Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2117360090> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2117360090 endingPage "19559" @default.
- W2117360090 startingPage "19552" @default.
- W2117360090 abstract "The matrix metalloproteinase gelatinase A plays a key role in the evolution of glomerular injury and is a major contributing factor to the development of glomerulosclerosis. Prior studies have focused on a potent cis-acting enhancer element located in the near 5′-flanking region of the rat and human gelatinase A genes (Harendza, S., Pollock, A. S., Mertens, P. R., and Lovett, D. H. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 18286–18796; Mertens, P. R., Alfonso-Jaume, M. A., Steinmann, K., and Lovett, D. H. (1999) J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 10, 2480–2487). Given the combinatorial nature of transcriptional regulation, we examined additional regions of the 5′-flanking region of the rat gelatinase A gene to identify further regulatory elements. In this study the identification of a silencing element located between −1903 and −1847 base pairs of the 5′-flanking region of the rat gelatinase A gene is reported. Sequence analysis, electrophoretic mobility studies, and transfection experiments demonstrate that a specific binding sequence for the hematopoietic transcription factor PU.1 is present within the silencing sequence. PU.1 activity is absolutely required for the expression of silencing activity within the context of transfected glomerular mesangial cells. Western blots identify the PU.1 protein within nuclear extracts of mesangial cells, and cotransfection with a PU.1 expression vector directly augments silencing activity. These studies underscore the complex patterns of gelatinase A transcriptional regulation and also strongly suggest that glomerular mesangial cells are ultimately derived from bone marrow cells. The matrix metalloproteinase gelatinase A plays a key role in the evolution of glomerular injury and is a major contributing factor to the development of glomerulosclerosis. Prior studies have focused on a potent cis-acting enhancer element located in the near 5′-flanking region of the rat and human gelatinase A genes (Harendza, S., Pollock, A. S., Mertens, P. R., and Lovett, D. H. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 18286–18796; Mertens, P. R., Alfonso-Jaume, M. A., Steinmann, K., and Lovett, D. H. (1999) J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 10, 2480–2487). Given the combinatorial nature of transcriptional regulation, we examined additional regions of the 5′-flanking region of the rat gelatinase A gene to identify further regulatory elements. In this study the identification of a silencing element located between −1903 and −1847 base pairs of the 5′-flanking region of the rat gelatinase A gene is reported. Sequence analysis, electrophoretic mobility studies, and transfection experiments demonstrate that a specific binding sequence for the hematopoietic transcription factor PU.1 is present within the silencing sequence. PU.1 activity is absolutely required for the expression of silencing activity within the context of transfected glomerular mesangial cells. Western blots identify the PU.1 protein within nuclear extracts of mesangial cells, and cotransfection with a PU.1 expression vector directly augments silencing activity. These studies underscore the complex patterns of gelatinase A transcriptional regulation and also strongly suggest that glomerular mesangial cells are ultimately derived from bone marrow cells. base pair(s) kilobase pair(s) phorbol myristoyl acetate normal rat kidney phosphate-buffered saline lipopolysaccharide polyethyleneimine electrophoretic mobility shift analyses mesangial cells Gelatinase A (also denoted MMP-2 or 72-kDa type IV collagenase) is an important member of the large family of matrix metalloproteinases that have been ascribed key roles in multiple biologic processes, including embryogenesis, wound healing, and neoplasia. As with all members of this family, gelatinase A is secreted in a latent proenzyme form, is dependent upon zinc for catalytic activity, and is inhibited by a family of low molecular weight proteins, the tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (4.Woessner Jr., J.F. FASEB J. 1991; 5: 2145-2154Crossref PubMed Scopus (3091) Google Scholar). Gelatinase A is secreted in vitro by many cells of mesenchymal or neoplastic origin and displays highly regulated expression during murine embryogenesis (5.Reponen P. Sahlberg C. Huhtala P. Hurskainen T. Thesleff I. Tryggvason K. J. Biol. Chem. 1992; 267: 7856-7862Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar). Numerous studies have defined a critical role for gelatinase A in renal inflammatory processes affecting both the glomerulus and interstitium (6.Lovett D.H. Johnson R.J. Marti H.-P. Martin J. Davies M. Couser W.G. Am. J. Pathol. 1992; 141: 85-98PubMed Google Scholar, 7.Harendza S. Schneider A. Helmchen U. Stahl R.A.K. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 1999; 14 (2287): 2873Crossref PubMed Scopus (39) Google Scholar). For example, enhanced gelatinase A synthesis by a proliferating glomerular mesangial cell population is characteristic of a model of immune complex-mediated glomerulonephritis in rats (6.Lovett D.H. Johnson R.J. Marti H.