FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2113090984> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2113090984 endingPage "1243" @default.
• W2113090984 startingPage "1243" @default.
• W2113090984 abstract "With great interest we read the article by Kok and colleagues published on March 27, 2006 in Transplantation (1). The authors compared laparoscopic and the mini-incision muscle splitting open donor nephrectomy as two minimal invasive methods to perform a donor nephrectomy and conclude that there are no significant differences. The high conversion rate and perioperative morbidity rate of the total laparoscopic group can be held responsible for that. Perry et al. demonstrated that the mini incision donor nephrectomy is inferior to the laparoscopic approach in many domains (2). The open nephrectomy is especially associated with delayed resumption of normal activities such as return to full activity and driving, and with a diminished quality of life. Unfortunately, these aspects that are especially important for a healthy donor were not included in the analysis by Kok et al. A mini-incision ranging up to 15 cm cannot be considered a mini-incision anymore and but must be counted as a conversion to a formal laparotomy. This in concordance with the definition of a conversion in laparoscopic surgery such as when the intended incision must be enlarged. In the search for the best minimal invasive method for donor nephrectomy, did the authors considered the hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy? Various studies demonstrated the advantages of the hand-assisted modality as compared to the total laparoscopic approach. The hand-assisted approach leads to a shorter operation time, shorter warm ischemic time, lower conversion rate, and increased donor safety (3, 4). In addition, we are concerned about the high urological complication rate of over 20% in both groups as described by Kok et al. Recently, two meta-analysis demonstrated that a splinted ureterocystostomy is superior to a nonsplinted anastomosis and that the urological complication rate with a routine splinting policy should be in the 2–3% target range (5). Did the authors use splinted anastomoses and did they harvest the ureter together with the gonadal vein, because this is also demonstrated to reduce the urological complication rate? Mirza M. Idu Ron Balm Willem A. Bemelman Department of Vascular and Transplant Surgery Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands" @default.
• W2113090984 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2113090984 creator A5055961498 @default.
• W2113090984 creator A5056187637 @default.
• W2113090984 creator A5078012266 @default.
• W2113090984 date "2006-11-15" @default.
• W2113090984 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2113090984 title "Laparoscopic Versus Open Donor Nephrectomy" @default.
• W2113090984 cites W1981060440 @default.
• W2113090984 cites W1997553201 @default.
• W2113090984 cites W1998986767 @default.
• W2113090984 cites W2079133213 @default.
• W2113090984 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/01.tp.0000233344.84705.35" @default.
• W2113090984 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17102783" @default.
• W2113090984 hasPublicationYear "2006" @default.
• W2113090984 type Work @default.
• W2113090984 sameAs 2113090984 @default.
• W2113090984 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2113090984 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2113090984 hasAuthorship W2113090984A5055961498 @default.
• W2113090984 hasAuthorship W2113090984A5056187637 @default.
• W2113090984 hasAuthorship W2113090984A5078012266 @default.
• W2113090984 hasBestOaLocation W21130909841 @default.
• W2113090984 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2113090984 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2113090984 hasConcept C2780047204 @default.
• W2113090984 hasConcept C2780091579 @default.
• W2113090984 hasConcept C2780227381 @default.
• W2113090984 hasConcept C2780778865 @default.
• W2113090984 hasConcept C31174226 @default.
• W2113090984 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2113090984 hasConceptScore W2113090984C126322002 @default.
• W2113090984 hasConceptScore W2113090984C141071460 @default.
• W2113090984 hasConceptScore W2113090984C2780047204 @default.
• W2113090984 hasConceptScore W2113090984C2780091579 @default.
• W2113090984 hasConceptScore W2113090984C2780227381 @default.
• W2113090984 hasConceptScore W2113090984C2780778865 @default.
• W2113090984 hasConceptScore W2113090984C31174226 @default.
• W2113090984 hasConceptScore W2113090984C71924100 @default.
• W2113090984 hasIssue "9" @default.
• W2113090984 hasLocation W21130909841 @default.
• W2113090984 hasLocation W21130909842 @default.
• W2113090984 hasOpenAccess W2113090984 @default.
• W2113090984 hasPrimaryLocation W21130909841 @default.
• W2113090984 hasRelatedWork W1972458789 @default.
• W2113090984 hasRelatedWork W2075481612 @default.
• W2113090984 hasRelatedWork W2116385867 @default.
• W2113090984 hasRelatedWork W2169511669 @default.
• W2113090984 hasRelatedWork W2301992407 @default.
• W2113090984 hasRelatedWork W2388907268 @default.
• W2113090984 hasRelatedWork W2390239520 @default.
• W2113090984 hasRelatedWork W3112851427 @default.
• W2113090984 hasRelatedWork W3156638658 @default.
• W2113090984 hasRelatedWork W5614403 @default.
• W2113090984 hasVolume "82" @default.
• W2113090984 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2113090984 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2113090984 magId "2113090984" @default.
• W2113090984 workType "article" @default.