FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2113183579> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2113183579 endingPage "376" @default.
• W2113183579 startingPage "366" @default.
• W2113183579 abstract "Purpose To evaluate a range of staffing measures and data sources for long-term use in public reporting of staffing as a quality measure in nursing homes. Method Eighty-seven research articles and government documents published from 1975 to 2003 were reviewed and summarized. Relevant content was extracted and organized around 3 themes: staffing measures, quality measures, and risk adjustment variables. Data sources for staffing information were also identified. Results There is a proven association between higher total staffing levels (especially licensed staff) and improved quality of care. Studies also indicate a significant relationship between high turnover and poor resident outcomes. Functional ability, pressure ulcers, and weight loss are the most sensitive quality indicators linked to staffing. The best national data sources for staffing and quality include the Minimum Data Set (MDS) and On-line Survey and Certification Automated Records (OSCAR). However, the accuracy of this self-reported information requires further reliability and validity testing. Conclusions A nationwide instrument needs to be developed to accurately measure staff turnover. Large-scale studies using payroll data to measure staff retention and its impact on resident outcomes are recommended. Future research should use the most nurse-sensitive quality indicators such as pressure ulcers, functional status, and weight loss. To evaluate a range of staffing measures and data sources for long-term use in public reporting of staffing as a quality measure in nursing homes. Eighty-seven research articles and government documents published from 1975 to 2003 were reviewed and summarized. Relevant content was extracted and organized around 3 themes: staffing measures, quality measures, and risk adjustment variables. Data sources for staffing information were also identified. There is a proven association between higher total staffing levels (especially licensed staff) and improved quality of care. Studies also indicate a significant relationship between high turnover and poor resident outcomes. Functional ability, pressure ulcers, and weight loss are the most sensitive quality indicators linked to staffing. The best national data sources for staffing and quality include the Minimum Data Set (MDS) and On-line Survey and Certification Automated Records (OSCAR). However, the accuracy of this self-reported information requires further reliability and validity testing. A nationwide instrument needs to be developed to accurately measure staff turnover. Large-scale studies using payroll data to measure staff retention and its impact on resident outcomes are recommended. Future research should use the most nurse-sensitive quality indicators such as pressure ulcers, functional status, and weight loss." @default.
• W2113183579 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2113183579 creator A5016889544 @default.
• W2113183579 creator A5032341417 @default.
• W2113183579 creator A5036631261 @default.
• W2113183579 creator A5088368899 @default.
• W2113183579 date "2006-07-01" @default.
• W2113183579 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2113183579 title "Systematic Review of Studies of Staffing and Quality in Nursing Homes" @default.
• W2113183579 cites W134049450 @default.
• W2113183579 cites W1595729236 @default.
• W2113183579 cites W1967051675 @default.
• W2113183579 cites W1967956440 @default.
• W2113183579 cites W1973926125 @default.
• W2113183579 cites W1983311436 @default.
• W2113183579 cites W1985873367 @default.
• W2113183579 cites W1999742763 @default.
• W2113183579 cites W2000535404 @default.
• W2113183579 cites W2017860844 @default.
• W2113183579 cites W2019264723 @default.
• W2113183579 cites W2021802882 @default.
• W2113183579 cites W2034455514 @default.
• W2113183579 cites W2037407914 @default.
• W2113183579 cites W2037531382 @default.
• W2113183579 cites W2058500531 @default.
• W2113183579 cites W2060005511 @default.
• W2113183579 cites W2070877535 @default.
• W2113183579 cites W2079074015 @default.
• W2113183579 cites W2081066833 @default.
• W2113183579 cites W2091353799 @default.
• W2113183579 cites W2101115407 @default.
• W2113183579 cites W2103548897 @default.
• W2113183579 cites W2121592421 @default.
• W2113183579 cites W2125884746 @default.
• W2113183579 cites W2131189970 @default.
• W2113183579 cites W2133488320 @default.
• W2113183579 cites W2134700702 @default.
• W2113183579 cites W2143487098 @default.
• W2113183579 cites W2156229406 @default.
• W2113183579 cites W2160655103 @default.
• W2113183579 cites W2168462057 @default.
• W2113183579 cites W2171887959 @default.
• W2113183579 cites W2318391789 @default.
• W2113183579 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2006.01.024" @default.
• W2113183579 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16843237" @default.
• W2113183579 hasPublicationYear "2006" @default.
• W2113183579 type Work @default.
• W2113183579 sameAs 2113183579 @default.
• W2113183579 citedByCount "317" @default.
• W2113183579 countsByYear W21131835792012 @default.
• W2113183579 countsByYear W21131835792013 @default.
• W2113183579 countsByYear W21131835792014 @default.
• W2113183579 countsByYear W21131835792015 @default.
• W2113183579 countsByYear W21131835792016 @default.
• W2113183579 countsByYear W21131835792017 @default.
• W2113183579 countsByYear W21131835792018 @default.
• W2113183579 countsByYear W21131835792019 @default.
• W2113183579 countsByYear W21131835792020 @default.
• W2113183579 countsByYear W21131835792021 @default.
• W2113183579 countsByYear W21131835792022 @default.
• W2113183579 countsByYear W21131835792023 @default.
• W2113183579 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2113183579 hasAuthorship W2113183579A5016889544 @default.
• W2113183579 hasAuthorship W2113183579A5032341417 @default.
• W2113183579 hasAuthorship W2113183579A5036631261 @default.
• W2113183579 hasAuthorship W2113183579A5088368899 @default.
• W2113183579 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2113183579 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2113183579 hasConcept C121955636 @default.
• W2113183579 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2113183579 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2113183579 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2113183579 hasConcept C163258240 @default.
• W2113183579 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2113183579 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2113183579 hasConcept C2777512617 @default.
• W2113183579 hasConcept C2778137410 @default.
• W2113183579 hasConcept C2778755073 @default.
• W2113183579 hasConcept C2778873167 @default.
• W2113183579 hasConcept C2779028819 @default.
• W2113183579 hasConcept C2779530757 @default.
• W2113183579 hasConcept C3019398978 @default.
• W2113183579 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2113183579 hasConcept C43214815 @default.
• W2113183579 hasConcept C46304622 @default.
• W2113183579 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W2113183579 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2113183579 hasConceptScore W2113183579C111472728 @default.
• W2113183579 hasConceptScore W2113183579C121332964 @default.
• W2113183579 hasConceptScore W2113183579C121955636 @default.
• W2113183579 hasConceptScore W2113183579C138885662 @default.
• W2113183579 hasConceptScore W2113183579C144133560 @default.
• W2113183579 hasConceptScore W2113183579C159110408 @default.
• W2113183579 hasConceptScore W2113183579C163258240 @default.
• W2113183579 hasConceptScore W2113183579C17744445 @default.
• W2113183579 hasConceptScore W2113183579C199539241 @default.
• W2113183579 hasConceptScore W2113183579C2777512617 @default.
• W2113183579 hasConceptScore W2113183579C2778137410 @default.

• next