FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2116727741> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2116727741 abstract "Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) is the treatment of choice for high-risk facial basal cell carcinoma (BCC) as it offers the greatest chance of cure with maximum preservation of healthy tissue. Its use in Spanish public health care hospitals is still limited, however, due to the controversy surrounding its cost.To determine the cost of MMS with fresh tissue to treat high-risk facial BCC and compare this to the estimated cost of conventional surgery in a Spanish public hospital. A secondary objective was to identify cost-optimization strategies for MMS.Cross-sectional study of a consecutive series of patients with high-risk facial BCC who underwent MMS at the Department of Dermatology at Hospital Costa del Sol in Malaga, Spain between July 2006 and December 2007. We performed a descriptive analysis of the clinical characteristics of the patients and surgical factors. We calculated the total and mean cost of MMS and compared the results to the estimated costs of conventional surgery using patients as their own controls. Differences were analyzed according to tumor site and size, histologic subtype, and recurrence.Seventy-nine patients (mean age, 62 years) with 81 high-risk facial BCCs, 97.5% of which were primary tumors, underwent MMS. The most common tumor site was the nose (57%) followed by the orbital region (25%). Histology showed that 64% of the tumors were infiltrative or micronodular carcinomas. Tumor-free margins were achieved in all patients, with no more than 2 stages required in 88% of the cases. The most common surgical reconstruction techniques were direct closure (21%) and closure with a local skin flap or graft (71%); the corresponding estimates for conventional surgery were 2% and 89%, respectively. The total and mean cost of MMS was e106,129.07 and e1325.80, respectively (compared to e97 700 and e1208.70 for conventional surgery). The difference in mean costs between MMS and conventional surgery was not significant (P=0.534).MMS is a viable, effective technique that does not generate significantly higher costs than conventional surgery in selected patients with high-risk facial BCC. Certain technical and organizational strategies could contribute to optimizing the cost of MMS." @default.
• W2116727741 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2116727741 creator A5002372610 @default.
• W2116727741 creator A5004665655 @default.
• W2116727741 creator A5051669245 @default.
• W2116727741 creator A5069596831 @default.
• W2116727741 creator A5075138463 @default.
• W2116727741 creator A5077071488 @default.
• W2116727741 date "2010-01-01" @default.
• W2116727741 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2116727741 title "Cost Analysis of Mohs Micrographic Surgery in High-Risk Facial Basal Cell Carcinoma" @default.
• W2116727741 cites W117283996 @default.
• W2116727741 cites W1966637321 @default.
• W2116727741 cites W1975048282 @default.
• W2116727741 cites W1982697548 @default.
• W2116727741 cites W1988996236 @default.
• W2116727741 cites W1993905045 @default.
• W2116727741 cites W2005367751 @default.
• W2116727741 cites W2025268169 @default.
• W2116727741 cites W2030889722 @default.
• W2116727741 cites W2049796490 @default.
• W2116727741 cites W2053094263 @default.
• W2116727741 cites W2080676269 @default.
• W2116727741 cites W2097067989 @default.
• W2116727741 cites W2105820114 @default.
• W2116727741 cites W2122549495 @default.
• W2116727741 cites W2128189549 @default.
• W2116727741 cites W2131131624 @default.
• W2116727741 cites W2141453076 @default.
• W2116727741 cites W2147133104 @default.
• W2116727741 cites W2161891371 @default.
• W2116727741 cites W2165904438 @default.
• W2116727741 cites W71597 @default.
• W2116727741 cites W2153366753 @default.
• W2116727741 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/s1578-2190(10)70684-3" @default.
• W2116727741 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28709544" @default.
• W2116727741 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W2116727741 type Work @default.
• W2116727741 sameAs 2116727741 @default.
• W2116727741 citedByCount "4" @default.
• W2116727741 countsByYear W21167277412012 @default.
• W2116727741 countsByYear W21167277412014 @default.
• W2116727741 countsByYear W21167277412016 @default.
• W2116727741 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2116727741 hasAuthorship W2116727741A5002372610 @default.
• W2116727741 hasAuthorship W2116727741A5004665655 @default.
• W2116727741 hasAuthorship W2116727741A5051669245 @default.
• W2116727741 hasAuthorship W2116727741A5069596831 @default.
• W2116727741 hasAuthorship W2116727741A5075138463 @default.
• W2116727741 hasAuthorship W2116727741A5077071488 @default.
• W2116727741 hasBestOaLocation W21167277411 @default.
• W2116727741 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2116727741 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2116727741 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2116727741 hasConcept C16005928 @default.
• W2116727741 hasConcept C2777789703 @default.
• W2116727741 hasConcept C2778311950 @default.
• W2116727741 hasConcept C2778334829 @default.
• W2116727741 hasConcept C2778804307 @default.
• W2116727741 hasConcept C3019992690 @default.
• W2116727741 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2116727741 hasConceptScore W2116727741C121608353 @default.
• W2116727741 hasConceptScore W2116727741C126322002 @default.
• W2116727741 hasConceptScore W2116727741C141071460 @default.
• W2116727741 hasConceptScore W2116727741C16005928 @default.
• W2116727741 hasConceptScore W2116727741C2777789703 @default.
• W2116727741 hasConceptScore W2116727741C2778311950 @default.
• W2116727741 hasConceptScore W2116727741C2778334829 @default.
• W2116727741 hasConceptScore W2116727741C2778804307 @default.
• W2116727741 hasConceptScore W2116727741C3019992690 @default.
• W2116727741 hasConceptScore W2116727741C71924100 @default.
• W2116727741 hasLocation W21167277411 @default.
• W2116727741 hasLocation W21167277412 @default.
• W2116727741 hasOpenAccess W2116727741 @default.
• W2116727741 hasPrimaryLocation W21167277411 @default.
• W2116727741 hasRelatedWork W109654155 @default.
• W2116727741 hasRelatedWork W139793809 @default.
• W2116727741 hasRelatedWork W1973190050 @default.
• W2116727741 hasRelatedWork W1994913176 @default.
• W2116727741 hasRelatedWork W207205167 @default.
• W2116727741 hasRelatedWork W2078269557 @default.
• W2116727741 hasRelatedWork W2273910761 @default.
• W2116727741 hasRelatedWork W3119361717 @default.
• W2116727741 hasRelatedWork W2523494652 @default.
• W2116727741 hasRelatedWork W2593957515 @default.
• W2116727741 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2116727741 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2116727741 magId "2116727741" @default.
• W2116727741 workType "article" @default.