FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2114785655> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2114785655 abstract "Traced back to the writings of Grotius and Vattel, the doctrine of lex specialis has been the focal point in the ongoing debate on the fragmentation of international law. While international economic law has been envisaged as a specialized field in the adjudicative ambit of which normative conflicts often arise, it appears that only sporadically lex specialis has been specifically scrutinized in the context of international economic adjudication in general, and the World Trade Organization (WTO) adjudication and investment arbitration in particular. For, despite the rather often invocation of lex specialis in international trade and investment disputes, a considerable degree of generality and vagueness still appears to surround the more detailed aspects of its normative operation. In fact, the continuously growing body of panel and Appellate Body jurisprudence and the numerous investor-state arbitrations indeed feature repeated instances of recourse to the concept, perhaps now more (in numerical terms) than in any other field of public international law. At the same time, and now in qualitative terms, a closer look at these two seminal adjudicative aspects of international economic law provides the opportunity to draw insights that have also merit in the greater field of international dispute resolution. Ergo, as a first step dual typology of lex specialis is examined, so as to draw the line between the lex specialis derogat generali principle and the lex specialis/generalis qualification. Then, as a matter of normative methodology, it is demonstrated, inter alia, that the proper operation of lex specialis derogat generali denotes the juxtaposition of two specific norms. Additionally, it is argued that lex specialis is equally characterized by the normative equivalence of the juxtaposed norms, translated in a requirement for a rather high degree of rationae materiae sameness in terms of both their normative content and function. With these propositions in mind, the argument finally unfolds further so as to offer insights on the obscure issue of normative priority between lex specialis derogat generali and lex posterior derogat priori (later treaties supersedes earlier treaties) as expressed in the Vienna Convention, to then conclude with certain more generic remarks linking the analysis on lex specialis with the rationae materiae aspect of international legal disputes now, so that, overall, the conclusions reached can potentially also find general application outside the four corners of international economic law adjudication. Presented at the SIEL 2010 Conference in Barcelona." @default.
• W2114785655 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2114785655 creator A5005388977 @default.
• W2114785655 date "2010-01-01" @default.
• W2114785655 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2114785655 title "'Lex Specialis' in WTO and Investment Protection Law" @default.
• W2114785655 doi "https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1634051" @default.
• W2114785655 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W2114785655 type Work @default.
• W2114785655 sameAs 2114785655 @default.
• W2114785655 citedByCount "5" @default.
• W2114785655 countsByYear W21147856552014 @default.
• W2114785655 countsByYear W21147856552020 @default.
• W2114785655 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2114785655 hasAuthorship W2114785655A5005388977 @default.
• W2114785655 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2114785655 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2114785655 hasConcept C185436325 @default.
• W2114785655 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
• W2114785655 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2114785655 hasConcept C204434341 @default.
• W2114785655 hasConcept C55447825 @default.
• W2114785655 hasConcept C71043370 @default.
• W2114785655 hasConceptScore W2114785655C144024400 @default.
• W2114785655 hasConceptScore W2114785655C17744445 @default.
• W2114785655 hasConceptScore W2114785655C185436325 @default.
• W2114785655 hasConceptScore W2114785655C190253527 @default.
• W2114785655 hasConceptScore W2114785655C199539241 @default.
• W2114785655 hasConceptScore W2114785655C204434341 @default.
• W2114785655 hasConceptScore W2114785655C55447825 @default.
• W2114785655 hasConceptScore W2114785655C71043370 @default.
• W2114785655 hasLocation W21147856551 @default.
• W2114785655 hasOpenAccess W2114785655 @default.
• W2114785655 hasPrimaryLocation W21147856551 @default.
• W2114785655 hasRelatedWork W1554599468 @default.
• W2114785655 hasRelatedWork W1568804957 @default.
• W2114785655 hasRelatedWork W1591306057 @default.
• W2114785655 hasRelatedWork W1593351374 @default.
• W2114785655 hasRelatedWork W1850618663 @default.
• W2114785655 hasRelatedWork W2085817431 @default.
• W2114785655 hasRelatedWork W2098293340 @default.
• W2114785655 hasRelatedWork W2254022445 @default.
• W2114785655 hasRelatedWork W2291652370 @default.
• W2114785655 hasRelatedWork W2484190618 @default.
• W2114785655 hasRelatedWork W2776635754 @default.
• W2114785655 hasRelatedWork W288758773 @default.
• W2114785655 hasRelatedWork W2891007394 @default.
• W2114785655 hasRelatedWork W2976518679 @default.
• W2114785655 hasRelatedWork W2996336412 @default.
• W2114785655 hasRelatedWork W304865868 @default.
• W2114785655 hasRelatedWork W3121187619 @default.
• W2114785655 hasRelatedWork W3159192997 @default.
• W2114785655 hasRelatedWork W3161439244 @default.
• W2114785655 hasRelatedWork W5219984 @default.
• W2114785655 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2114785655 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2114785655 magId "2114785655" @default.
• W2114785655 workType "article" @default.