FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2117300059> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2117300059 endingPage "762" @default.
• W2117300059 startingPage "756" @default.
• W2117300059 abstract "Purpose To investigate how the selection of ion type affects the calculated isoeffective dose to the surrounding normal tissue as a function of both normal tissue and target tissue α/β ratios. Methods and Materials A microdosimetric biologic dose model was incorporated into a Geant4 simulation of parallel opposed beams of protons, helium, lithium, beryllium, carbon, and neon ions. The beams were constructed to give a homogeneous isoeffective dose to a volume in the center of a water phantom for target tissues covering a range of cobalt equivalent α/β ratios of 1–20 Gy. Concomitant normal tissue isoeffective doses in the plateau of the ion beam were then compared for different ions across the range of normal tissue and target tissue radiosensitivities for a fixed isoeffective dose to the target tissue. Results The ion type yielding the optimal normal tissue sparing was highly dependent on the α/β ratio of both the normal and the target tissue. For carbon ions, the calculated isoeffective dose to normal tissue at a 5-cm depth varied by almost a factor of 5, depending on the α/β ratios of the normal and target tissue. This ranges from a factor of 2 less than the isoeffective dose of a similar proton treatment to a factor of 2 greater. Conclusions No single ion is optimal for all treatment scenarios. The heavier ions are superior in cases in which the α/β ratio of the target tissue is low and the α/β ratio of normal tissue is high, and protons are superior in the opposite circumstances. Lithium and beryllium appear to offer dose advantages similar to carbon, with a considerably lower normal tissue dose when the α/β ratio in the target tissue is high and the α/β ratio in the normal tissue is low. To investigate how the selection of ion type affects the calculated isoeffective dose to the surrounding normal tissue as a function of both normal tissue and target tissue α/β ratios. A microdosimetric biologic dose model was incorporated into a Geant4 simulation of parallel opposed beams of protons, helium, lithium, beryllium, carbon, and neon ions. The beams were constructed to give a homogeneous isoeffective dose to a volume in the center of a water phantom for target tissues covering a range of cobalt equivalent α/β ratios of 1–20 Gy. Concomitant normal tissue isoeffective doses in the plateau of the ion beam were then compared for different ions across the range of normal tissue and target tissue radiosensitivities for a fixed isoeffective dose to the target tissue. The ion type yielding the optimal normal tissue sparing was highly dependent on the α/β ratio of both the normal and the target tissue. For carbon ions, the calculated isoeffective dose to normal tissue at a 5-cm depth varied by almost a factor of 5, depending on the α/β ratios of the normal and target tissue. This ranges from a factor of 2 less than the isoeffective dose of a similar proton treatment to a factor of 2 greater. No single ion is optimal for all treatment scenarios. The heavier ions are superior in cases in which the α/β ratio of the target tissue is low and the α/β ratio of normal tissue is high, and protons are superior in the opposite circumstances. Lithium and beryllium appear to offer dose advantages similar to carbon, with a considerably lower normal tissue dose when the α/β ratio in the target tissue is high and the α/β ratio in the normal tissue is low." @default.
• W2117300059 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2117300059 creator A5018667251 @default.
• W2117300059 creator A5020773196 @default.
• W2117300059 creator A5027235876 @default.
• W2117300059 date "2012-06-01" @default.
• W2117300059 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2117300059 title "Optimizing Normal Tissue Sparing in Ion Therapy Using Calculated Isoeffective Dose for Ion Selection" @default.
• W2117300059 cites W1994000794 @default.
• W2117300059 cites W1997533204 @default.
• W2117300059 cites W2005391728 @default.
• W2117300059 cites W2031231902 @default.
• W2117300059 cites W2040145532 @default.
• W2117300059 cites W2041596966 @default.
• W2117300059 cites W2041753214 @default.
• W2117300059 cites W2047763793 @default.
• W2117300059 cites W2048338122 @default.
• W2117300059 cites W2060936143 @default.
• W2117300059 cites W2076771282 @default.
• W2117300059 cites W2083079551 @default.
• W2117300059 cites W2094764787 @default.
• W2117300059 cites W2102049456 @default.
• W2117300059 cites W2104358865 @default.
• W2117300059 cites W2119860372 @default.
• W2117300059 cites W2128158076 @default.
• W2117300059 cites W2129154213 @default.
• W2117300059 cites W2132034069 @default.
• W2117300059 cites W2153683941 @default.
• W2117300059 cites W2163082543 @default.
• W2117300059 cites W2166098780 @default.
• W2117300059 cites W2176639809 @default.
• W2117300059 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.08.006" @default.
• W2117300059 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22436796" @default.
• W2117300059 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W2117300059 type Work @default.
• W2117300059 sameAs 2117300059 @default.
• W2117300059 citedByCount "16" @default.
• W2117300059 countsByYear W21173000592014 @default.
• W2117300059 countsByYear W21173000592015 @default.
• W2117300059 countsByYear W21173000592016 @default.
• W2117300059 countsByYear W21173000592018 @default.
• W2117300059 countsByYear W21173000592019 @default.
• W2117300059 countsByYear W21173000592020 @default.
• W2117300059 countsByYear W21173000592022 @default.
• W2117300059 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2117300059 hasAuthorship W2117300059A5018667251 @default.
• W2117300059 hasAuthorship W2117300059A5020773196 @default.
• W2117300059 hasAuthorship W2117300059A5027235876 @default.
• W2117300059 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2117300059 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2117300059 hasConcept C145148216 @default.
• W2117300059 hasConcept C185544564 @default.
• W2117300059 hasConcept C2779244869 @default.
• W2117300059 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W2117300059 hasConcept C506630978 @default.
• W2117300059 hasConcept C509974204 @default.
• W2117300059 hasConcept C54516573 @default.
• W2117300059 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W2117300059 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2117300059 hasConceptScore W2117300059C121332964 @default.
• W2117300059 hasConceptScore W2117300059C126838900 @default.
• W2117300059 hasConceptScore W2117300059C145148216 @default.
• W2117300059 hasConceptScore W2117300059C185544564 @default.
• W2117300059 hasConceptScore W2117300059C2779244869 @default.
• W2117300059 hasConceptScore W2117300059C2989005 @default.
• W2117300059 hasConceptScore W2117300059C506630978 @default.
• W2117300059 hasConceptScore W2117300059C509974204 @default.
• W2117300059 hasConceptScore W2117300059C54516573 @default.
• W2117300059 hasConceptScore W2117300059C62520636 @default.
• W2117300059 hasConceptScore W2117300059C71924100 @default.
• W2117300059 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2117300059 hasLocation W21173000591 @default.
• W2117300059 hasLocation W21173000592 @default.
• W2117300059 hasOpenAccess W2117300059 @default.
• W2117300059 hasPrimaryLocation W21173000591 @default.
• W2117300059 hasRelatedWork W1969524135 @default.
• W2117300059 hasRelatedWork W1979314332 @default.
• W2117300059 hasRelatedWork W2041279798 @default.
• W2117300059 hasRelatedWork W2046835972 @default.
• W2117300059 hasRelatedWork W2081924222 @default.
• W2117300059 hasRelatedWork W2407142571 @default.
• W2117300059 hasRelatedWork W3011224823 @default.
• W2117300059 hasRelatedWork W3025724153 @default.
• W2117300059 hasRelatedWork W4293021298 @default.
• W2117300059 hasRelatedWork W4310043601 @default.
• W2117300059 hasVolume "83" @default.
• W2117300059 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2117300059 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2117300059 magId "2117300059" @default.
• W2117300059 workType "article" @default.