-P. Martin J. Davies M. Couser W.G. Am. J. Pathol. 1992; 141: 85-98PubMed Google Scholar, 8.Harendza S. Behrens U. Zahner G. Schneider A. Stahl R.A.K. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 1997; 12: 2537-2541Crossref PubMed Scopus (5) Google Scholar) and in chronic glomerulosclerosis in a variety of human renal diseases (9.Carome M.A. Striker L.J. Peten E.P. Elliot S.J. Yang C.W. Stetler-Stevenson W.G. Reponen P. Tryggvason K. Striker G.E. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 1994; 5: 1391-1399PubMed Google Scholar). The functional significance of enhanced gelatinase A synthesis during these processes was underscored by the observation that inhibition of gelatinase A expression in glomerular mesangial cells blocks cellular proliferation and interstitial scar collagen formation (10.Turck J. Pollock A.S. Lee L. Marti H.-P. Lovett D.H. J. Biol. Chem. 1996; 25: 15074-15083Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF Scopus (149) Google Scholar). Recent studies with hepatic stellate cells, a myofibroblast that closely resembles the mesangial cell, have also demonstrated that gelatinase A is a direct determinant of cellular proliferation and interstitial collagen formation (11.Préaux A.-M. Mallat A. Van Nhieu J.T. D'Ortho M.-P. Hembry R.M. Mavier P. Hepatology. 1999; 30: 944-950Crossref PubMed Scopus (120) Google Scholar, 12.Benyon R.C. Hovell C.J. Da Gaça M. Jones E.H. Iredale J.P. Arthur M.J.P. Hepatology. 1999; 30: 977-986Crossref PubMed Scopus (120) Google Scholar). Given the functional significance of gelatinase A expression for multiple glomerular disease processes, our laboratories have focused on a detailed analysis of the transcriptional regulatory mechanisms that determine gelatinase A expression by the mesangial cell type. We initially identified a potent 80-bp1 enhancer element, denoted RE-1, located at −1342 to −1262 bp relative to the translational start site of the rat gelatinase A gene that drives in a cell-specific manner high level gene expression (1.Harendza S. Pollock A.S. Mertens P.R. Lovett D.H. J. Biol. Chem. 1995; 270: 18786-18796Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (84) Google Scholar). Subsequent expression cloning studies have demonstrated the specific interaction of the highly conserved transcription factor, YB-1, with the RE-1 sequence (2.Mertens P.R. Harendza S. Pollock A.S. Lovett D.H. J. Biol. Chem. 1997; 272: 22905-22912Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (142) Google Scholar). Positive transactivation by YB-1 is further augmented by cooperative interactions with the transcription factor, AP-2, leading to major increases in gelatinase A transcription and translation rates (13.Mertens P.R. Alfonso-Jaume M.A. Steinmann K. Lovett D.H. J. Biol. Chem. 1998; 273: 32957-32965Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (100) Google Scholar). An analogous sequence in the human gelatinase A gene has been recently identified and shown to also interact in a specific manner with YB-1 and AP-2 (3.Mertens P.R. Alfonso-Jaume M.A. Steinmann K. Lovett D.H. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 1999; 10: 2480-2487Crossref PubMed Google Scholar). Our initial series of studies focused on the near 5′ (up to −1686 bp)-flanking region of the human and rat gelatinase A genes, and the current investigation was designed to identify additional regulatory sequences located in the further upstream regions of the rat gelatinase A gene. In this report we define a specific silencer element located at −1869 to −1845 bp relative to the translational start site that specifically interacts with the hematopoietic transcription factor PU.1. Overexpression of PU.1 results in highly significant silencing of gelatinase A gene transcription and further underscores the complex combinatorial nature of the regulation of this important gene. Rat glomerular mesangial cells were isolated and characterized as reported in detail (6.Lovett D.H. Johnson R.J. Marti H.-P. Martin J. Davies M. Couser W.G. Am. J. Pathol. 1992; 141: 85-98PubMed Google Scholar). Mesangial cells were maintained in RPMI 1640 (Life Technologies, Inc.) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 μg/ml streptomycin, and 100 units/ml penicillin. Human monocytic leukemia U937 cells and rat renal fibroblast NRK cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA) and were maintained in the same growth medium as defined above. For experiments with differentiated U937 cells, 1 × 10−7m phorbol myristoyl acetate (PMA) was added to the culture medium 24 h prior to study. A rat λDASHII genomic library (Stratagene) was screened with a radiolabeled 250-bp fragment representing the 5′ proximal end of the cloned rat gelatinase A cDNA (14.Marti H.