FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2114909969> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2114909969 endingPage "290" @default.
• W2114909969 startingPage "283" @default.
• W2114909969 abstract "Background Endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy (ES) can cause bleeding, pancreatitis, and perforation. This has, in part, been attributed to the type of electrosurgical current used for ES. No consensus exists on the optimal type of electrosurgical current for ES to maximize safety. Objective To compare the rates of complications in patients undergoing ES via pure current versus mixed current. Design A systematic review of published, prospective, randomized trials that compared pure current with mixed current for ES. Patients Patients undergoing ES, with random assignment to either current group. Interventions Data were standardized for pancreatitis and postsphincterotomy bleeding. There were insufficient data to analyze perforation risk. A random-effects model was used. Main Outcome Measurements Bleeding, pancreatitis, and perforation. Results A total of 804 patients from 4 trials that compared pure current to mixed current were analyzed. The aggregated rate of pancreatitis was 3.8%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.0%-6.6%, for the pure-current group versus 7.9%, 95% CI 3.1%-12.7%, for the mixed-current group; the difference was not statistically significant. The rate of bleeding (all severity groups) for the pure-current group was 37.3% (95% CI 27.3%, 47.3%), which was significantly higher than that of the mixed-current group (12.2% [95% CI 4.1%, 20.3%]). Mild bleeding was significantly more frequent with pure current (28.9% [95% CI 16.3, 41.4]) compared with mixed current (9.4% [95% CI 2.1%, 16.8%]). Limitations Variables, including endoscopist skill and cannulation difficulty, were difficult to measure. Conclusions The rate of pancreatitis in patients who underwent ES when using pure current was not significantly different from those when using mixed current. Pure current was associated with more episodes of bleeding, primarily mild bleeding. Data were insufficient to analyze the perforation risk. Endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy (ES) can cause bleeding, pancreatitis, and perforation. This has, in part, been attributed to the type of electrosurgical current used for ES. No consensus exists on the optimal type of electrosurgical current for ES to maximize safety. To compare the rates of complications in patients undergoing ES via pure current versus mixed current. A systematic review of published, prospective, randomized trials that compared pure current with mixed current for ES. Patients undergoing ES, with random assignment to either current group. Data were standardized for pancreatitis and postsphincterotomy bleeding. There were insufficient data to analyze perforation risk. A random-effects model was used. Bleeding, pancreatitis, and perforation. A total of 804 patients from 4 trials that compared pure current to mixed current were analyzed. The aggregated rate of pancreatitis was 3.8%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.0%-6.6%, for the pure-current group versus 7.9%, 95% CI 3.1%-12.7%, for the mixed-current group; the difference was not statistically significant. The rate of bleeding (all severity groups) for the pure-current group was 37.3% (95% CI 27.3%, 47.3%), which was significantly higher than that of the mixed-current group (12.2% [95% CI 4.1%, 20.3%]). Mild bleeding was significantly more frequent with pure current (28.9% [95% CI 16.3, 41.4]) compared with mixed current (9.4% [95% CI 2.1%, 16.8%]). Variables, including endoscopist skill and cannulation difficulty, were difficult to measure. The rate of pancreatitis in patients who underwent ES when using pure current was not significantly different from those when using mixed current. Pure current was associated with more episodes of bleeding, primarily mild bleeding. Data were insufficient to analyze the perforation risk." @default.
• W2114909969 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2114909969 creator A5023735788 @default.
• W2114909969 creator A5053997007 @default.
• W2114909969 creator A5080103167 @default.
• W2114909969 date "2007-08-01" @default.
• W2114909969 modified "2023-10-03" @default.
• W2114909969 title "Pure versus mixed electrosurgical current for endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy: a meta-analysis of adverse outcomes" @default.
• W2114909969 cites W117136187 @default.
• W2114909969 cites W1212923277 @default.
• W2114909969 cites W1965476565 @default.
• W2114909969 cites W1965976096 @default.
• W2114909969 cites W1967246198 @default.
• W2114909969 cites W1967670501 @default.
• W2114909969 cites W1971734019 @default.
• W2114909969 cites W1972036508 @default.
• W2114909969 cites W1979250326 @default.
