FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2113808567> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2113808567 endingPage "951" @default.
• W2113808567 startingPage "948" @default.
• W2113808567 abstract "‘Evidence-based policy’ has become the catch-cry of the drug policy field. A growing literature has been dedicated to better realising the goal of evidence-based drug policy: to maximise the use of the best quality research to inform policy decision-making and help answer the question of ‘what works’. Alternative accounts in the policy processes literature conceptualise policy activity as an ambiguous and contested process, and the role of evidence as being only marginally influential. Multiple participants jostle for influence and seek to define what may be regarded as a policy problem, how it may be appropriately addressed, which participants may speak authoritatively, and what knowledge(s) may be brought to bear. The question posited in this article is whether the conceptual shift offered by thinking about policy activity as a process of social construction may be valuable for beginning to explore different perspectives of the evidence-based drug policy endeavour. Within a constructionist account of policy, what counts as valid ‘evidence’ will always be a constructed notion within a dynamic system, based on the privileging and silencing of participants and discourse, and the contestation of those many positions and perspectives. The social construction account shifts our focus from the inherent value of ‘evidence’ for addressing ‘problems’ to the ways in which policy knowledge is made valid, by whom and in what contexts. As such, social construction provides a framework for critically analysing the ways in which ‘policy-relevant knowledge’ may not be a stable concept but rather one which is constructed through the policy process, and, through a process of validation, is rendered useful. We have limited knowledge in the drug policy field about how this happens; how ambiguity about the problems to be addressed, which voices should be heard, and what activities may be appropriate is contested and managed. By unpicking the values and assumptions which underlie drug policy processes, how problems are constructed and represented, and the ways in which different voices and knowledge(s) come to bear on that process, we may begin to see avenues for reform which may not at present seem obvious." @default.
• W2113808567 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2113808567 creator A5036885833 @default.
• W2113808567 date "2014-09-01" @default.
• W2113808567 modified "2023-10-05" @default.
• W2113808567 title "Social construction and the evidence-based drug policy endeavour" @default.
• W2113808567 cites W1509606451 @default.
• W2113808567 cites W1970963423 @default.
• W2113808567 cites W1990581612 @default.
• W2113808567 cites W2018447211 @default.
• W2113808567 cites W2034008987 @default.
• W2113808567 cites W2034872996 @default.
• W2113808567 cites W2038194537 @default.
• W2113808567 cites W2038420893 @default.
• W2113808567 cites W2055072854 @default.
• W2113808567 cites W2067516463 @default.
• W2113808567 cites W2081924523 @default.
• W2113808567 cites W2098615374 @default.
• W2113808567 cites W2104868252 @default.
• W2113808567 cites W2105384100 @default.
• W2113808567 cites W2119266541 @default.
• W2113808567 cites W2123933665 @default.
• W2113808567 cites W2155180859 @default.
• W2113808567 cites W2157737201 @default.
• W2113808567 cites W2329533595 @default.
• W2113808567 cites W2460088474 @default.
• W2113808567 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2014.01.002" @default.
• W2113808567 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24491356" @default.
• W2113808567 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W2113808567 type Work @default.
• W2113808567 sameAs 2113808567 @default.
• W2113808567 citedByCount "59" @default.
• W2113808567 countsByYear W21138085672014 @default.
• W2113808567 countsByYear W21138085672015 @default.
• W2113808567 countsByYear W21138085672016 @default.
• W2113808567 countsByYear W21138085672017 @default.
• W2113808567 countsByYear W21138085672018 @default.
• W2113808567 countsByYear W21138085672019 @default.
• W2113808567 countsByYear W21138085672020 @default.
• W2113808567 countsByYear W21138085672021 @default.
• W2113808567 countsByYear W21138085672022 @default.
• W2113808567 countsByYear W21138085672023 @default.
• W2113808567 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2113808567 hasAuthorship W2113808567A5036885833 @default.
• W2113808567 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2113808567 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W2113808567 hasConcept C118084267 @default.
• W2113808567 hasConcept C123587114 @default.
• W2113808567 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2113808567 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2113808567 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2113808567 hasConcept C154350673 @default.
• W2113808567 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2113808567 hasConcept C163877629 @default.
• W2113808567 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2113808567 hasConcept C19159745 @default.
• W2113808567 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2113808567 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W2113808567 hasConcept C2777503682 @default.
• W2113808567 hasConcept C3116431 @default.
• W2113808567 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W2113808567 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W2113808567 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2113808567 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2113808567 hasConcept C98045186 @default.
• W2113808567 hasConceptScore W2113808567C111472728 @default.
• W2113808567 hasConceptScore W2113808567C111919701 @default.
• W2113808567 hasConceptScore W2113808567C118084267 @default.
• W2113808567 hasConceptScore W2113808567C123587114 @default.
• W2113808567 hasConceptScore W2113808567C138885662 @default.
• W2113808567 hasConceptScore W2113808567C142724271 @default.
• W2113808567 hasConceptScore W2113808567C144024400 @default.
• W2113808567 hasConceptScore W2113808567C154350673 @default.
• W2113808567 hasConceptScore W2113808567C162324750 @default.
• W2113808567 hasConceptScore W2113808567C163877629 @default.
• W2113808567 hasConceptScore W2113808567C17744445 @default.
• W2113808567 hasConceptScore W2113808567C19159745 @default.
• W2113808567 hasConceptScore W2113808567C199539241 @default.
• W2113808567 hasConceptScore W2113808567C204787440 @default.
• W2113808567 hasConceptScore W2113808567C2777503682 @default.
• W2113808567 hasConceptScore W2113808567C3116431 @default.
• W2113808567 hasConceptScore W2113808567C36289849 @default.
• W2113808567 hasConceptScore W2113808567C39549134 @default.
• W2113808567 hasConceptScore W2113808567C41008148 @default.
• W2113808567 hasConceptScore W2113808567C71924100 @default.
• W2113808567 hasConceptScore W2113808567C98045186 @default.
• W2113808567 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W2113808567 hasLocation W21138085671 @default.
• W2113808567 hasLocation W21138085672 @default.
• W2113808567 hasOpenAccess W2113808567 @default.
• W2113808567 hasPrimaryLocation W21138085671 @default.
• W2113808567 hasRelatedWork W1986078628 @default.
• W2113808567 hasRelatedWork W1995640527 @default.
• W2113808567 hasRelatedWork W2015307630 @default.
• W2113808567 hasRelatedWork W2062315754 @default.
• W2113808567 hasRelatedWork W2105462521 @default.
• W2113808567 hasRelatedWork W2113808567 @default.
• W2113808567 hasRelatedWork W2142138096 @default.

• next