FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2113062891> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2113062891 endingPage "1626" @default.
• W2113062891 startingPage "1625" @default.
• W2113062891 abstract "Daniel Pilger and Charlotte Watts address the puzzling question of why the prevalence of intimate partner homicide is high in regions where the prevalence of intimate partner violence is fairly low, using the recently published estimates of prevalence of intimate partner homicide1Stöckl H Devries K Rotstein A et al.The global prevalence of intimate partner homicide: a systematic review.Lancet. 2013; 382: 859-865Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (430) Google Scholar and intimate partner violence.2Devries KM Mak JYT García-Moreno C et al.The global prevalence of intimate partner violence against women.Science. 2013; 340: 1527-1528Crossref PubMed Scopus (752) Google Scholar Their analysis compares rates of homicide in women who did and did not experience intimate partner violence, worldwide and for different regions. Their findings suggest that homicide rates are higher in women who experienced intimate partner violence in most regions, even in those with a fairly low prevalence of intimate partner violence. These findings highlight the importance of studying exposure to intimate partner violence as a risk factor for eventual intimate partner homicide. A review by Campbell and colleagues3Campbell JC Glass N Sharps PW Laughon K Bloom T Intimate partner homicide review and implications of research and policy.Trauma Violence Abuse. 2007; 8: 246-269Crossref PubMed Scopus (415) Google Scholar in 2007, showed that 67–75% of intimate partner homicides in the USA were associated with a reported history of intimate partner violence against the female partner, irrespective of whether the victim was male or female. Similar findings emerged from a study4Weizmann-Henelius G Matti Grönroos L Putkonen H Eronen M Lindberg N Häkkänen-Nyholm H Gender-specific risk factors for intimate partner homicide—a nationwide register-based study.J Interpers Violence. 2012; 27: 1519-1539Crossref PubMed Scopus (43) Google Scholar of intimate partner homicide offenders in Finland, which showed that for 47% of male and 35% of female perpetrators reports existed that they had previously abused their victim. In view of the existing knowledge on the underlying causes of intimate partner violence and intimate partner homicide, this finding is not surprising. Not only are both intimate partner homicide and intimate partner violence mainly committed by men against women, but they are also often the result of unequal gender norms and beliefs that promote male jealousy, dominance, and possessiveness.4Weizmann-Henelius G Matti Grönroos L Putkonen H Eronen M Lindberg N Häkkänen-Nyholm H Gender-specific risk factors for intimate partner homicide—a nationwide register-based study.J Interpers Violence. 2012; 27: 1519-1539Crossref PubMed Scopus (43) Google Scholar, 5Belknap J Larson D-L Abrams ML Garcia C Anderson-Block K Types of intimate partner homicides committed by women self-defense, proxy/retaliation, and sexual proprietariness.Homicide Studies. 2012; 16: 359-379Crossref Scopus (32) Google Scholar Although, a few intimate partner homicides committed by women are based on jealousy and fear of infidelity, most women claim to have been motivated by self-defence against intimate partner violence.5Belknap J Larson D-L Abrams ML Garcia C Anderson-Block K Types of intimate partner homicides committed by women self-defense, proxy/retaliation, and sexual proprietariness.Homicide Studies. 2012; 16: 359-379Crossref Scopus (32) Google Scholar Pilger and Watts' analysis not only lends support to the recommendation1Stöckl H Devries K Rotstein A et al.The global prevalence of intimate partner homicide: a systematic review.Lancet. 2013; 382: 859-865Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (430) Google Scholar, 2Devries KM Mak JYT García-Moreno C et al.The global prevalence of intimate partner violence against women.Science. 2013; 340: 1527-1528Crossref PubMed Scopus (752) Google Scholar that addressing intimate partner violence is an important goal itself, but it also suggests that reduction in intimate partner violence could lower homicide rates worldwide. Health-care providers can play a crucial part in achieving this goal, by identifying women who experience intimate partner violence, and by undertaking danger assessments and safety planning for women who experience intimate partner violence. We declare that we have no conflicts of interest. Global estimates of homicide risk related to intimate partner violenceIntimate partner violence has many detrimental consequences for women's health.1 Heidi Stöckl and colleagues (Sept 7, p 859)2 present worldwide estimates of the most severe consequence: intimate partner homicide. Devries and colleagues3 recently reported global estimates of the prevalence of intimate partner violence against women. Importantly, estimates differ considerably between regions, and high prevalence of intimate partner violence does not always go along with high prevalence of intimate partner homicide. Full-Text PDF The global prevalence of intimate partner homicide: a systematic reviewAt least one in seven homicides globally and more than a third of female homicides are perpetrated by an intimate partner. Such violence commonly represents the culmination of a long history of abuse. Strategies to reduce homicide risk include increased investment in intimate partner violence prevention, risk assessments at different points of care, support for women experiencing intimate partner violence, and control of gun ownership for people with a history of violence. Improvements in country-level data collection and monitoring systems are also essential, because data availability and quality varied strongly across regions. Full-Text PDF Open Access" @default.
