between different timing methods for IUI expressed as live birth rates: hCG versus LH surge (odds ratio (OR) 1.0, 95% CI 0.06 to 18); urinary hCG versus recombinant hCG (OR 1.2, 95% CI 0.68 to 2.0); and hCG versus GnRH agonist (OR 1.1, 95% CI 0.42 to 3.1). All the secondary outcomes analysed showed no significant differences between treatment groups.There is no evidence to advise one particular treatment option over another. The choice should be based on hospital facilities, convenience for the patient, medical staff, costs and drop-out levels. Since different time intervals between hCG and IUI did not result in different pregnancy rates, a more flexible approach might be allowed." @default.
- W2112933032 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2112933032 creator A5005254575 @default.
- W2112933032 creator A5015471022 @default.
- W2112933032 creator A5064864190 @default.
- W2112933032 creator A5079088188 @default.
- W2112933032 date "2010-04-14" @default.
- W2112933032 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
- W2112933032 title "Synchronised approach for intrauterine insemination in subfertile couples." @default.
- W2112933032 cites W113115169 @default.
- W2112933032 cites W123908259 @default.
- W2112933032 cites W1489890885 @default.
- W2112933032 cites W1526232826 @default.
- W2112933032 cites W1966953651 @default.
- W2112933032 cites W1970336384 @default.
- W2112933032 cites W1974533931 @default.
- W2112933032 cites W1978143403 @default.
- W2112933032 cites W1985254335 @default.
- W2112933032 cites W1986824767 @default.
- W2112933032 cites W1991920686 @default.
- W2112933032 cites W1992350895 @default.
- W2112933032 cites W2001174620 @default.
- W2112933032 cites W2006139862 @default.
- W2112933032 cites W2012253546 @default.
- W2112933032 cites W2016291612 @default.
- W2112933032 cites W2023128435 @default.
- W2112933032 cites W2025439550 @default.
- W2112933032 cites W2025702557 @default.
- W2112933032 cites W2027105067 @default.
- W2112933032 cites W2037791979 @default.
- W2112933032 cites W2038430049 @default.
- W2112933032 cites W2053369084 @default.
- W2112933032 cites W2064767855 @default.
- W2112933032 cites W2064899713 @default.
- W2112933032 cites W2077146424 @default.
- W2112933032 cites W2085009368 @default.
- W2112933032 cites W2089892335 @default.
- W2112933032 cites W2097330637 @default.
- W2112933032 cites W2101509880 @default.
- W2112933032 cites W2104509557 @default.
- W2112933032 cites W2111808769 @default.
- W2112933032 cites W2119116282 @default.
- W2112933032 cites W2129092013 @default.
- W2112933032 cites W2129716320 @default.
- W2112933032 cites W2133221736 @default.
- W2112933032 cites W2134556895 @default.
- W2112933032 cites W2139123102 @default.
- W2112933032 cites W2139417385 @default.
- W2112933032 cites W2144545367 @default.
- W2112933032 cites W2148019868 @default.
- W2112933032 cites W2152527116 @default.
- W2112933032 cites W2154487013 @default.
- W2112933032 cites W2156548859 @default.
- W2112933032 cites W2159902645 @default.
- W2112933032 cites W2291648414 @default.
- W2112933032 cites W2306620417 @default.
- W2112933032 cites W2321931449 @default.
- W2112933032 cites W2326568181 @default.
- W2112933032 cites W2403373204 @default.
- W2112933032 cites W2417255529 @default.
- W2112933032 cites W2463817477 @default.
- W2112933032 cites W4247007207 @default.
- W2112933032 cites W4247885073 @default.
- W2112933032 cites W90613495 @default.
- W2112933032 doi "https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd006942.pub2" @default.
- W2112933032 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25528596" @default.
- W2112933032 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
- W2112933032 type Work @default.
- W2112933032 sameAs 2112933032 @default.
- W2112933032 citedByCount "33" @default.
- W2112933032 countsByYear W21129330322012 @default.
- W2112933032 countsByYear W21129330322013 @default.
- W2112933032 countsByYear W21129330322015 @default.
- W2112933032 countsByYear W21129330322016 @default.
- W2112933032 countsByYear W21129330322017 @default.
- W2112933032 countsByYear W21129330322018 @default.
- W2112933032 countsByYear W21129330322019 @default.
- W2112933032 countsByYear W21129330322020 @default.
- W2112933032 countsByYear W21129330322021 @default.
- W2112933032 countsByYear W21129330322022 @default.
- W2112933032 countsByYear W21129330322023 @default.
- W2112933032 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2112933032 hasAuthorship W2112933032A5005254575 @default.
- W2112933032 hasAuthorship W2112933032A5015471022 @default.
- W2112933032 hasAuthorship W2112933032A5064864190 @default.
- W2112933032 hasAuthorship W2112933032A5079088188 @default.
- W2112933032 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W2112933032 hasConcept C131872663 @default.
- W2112933032 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
- W2112933032 hasConcept C2775948956 @default.
- W2112933032 hasConcept C2776478404 @default.
- W2112933032 hasConcept C2777702977 @default.
- W2112933032 hasConcept C2778575703 @default.
- W2112933032 hasConcept C2778894405 @default.
- W2112933032 hasConcept C29456083 @default.
- W2112933032 hasConcept C71315377 @default.
- W2112933032 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2112933032 hasConceptScore W2112933032C126322002 @default.