-P. McNeil L. Davies M. Martin J. Lovett D.H. Biochem. J. 1993; 291: 441-446Crossref PubMed Scopus (81) Google Scholar). Prior studies have focused on a 6-kbKpnI-NotI fragment extending from −1686 bp relative to the translational start site through the second intron (1.Harendza S. Pollock A.S. Mertens P.R. Lovett D.H. J. Biol. Chem. 1995; 270: 18786-18796Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (84) Google Scholar,2.Mertens P.R. Harendza S. Pollock A.S. Lovett D.H. J. Biol. Chem. 1997; 272: 22905-22912Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (142) Google Scholar). For this study the adjacent 5′ PstI-KpnI 1311-bp fragment (see map in Fig. 1) was subcloned into pBluescript KS+ (Stratagene) and sequenced. Plasmid pT4-Luc1686 consists of 1686 bp of the immediate 5′-flanking region of the rat gelatinase A gene subcloned into the promoterless luciferase expression vector, pGL2-Basic (Promega), as reported in detail (1.Harendza S. Pollock A.S. Mertens P.R. Lovett D.H. J. Biol. Chem. 1995; 270: 18786-18796Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (84) Google Scholar). For these studies the 1311-bp PstI-KpnI fragment was subcloned into pT4-Luc1686 5′ to the 1686-bp insert (see diagram of constructs, Fig.2). This construct is denoted pT4-LucA2997. A series of truncation constructs extending over the 1311-bp PstI-KpnI segment was prepared by polymerase chain reaction using thePstI-KpnI fragment as a template. These constructs were terminated at −2783, −2563, −2343, −2123, and −1903 bp relative to the translational start site and are denoted pT4-LucA2686, pT4-LucA2486, pT4-LucA2286, pT4-LucA2086, and pT4-LucA1903, respectively. A second series of deletion constructs was prepared with 5′ terminations at −1847 and −1791 bp, and the constructs are denoted pT4-LucA1847 and pT4-LucA1791, respectively. The sequence between bp −1687 and −1903 was also subcloned in the reverse orientation into pT4-Luc1686 and is denoted pT4-LucA1903inv (see diagram of constructs, Fig. 2). The pT4-Luc1686 construct includes the strong enhancer element located between −1342 and −1262 bp (1.Harendza S. Pollock A.S. Mertens P.R. Lovett D.H. J. Biol. Chem. 1995; 270: 18786-18796Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (84) Google Scholar). To assess silencing activity in the absence of this enhancer element, a deletion construct, pT4-Luc1007, which extends to −1007 bp was prepared. The sequence between −1903 and −1687 bp was subcloned into pT4-Luc1007 yielding pT4-Luc1007/1903-1687. The sequences between −1847 and −1687 bp and −1791 and −1687 bp were also subcloned into pT4-Luc1007, yielding pT4-Luc1007/1847-1687 and pT4-Luc1007/1791-1687, respectively. A final series of constructs was designed to map further the silencer activity located between −1903 and −1687 bp. The sequence between −1903 and −1792 was subcloned into pT4-Luc1007 to yield pT4-LucA1007/1903-1792. Constructs pT4-Luc1007/1903-1847 and pT4-Luc1007/1847-1792 were prepared similarly. Finally, the consensus PU.1-binding motif −1854GAGGAA−1849 in pT4-Luc1007/1903-1847 was mutated to−1854CTATCG−1849, yielding construct pT4-Luc1007/1903-1847mut (see diagram of constructs, Fig. 2). Transient transfection of mesangial cells was performed with polyethyleneimine (PEI) according to Boussifet al. (15.Boussif O. Lezoualch F. Zanta M.A. Mergny M.D. Scherman D. Demeneix B. Behr J.-P. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1995; 92: 7297-7301Crossref PubMed Scopus (5654) Google Scholar). In brief, 50 kDa PEI (Sigma) was prepared as a neutralized, sterile-filtered aqueous 10 mm stock. Triplicate cultures were plated at a density of 100,000 cells/well (Falcon 6-well dishes) and cultured overnight prior to transfection. The cultures were rinsed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and given fresh growth medium without serum. Purified pT4-Luc expression plasmids (2 μg/well) and a normalizing pCMV-β-galactosidase plasmid (2 μg/well) were diluted in 100 μl of PBS and vortexed. In a separate tube 10.8 μl of PEI stock solution was vortexed into 100 μl of PBS. After 10 min the solutions were mixed, vortexed, and incubated for 10 min at room temperature, followed by addition to the cultures. After 4 h the medium was supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum, and the cells were harvested after an additional 18 h. Luciferase and β-galactosidase assays of cell lysates were performed as described (16.Brasier A.R. Tate J.E. Habener J.F. BioTechniques. 1989; 7: 1116-1122PubMed Google Scholar, 17.Rosenthal N. Methods Enzymol. 1987; 152: 704-720Crossref PubMed Scopus (403) Google Scholar). All transfections were performed in triplicate for each construct, and all transfection sets were repeated at least three times. Transfection results were averaged, normalized with the β-galactosidase results, and expressed as the means (S.D less than 15%). For cotransfection experiments, 1 μg of the PU.1 expression plasmid PU-pECE or control pECE plasmid (the kind gift of Matthew J. Fenton, Boston) was included in the transfection mixture. The effects of bacterial endotoxin (LPS) and PMA on silencer function were assessed by addition of 1 ng/ml LPS or 1 × 10−7m PMA for the final 6 h of the transfection period. Nuclear extracts from mesangial cells, phorbol-differentiated U937 cells, and NRK cells were prepared as reported in detail (1.Harendza S. Pollock A.S. Mertens P.R. Lovett D.H. J. Biol. Chem. 1995; 270: 18786-18796Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (84) Google Scholar). Synthetic oligonucleotides were annealed and end-labeled with polynucleotide kinase and [γ-32P]dATP according to standard methodology. Nuclear extracts were used at 10 