Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2116603875> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 90 of
90
with 100 items per page.
- W2116603875 endingPage "S102" @default.
- W2116603875 startingPage "S91" @default.
- W2116603875 abstract "Le maintien en emploi de personnes aux prises avec un trouble mental grave (tel que la schizophrénie) reste la pierre d’achoppement de leur réinsertion au travail. Toutefois, la durée du maintien en emploi peut varier considérablement selon le contexte de travail dans laquelle la personne s’engage (par ex. marché du travail ordinaire, entreprise à économie sociale). Ces différences peuvent s’expliquer en partie par des composantes organisationnelles différentes selon le contexte de travail, telles que la présence de mesures d’accommodements, lesquelles ont souvent pour condition la divulgation du trouble mental en milieu de travail. Cet article vise à documenter ces deux notions, en s’appuyant sur la littérature spécialisée et nos propres recherches. Ces travaux font apparaître que la divulgation du trouble mental est un processus dialectique qui ne peut se résumer « à dire ou ne pas dire ». La divulgation soulève une série de questions : quoi, comment, quand et à qui divulguer son état de santé ? Les raisons évoquées pour divulguer ou non son trouble mental en milieu de travail sont nombreuses, avec des facteurs de nature individuelle, d’autres interpersonnels, d’autres encore dépendant de l’environnement de travail. Ces raisons peuvent être liées à l’anticipation de conséquences positives (par ex. mesures d’accommodements) ou négatives (par ex. stigmate social). Dès que la personne s’interroge sur l’opportunité de donner des informations concernant sa santé sur son lieu de travail, s’engage un processus décisionnel complexe même s’il n’est pas systématique. Une étude récente explore les liens entre la divulgation, la mise en place d’accommodement et le maintien en emploi. Il apparaît que le soutien du supérieur immédiat et des collègues de travail est essentiel au regard d’une liste de mesures d’accommodement et de soutiens naturels. Le conseiller en emploi ou autre intervenant œuvrant dans des programmes de réinsertion au travail peut aider à apprécier les tenants et aboutissants de la divulgation du trouble mental sur le lieu de travail à l’aide d’un « plan de gestion des informations personnelles ». Ce plan permet entre autres de dépasser la notion de divulgation, souvent connotée négativement. En conclusion, la réinsertion professionnelle de personnes aux prises avec un trouble mental n’est plus un vœu pieu, des éléments d’interventions pragmatiques sont à présent disponibles. Job tenure for people with severe mental disorders (e.g., schizophrenia) remains a stumbling-block to their work integration. However, the length of job tenure can vary according to the workplace (e.g., provided resources) and the work context (e.g., regular market, social firms). This gap can be explained in part by diverse organisational components, particularly the implementation of work accommodations, which is related to the disclosure of the mental disorder in the workplace. Indeed, in the scientific literature, the principal reason associated with disclosure is in regards to requesting work accommodations. The main objective of this paper is to increase our understanding of the relationships between these three concepts – disclosure of a mental disorder, work accommodations and natural supports, and job tenure – by reviewing the specialized literature and presenting the work of the authors of this paper. To do so, the authors will address the following questions: How do we define ‘disclosure’ of a mental disorder in the workplace and what are the strategies to consider before disclosing? What is the decision-making process related to disclosure in the workplace? How are the three concepts – disclosure of the mental disorder in the workplace, work accommodations and job tenure – intertwined? Finally, how can employment specialists facilitate the work integration of people with severe mental disorders by considering the three concepts mentioned above? Results from a review of the literature show that disclosure of a mental disorder is a dialectical process that goes beyond the question: to tell or not to tell? In fact, it is not a single binary decision. Several components are associated with the disclosure concept, and can be summarized by the questions: What, how, when and to whom to disclose his/her mental condition? Reasons for disclosing his/her mental disorder in the workplace are numerous, characterized by personal, interpersonal and work environmental factors, on one hand. On the other hand, disclosure has potential consequences, both positive (e.g., to obtain work accommodations) and negative (e.g., stigma). A decision-making process takes place when people with a severe mental disorder think about the possibility of disclosing their mental condition in the workplace – a complex decisional process involving the need to evaluate different aspects (i.e. individual, interpersonal and work environmental factors). Also, the literature supports the fact that requiring work accommodations is often related to the disclosure of the mental disorder, when natural supports in the workplace are not available. The literature is scarce regarding the correlations between the concepts of disclosure, implementation of work accommodations and job tenure; however, a more recent study demonstrated this significant relationship, in which the supervisor and co-worker supports are crucial. Employment specialists or counselors recognise the importance of planned disclosure as a means to obtain access to work adjustments in the workplace and to prevent stigma. The employment specialist working in supported employment programs for instance, could adopt with his/her clients a plan for managing the pros and cons of disclosure of the mental disorder in the workplace; this plan is entitled: Managing personal information. It consists of several steps – for example, to collect details of any sensitive information such as diagnosis, to identify work restrictions with the client, to have a common agreement (employment specialists and clients together) on terms to describe work restrictions – to help clients feel empowered and more confident as productive and valued workers. This plan allows employment specialists to work through the disclosure concept, often negatively connoted, and to adopt a more normalising strategy. Furthermore, additional tools for supporting the management of personal information plan could be used such as the Decision-Making About Disclosure Scale, the Barriers to Employment and Coping Efficacy Scale, and the Work Accommodation and Natural Support Scale, to name a few. To conclude, job tenure for people with severe mental disorders is not a pious vow, several pragmatic ingredients for intervening on this issue are now available." @default.
