FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2117967145> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2117967145 abstract "This paper contributes to the discussion about nonprofit organizations’ (NPO) model of financial management in the accounts receivable area. In fact, when it is judged from a technical point of view, the opinion that nonprofit financial management do not differ from a for-profit business could be justified, and is known in nonprofit financial management discussion (Jegers 2011; Hansmann, 1987). But that point of view is only partially right. Sloan et al. and Wedig et al. implemented with modifications a financial management portfolio theory to NPO financial management (Sloan et al., 1988; Wedig 1994, Wedig et al. 1996, Jegers, Verschueren, 2006). In the paper, the model of financial liquidity management in NPOs is presented from the perspective that claims the basic financial aim of an NPO is the most financially effective realization of the mission, resulting in the donors’ support for the organization (Leone, Van Horn, 2005; Eldenburg et al., 2011). It is close in many points to the maximization of for-profit firms’ values, but in fact it has many differences, and non-profit entrepreneurship could attract entrepreneurs more than for-profit organizations (Michalski, 2012; Chapelle, 2010). The net working capital requirements and the elements shaping it, such as the level of cash tied up in accounts receivable, inventories, the early settlement of accounts payable, and operational cash balances, is one of the fields where a difference could be seen. Not many NPOs have to deal with all aspects of liquidity decisions or current assets management. Like for-profit organizations, some of them use only cash from current assets, redistributing it from donors to beneficiaries. Other NPOs collect free-of-charge goods for resale, using this income to realize their mission. Many NPOs are almost identical in operating processes with for-profit businesses, but are nonprofit because of their main mission.An NPO’s management team’s decision about the accounts receivables policy is a balance between gaining new customers by way of a more liberal organization’s trade credit policy and limiting the risk of allowing for delayed payment from unreliable purchasers. That kind of decision shapes the level and quality of accounts receivables (Michalski, 2012). Paraphrasing Keith Smith and James A. Gentry’s observations, it is possible to observe that Robichek et al. (Gentry, 1988; Robichek et al., 1965; Smith, 1973) talk about the risk involved to accounts receivable decisions which must be accepted by financial institutions’ pledging of accounts receivable of the firm. Keith Smith (Smith, 1973; Gentry, 1988) predicted and Michalski (Michalski, 2008) showed how a portfolio theory may be used to decrease the accounts receivable risk. Current assets, and among them accounts receivables, could be viewed in the portfolio context as presented by Friedland (1966; Gentry, 1988). Pringle and Cohn (1974; Gentry, 1988) tried to adapt the CAPM theory to working capital elements. Bierman and Hausman (1970; Gentry, 1988) discuss the granting policy of an organization and shows that trade credit policy requires balancing the future sales gains against possible losses. Lewellen, Johnson and Edmister (Lewellen, Johnson, 1972; Lewellen, Edmister, 1973) explain how and why traditional devices used for monitoring accounts receivable should be changed by new and better ones. Freitas (Freitas, 1973) shows the relationship between liquidity and risk during accounts receivable management. The question discussed in that paper concerns the making of decisions by NPOs in the accounts receivables area." @default.
• W2117967145 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2117967145 creator A5009745982 @default.
• W2117967145 date "2012-01-01" @default.
• W2117967145 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2117967145 title "Accounts Receivable Management in Nonprofit Organizations" @default.
• W2117967145 cites W1548696140 @default.
• W2117967145 cites W1595501262 @default.
• W2117967145 cites W1999374462 @default.
• W2117967145 cites W2017603205 @default.
• W2117967145 cites W2028384087 @default.
• W2117967145 cites W2056761374 @default.
• W2117967145 cites W2087460770 @default.
• W2117967145 cites W2128524002 @default.
• W2117967145 cites W2139455506 @default.
• W2117967145 cites W2969646294 @default.
• W2117967145 cites W3122284311 @default.
• W2117967145 cites W3123630400 @default.
• W2117967145 cites W578126950 @default.
• W2117967145 cites W584573429 @default.
• W2117967145 doi "https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2193352" @default.
• W2117967145 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W2117967145 type Work @default.
• W2117967145 sameAs 2117967145 @default.
• W2117967145 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W2117967145 countsByYear W21179671452016 @default.
• W2117967145 countsByYear W21179671452018 @default.
• W2117967145 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2117967145 hasAuthorship W2117967145A5009745982 @default.
• W2117967145 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
• W2117967145 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2117967145 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2117967145 hasConcept C183582576 @default.
• W2117967145 hasConcept C202451310 @default.
• W2117967145 hasConcept C2778083465 @default.
• W2117967145 hasConcept C506796395 @default.
• W2117967145 hasConcept C60679458 @default.
• W2117967145 hasConcept C76087492 @default.
• W2117967145 hasConceptScore W2117967145C10138342 @default.
• W2117967145 hasConceptScore W2117967145C144133560 @default.
• W2117967145 hasConceptScore W2117967145C162324750 @default.
• W2117967145 hasConceptScore W2117967145C183582576 @default.
• W2117967145 hasConceptScore W2117967145C202451310 @default.
• W2117967145 hasConceptScore W2117967145C2778083465 @default.
• W2117967145 hasConceptScore W2117967145C506796395 @default.
• W2117967145 hasConceptScore W2117967145C60679458 @default.
• W2117967145 hasConceptScore W2117967145C76087492 @default.
• W2117967145 hasLocation W21179671451 @default.
• W2117967145 hasOpenAccess W2117967145 @default.
• W2117967145 hasPrimaryLocation W21179671451 @default.
• W2117967145 hasRelatedWork W1576190385 @default.
• W2117967145 hasRelatedWork W2189211702 @default.
• W2117967145 hasRelatedWork W2264487419 @default.
• W2117967145 hasRelatedWork W2270576565 @default.
• W2117967145 hasRelatedWork W2320983123 @default.
• W2117967145 hasRelatedWork W2322193065 @default.
• W2117967145 hasRelatedWork W259657083 @default.
• W2117967145 hasRelatedWork W2606431829 @default.
• W2117967145 hasRelatedWork W29186167 @default.
• W2117967145 hasRelatedWork W3015454302 @default.
• W2117967145 hasRelatedWork W3023938667 @default.
• W2117967145 hasRelatedWork W3125440155 @default.
• W2117967145 hasRelatedWork W3174510978 @default.
• W2117967145 hasRelatedWork W41233872 @default.
• W2117967145 hasRelatedWork W60399413 @default.
• W2117967145 hasRelatedWork W637870898 @default.
• W2117967145 hasRelatedWork W82906704 @default.
• W2117967145 hasRelatedWork W1853321150 @default.
• W2117967145 hasRelatedWork W2336060348 @default.
• W2117967145 hasRelatedWork W2441031050 @default.
• W2117967145 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2117967145 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2117967145 magId "2117967145" @default.
• W2117967145 workType "article" @default.