FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2117089488> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2117089488 endingPage "82.e8" @default.
• W2117089488 startingPage "82.e1" @default.
• W2117089488 abstract "While open ureteral reimplantation is the gold standard of surgical intervention for vesicoureteral reflux (VUR), minimally invasive approaches offer the potential benefits of decreased postoperative pain, improved cosmesis, and shorter hospital stay and convalescence. Studies comparing open and minimally invasive surgery with respect to postoperative pain in children have been inconclusive.We sought to compare postoperative pain in children undergoing open versus robotic ureteral reimplantation by using age-appropriate, validated pain assessment scales.A prospective cohort of all patients enrolled in an Institutional Review Board-approved VUR surgery registry between July 2010 and February 2013 was analyzed. Patients who underwent endoscopic treatment or who received caudal or epidural anesthesia were excluded. Age-appropriate, validated pain scales ranging from 0 to 10 were utilized for pain assessment. Pain scores and narcotic doses administered on the first postoperative day were analyzed.Of the 34 subjects included, 11 underwent open intravesical reimplantation, while 23 patients underwent robotic extravesical reimplantation. Table 1 displays patient characteristics and results of pain assessment. Robotic surgery was associated with lower narcotic requirement compared to open surgery (P < 0.05). The difference in pain scores between the two cohorts approached, but did not reach, statistical significance (P = 0.12). However, the percentage of patients with mild or no pain (57% robotic, 27% open) versus severe pain (9% robotic, 45% open) was notably different between the two cohorts.Previous studies addressing the effect of surgical modality on pediatric postoperative pain are limited by their reliance on narcotic administration as an indirect surrogate for measuring pain. In the present study, postoperative pain was assessed with narcotic requirements and consistently collected validated pain scores, which more accurately reflect a patient's perceived pain. Although there was no significant difference in subjective pain scores between patients undergoing open versus robotic reimplantation, the percentage of patients with mild or no pain (57% robotic, 27% open) versus severe pain (9% robotic, 45% open) was notably different between the two cohorts. This study was limited by a lack of randomization as well as small sample size, which did not allow for age sub-group analysis or small differences to be statistically significant.In the present study, robotic ureteral reimplantation was associated with lower narcotic requirement compared to open surgery, and lower intensity of postoperative pain according to a direct pain assessment tool. Larger sample sizes are necessary to strengthen statistical comparisons." @default.
• W2117089488 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2117089488 creator A5021981760 @default.
• W2117089488 creator A5040029066 @default.
• W2117089488 creator A5051965275 @default.
• W2117089488 creator A5072942205 @default.
• W2117089488 creator A5076598585 @default.
• W2117089488 creator A5091594429 @default.
• W2117089488 date "2015-04-01" @default.
• W2117089488 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2117089488 title "Objective pain assessment after ureteral reimplantation: Comparison of open versus robotic approach" @default.
• W2117089488 cites W1724282010 @default.
• W2117089488 cites W1963709694 @default.
• W2117089488 cites W1965377984 @default.
• W2117089488 cites W1997279652 @default.
• W2117089488 cites W1998003721 @default.
• W2117089488 cites W1999220961 @default.
• W2117089488 cites W2008459949 @default.
• W2117089488 cites W2016824457 @default.
• W2117089488 cites W2021312513 @default.
• W2117089488 cites W2040248009 @default.
• W2117089488 cites W2053900761 @default.
• W2117089488 cites W2054759022 @default.
• W2117089488 cites W2062770028 @default.
• W2117089488 cites W2066373193 @default.
• W2117089488 cites W2122171011 @default.
• W2117089488 cites W2142960553 @default.
• W2117089488 cites W2152898838 @default.
• W2117089488 cites W2315746592 @default.
• W2117089488 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.12.007" @default.
• W2117089488 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25864615" @default.
• W2117089488 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W2117089488 type Work @default.
• W2117089488 sameAs 2117089488 @default.
• W2117089488 citedByCount "43" @default.
• W2117089488 countsByYear W21170894882016 @default.
• W2117089488 countsByYear W21170894882017 @default.
• W2117089488 countsByYear W21170894882018 @default.
• W2117089488 countsByYear W21170894882019 @default.
• W2117089488 countsByYear W21170894882020 @default.
• W2117089488 countsByYear W21170894882021 @default.
• W2117089488 countsByYear W21170894882022 @default.
• W2117089488 countsByYear W21170894882023 @default.
• W2117089488 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2117089488 hasAuthorship W2117089488A5021981760 @default.
• W2117089488 hasAuthorship W2117089488A5040029066 @default.
• W2117089488 hasAuthorship W2117089488A5051965275 @default.
• W2117089488 hasAuthorship W2117089488A5072942205 @default.
• W2117089488 hasAuthorship W2117089488A5076598585 @default.
• W2117089488 hasAuthorship W2117089488A5091594429 @default.
• W2117089488 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2117089488 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2117089488 hasConcept C188816634 @default.
• W2117089488 hasConcept C2775849661 @default.
• W2117089488 hasConcept C2777106319 @default.
• W2117089488 hasConcept C2777945365 @default.
• W2117089488 hasConcept C2778282284 @default.
• W2117089488 hasConcept C2780943399 @default.
• W2117089488 hasConcept C2983098980 @default.
• W2117089488 hasConcept C40993552 @default.
• W2117089488 hasConcept C42219234 @default.
• W2117089488 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2117089488 hasConceptScore W2117089488C126322002 @default.
• W2117089488 hasConceptScore W2117089488C141071460 @default.
• W2117089488 hasConceptScore W2117089488C188816634 @default.
• W2117089488 hasConceptScore W2117089488C2775849661 @default.
• W2117089488 hasConceptScore W2117089488C2777106319 @default.
• W2117089488 hasConceptScore W2117089488C2777945365 @default.
• W2117089488 hasConceptScore W2117089488C2778282284 @default.
• W2117089488 hasConceptScore W2117089488C2780943399 @default.
• W2117089488 hasConceptScore W2117089488C2983098980 @default.
• W2117089488 hasConceptScore W2117089488C40993552 @default.
• W2117089488 hasConceptScore W2117089488C42219234 @default.
• W2117089488 hasConceptScore W2117089488C71924100 @default.
• W2117089488 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2117089488 hasLocation W21170894881 @default.
• W2117089488 hasLocation W21170894882 @default.
• W2117089488 hasOpenAccess W2117089488 @default.
• W2117089488 hasPrimaryLocation W21170894881 @default.
• W2117089488 hasRelatedWork W1983827921 @default.
• W2117089488 hasRelatedWork W2011595863 @default.
• W2117089488 hasRelatedWork W2040663675 @default.
• W2117089488 hasRelatedWork W2096163185 @default.
• W2117089488 hasRelatedWork W2117089488 @default.
• W2117089488 hasRelatedWork W2182447214 @default.
• W2117089488 hasRelatedWork W2403884693 @default.
• W2117089488 hasRelatedWork W2426421043 @default.
• W2117089488 hasRelatedWork W2913502599 @default.
• W2117089488 hasRelatedWork W2465770319 @default.
• W2117089488 hasVolume "11" @default.
• W2117089488 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2117089488 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2117089488 magId "2117089488" @default.
• W2117089488 workType "article" @default.