FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2113899680> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2113899680 endingPage "678" @default.
• W2113899680 startingPage "673" @default.
• W2113899680 abstract "BackgroundIn medicine, the use of standard operating procedures (SOPs) is often evaluated using questionnaires (QUES). However, QUES can have limitations with regard to method, thus leading to errors. Simulation (SIM) offers another opportunity for evaluation. We hypothesized that medical errors in the evaluation of SOPs using QUES could be detected by SIM, and that SIM is better qualified to demonstrate applied medicine.MethodsWe investigated the use of SOPs in anaesthesia, rapid sequence induction (RSI), by means of a QUES (n=42) or SIM (n=42) among 84 anaesthesiologists. Seven measures for preventing aspiration during induction of anaesthesia were examined and evaluated according to a predetermined points system.ResultsThe average number of times that precautionary measures to prevent aspiration were mentioned in the QUES [4.8 (0.9)] or performed during SIM [5.0 (1.1)] did not differ between the two groups. Pre-oxygenation was the most frequently described or performed measure (95% vs 93%). However, other measures, such as avoidance of positive pressure ventilation (45% vs 85%), differed significantly between the two groups.ConclusionsQUES and SIM are powerful instruments for evaluating the implementation of SOPs such as RSI. SIM demonstrates automated behaviours and thus more clearly represents behaviours used in clinical practice than is possible to demonstrate using QUES. Using a combination of these two instruments, method errors resulting from the individual instruments can be reduced. In medicine, the use of standard operating procedures (SOPs) is often evaluated using questionnaires (QUES). However, QUES can have limitations with regard to method, thus leading to errors. Simulation (SIM) offers another opportunity for evaluation. We hypothesized that medical errors in the evaluation of SOPs using QUES could be detected by SIM, and that SIM is better qualified to demonstrate applied medicine. We investigated the use of SOPs in anaesthesia, rapid sequence induction (RSI), by means of a QUES (n=42) or SIM (n=42) among 84 anaesthesiologists. Seven measures for preventing aspiration during induction of anaesthesia were examined and evaluated according to a predetermined points system. The average number of times that precautionary measures to prevent aspiration were mentioned in the QUES [4.8 (0.9)] or performed during SIM [5.0 (1.1)] did not differ between the two groups. Pre-oxygenation was the most frequently described or performed measure (95% vs 93%). However, other measures, such as avoidance of positive pressure ventilation (45% vs 85%), differed significantly between the two groups. QUES and SIM are powerful instruments for evaluating the implementation of SOPs such as RSI. SIM demonstrates automated behaviours and thus more clearly represents behaviours used in clinical practice than is possible to demonstrate using QUES. Using a combination of these two instruments, method errors resulting from the individual instruments can be reduced." @default.
• W2113899680 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2113899680 creator A5020962607 @default.
• W2113899680 creator A5022170044 @default.
• W2113899680 creator A5022958818 @default.
• W2113899680 creator A5045272490 @default.
• W2113899680 creator A5056833726 @default.
• W2113899680 creator A5087658756 @default.
• W2113899680 creator A5089434362 @default.
• W2113899680 date "2007-11-01" @default.
• W2113899680 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2113899680 title "Simulation as an additional tool for investigating the performance of standard operating procedures in anaesthesia †" @default.
• W2113899680 cites W1994099116 @default.
• W2113899680 cites W2013820438 @default.
• W2113899680 cites W2016052949 @default.
• W2113899680 cites W2021750853 @default.
• W2113899680 cites W2021802223 @default.
• W2113899680 cites W2023341821 @default.
• W2113899680 cites W2040596761 @default.
• W2113899680 cites W2045796467 @default.
• W2113899680 cites W2084890145 @default.
• W2113899680 cites W2088542342 @default.
• W2113899680 cites W2114125406 @default.
• W2113899680 cites W2138512901 @default.
• W2113899680 cites W2143436751 @default.
• W2113899680 cites W2149397443 @default.
• W2113899680 cites W2150772244 @default.
• W2113899680 cites W2160045789 @default.
• W2113899680 cites W2170119333 @default.
• W2113899680 cites W2415324673 @default.
• W2113899680 cites W4213388807 @default.
• W2113899680 doi "https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aem240" @default.
• W2113899680 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17704088" @default.
• W2113899680 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
• W2113899680 type Work @default.
• W2113899680 sameAs 2113899680 @default.
• W2113899680 citedByCount "27" @default.
• W2113899680 countsByYear W21138996802012 @default.
• W2113899680 countsByYear W21138996802013 @default.
• W2113899680 countsByYear W21138996802014 @default.
• W2113899680 countsByYear W21138996802015 @default.
• W2113899680 countsByYear W21138996802017 @default.
• W2113899680 countsByYear W21138996802018 @default.
• W2113899680 countsByYear W21138996802021 @default.
• W2113899680 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2113899680 hasAuthorship W2113899680A5020962607 @default.
• W2113899680 hasAuthorship W2113899680A5022170044 @default.
• W2113899680 hasAuthorship W2113899680A5022958818 @default.
• W2113899680 hasAuthorship W2113899680A5045272490 @default.
• W2113899680 hasAuthorship W2113899680A5056833726 @default.
• W2113899680 hasAuthorship W2113899680A5087658756 @default.
• W2113899680 hasAuthorship W2113899680A5089434362 @default.
• W2113899680 hasBestOaLocation W21138996801 @default.
• W2113899680 hasConcept C19527891 @default.
• W2113899680 hasConcept C42219234 @default.
• W2113899680 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2113899680 hasConceptScore W2113899680C19527891 @default.
• W2113899680 hasConceptScore W2113899680C42219234 @default.
• W2113899680 hasConceptScore W2113899680C71924100 @default.
• W2113899680 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W2113899680 hasLocation W21138996801 @default.
• W2113899680 hasLocation W21138996802 @default.
• W2113899680 hasOpenAccess W2113899680 @default.
• W2113899680 hasPrimaryLocation W21138996801 @default.
• W2113899680 hasRelatedWork W1506200166 @default.
• W2113899680 hasRelatedWork W1995515455 @default.
• W2113899680 hasRelatedWork W2048182022 @default.
• W2113899680 hasRelatedWork W2080531066 @default.
• W2113899680 hasRelatedWork W2604872355 @default.
• W2113899680 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2113899680 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2113899680 hasRelatedWork W3031052312 @default.
• W2113899680 hasRelatedWork W3032375762 @default.
• W2113899680 hasRelatedWork W3108674512 @default.
• W2113899680 hasVolume "99" @default.
• W2113899680 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2113899680 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2113899680 magId "2113899680" @default.
• W2113899680 workType "article" @default.