• W2113062891 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2113062891 creator A5040399914 @default.
• W2113062891 creator A5068645875 @default.
• W2113062891 date "2013-11-01" @default.
• W2113062891 modified "2023-10-15" @default.
• W2113062891 title "Global estimates of homicide risk related to intimate partner violence – Authors' reply" @default.
• W2113062891 cites W1993311760 @default.
• W2113062891 cites W2048195841 @default.
• W2113062891 cites W2071539281 @default.
• W2113062891 cites W2124952808 @default.
• W2113062891 cites W2155292523 @default.
• W2113062891 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(13)62358-2" @default.
• W2113062891 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24238551" @default.
• W2113062891 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W2113062891 type Work @default.
• W2113062891 sameAs 2113062891 @default.
• W2113062891 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W2113062891 countsByYear W21130628912014 @default.
• W2113062891 countsByYear W21130628912022 @default.
• W2113062891 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2113062891 hasAuthorship W2113062891A5040399914 @default.
• W2113062891 hasAuthorship W2113062891A5068645875 @default.
• W2113062891 hasBestOaLocation W21130628911 @default.
• W2113062891 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2113062891 hasConcept C149923435 @default.
• W2113062891 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2113062891 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2113062891 hasConcept C190385971 @default.
• W2113062891 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2113062891 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W2113062891 hasConcept C3017944768 @default.
• W2113062891 hasConcept C3019426347 @default.
• W2113062891 hasConcept C525541732 @default.
• W2113062891 hasConcept C542059537 @default.
• W2113062891 hasConcept C545542383 @default.
• W2113062891 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2113062891 hasConcept C73484699 @default.
• W2113062891 hasConcept C83867959 @default.
• W2113062891 hasConceptScore W2113062891C144024400 @default.
• W2113062891 hasConceptScore W2113062891C149923435 @default.
• W2113062891 hasConceptScore W2113062891C15744967 @default.
• W2113062891 hasConceptScore W2113062891C17744445 @default.
• W2113062891 hasConceptScore W2113062891C190385971 @default.
• W2113062891 hasConceptScore W2113062891C199539241 @default.
• W2113062891 hasConceptScore W2113062891C2779473830 @default.
• W2113062891 hasConceptScore W2113062891C3017944768 @default.
• W2113062891 hasConceptScore W2113062891C3019426347 @default.
• W2113062891 hasConceptScore W2113062891C525541732 @default.
• W2113062891 hasConceptScore W2113062891C542059537 @default.
• W2113062891 hasConceptScore W2113062891C545542383 @default.
• W2113062891 hasConceptScore W2113062891C71924100 @default.
• W2113062891 hasConceptScore W2113062891C73484699 @default.
• W2113062891 hasConceptScore W2113062891C83867959 @default.
• W2113062891 hasIssue "9905" @default.
• W2113062891 hasLocation W21130628911 @default.
• W2113062891 hasLocation W21130628912 @default.
• W2113062891 hasOpenAccess W2113062891 @default.
• W2113062891 hasPrimaryLocation W21130628911 @default.
• W2113062891 hasRelatedWork W1978679178 @default.
• W2113062891 hasRelatedWork W2005331386 @default.
• W2113062891 hasRelatedWork W2067305560 @default.
• W2113062891 hasRelatedWork W2148389259 @default.
• W2113062891 hasRelatedWork W2153109294 @default.
• W2113062891 hasRelatedWork W2769958417 @default.
• W2113062891 hasRelatedWork W2890650972 @default.
• W2113062891 hasRelatedWork W3081216313 @default.
• W2113062891 hasRelatedWork W3128033338 @default.
• W2113062891 hasRelatedWork W4290102475 @default.
• W2113062891 hasVolume "382" @default.
• W2113062891 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2113062891 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2113062891 magId "2113062891" @default.
• W2113062891 workType "article" @default.