FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2115472923> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2115472923 abstract "The term anchorage in orthodontic treatment refers to methods of controlling unwanted tooth movement. This is provided either by anchor sites within the mouth, such as the teeth and the palate, or from outside the mouth (headgear). Recently, new methods of providing anchorage have been developed using orthodontic implants which are surgically inserted into the bone in the mouth. This is termed surgical anchorage. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2007.To assess the effects of surgical anchorage techniques compared to conventional anchorage in the prevention of unwanted tooth movement in patients undergoing orthodontic treatment by evaluating the mesiodistal movement of upper first molar teeth. A secondary objective was to compare the effects of one type of surgical anchorage with another.We searched the Cochrane Oral Health Group's Trials Register (to 28 October 2013), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2013, Issue 9), MEDLINE via OVID (1946 to 28 October 2013) and EMBASE via OVID (1980 to 28 October 2013). We handsearched key international orthodontic and dental journals, and searched the trial database ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform for ongoing and unpublished studies.Randomised controlled trials comparing surgical anchorage with conventional anchorage in orthodontic patients. Trials comparing two types of surgical anchorage were also included.At least two review authors independently and in duplicate extracted data and carried out risk of bias assessments. We contacted study authors to clarify aspects of study design and conduct, and to obtain unreported data.Fourteen new studies were added in this update resulting in a total of 15 studies reporting data from 561 randomised patients. The studies were conducted in Europe, India, China, South Korea and the USA. The age range of patients was commonly restricted to adolescents or young adults, however the participants of two studies were from a much wider age range (12 to 54 years). The distribution of males and females was similar in eight of the studies, with a predominance of female patients in seven studies.Eight studies were assessed to be at high overall risk of bias; six studies at unclear risk of bias; one study at low risk of bias.Ten studies with 407 randomised and 390 analysed patients compared surgical anchorage with conventional anchorage for the primary outcome of mesiodistal movement of upper first molars. We carried out a random-effects model meta-analysis for the seven studies that fully reported this outcome. There was strong evidence of an effect of surgical anchorage on this outcome. Compared with conventional anchorage, surgical anchorage was more effective in the reinforcement of anchorage by 1.68 mm (95% confidence interval (CI) -2.27 mm to -1.09 mm; seven studies, 308 participants analysed) with moderate quality of evidence (one study at high overall risk of bias, five studies at unclear risk of bias, one study at low risk of bias). This result should be interpreted with some caution, however, as there was a substantial degree of heterogeneity for this comparison. There was no evidence of a difference in overall duration of treatment between surgical and conventional anchorage (-0.15 years; 95% CI -0.37 years to 0.07 years; three studies, 111 analysed patients) with low quality of evidence (one study at high overall risk of bias and two studies at unclear risk of bias). Information on patient-reported outcomes such as pain and acceptability was limited and inconclusive.When direct comparisons were made between two types of surgical anchorage, there was a lack of evidence to suggest that any one technique was better than another.No included studies reported adverse effects.There is moderate quality evidence that reinforcement of anchorage is more effective with surgical anchorage than conventional anchorage, and that results from mini-screw implants are particularly promising. While surgical anchorage is not associated with the inherent risks and compliance issues related to extraoral headgear, none of the included studies reported on harms of surgical or conventional anchorage." @default.
• W2115472923 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2115472923 creator A5041511809 @default.
• W2115472923 creator A5045126942 @default.
• W2115472923 creator A5048153135 @default.
• W2115472923 creator A5054548721 @default.
• W2115472923 creator A5060032404 @default.
• W2115472923 creator A5066907939 @default.
• W2115472923 date "2014-08-19" @default.
• W2115472923 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2115472923 title "Reinforcement of anchorage during orthodontic brace treatment with implants or other surgical methods" @default.
• W2115472923 cites W1486984217 @default.
• W2115472923 cites W1492268402 @default.
• W2115472923 cites W1497529849 @default.
• W2115472923 cites W1536488102 @default.
• W2115472923 cites W1541972779 @default.
• W2115472923 cites W158088000 @default.
• W2115472923 cites W1732215652 @default.
