FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2116039526> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2116039526 endingPage "415" @default.
• W2116039526 startingPage "408" @default.
• W2116039526 abstract "People suffering from mental illness are exposed to stigma. However, only few tools are available to assess stigmatization as perceived from the patient's perspective. The aim of this study is to adapt and validate a French version of the Stigma Scale (King et al., 2007 [8]). This self-report questionnaire has a three-factor structure: discrimination, disclosure and positive aspects of mental illness. Discrimination subscale refers to perceived negative reactions of others. Disclosure subscale refers mainly to managing disclosure to avoid discrimination and finally positive aspects subscale taps into how patients are becoming more accepting, more understanding toward their illness.In the first step, internal consistency, convergent validity and test-retest reliability of the French adaptation of the 28-item scale were assessed in a sample of 183 patients. Results of confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) did not confirm the hypothesized structure. In the light of the failed attempts to validate the original version, an alternative 9-item short-form version of the Stigma Scale, maintaining the integrity of the original model, was developed based on results of exploratory factor analyses in the first sample and cross-validated in a new sample of 234 patients.Results of CFA did not confirm that the data fitted well to the three-factor model of the 28-item Stigma Scale (χ(2)/df=2.02, GFI=0.77, AGFI=0.73, RMSEA=0.07, CFI=0.77 and NNFI=0.75). Cronbach's α was excellent for discrimination (0.84) and disclosure (0.83) subscales but poor for potential positive aspects (0.46). External validity was satisfactory. Overall Stigma Scale total score was negatively correlated with the score on Rosenberg's Self-Esteem Scale (r=-0.49), and each subscale was significantly correlated with a visual analogue scale that referred to the specific aspect of stigma (0.43≤|r|≤0.60). Intraclass correlation coefficients between 0.68 and 0.89 indicated good test-retest reliability. The results of the CFA demonstrated that the items chosen for the short version of the Stigma Scale have the expected fit properties (χ(2)/df=1.02, GFI=0.98, AGFI=0.98, RMSEA=0.01, CFI=1.0 and NNFI=1.0). Considering the small number (three) of items in each subscale of the short version of the Stigma Scale, α coefficients for discrimination (0.57), disclosure (0.80) and potential positive aspects subscales (0.62) are considered as good.Our results suggest that the 9-item French short version of the Stigma Scale is a useful, reliable and valid self-report questionnaire to assess perceived stigmatization in people suffering from mental illness. The time of completion is really short and questions are well understood and accepted by the patients." @default.
• W2116039526 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2116039526 creator A5017792277 @default.
• W2116039526 creator A5029450925 @default.
• W2116039526 creator A5035241424 @default.
• W2116039526 creator A5045545231 @default.
• W2116039526 creator A5062258394 @default.
• W2116039526 creator A5084691403 @default.
• W2116039526 creator A5091463890 @default.
• W2116039526 date "2013-12-01" @default.
• W2116039526 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2116039526 title "Mesurer la stigmatisation perçue chez les personnes souffrant de troubles psychiques : traduction française, validation et adaptation de la Stigma Scale" @default.
• W2116039526 cites W2008400029 @default.
• W2116039526 cites W2022800696 @default.
• W2116039526 cites W2034664668 @default.
• W2116039526 cites W2035072042 @default.
• W2116039526 cites W2038555815 @default.
• W2116039526 cites W2060846259 @default.
• W2116039526 cites W2071666535 @default.
• W2116039526 cites W2072787586 @default.
• W2116039526 cites W2101945577 @default.
• W2116039526 cites W2109022442 @default.
• W2116039526 cites W2118482901 @default.
• W2116039526 cites W2123149156 @default.
• W2116039526 cites W2126724189 @default.
• W2116039526 cites W2131115009 @default.
• W2116039526 cites W2138848350 @default.
• W2116039526 cites W2149608872 @default.
• W2116039526 cites W2157216651 @default.
• W2116039526 cites W2158298118 @default.
• W2116039526 cites W3125563162 @default.
• W2116039526 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.encep.2013.03.002" @default.
• W2116039526 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23820897" @default.
• W2116039526 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W2116039526 type Work @default.
• W2116039526 sameAs 2116039526 @default.
• W2116039526 citedByCount "12" @default.
• W2116039526 countsByYear W21160395262017 @default.
• W2116039526 countsByYear W21160395262018 @default.
• W2116039526 countsByYear W21160395262019 @default.
• W2116039526 countsByYear W21160395262020 @default.
• W2116039526 countsByYear W21160395262021 @default.
• W2116039526 countsByYear W21160395262022 @default.
• W2116039526 countsByYear W21160395262023 @default.
• W2116039526 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2116039526 hasAuthorship W2116039526A5017792277 @default.
• W2116039526 hasAuthorship W2116039526A5029450925 @default.
• W2116039526 hasAuthorship W2116039526A5035241424 @default.
• W2116039526 hasAuthorship W2116039526A5045545231 @default.
• W2116039526 hasAuthorship W2116039526A5062258394 @default.
• W2116039526 hasAuthorship W2116039526A5084691403 @default.
• W2116039526 hasAuthorship W2116039526A5091463890 @default.
• W2116039526 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2116039526 hasConcept C106906290 @default.
• W2116039526 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W2116039526 hasConcept C121244757 @default.
• W2116039526 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2116039526 hasConcept C134362201 @default.
• W2116039526 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2116039526 hasConcept C165957694 @default.
• W2116039526 hasConcept C168285401 @default.
• W2116039526 hasConcept C171606756 @default.
• W2116039526 hasConcept C2776674806 @default.
• W2116039526 hasConcept C2778755073 @default.
• W2116039526 hasConcept C3018868096 @default.
• W2116039526 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2116039526 hasConcept C40722632 @default.
• W2116039526 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W2116039526 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
• W2116039526 hasConcept C71104824 @default.
• W2116039526 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2116039526 hasConceptScore W2116039526C105795698 @default.
• W2116039526 hasConceptScore W2116039526C106906290 @default.
• W2116039526 hasConceptScore W2116039526C118552586 @default.
• W2116039526 hasConceptScore W2116039526C121244757 @default.
• W2116039526 hasConceptScore W2116039526C121332964 @default.
• W2116039526 hasConceptScore W2116039526C134362201 @default.
• W2116039526 hasConceptScore W2116039526C15744967 @default.
• W2116039526 hasConceptScore W2116039526C165957694 @default.
• W2116039526 hasConceptScore W2116039526C168285401 @default.
• W2116039526 hasConceptScore W2116039526C171606756 @default.
• W2116039526 hasConceptScore W2116039526C2776674806 @default.
• W2116039526 hasConceptScore W2116039526C2778755073 @default.
• W2116039526 hasConceptScore W2116039526C3018868096 @default.
• W2116039526 hasConceptScore W2116039526C33923547 @default.
• W2116039526 hasConceptScore W2116039526C40722632 @default.
• W2116039526 hasConceptScore W2116039526C62520636 @default.
• W2116039526 hasConceptScore W2116039526C70410870 @default.
• W2116039526 hasConceptScore W2116039526C71104824 @default.
• W2116039526 hasConceptScore W2116039526C77805123 @default.
• W2116039526 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W2116039526 hasLocation W21160395261 @default.
• W2116039526 hasLocation W21160395262 @default.
• W2116039526 hasOpenAccess W2116039526 @default.
• W2116039526 hasPrimaryLocation W21160395261 @default.
• W2116039526 hasRelatedWork W2184398632 @default.
• W2116039526 hasRelatedWork W2353508554 @default.
• W2116039526 hasRelatedWork W2384586913 @default.

• next