Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2119761489> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2119761489 endingPage "1002" @default.
- W2119761489 startingPage "995" @default.
- W2119761489 abstract "Purpose To assess motion of the spinal cord and cauda equina, which are critical neural tissues (CNT), which is important when evaluating the planning organ-at-risk margin required for stereotactic body radiation therapy. Methods and Materials We analyzed CNT motion in 65 patients with spinal metastases (11 cervical, 39 thoracic, and 24 lumbar spinal segments) in the supine position using dynamic axial and sagittal magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI, 3T Verio, Siemens) over a 137-second interval. Motion was segregated according to physiologic cardiorespiratory oscillatory motion (characterized by the average root mean square deviation) and random bulk shifts associated with gross patient motion (characterized by the range). Displacement was evaluated in the anteroposterior (AP), lateral (LR), and superior-inferior (SI) directions by use of a correlation coefficient template matching algorithm, with quantification of random motion measure error over 3 separate trials. Statistical significance was defined according to P<.05. Results In the AP, LR, and SI directions, significant oscillatory motion was observed in 39.2%, 35.1%, and 10.8% of spinal segments, respectively, and significant bulk motions in all cases. The median oscillatory CNT motions in the AP, LR, and SI directions were 0.16 mm, 0.17 mm, and 0.44 mm, respectively, and the maximal statistically significant oscillatory motions were 0.39 mm, 0.41 mm, and 0.77 mm, respectively. The median bulk displacements in the AP, LR, and SI directions were 0.51 mm, 0.59 mm, and 0.66 mm, and the maximal statistically significant displacements were 2.21 mm, 2.87 mm, and 3.90 mm, respectively. In the AP, LR, and SI directions, bulk displacements were greater than 1.5 mm in 5.4%, 9.0%, and 14.9% of spinal segments, respectively. No significant differences in axial motion were observed according to cord level or cauda equina. Conclusions Oscillatory CNT motion was observed to be relatively minor. Our results support the importance of controlling bulk patient motion and the practice of applying a planning organ-at-risk margin. To assess motion of the spinal cord and cauda equina, which are critical neural tissues (CNT), which is important when evaluating the planning organ-at-risk margin required for stereotactic body radiation therapy. We analyzed CNT motion in 65 patients with spinal metastases (11 cervical, 39 thoracic, and 24 lumbar spinal segments) in the supine position using dynamic axial and sagittal magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI, 3T Verio, Siemens) over a 137-second interval. Motion was segregated according to physiologic cardiorespiratory oscillatory motion (characterized by the average root mean square deviation) and random bulk shifts associated with gross patient motion (characterized by the range). Displacement was evaluated in the anteroposterior (AP), lateral (LR), and superior-inferior (SI) directions by use of a correlation coefficient template matching algorithm, with quantification of random motion measure error over 3 separate trials. Statistical significance was defined according to P<.05. In the AP, LR, and SI directions, significant oscillatory motion was observed in 39.2%, 35.1%, and 10.8% of spinal segments, respectively, and significant bulk motions in all cases. The median oscillatory CNT motions in the AP, LR, and SI directions were 0.16 mm, 0.17 mm, and 0.44 mm, respectively, and the maximal statistically significant oscillatory motions were 0.39 mm, 0.41 mm, and 0.77 mm, respectively. The median bulk displacements in the AP, LR, and SI directions were 0.51 mm, 0.59 mm, and 0.66 mm, and the maximal statistically significant displacements were 2.21 mm, 2.87 mm, and 3.90 mm, respectively. In the AP, LR, and SI directions, bulk displacements were greater than 1.5 mm in 5.4%, 9.0%, and 14.9% of spinal segments, respectively. No significant differences in axial motion were observed according to cord level or cauda equina. Oscillatory CNT motion was observed to be relatively minor. Our results support the importance of controlling bulk patient motion and the practice of applying a planning organ-at-risk margin." @default.
- W2119761489 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2119761489 creator A5015138770 @default.
- W2119761489 creator A5020447959 @default.
- W2119761489 creator A5032324904 @default.
- W2119761489 creator A5038804938 @default.
- W2119761489 creator A5047977949 @default.
- W2119761489 creator A5050365329 @default.
- W2119761489 creator A5054321389 @default.
- W2119761489 creator A5057593975 @default.
- W2119761489 creator A5078235989 @default.
- W2119761489 creator A5079012174 @default.
- W2119761489 creator A5079227079 @default.
- W2119761489 creator A5080794668 @default.
- W2119761489 date "2015-04-01" @default.
