Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2115149563> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2115149563 abstract "Dengue disease surveillance and vector surveillance are presumed to detect dengue outbreaks at an early stage and to save – through early response activities – resources, and reduce the social and economic impact of outbreaks on individuals, health systems and economies. The aim of this study is to unveil evidence on the cost of dengue outbreaks. Economic evidence on dengue outbreaks was gathered by conducting a literature review and collecting information on the costs of recent dengue outbreaks in 4 countries: Peru, Dominican Republic, Vietnam, and Indonesia. The literature review distinguished between costs of dengue illness including cost of dengue outbreaks, cost of interventions and cost-effectiveness of interventions. Seventeen publications on cost of dengue showed a large range of costs from 0.2 Million US$ in Venezuela to 135.2 Million US$ in Brazil. However, these figures were not standardized to make them comparable. Furthermore, dengue outbreak costs are calculated differently across the publications, and cost of dengue illness is used interchangeably with cost of dengue outbreaks. Only one paper from Australia analysed the resources saved through active dengue surveillance. Costs of vector control interventions have been reported in 4 studies, indicating that the costs of such interventions are lower than those of actual outbreaks. Nine papers focussed on the cost-effectiveness of dengue vaccines or dengue vector control; they do not provide any direct information on cost of dengue outbreaks, but their modelling methodologies could guide future research on cost-effectiveness of national surveillance systems. The country case studies – conducted in very different geographic and health system settings - unveiled rough estimates for 2011 outbreak costs of: 12 million US$ in Vietnam, 6.75 million US$ in Indonesia, 4.5 million US$ in Peru and 2.8 million US$ in Dominican Republic (all in 2012 US$). The proportions of the different cost components (vector control; surveillance; information, education and communication; direct medical and indirect costs), as percentage of total costs, differed across the respective countries. Resources used for dengue disease control and treatment were country specific. The evidence so far collected further confirms the methodological challenges in this field: 1) to define technically dengue outbreaks (what do we measure?) and 2) to measure accurately the costs in prospective field studies (how do we measure?). Currently, consensus on the technical definition of an outbreak is sought through the International Research Consortium on Dengue Risk Assessment, Management and Surveillance (IDAMS). Best practice guidelines should be further developed, also to improve the quality and comparability of cost study findings. Modelling the costs of dengue outbreaks and validating these models through field studies should guide further research." @default.
- W2115149563 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2115149563 creator A5026342078 @default.
- W2115149563 creator A5052483256 @default.
- W2115149563 creator A5053081634 @default.
- W2115149563 creator A5053694481 @default.
- W2115149563 creator A5055810492 @default.
- W2115149563 creator A5064597793 @default.
- W2115149563 creator A5075646635 @default.
- W2115149563 creator A5083663856 @default.
- W2115149563 creator A5083874772 @default.
- W2115149563 date "2013-11-06" @default.
- W2115149563 modified "2023-10-12" @default.
- W2115149563 title "Cost of dengue outbreaks: literature review and country case studies" @default.
- W2115149563 cites W1527856663 @default.
- W2115149563 cites W1603066023 @default.
- W2115149563 cites W1915341727 @default.
- W2115149563 cites W1959981670 @default.
- W2115149563 cites W1965515622 @default.
- W2115149563 cites W1995072592 @default.
- W2115149563 cites W2001408196 @default.
- W2115149563 cites W2024514465 @default.
- W2115149563 cites W2030142520 @default.
- W2115149563 cites W2032070006 @default.
- W2115149563 cites W2056411782 @default.
- W2115149563 cites W2057541661 @default.
- W2115149563 cites W2070489036 @default.
- W2115149563 cites W2081340238 @default.
- W2115149563 cites W2087930531 @default.
- W2115149563 cites W2102000320 @default.
- W2115149563 cites W2102331226 @default.
- W2115149563 cites W2110728776 @default.
- W2115149563 cites W2114863722 @default.
- W2115149563 cites W2123858885 @default.
- W2115149563 cites W2128822785 @default.
- W2115149563 cites W2144546135 @default.
- W2115149563 cites W2147797917 @default.
- W2115149563 cites W2149292001 @default.
- W2115149563 cites W2151115521 @default.
- W2115149563 cites W2159524894 @default.
- W2115149563 cites W2161413890 @default.
- W2115149563 cites W2164451562 @default.
- W2115149563 doi "https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-1048" @default.
- W2115149563 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/4228321" @default.
- W2115149563 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24195519" @default.
- W2115149563 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
- W2115149563 type Work @default.
- W2115149563 sameAs 2115149563 @default.
- W2115149563 citedByCount "54" @default.
- W2115149563 countsByYear W21151495632014 @default.
- W2115149563 countsByYear W21151495632015 @default.
- W2115149563 countsByYear W21151495632016 @default.
- W2115149563 countsByYear W21151495632017 @default.
- W2115149563 countsByYear W21151495632018 @default.
- W2115149563 countsByYear W21151495632019 @default.
- W2115149563 countsByYear W21151495632020 @default.
- W2115149563 countsByYear W21151495632021 @default.
- W2115149563 countsByYear W21151495632022 @default.
- W2115149563 countsByYear W21151495632023 @default.
- W2115149563 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2115149563 hasAuthorship W2115149563A5026342078 @default.
- W2115149563 hasAuthorship W2115149563A5052483256 @default.
- W2115149563 hasAuthorship W2115149563A5053081634 @default.
- W2115149563 hasAuthorship W2115149563A5053694481 @default.
- W2115149563 hasAuthorship W2115149563A5055810492 @default.
- W2115149563 hasAuthorship W2115149563A5064597793 @default.
- W2115149563 hasAuthorship W2115149563A5075646635 @default.
- W2115149563 hasAuthorship W2115149563A5083663856 @default.
- W2115149563 hasAuthorship W2115149563A5083874772 @default.
- W2115149563 hasBestOaLocation W21151495631 @default.
- W2115149563 hasConcept C116675565 @default.
- W2115149563 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
- W2115149563 hasConcept C133425853 @default.
- W2115149563 hasConcept C138816342 @default.
- W2115149563 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
- W2115149563 hasConcept C145096142 @default.
- W2115149563 hasConcept C159047783 @default.
- W2115149563 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
- W2115149563 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
- W2115149563 hasConcept C2779635636 @default.
- W2115149563 hasConcept C533803919 @default.
- W2115149563 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2115149563 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
- W2115149563 hasConceptScore W2115149563C116675565 @default.
- W2115149563 hasConceptScore W2115149563C118552586 @default.
- W2115149563 hasConceptScore W2115149563C133425853 @default.
- W2115149563 hasConceptScore W2115149563C138816342 @default.
- W2115149563 hasConceptScore W2115149563C142724271 @default.
- W2115149563 hasConceptScore W2115149563C145096142 @default.
- W2115149563 hasConceptScore W2115149563C159047783 @default.
- W2115149563 hasConceptScore W2115149563C162324750 @default.
- W2115149563 hasConceptScore W2115149563C27415008 @default.
- W2115149563 hasConceptScore W2115149563C2779635636 @default.
- W2115149563 hasConceptScore W2115149563C533803919 @default.
- W2115149563 hasConceptScore W2115149563C71924100 @default.
- W2115149563 hasConceptScore W2115149563C99454951 @default.
- W2115149563 hasIssue "1" @default.
- W2115149563 hasLocation W21151495631 @default.
- W2115149563 hasLocation W21151495632 @default.
- W2115149563 hasLocation W21151495633 @default.