FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2117821692> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2117821692 abstract "This paper describes how comprehensive web sites (online study guides) are being used as a tool to deliver course material. Such a delivery tool may not be needed for all courses, but feedback from students suggests that web pages provide improved delivery of course material. Students report that having a complete site with all course material presented in hierarchical order with links to related internal and external material gives the course more structure and that the material is more convenient to access. Although the specific software tool used to create these study guides is held in high regard, the intent is to present the value of online study guides as a teaching tool rather than the merits of a specific program. Other educators may prefer to use a different program to develop study guides. While teaching an online class, a new software tool was used to facilitate the development of a web site containing the course material. The objective was to provide additional instruction and reference material to compensate for not being with the students in person. Although the students had the textbook and recorded lectures with accompanying slides (PowerPoint), an additional resource seemed to be needed to guide them through the course material. Similar web sites were later developed for three traditional classroom courses. In these classes, the course material web sites were called online study guides. A study guide falls between a textbook and lecture slides in terms of the level of detail to the material presented. Say Hello To PowerPoint In the pre-digital, olden days of public speaking, audiences mostly looked at the speaker who used their words, voice inflection, gestures and an occasional visual aid to make their points. If the audience were students in a classroom, then they busily took notes trying to catch every important point that might appear on an exam. Now, audiences often stare at images projected onto a white screen and take minimal notes. This is because two technologies emerged some twenty years ago that significantly impacted the craft of public speaking. The impact soon affected the delivery of classroom lectures and the overall practice of teaching. The technology is so compelling that things will never go back to how they were before. These technologies are none other than the software for producing and displaying slides and data projectors to display the slides for all to view. Since the slides are easily printed or distributed electronically, lecture slides have often become a primary media for course material distribution. This paper makes the claim that PowerPoint slides, which are perfectly suited for presentations at conferences and business meetings, might be suboptimal to web pages for course material delivery. In 1987, Microsoft purchased the software rights to a product called Presenter that was developed by Forethought Inc. and renamed it PowerPoint. Initially, PowerPoint files were sent to third party companies, which for a fee produced 35mm slides for use with a slide projector. However, this was short lived as addressable liquid crystal display (LCD) projectors were simultaneously being developed. In 1988, Panasonic and Samsung purchased licenses to technology allowing them mass produce LCD data projectors.(Hewitt, 2008) In the 1990s, PowerPoint became very popular; and data projectors and instructor computers were being installed in as many classrooms as budgets would allow. PowerPoint is the standard by which other slide presentation software is measured. The term “PowerPoint” has become not only the name of Microsoft's product, but also a generic label for slide presentation software. The subject matter in this paper is slide presentation software – not Microsoft's PowerPoint product. The observations presented here apply equally to OpenOffice Impress, Prezi, Apple Keynote, Google Docs Presentation or any other slide presentation software." @default.
• W2117821692 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2117821692 creator A5062483612 @default.
• W2117821692 date "2011-04-07" @default.
• W2117821692 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W2117821692 title "Dumping PowerPoint In Favor of Web Sites" @default.
• W2117821692 cites W1529406847 @default.
• W2117821692 cites W1606706489 @default.
• W2117821692 cites W2057319654 @default.
• W2117821692 cites W2989191493 @default.
• W2117821692 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W2117821692 type Work @default.
• W2117821692 sameAs 2117821692 @default.
• W2117821692 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2117821692 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2117821692 hasAuthorship W2117821692A5062483612 @default.
• W2117821692 hasConcept C110875604 @default.
• W2117821692 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2117821692 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W2117821692 hasConcept C146978453 @default.
• W2117821692 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W2117821692 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W2117821692 hasConcept C206345919 @default.
• W2117821692 hasConcept C2777212361 @default.
• W2117821692 hasConcept C2777552389 @default.
• W2117821692 hasConcept C2777904410 @default.
• W2117821692 hasConcept C2984519610 @default.
• W2117821692 hasConcept C31258907 @default.
• W2117821692 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2117821692 hasConcept C49774154 @default.
• W2117821692 hasConceptScore W2117821692C110875604 @default.
• W2117821692 hasConceptScore W2117821692C127413603 @default.
• W2117821692 hasConceptScore W2117821692C136764020 @default.
• W2117821692 hasConceptScore W2117821692C146978453 @default.
• W2117821692 hasConceptScore W2117821692C154945302 @default.
• W2117821692 hasConceptScore W2117821692C199360897 @default.
• W2117821692 hasConceptScore W2117821692C206345919 @default.
• W2117821692 hasConceptScore W2117821692C2777212361 @default.
• W2117821692 hasConceptScore W2117821692C2777552389 @default.
• W2117821692 hasConceptScore W2117821692C2777904410 @default.
• W2117821692 hasConceptScore W2117821692C2984519610 @default.
• W2117821692 hasConceptScore W2117821692C31258907 @default.
• W2117821692 hasConceptScore W2117821692C41008148 @default.
• W2117821692 hasConceptScore W2117821692C49774154 @default.
• W2117821692 hasLocation W21178216921 @default.
• W2117821692 hasOpenAccess W2117821692 @default.
• W2117821692 hasPrimaryLocation W21178216921 @default.
• W2117821692 hasRelatedWork W11998038 @default.
• W2117821692 hasRelatedWork W1504172223 @default.
• W2117821692 hasRelatedWork W1531963816 @default.
• W2117821692 hasRelatedWork W1568703506 @default.
• W2117821692 hasRelatedWork W1579892436 @default.
• W2117821692 hasRelatedWork W186824521 @default.
• W2117821692 hasRelatedWork W2058967519 @default.
• W2117821692 hasRelatedWork W2086642499 @default.
• W2117821692 hasRelatedWork W2142661738 @default.
• W2117821692 hasRelatedWork W2164108318 @default.
• W2117821692 hasRelatedWork W2245160969 @default.
• W2117821692 hasRelatedWork W2254893407 @default.
• W2117821692 hasRelatedWork W2290598154 @default.
• W2117821692 hasRelatedWork W238125229 @default.
• W2117821692 hasRelatedWork W2411313624 @default.
• W2117821692 hasRelatedWork W2527843861 @default.
• W2117821692 hasRelatedWork W2768309603 @default.
• W2117821692 hasRelatedWork W2913968687 @default.
• W2117821692 hasRelatedWork W61507479 @default.
• W2117821692 hasRelatedWork W2760947595 @default.
• W2117821692 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2117821692 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2117821692 magId "2117821692" @default.
• W2117821692 workType "article" @default.