μg of protein/reaction, incubated with oligonucleotides, and electrophoresed as reported in detail (1.Harendza S. Pollock A.S. Mertens P.R. Lovett D.H. J. Biol. Chem. 1995; 270: 18786-18796Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (84) Google Scholar, 2.Mertens P.R. Harendza S. Pollock A.S. Lovett D.H. J. Biol. Chem. 1997; 272: 22905-22912Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (142) Google Scholar). For competition experiments, unlabeled oligonucleotides were added to 50-fold molar excess to the nuclear extracts for 15 min prior to addition of labeled oligonucleotides to the reaction mixture. Antibody supershift experiments were performed by preincubation of the nuclear extracts for 1 h at 4 °C with 1–2 μg/ml rabbit polyclonal anti-mouse PU.1 or control rabbit serum (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) prior to addition of labeled oligonucleotide and electrophoresis. Nuclear extracts (50 μg) were electrophoresed on 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gels and transferred to nitrocellulose blots (Hybond ECL, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Membranes were blocked in 5% dried milk in wash buffer (1× PBS, 0.1% Tween 20) for 1 h at room temperature, followed by incubation for 1 h at room temperature with wash buffer containing 1 μg/ml rabbit anti-mouse PU.1 antibody. Membranes were then washed three times in wash buffer and incubated for 1 h at room temperature with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (1 μg/ml wash buffer, Southern Biotechnology). Washed blots were then developed using the ECL system (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) according to the manufacturer's instructions and exposed to film for 10 min. For our initial investigations of the transcriptional regulation of the gelatinase A gene, a 17-kb genomic clone was isolated from a rat λ phage genomic library using a cDNA probe composed of exon 1 (1.Harendza S. Pollock A.S. Mertens P.R. Lovett D.H. J. Biol. Chem. 1995; 270: 18786-18796Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (84) Google Scholar, 14.Marti H.-P. McNeil L. Davies M. Martin J. Lovett D.H. Biochem. J. 1993; 291: 441-446Crossref PubMed Scopus (81) Google Scholar). TheKpnI/NotI fragment, which includes −1686 bp of the 5′ regulatory region of the gelatinase A gene, has been extensively characterized (1.Harendza S. Pollock A.S. Mertens P.R. Lovett D.H. J. Biol. Chem. 1995; 270: 18786-18796Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (84) Google Scholar, 2.Mertens P.R. Harendza S. Pollock A.S. Lovett D.H. J. Biol. Chem. 1997; 272: 22905-22912Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (142) Google Scholar, 13.Mertens P.R. Alfonso-Jaume M.A. Steinmann K. Lovett D.H. J. Biol. Chem. 1998; 273: 32957-32965Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (100) Google Scholar). These studies have demonstrated a potent, cell-specific 80-bp enhancer element located between −1342 and −1262 bp (1.Harendza S. Pollock A.S. Mertens P.R. Lovett D.H. J. Biol. Chem. 1995; 270: 18786-18796Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (84) Google Scholar, 2.Mertens P.R. Harendza S. Pollock A.S. Lovett D.H. J. Biol. Chem. 1997; 272: 22905-22912Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (142) Google Scholar). The adjacent 1311-bp PstI/KpnI fragment (fragment 2 in Fig. 1) was subcloned into pBluescript KS+ and sequenced. This fragment was also subcloned into the plasmid pT4-Luc1686, which includes 1686 bp of the 5′-flanking region in a promoterless luciferase expression plasmid, yielding plasmid pT4-LucA2997 (see Fig. 2for a schematic outline of all constructs used in this study). A series of deletions of this construct was prepared and used to transfect cultured rat glomerular mesangial cells (Fig.3). Deletion construct pT4-LucA1903 reduced the luciferase activity of the original construct pT4-Luc1686 by 50%, whereas the other deletion constructs had no significant effects on pT4-Luc1686 reporter activity. These first experiments suggested that a silencing activity existed within the 217-bp fragment extending from bases −1903 to −1687. The nucleotide sequence of this fragment is shown in Fig. 4. Analysis of this sequence using the TRANSFAC data base (18.Heinemeyer T. Wingender E. Reuter I. Hermjakob H. Kel A.E. Kel O.V. Ignatieva E.V. Ananko E.A. Podkolodnaya O.A. Kolpakov F.A. Podkolodny N.L. Kolchanov N.A. Nucleic Acids Res. 1998; 26: 264-370Crossref Scopus (1325) Google Scholar) revealed a core consensus PU.1-binding sequence (5′-GAGGAA-3′) located between bases −1854 to −1849.Figure 4Nucleotide sequence (GenBank™ accession number ; Ref. 1.Harendza S. Pollock A.S. Mertens P.R. Lovett D.H. J. Biol. Chem. 1995; 270: 18786-18796Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (84) Google Scholar) of the rat gelatinase A gene between −1903 and −1687 nucleotides upstream of the ATG translation initiation codon. The box indicates a potential binding site for the transcription factor PU.1.View Large Image Figure ViewerDownload Hi-res image Download (PPT) To map the silencing activity within this 217-bp fragment of the gelatinase A gene, serial deletions of this fragment were subcloned into pT4-Luc1686 and used to transfect mesangial cells (Fig.5 A). Moderate but not significant decreases in luciferase activity were observed with constructs pT4-LucA1791 and pT4-LucA1847, as compared with construct pT4-Luc1686. Luciferase expression was reduced by 50% following transfection with construct pT4-LucA1903, as compared with pT4-Luc1686. When the 217-bp fragment was cloned into pT4-Luc1686 in the reverse orientation (construct pT4-LucA1903inv), there was also a 50% reduction in luciferase activity, as compared with pT4-Luc1686. These experiments suggested that one or more regions with silencing activity are present within the −1903 to −1847 sequence. They also indicate that this region can act in an orientation-independent manner, which is characteristic of some silencer elements (19.Ogbourne S. Antalis T.M. Biochem. J. 1998; 331: 1-14Crossref PubMed Scopus (180) Google Scholar). To determine whether the silencing activity identified in sequence −1903 to −1687 was the result of direct suppression of the strong enhancer element located at −1342 to −1262 bp, a second series of deletions was subcloned into plasmid pT4-Luc1007, which does not include the enhancer sequence (Fig. 5 B). As observed with the earlier set of deletion constructs, only the construct including −1903 to −1686 bp reduced the luciferase activity of construct pT4-Luc1007. These experiments indicate that the silencing activity of the −1903 to −1687-bp sequence is not dependent upon interactions with the enhancer element and is more probably the consequence of interaction with the proximal promoter. For further mapping of the silencing activity, an additional series of deletion constructs of the −1903 to −1687-bp region was prepared, using the enhancerless pT4-Luc1007 reporter construct (Fig.5 C). Deletion constructs including the most 5′ 83 and 56 bp (plasmids pT4-Luc1007/1903-1820 and pT4-Luc1007/1903-1847, respectively) had the same degree of silencing activity as obtained with the complete −1903- to −1687-bp fragment. The 27-bp sequence extending from −1847 to −1820 bp (pT4-Luc1007/1847-1820) did not demonstrate any significant silencing activity, thereby mapping the silencer to the sequence spanning −1903 to −1847 bp. The 56-bp −1903 to −1847 sequence includes the consensus core PU.1-binding site discussed above. In order to determine the functional significance of this site, an additional construct was prepared in which the core PU.1-binding site was mutated to 5′-CTATCG-3′, according to Klemsz et al. (20.McKercher S.R. Torbett B.E. Anderson K.L. Henkel G.W. Vestal D.J. Baribault H. Klemsz M. Feeney A.J. Wu G.E. Paige C.J. Maki R.A. EMBO J. 1996; 15: 5647-5658Crossref PubMed Scopus (934) Google Scholar), creating plasmid pT4-Luc1007/1903-1847mut). This mutated plasmid did not express silencing activity as compared with control pT4-Luc1007, indicating that an intact PU.1 core consensus binding site is required for silencing activity. EMSA using nuclear extracts from mesangial cells and a synthetic oligonucleotide extending from −1869 to −1845 bp, which includes the PU.1-binding site, was performed. In the presence of mesangial cell nuclear extract, the radiolabeled −1869 to −1845-bp oligonucleotide showed significant mobility retardation with formation of a single major oligonucleotide-protein complex (Fig. 6,2nd lane). The formation of the oligonucleotide-protein complex was significantly reduced when the mesangial cell nuclear extracts were preincubated with a specific rabbit anti-PU.1 IgG (Fig. 6, 3rd lane), whereas preincubation with a control rabbit anti-mouse IgG had no significant effect on the formation of the oligonucleotide-protein complex (Fig. 6,4th lane). The specificity of the oligonucleotide-protein complex formation was further confirmed by competition experiments. A 50-molar excess of cold −1869- to −1845-bp oligonucleotide strongly competed for nuclear protein binding, resulting in the disappearance of the major shifted complex (Fig. 6,5th lane), whereas a 50-molar excess of the cold −1875 to −1856 oligonucleotide, which lacks the PU.1 consensus binding site, did not compete for complex formation (Fig. 6, 6th lane). A synthetic oligonucleotide extending from −1869 to −1845 was prepared in which the consensus PU.1 site was mutated. Preincubation with a 50-molar excess of this oligonucleotide had no effect on nuclear protein-oligonucleotide complex formation (Fig. 6,7th lane), providing further confirmation that the PU.1 protein is required for complex formation. The cell-specific nuclear protein binding activity for the −1869 to −1845 oligonucleotide was investigated by comparing nuclear extracts from mesangial cells, phorbol ester-differentiated U937 monocytic leukemia cells, which express PU.1 protein, and fibroblastic NRK cells, which do not. EMSA with nuclear extracts from mesangial cells and differentiated U937 cells yielded identically retarded complexes following incubation with radiolabeled −1869 to −1845 oligonucleotide (Fig. 7 A), whereas nuclear extracts from PU.1-negative NRK cells did not yield oligonucleotide-protein complexes. When a Western blot with anti-PU.1 antibody was performed with the respective nuclear extracts, specific bands of 42 kDa, consistent with the molecular mass of PU.1, were detected in the mesangial and U937 