• W2115472923 cites W1819509754 @default.
• W2115472923 cites W1845683422 @default.
• W2115472923 cites W1968852764 @default.
• W2115472923 cites W1973115655 @default.
• W2115472923 cites W1975960985 @default.
• W2115472923 cites W1982464861 @default.
• W2115472923 cites W1984093380 @default.
• W2115472923 cites W1990341835 @default.
• W2115472923 cites W1991641593 @default.
• W2115472923 cites W1993002961 @default.
• W2115472923 cites W2002276592 @default.
• W2115472923 cites W2002864578 @default.
• W2115472923 cites W2011074637 @default.
• W2115472923 cites W2018111730 @default.
• W2115472923 cites W2020161135 @default.
• W2115472923 cites W2027078166 @default.
• W2115472923 cites W2031339499 @default.
• W2115472923 cites W2037884961 @default.
• W2115472923 cites W2039832230 @default.
• W2115472923 cites W2051604861 @default.
• W2115472923 cites W2052348924 @default.
• W2115472923 cites W2052580653 @default.
• W2115472923 cites W2053645679 @default.
• W2115472923 cites W2061067306 @default.
• W2115472923 cites W2061760027 @default.
• W2115472923 cites W2062623704 @default.
• W2115472923 cites W2068367142 @default.
• W2115472923 cites W2070698597 @default.
• W2115472923 cites W2072277208 @default.
• W2115472923 cites W2073317590 @default.
• W2115472923 cites W2079626623 @default.
• W2115472923 cites W2082494289 @default.
• W2115472923 cites W2093601964 @default.
• W2115472923 cites W2105436889 @default.
• W2115472923 cites W2107044339 @default.
• W2115472923 cites W2115472923 @default.
• W2115472923 cites W2115663736 @default.
• W2115472923 cites W2121980335 @default.
• W2115472923 cites W2123650000 @default.
• W2115472923 cites W2127397155 @default.
• W2115472923 cites W2137337119 @default.
• W2115472923 cites W2139148283 @default.
• W2115472923 cites W2139453153 @default.
• W2115472923 cites W2142676212 @default.
• W2115472923 cites W2151047415 @default.
• W2115472923 cites W2157390825 @default.
• W2115472923 cites W2163603389 @default.
• W2115472923 cites W2189385001 @default.
• W2115472923 cites W2314040035 @default.
• W2115472923 cites W2404205709 @default.
• W2115472923 cites W2409470776 @default.
• W2115472923 cites W3125615875 @default.
• W2115472923 cites W4245269759 @default.
• W2115472923 cites W99123515 @default.
• W2115472923 cites W3082175557 @default.
• W2115472923 doi "https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd005098.pub3" @default.
• W2115472923 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6464832" @default.
• W2115472923 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25135678" @default.
• W2115472923 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W2115472923 type Work @default.
• W2115472923 sameAs 2115472923 @default.
• W2115472923 citedByCount "36" @default.
• W2115472923 countsByYear W21154729232012 @default.
• W2115472923 countsByYear W21154729232014 @default.
• W2115472923 countsByYear W21154729232015 @default.
• W2115472923 countsByYear W21154729232016 @default.
• W2115472923 countsByYear W21154729232017 @default.
• W2115472923 countsByYear W21154729232018 @default.
• W2115472923 countsByYear W21154729232019 @default.
• W2115472923 countsByYear W21154729232021 @default.
• W2115472923 countsByYear W21154729232022 @default.
• W2115472923 countsByYear W21154729232023 @default.
• W2115472923 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2115472923 hasAuthorship W2115472923A5041511809 @default.
• W2115472923 hasAuthorship W2115472923A5045126942 @default.
• W2115472923 hasAuthorship W2115472923A5048153135 @default.
• W2115472923 hasAuthorship W2115472923A5054548721 @default.
• W2115472923 hasAuthorship W2115472923A5060032404 @default.
• W2115472923 hasAuthorship W2115472923A5066907939 @default.
• W2115472923 hasBestOaLocation W21154729232 @default.
• W2115472923 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2115472923 hasConcept C142724271 @default.

• next