• W2114909969 cites W1981538676 @default.
• W2114909969 cites W2000442546 @default.
• W2114909969 cites W2011800784 @default.
• W2114909969 cites W2024902854 @default.
• W2114909969 cites W2034378499 @default.
• W2114909969 cites W2036448952 @default.
• W2114909969 cites W2043770856 @default.
• W2114909969 cites W2043813971 @default.
• W2114909969 cites W2045382808 @default.
• W2114909969 cites W2049306900 @default.
• W2114909969 cites W2049754380 @default.
• W2114909969 cites W2052551357 @default.
• W2114909969 cites W2063707994 @default.
• W2114909969 cites W2071228265 @default.
• W2114909969 cites W2075969251 @default.
• W2114909969 cites W2082471142 @default.
• W2114909969 cites W2094509724 @default.
• W2114909969 cites W2094796379 @default.
• W2114909969 cites W2103637454 @default.
• W2114909969 cites W2136481170 @default.
• W2114909969 cites W2137366845 @default.
• W2114909969 cites W2147581820 @default.
• W2114909969 cites W2154666676 @default.
• W2114909969 cites W2155053630 @default.
• W2114909969 cites W2320210611 @default.
• W2114909969 cites W255222286 @default.
• W2114909969 cites W4237307834 @default.
• W2114909969 cites W4252067876 @default.
• W2114909969 cites W75667042 @default.
• W2114909969 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2007.01.018" @default.
• W2114909969 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17643701" @default.
• W2114909969 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
• W2114909969 type Work @default.
• W2114909969 sameAs 2114909969 @default.
• W2114909969 citedByCount "86" @default.
• W2114909969 countsByYear W21149099692012 @default.
• W2114909969 countsByYear W21149099692013 @default.
• W2114909969 countsByYear W21149099692014 @default.
• W2114909969 countsByYear W21149099692015 @default.
• W2114909969 countsByYear W21149099692016 @default.
• W2114909969 countsByYear W21149099692017 @default.
• W2114909969 countsByYear W21149099692018 @default.
• W2114909969 countsByYear W21149099692019 @default.
• W2114909969 countsByYear W21149099692020 @default.
• W2114909969 countsByYear W21149099692021 @default.
• W2114909969 countsByYear W21149099692022 @default.
• W2114909969 countsByYear W21149099692023 @default.
• W2114909969 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2114909969 hasAuthorship W2114909969A5023735788 @default.
• W2114909969 hasAuthorship W2114909969A5053997007 @default.
• W2114909969 hasAuthorship W2114909969A5080103167 @default.
• W2114909969 hasConcept C119599485 @default.
• W2114909969 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2114909969 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2114909969 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2114909969 hasConcept C148043351 @default.
• W2114909969 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2114909969 hasConcept C191897082 @default.
• W2114909969 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W2114909969 hasConcept C197934379 @default.
• W2114909969 hasConcept C2775967933 @default.
• W2114909969 hasConcept C2778456384 @default.
• W2114909969 hasConcept C2778527123 @default.
• W2114909969 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W2114909969 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2114909969 hasConceptScore W2114909969C119599485 @default.
• W2114909969 hasConceptScore W2114909969C126322002 @default.
• W2114909969 hasConceptScore W2114909969C127413603 @default.
• W2114909969 hasConceptScore W2114909969C141071460 @default.
• W2114909969 hasConceptScore W2114909969C148043351 @default.
• W2114909969 hasConceptScore W2114909969C168563851 @default.
• W2114909969 hasConceptScore W2114909969C191897082 @default.
• W2114909969 hasConceptScore W2114909969C192562407 @default.
• W2114909969 hasConceptScore W2114909969C197934379 @default.
• W2114909969 hasConceptScore W2114909969C2775967933 @default.
• W2114909969 hasConceptScore W2114909969C2778456384 @default.
• W2114909969 hasConceptScore W2114909969C2778527123 @default.
• W2114909969 hasConceptScore W2114909969C44249647 @default.
• W2114909969 hasConceptScore W2114909969C71924100 @default.
• W2114909969 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2114909969 hasLocation W21149099691 @default.

• next