cell extracts but not with the NRK extracts. These studies provide further confirmation for the direct role of the PU.1 protein in the formation of the oligonucleotide-protein complexes. To assess directly the influence of PU.1 on the silencing activity, cotransfection experiments with the luciferase reporter constructs and a eukaryotic expression vector PU-pECE encoding PU.1 were performed. The results of these experiments are summarized in Fig. 8. Cotransfection of the PU-pECE plasmid with the pT4-Luc1686 construct had no significant effect on relative luciferase activity, as compared with cotransfection with a control pECE plasmid. Cotransfection of PU-pECE, but not control pECE, with the pT4-LucA1903 plasmid, which includes the PU.1-binding site, further reduced luciferase activity by more than 50%. The phosphorylation status of the PU.1 protein has been previously shown to affect DNA binding and transcriptional regulatory activity (21.Carey J.O. Posekany K.J. deVente J.E. Pettit G.R. Ways D.K. Blood. 1996; 87: 4316-4324Crossref PubMed Google Scholar, 22.Shackelford R. Adams D.O. Johnson S.P. J. Immunol. 1995; 154: 1374-1382PubMed Google Scholar). By using hematopoietic cells, incubation with bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or phorbol ester (PMA) enhances PU.1 activity through protein kinase-dependent pathways (24.Lodie T.A. Savedra Jr., R. Golenbock D.T. Van Beveren C.P. Maki R.A. Fenton M.J. J. Immunol. 1997; 158: 1848-1856PubMed Google Scholar, 25.Xue Y. Alford P. Shackelford R.E. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1999; 254: 211-214Crossref PubMed Scopus (8) Google Scholar). To determine whether a similar pathway is operative for PU.1-mediated gelatinase A silencing, cultured mesangial cells were transfected with the reporter constructs pT4-Luc1686 and pT4-LucA1903. Following transfection the cultures were incubated either in control medium, 1 ng/ml LPS, or 1 × 10−7m PMA for 6 h. The results of these experiments are shown in Fig.9. Treatment with either LPS or PMA had no significant effect on the transcriptional activity of the pT4-Luc1686 plasmid, whereas both reagents significantly increased the silencing activity contained with the pT4-LucA1903 plasmid, which includes the PU.1-binding site. Taken together with the PU.1 transfection experiments, these studies provide direct experimental evidence for the involvement of PU.1 in the silencing activity mapped to −1903 to −1847. Enhanced gelatinase A expression is a critical component of the glomerular inflammatory process and is directly associated with the development of sclerosis and loss of renal function. Thus, a comprehensive understanding of the transcriptional regulation of this gene within the context of glomerular mesangial cells is an important experimental goal. In this study we have further analyzed the 5′-flanking region of the rat gelatinase A gene and have identified the transcription factor PU.1 as a potent silencer of gelatinase A transcription. The silencer activity was localized to a 56-bp sequence located between −1903 and −1847 bp relative to the translational start site. Inspection of this sequence revealed the consensus core PU.1-binding sequence, GAGGAA, which is flanked on the 3′ aspect by GG. The GAGGAAGG sequence is present in the promoters of the FcγRI and FcγRIIIA genes and specifically binds PU.1 (23.Li S.L. Schlegel W. Valente A.J. Clark R.A. J. Biol. Chem. 1999; 274: 32453-32460Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (36) Google Scholar). Mutation of this sequence in the gelatinase A gene resulted in complete loss of silencing and EMSA activity. Furthermore, studies with a highly specific anti-PU.1 antibody confirmed the presence of PU.1 protein binding with the GAGGAAGG-containing oligonucleotide, whereas Western blot analysis of mesangial cell nuclear extracts specifically detected the 42-kDa PU.1 protein. Cotransfection with a PU.1 expression plasmid significantly enhanced the silencing activity of this sequence, as did incubation with bacterial endotoxin and phorbol esters. Bacterial endotoxin and phorbol esters have been demonstrated to increase the transcriptional activity of PU.1 through casein kinase II- or protein kinase C-mediated PU.1 phosphorylation (24.Lodie T.A. Savedra Jr., R. Golenbock D.T. Van Beveren C.P. Maki R.A. Fenton M.J. J. Immunol. 1997; 158: 1848-1856PubMed Google Scholar, 25.Xue Y. Alford P. Shackelford R.E. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1999; 254: 211-214Crossref PubMed Scopus (8) Google Scholar). PU.1 is an important member of the large Ets family of transcriptional regulatory proteins. PU.1 expression is generally considered to be restricted to cells of hematopoietic lineage, including stem cells, macrophages, B-cells, and neutrophils (20.McKercher S.R. Torbett B.E. Anderson K.L. Henkel G.W. Vestal D.J. Baribault H. Klemsz M. Feeney A.J. Wu G.E. Paige C.J. Maki R.A. EMBO J. 1996; 15: 5647-5658Crossref PubMed Scopus (934) Google Scholar, 27.McKercher S.R. Henkel G.W. Maki R.A. J. Leukocyte Biol. 1999; 66: 727-732Crossref PubMed Scopus (27) Google Scholar, 28.Marecki S. Atchinson M.L. Fenton M.J. J. Immunol. 1999; 163: 2713-2722PubMed Google Scholar, 29.Anderson K.L. Smith K.A. Perkin H. Hermanson G. Anderson C.G. Jolly D.J. Maki R.A. Torbett B.E. Blood. 