- W2119761489 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
- W2119761489 title "Magnetic Resonance Imaging Assessment of Spinal Cord and Cauda Equina Motion in Supine Patients With Spinal Metastases Planned for Spine Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy" @default.
- W2119761489 cites W1537972189 @default.
- W2119761489 cites W1946825180 @default.
- W2119761489 cites W1977465552 @default.
- W2119761489 cites W1978683126 @default.
- W2119761489 cites W1989321666 @default.
- W2119761489 cites W2001738903 @default.
- W2119761489 cites W2012809258 @default.
- W2119761489 cites W2020870950 @default.
- W2119761489 cites W2023765951 @default.
- W2119761489 cites W2026139629 @default.
- W2119761489 cites W2040647120 @default.
- W2119761489 cites W2047106812 @default.
- W2119761489 cites W2049434357 @default.
- W2119761489 cites W2067243958 @default.
- W2119761489 cites W2070204552 @default.
- W2119761489 cites W2070419704 @default.
- W2119761489 cites W2070472844 @default.
- W2119761489 cites W2140139548 @default.
- W2119761489 cites W2155266001 @default.
- W2119761489 cites W2161160110 @default.
- W2119761489 cites W2319697373 @default.
- W2119761489 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.12.037" @default.
- W2119761489 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25832691" @default.
- W2119761489 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
- W2119761489 type Work @default.
- W2119761489 sameAs 2119761489 @default.
- W2119761489 citedByCount "32" @default.
- W2119761489 countsByYear W21197614892015 @default.
- W2119761489 countsByYear W21197614892016 @default.
- W2119761489 countsByYear W21197614892017 @default.
- W2119761489 countsByYear W21197614892018 @default.
- W2119761489 countsByYear W21197614892019 @default.
- W2119761489 countsByYear W21197614892020 @default.
- W2119761489 countsByYear W21197614892021 @default.
- W2119761489 countsByYear W21197614892022 @default.
- W2119761489 countsByYear W21197614892023 @default.
- W2119761489 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2119761489 hasAuthorship W2119761489A5015138770 @default.
- W2119761489 hasAuthorship W2119761489A5020447959 @default.
- W2119761489 hasAuthorship W2119761489A5032324904 @default.
- W2119761489 hasAuthorship W2119761489A5038804938 @default.
- W2119761489 hasAuthorship W2119761489A5047977949 @default.
- W2119761489 hasAuthorship W2119761489A5050365329 @default.
- W2119761489 hasAuthorship W2119761489A5054321389 @default.
- W2119761489 hasAuthorship W2119761489A5057593975 @default.
- W2119761489 hasAuthorship W2119761489A5078235989 @default.
- W2119761489 hasAuthorship W2119761489A5079012174 @default.
- W2119761489 hasAuthorship W2119761489A5079227079 @default.
- W2119761489 hasAuthorship W2119761489A5080794668 @default.
- W2119761489 hasConcept C105702510 @default.
- W2119761489 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
- W2119761489 hasConcept C125567185 @default.
- W2119761489 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
- W2119761489 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W2119761489 hasConcept C143409427 @default.
- W2119761489 hasConcept C178910020 @default.
- W2119761489 hasConcept C2780775167 @default.
- W2119761489 hasConcept C2781300204 @default.
- W2119761489 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
- W2119761489 hasConcept C44575665 @default.
- W2119761489 hasConcept C60465272 @default.
- W2119761489 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2119761489 hasConceptScore W2119761489C105702510 @default.
- W2119761489 hasConceptScore W2119761489C118552586 @default.
- W2119761489 hasConceptScore W2119761489C125567185 @default.
- W2119761489 hasConceptScore W2119761489C126838900 @default.
- W2119761489 hasConceptScore W2119761489C141071460 @default.
- W2119761489 hasConceptScore W2119761489C143409427 @default.
- W2119761489 hasConceptScore W2119761489C178910020 @default.
- W2119761489 hasConceptScore W2119761489C2780775167 @default.
- W2119761489 hasConceptScore W2119761489C2781300204 @default.
- W2119761489 hasConceptScore W2119761489C2989005 @default.
- W2119761489 hasConceptScore W2119761489C44575665 @default.
- W2119761489 hasConceptScore W2119761489C60465272 @default.
- W2119761489 hasConceptScore W2119761489C71924100 @default.
- W2119761489 hasIssue "5" @default.
- W2119761489 hasLocation W21197614891 @default.
- W2119761489 hasLocation W21197614892 @default.
- W2119761489 hasOpenAccess W2119761489 @default.
- W2119761489 hasPrimaryLocation W21197614891 @default.
- W2119761489 hasRelatedWork W1967939705 @default.