- W2116603875 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2116603875 creator A5019756523 @default.
- W2116603875 creator A5068618057 @default.
- W2116603875 creator A5079074458 @default.
- W2116603875 creator A5081784776 @default.
- W2116603875 date "2014-06-01" @default.
- W2116603875 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
- W2116603875 title "La divulgation du trouble mental et les mesures d’accommodements de travail : deux facteurs du maintien en emploi des personnes aux prises avec un trouble mental grave" @default.
- W2116603875 cites W1135911500 @default.
- W2116603875 cites W143201091 @default.
- W2116603875 cites W1497266635 @default.
- W2116603875 cites W1771972262 @default.
- W2116603875 cites W1910945506 @default.
- W2116603875 cites W1921328238 @default.
- W2116603875 cites W1977106400 @default.
- W2116603875 cites W1983947710 @default.
- W2116603875 cites W1987275771 @default.
- W2116603875 cites W1989496296 @default.
- W2116603875 cites W1989795613 @default.
- W2116603875 cites W1996051758 @default.
- W2116603875 cites W2011777828 @default.
- W2116603875 cites W2020730049 @default.
- W2116603875 cites W2020847012 @default.
- W2116603875 cites W2033388673 @default.
- W2116603875 cites W2038259481 @default.
- W2116603875 cites W2072758344 @default.
- W2116603875 cites W2085401009 @default.
- W2116603875 cites W2099697766 @default.
- W2116603875 cites W2110410436 @default.
- W2116603875 cites W2117171752 @default.
- W2116603875 cites W2122318679 @default.
- W2116603875 cites W2124362878 @default.
- W2116603875 cites W2127170011 @default.
- W2116603875 cites W2127625785 @default.
- W2116603875 cites W2152068993 @default.
- W2116603875 cites W2313430721 @default.
- W2116603875 cites W2316142957 @default.
- W2116603875 cites W2318201059 @default.
- W2116603875 cites W2324573021 @default.
- W2116603875 cites W334933903 @default.
- W2116603875 cites W4235137049 @default.
- W2116603875 cites W4255342005 @default.
- W2116603875 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.encep.2014.04.006" @default.
- W2116603875 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24948480" @default.
- W2116603875 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
- W2116603875 type Work @default.
- W2116603875 sameAs 2116603875 @default.
- W2116603875 citedByCount "21" @default.
- W2116603875 countsByYear W21166038752015 @default.
- W2116603875 countsByYear W21166038752016 @default.
- W2116603875 countsByYear W21166038752017 @default.
- W2116603875 countsByYear W21166038752018 @default.
- W2116603875 countsByYear W21166038752019 @default.
- W2116603875 countsByYear W21166038752020 @default.
- W2116603875 countsByYear W21166038752021 @default.
- W2116603875 countsByYear W21166038752022 @default.
- W2116603875 countsByYear W21166038752023 @default.
- W2116603875 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2116603875 hasAuthorship W2116603875A5019756523 @default.
- W2116603875 hasAuthorship W2116603875A5068618057 @default.
- W2116603875 hasAuthorship W2116603875A5079074458 @default.
- W2116603875 hasAuthorship W2116603875A5081784776 @default.
- W2116603875 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W2116603875 hasConcept C15708023 @default.
- W2116603875 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W2116603875 hasConceptScore W2116603875C138885662 @default.
- W2116603875 hasConceptScore W2116603875C15708023 @default.
- W2116603875 hasConceptScore W2116603875C15744967 @default.
- W2116603875 hasLocation W21166038751 @default.
- W2116603875 hasLocation W21166038752 @default.
- W2116603875 hasOpenAccess W2116603875 @default.
- W2116603875 hasPrimaryLocation W21166038751 @default.
- W2116603875 hasRelatedWork W1013667899 @default.
- W2116603875 hasRelatedWork W11365241 @default.
- W2116603875 hasRelatedWork W1589203209 @default.
- W2116603875 hasRelatedWork W1932013790 @default.
- W2116603875 hasRelatedWork W2557454913 @default.
- W2116603875 hasRelatedWork W2603296253 @default.
- W2116603875 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
- W2116603875 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
- W2116603875 hasRelatedWork W828925460 @default.
- W2116603875 hasRelatedWork W93312527 @default.
- W2116603875 hasVolume "40" @default.
- W2116603875 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2116603875 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2116603875 magId "2116603875" @default.
- W2116603875 workType "article" @default.