1999; 94: 2310-2318Crossref PubMed Google Scholar). Glomerular mesangial cells are multipotential pericytes that can execute macrophage-like functions, including phagocytosis, release of reactive oxygen species, and antigen presentation (30.Schlöndorff D. FASEB J. 1987; 1: 272-280Crossref PubMed Scopus (379) Google Scholar, 31.Radeke H.H. Emmendorffer A. Uciechowski P. von der Ohe J. Schwinzer B. Resch K. Kidney Int. 1994; 45: 763-774Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (26) Google Scholar). These properties have given rise to speculation that mesangial cells derive from the bone marrow, a speculation that has been recently confirmed using transplanted green fluorescent protein-expressing transgenic bone marrow cells (32.Utsunomiya Y., Yu, Z. Kawamua T. Nagasawa R. Okabe M. Maruyama N. Hosoya T. Ohno T. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 1999; 10 (abstr.): 406Google Scholar). Hence, the observation in this report that cultured glomerular mesangial cells express PU.1 protein is consistent with a hematopoietic origin for these cells. Most studies examining the transcriptional regulatory activity of PU.1 have demonstrated positive transactivation. For example, PU.1 enhances transcription of a large group of genes involved in myeloid differentiation, including the macrophage colony-stimulating factor receptor, the macrophage scavenger receptor, and the common β subunit of the interleukin-3, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, and interleukin-5 receptors (29.Anderson K.L. Smith K.A. Perkin H. Hermanson G. Anderson C.G. Jolly D.J. Maki R.A. Torbett B.E. Blood. 1999; 94: 2310-2318Crossref PubMed Google Scholar, 33.Zhang D.E. Hetherington C.J. Chen H.M. Tenen D.G. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1994; 14: 373-381Crossref PubMed Scopus (53) Google Scholar, 34.Moulton K.S. Semple K. Wu H. Glass C.K. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1994; 14: 4408-4418Crossref PubMed Scopus (161) Google Scholar, 35.Van Dijk T.B. Raaijmakers J.A. Lammers J.W. Koenderman L. de Groot R.P. J. Immunol. 1999; 163: 2674-2680PubMed Google Scholar, 36.Van Dijk T.B. Baltus B. Caldenhoven E. Handa H. Raaijmakers J.A. Lammers J.W. Koenderman L. de Groot R.P. Blood. 1998; 92: 3636-3646Crossref PubMed Google Scholar). PU.1 has also been shown to repress transcription of a much more limited set of genes, including CD11c integrin, the c-myb, gene and the I-Aβgene (37.Lopez-Rodriguez C. Corbi A.L. Eur. J. Immunol. 1997; 27: 1843-1847Crossref PubMed Scopus (32) Google Scholar, 38.Bellon T. Perrotti D. Calabretta B. Blood. 1997; 90: 1828-1839Crossref PubMed Google Scholar, 39.Borras F.E. Lloberas J. Maki R.A. Celada A. J. Biol. Chem. 1995; 270: 24385-24391Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (35) Google Scholar). Thus, PU.1-mediated gelatinase A transcriptional silencing in mesangial cells may be but one component of a larger group of PU.1-regulated genes in this cell type. Transcriptional silencers have been found in a number of genes, including vimentin, thyrotropin-β, plasminogen activator inhibitor type-2, platelet-derived growth factor, and c-fos (26.Natesan S. Gilman M.Z. Genes Dev. 1993; 7: 2497-2509Crossref PubMed Scopus (213) Google Scholar,40.Farell F.X. Sax C.M. Zeher Z.E. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1990; 10: 2349-2358Crossref PubMed Scopus (50) Google Scholar, 41.Kim M.K. Lesoonwood L.A. Weintraub B.D. Chung J.H. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1996; 16: 4366-4377Crossref PubMed Scopus (89) Google Scholar, 42.Antalis T.M. Costelloe E. Muddiman J. Ogbourne S. Donnan K. Blood. 1996; 88: 3686-3697Crossref PubMed Google Scholar, 43.Liu B. Maul R.S. Kaetzel D.M. J. Biol. Chem. 1996; 271: 26281-26290Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (19) Google Scholar). It has been suggested that bound silencer proteins repress transcription by interfering at a distance with the core proximal promoter, by interfering with an enhancer element directly, or by interfering with enhancer-core promoter interactions (19.Ogbourne S. Antalis T.M. Biochem. J. 1998; 331: 1-14Crossref PubMed Scopus (180) Google Scholar). The behavior of the PU.1-silencing element in the gelatinase A gene is most consistent with the first model, since core proximal promoter activity was repressed in the absence of the enhancer element. A similar pattern has been demonstrated for the vimentin silencer (40.Farell F.X. Sax C.M. Zeher Z.E. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1990; 10: 2349-2358Crossref PubMed Scopus (50) Google Scholar). In summary, this study has characterized a PU.1-binding silencer element in the 5′-flanking region of the rat gelatinase A gene. Recent sequence analysis of the human gelatinase A gene has detected a highly homologous sequence within the same region, suggesting that the current observations are applicable to regulation of the human gene as well. 2D. H. Lovett, unpublished observations. These studies underscore the complex patterns of gelatinase A transcriptional regulation within glomerular mesangial cells and provide further support for the macrophage-like nature of this critical inflammatory effector cell." @default.
