FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2119611701> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2119611701 abstract "In December 2010, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) adopted the Open Internet Order, which enacted binding network neutrality rules for the first time. Network neutrality rules limit the ability of Internet service providers to interfere with the applications, content and services on their networks; they allow users to decide how they want to use the Internet without interference from Internet service providers. In January of this year, the Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit struck down the core provisions of the Open Internet Order – the rules against blocking and discrimination. The Court upheld the Open Internet Order’s disclosure rule, so Internet service providers still have to publicly disclose any blocking or discrimination that occurs. As a result of this ruling, Internet service providers like Verizon, ATT it can develop a different, narrower network neutrality regime under Section 706 of the Telecommunications Act within the boundaries established by the Court of Appeal’s decision; or Congress or the FCC can adopt a new network neutrality regime under Title II of the Telecommunications Act. This paper helps policy makers think through the available options, focusing on the substantive merits of the different non-discrimination rules under consideration. In addition to rules that forbid network providers from blocking applications, content and services, rules that forbid discrimination are a key component of any network neutrality regime. Non-discrimination rules apply to any form of differential treatment that falls short of blocking. They determine, for example, whether network providers are allowed to provide low-delay service only to their own streaming video application, but not to competing video applications; whether network providers can count only traffic from unaffiliated video applications, but not their own Internet video applications, towards users’ monthly bandwidth cap; or whether network providers can charge different Internet access charges depending on the application used, independent of the amount of traffic created by the application.The paper makes five contributions: First, it proposes a substantive framework that policy makers can use to evaluate alternative proposals for network neutrality rules and assess specific forms of discriminatory conduct. Second, the paper evaluates eight existing proposals for non-discrimination rules and the Open Internet Order’s non-discrimination rule against this framework and proposes a non-discrimination rule that policy makers should adopt around the world – a rule that the Open Internet Order adopted in part. Third, the paper highlights the differences between an antitrust framework and the broader theoretical framework on which most calls for network neutrality regulation are based and explains why an antitrust framework does not capture all instances of blocking or discrimination that concern network neutrality proponents. Fourth, the paper offers the first in-depth analysis of the relationship between network neutrality and new network-level services called Quality of Service. Finally, the paper provides the first detailed analysis of the Open Internet Order’s non-discrimination rule for fixed broadband Internet access. The paper is relevant beyond the US: In Europe, the European Commission, the European Parliament and the member states are currently considering which approach to network neutrality they should take. The Brazilian Parliament is in the process of adopting network neutrality rules. In all of these debates, non-discrimination rules are a key point of contention. And no matter which network neutrality regime a country adopts, the question of which, if any, network-discriminations require a legal response will remain relevant for years to come." @default.
• W2119611701 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2119611701 creator A5053346791 @default.
• W2119611701 date "2014-06-26" @default.
• W2119611701 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2119611701 title "Network Neutrality and Quality of Service: What a Non-Discrimination Rule Should Look Like" @default.
• W2119611701 cites W1537172366 @default.
• W2119611701 cites W1557691773 @default.
• W2119611701 cites W2120946983 @default.
• W2119611701 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W2119611701 type Work @default.
• W2119611701 sameAs 2119611701 @default.
• W2119611701 citedByCount "5" @default.
• W2119611701 countsByYear W21196117012013 @default.
• W2119611701 countsByYear W21196117012015 @default.
• W2119611701 countsByYear W21196117012016 @default.
• W2119611701 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
• W2119611701 hasAuthorship W2119611701A5053346791 @default.
• W2119611701 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
• W2119611701 hasConcept C108827166 @default.
• W2119611701 hasConcept C110875604 @default.
• W2119611701 hasConcept C116537 @default.
• W2119611701 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W2119611701 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2119611701 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
• W2119611701 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2119611701 hasConcept C182306322 @default.
• W2119611701 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2119611701 hasConcept C2776034101 @default.
• W2119611701 hasConcept C2778449503 @default.
• W2119611701 hasConcept C2779581858 @default.
• W2119611701 hasConcept C2780378061 @default.
• W2119611701 hasConcept C2986707884 @default.
• W2119611701 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2119611701 hasConcept C5119721 @default.
• W2119611701 hasConcept C539553027 @default.
• W2119611701 hasConcept C76155785 @default.
• W2119611701 hasConceptScore W2119611701C10138342 @default.
• W2119611701 hasConceptScore W2119611701C108827166 @default.
• W2119611701 hasConceptScore W2119611701C110875604 @default.
• W2119611701 hasConceptScore W2119611701C116537 @default.
• W2119611701 hasConceptScore W2119611701C136764020 @default.
• W2119611701 hasConceptScore W2119611701C144133560 @default.
• W2119611701 hasConceptScore W2119611701C162853370 @default.
• W2119611701 hasConceptScore W2119611701C17744445 @default.
• W2119611701 hasConceptScore W2119611701C182306322 @default.
• W2119611701 hasConceptScore W2119611701C199539241 @default.
• W2119611701 hasConceptScore W2119611701C2776034101 @default.
• W2119611701 hasConceptScore W2119611701C2778449503 @default.
• W2119611701 hasConceptScore W2119611701C2779581858 @default.
• W2119611701 hasConceptScore W2119611701C2780378061 @default.
• W2119611701 hasConceptScore W2119611701C2986707884 @default.
• W2119611701 hasConceptScore W2119611701C41008148 @default.
• W2119611701 hasConceptScore W2119611701C5119721 @default.
• W2119611701 hasConceptScore W2119611701C539553027 @default.
• W2119611701 hasConceptScore W2119611701C76155785 @default.
• W2119611701 hasOpenAccess W2119611701 @default.
• W2119611701 hasRelatedWork W1494682024 @default.
• W2119611701 hasRelatedWork W1584558316 @default.
• W2119611701 hasRelatedWork W1588979248 @default.
• W2119611701 hasRelatedWork W1711652318 @default.
• W2119611701 hasRelatedWork W1837582345 @default.
• W2119611701 hasRelatedWork W212294345 @default.
• W2119611701 hasRelatedWork W2146215390 @default.
• W2119611701 hasRelatedWork W2153296587 @default.
• W2119611701 hasRelatedWork W2168908096 @default.
• W2119611701 hasRelatedWork W2248581181 @default.
• W2119611701 hasRelatedWork W2337563511 @default.
• W2119611701 hasRelatedWork W2543469572 @default.
• W2119611701 hasRelatedWork W2566454061 @default.
• W2119611701 hasRelatedWork W2579728130 @default.
• W2119611701 hasRelatedWork W2737357957 @default.
• W2119611701 hasRelatedWork W2750887074 @default.
• W2119611701 hasRelatedWork W2898157152 @default.
• W2119611701 hasRelatedWork W3007123400 @default.
• W2119611701 hasRelatedWork W3125165183 @default.
• W2119611701 hasRelatedWork W3151827794 @default.
• W2119611701 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2119611701 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2119611701 magId "2119611701" @default.
• W2119611701 workType "article" @default.