- W2117360090 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2117360090 creator A5002634924 @default.
- W2117360090 creator A5040494349 @default.
- W2117360090 creator A5043052973 @default.
- W2117360090 date "2000-06-01" @default.
- W2117360090 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
- W2117360090 title "The Hematopoietic Transcription Factor PU.1 Represses Gelatinase A Transcription in Glomerular Mesangial Cells" @default.
- W2117360090 cites W1483582136 @default.
- W2117360090 cites W1517339521 @default.
- W2117360090 cites W1565477991 @default.
- W2117360090 cites W1569115731 @default.
- W2117360090 cites W1585015128 @default.
- W2117360090 cites W1865845936 @default.
- W2117360090 cites W1912127524 @default.
- W2117360090 cites W1926072853 @default.
- W2117360090 cites W1970372703 @default.
- W2117360090 cites W1987851611 @default.
- W2117360090 cites W1988009798 @default.
- W2117360090 cites W2005328558 @default.
- W2117360090 cites W2007849798 @default.
- W2117360090 cites W2010655741 @default.
- W2117360090 cites W2028356539 @default.
- W2117360090 cites W2040116000 @default.
- W2117360090 cites W2046821312 @default.
- W2117360090 cites W2047580942 @default.
- W2117360090 cites W2063453094 @default.
- W2117360090 cites W2065603366 @default.
- W2117360090 cites W2087729062 @default.
- W2117360090 cites W2088050057 @default.
- W2117360090 cites W2099951558 @default.
- W2117360090 cites W2109572507 @default.
- W2117360090 cites W2109658199 @default.
- W2117360090 cites W2129826481 @default.
- W2117360090 cites W2133690652 @default.
- W2117360090 cites W2136115649 @default.
- W2117360090 cites W2151625863 @default.
- W2117360090 cites W2170538634 @default.
- W2117360090 cites W2171668140 @default.
- W2117360090 cites W2265807804 @default.
- W2117360090 cites W2344929644 @default.
- W2117360090 cites W2415933643 @default.
- W2117360090 cites W275773222 @default.
- W2117360090 cites W4313335089 @default.
- W2117360090 cites W7532581 @default.
- W2117360090 doi "https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m001322200" @default.
- W2117360090 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10867017" @default.
- W2117360090 hasPublicationYear "2000" @default.
- W2117360090 type Work @default.
- W2117360090 sameAs 2117360090 @default.
- W2117360090 citedByCount "16" @default.
- W2117360090 countsByYear W21173600902017 @default.
- W2117360090 countsByYear W21173600902018 @default.
- W2117360090 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2117360090 hasAuthorship W2117360090A5002634924 @default.
- W2117360090 hasAuthorship W2117360090A5040494349 @default.
- W2117360090 hasAuthorship W2117360090A5043052973 @default.
- W2117360090 hasBestOaLocation W21173600901 @default.
- W2117360090 hasConcept C104317684 @default.
- W2117360090 hasConcept C109159458 @default.
- W2117360090 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W2117360090 hasConcept C153911025 @default.
- W2117360090 hasConcept C179926584 @default.
- W2117360090 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
- W2117360090 hasConcept C28328180 @default.
- W2117360090 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
- W2117360090 hasConcept C502942594 @default.
- W2117360090 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
- W2117360090 hasConcept C86339819 @default.
- W2117360090 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
- W2117360090 hasConcept C95444343 @default.
- W2117360090 hasConceptScore W2117360090C104317684 @default.
- W2117360090 hasConceptScore W2117360090C109159458 @default.
- W2117360090 hasConceptScore W2117360090C138885662 @default.
- W2117360090 hasConceptScore W2117360090C153911025 @default.
- W2117360090 hasConceptScore W2117360090C179926584 @default.
- W2117360090 hasConceptScore W2117360090C185592680 @default.
- W2117360090 hasConceptScore W2117360090C28328180 @default.
- W2117360090 hasConceptScore W2117360090C41895202 @default.
- W2117360090 hasConceptScore W2117360090C502942594 @default.
- W2117360090 hasConceptScore W2117360090C55493867 @default.
- W2117360090 hasConceptScore W2117360090C86339819 @default.
- W2117360090 hasConceptScore W2117360090C86803240 @default.
- W2117360090 hasConceptScore W2117360090C95444343 @default.
- W2117360090 hasIssue "26" @default.
- W2117360090 hasLocation W21173600901 @default.
- W2117360090 hasOpenAccess W2117360090 @default.
- W2117360090 hasPrimaryLocation W21173600901 @default.
- W2117360090 hasRelatedWork W1837026174 @default.
- W2117360090 hasRelatedWork W1975595193 @default.
- W2117360090 hasRelatedWork W1996916774 @default.
- W2117360090 hasRelatedWork W2008301391 @default.
- W2117360090 hasRelatedWork W2017328306 @default.
- W2117360090 hasRelatedWork W2021516648 @default.
- W2117360090 hasRelatedWork W2025063645 @default.
- W2117360090 hasRelatedWork W2057841153 @default.
- W2117360090 hasRelatedWork W2119511363 @default.
- W2117360090 hasRelatedWork W2186218390 @default.