FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2120002178> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2120002178 endingPage "101" @default.
• W2120002178 startingPage "96" @default.
• W2120002178 abstract "Matching residential setting with cognitive and physical abilities is crucial for the provision of a supportive long-term care (LTC) environment. This study compares the cognitive and functional care differences of LTC residents on skilled nursing units designed for dementia care, chronic care, or ambulatory care, and an assisted living setting using the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Texas Index of Level for Effort (TILE) clinical categories (heavy care, rehabilitation/restorative, clinically unstable, clinically stable), MDS Activities of Daily Living (ADL), and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). The goal of the comparison was to find a parsimonious approach for determining resident placement in LTC using the MDS and MMSE. Using a descriptive comparative design, the study took place at a not-for-profit, urban, continuing care retirement center (CCRC) with a 120-bed skilled nursing facility and a 34-unit assisted living facility. Sixty residents, 15 from each of the 3 skilled nursing units and assisted living unit, consented to participate. To understand the differences in the MDS and MMSE scores between units, a Level of Care Algorithm was constructed to analyze resident placement. Results revealed that MDS and MMSE scores placed greater than 75% of elders who had extremely poor cognitive or physical function but did not discriminate well for residents with moderate cognitive and/or physical impairment. For these residents, interaction between institutional philosophy (aging in place versus moving to a new location); resource availability; and elder, family, and staff values and preferences may have influenced placement. Matching residential setting with cognitive and physical abilities is crucial for the provision of a supportive long-term care (LTC) environment. This study compares the cognitive and functional care differences of LTC residents on skilled nursing units designed for dementia care, chronic care, or ambulatory care, and an assisted living setting using the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Texas Index of Level for Effort (TILE) clinical categories (heavy care, rehabilitation/restorative, clinically unstable, clinically stable), MDS Activities of Daily Living (ADL), and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). The goal of the comparison was to find a parsimonious approach for determining resident placement in LTC using the MDS and MMSE. Using a descriptive comparative design, the study took place at a not-for-profit, urban, continuing care retirement center (CCRC) with a 120-bed skilled nursing facility and a 34-unit assisted living facility. Sixty residents, 15 from each of the 3 skilled nursing units and assisted living unit, consented to participate. To understand the differences in the MDS and MMSE scores between units, a Level of Care Algorithm was constructed to analyze resident placement. Results revealed that MDS and MMSE scores placed greater than 75% of elders who had extremely poor cognitive or physical function but did not discriminate well for residents with moderate cognitive and/or physical impairment. For these residents, interaction between institutional philosophy (aging in place versus moving to a new location); resource availability; and elder, family, and staff values and preferences may have influenced placement." @default.
• W2120002178 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2120002178 creator A5000018841 @default.
• W2120002178 creator A5011928394 @default.
• W2120002178 creator A5038342907 @default.
• W2120002178 date "2006-02-01" @default.
• W2120002178 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2120002178 title "A Comparison of Cognitive and Functional Care Differences in Four Long-term Care Settings" @default.
• W2120002178 cites W14617120 @default.
• W2120002178 cites W1847168837 @default.
• W2120002178 cites W1968750846 @default.
• W2120002178 cites W1972177265 @default.
• W2120002178 cites W1973348564 @default.
• W2120002178 cites W1974915847 @default.
• W2120002178 cites W1980915340 @default.
• W2120002178 cites W1983311436 @default.
• W2120002178 cites W1994077125 @default.
• W2120002178 cites W1994842091 @default.
• W2120002178 cites W1997821238 @default.
• W2120002178 cites W2010554419 @default.
• W2120002178 cites W2021418042 @default.
• W2120002178 cites W2083220625 @default.
• W2120002178 cites W2085930093 @default.
• W2120002178 cites W2101696449 @default.
• W2120002178 cites W2102617679 @default.
• W2120002178 cites W2104662749 @default.
• W2120002178 cites W2105071925 @default.
• W2120002178 cites W2109140840 @default.
• W2120002178 cites W2255455040 @default.
• W2120002178 cites W2314778970 @default.
• W2120002178 cites W2413037407 @default.
• W2120002178 cites W3145214206 @default.
• W2120002178 cites W590040178 @default.
• W2120002178 cites W2400830651 @default.
• W2120002178 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2005.10.005" @default.
• W2120002178 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16461251" @default.
• W2120002178 hasPublicationYear "2006" @default.
• W2120002178 type Work @default.
• W2120002178 sameAs 2120002178 @default.
• W2120002178 citedByCount "6" @default.
• W2120002178 countsByYear W21200021782013 @default.
• W2120002178 countsByYear W21200021782015 @default.
• W2120002178 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2120002178 hasAuthorship W2120002178A5000018841 @default.
• W2120002178 hasAuthorship W2120002178A5011928394 @default.
• W2120002178 hasAuthorship W2120002178A5038342907 @default.
• W2120002178 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W2120002178 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2120002178 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2120002178 hasConcept C169900460 @default.
• W2120002178 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2120002178 hasConcept C2778818304 @default.
• W2120002178 hasConcept C2779028819 @default.
• W2120002178 hasConcept C2779134260 @default.
• W2120002178 hasConcept C2779483572 @default.
• W2120002178 hasConcept C2780233487 @default.
• W2120002178 hasConcept C3019398978 @default.
• W2120002178 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2120002178 hasConcept C74909509 @default.
• W2120002178 hasConcept C79544238 @default.
• W2120002178 hasConceptScore W2120002178C118552586 @default.
• W2120002178 hasConceptScore W2120002178C142724271 @default.
• W2120002178 hasConceptScore W2120002178C159110408 @default.
• W2120002178 hasConceptScore W2120002178C169900460 @default.
• W2120002178 hasConceptScore W2120002178C1862650 @default.
• W2120002178 hasConceptScore W2120002178C2778818304 @default.
• W2120002178 hasConceptScore W2120002178C2779028819 @default.
• W2120002178 hasConceptScore W2120002178C2779134260 @default.
• W2120002178 hasConceptScore W2120002178C2779483572 @default.
• W2120002178 hasConceptScore W2120002178C2780233487 @default.
• W2120002178 hasConceptScore W2120002178C3019398978 @default.
• W2120002178 hasConceptScore W2120002178C71924100 @default.
• W2120002178 hasConceptScore W2120002178C74909509 @default.
• W2120002178 hasConceptScore W2120002178C79544238 @default.
• W2120002178 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2120002178 hasLocation W21200021781 @default.
• W2120002178 hasLocation W21200021782 @default.
• W2120002178 hasOpenAccess W2120002178 @default.
• W2120002178 hasPrimaryLocation W21200021781 @default.
• W2120002178 hasRelatedWork W1991922612 @default.
• W2120002178 hasRelatedWork W2135949853 @default.
• W2120002178 hasRelatedWork W2169522272 @default.
• W2120002178 hasRelatedWork W2320938894 @default.
• W2120002178 hasRelatedWork W2369871521 @default.
• W2120002178 hasRelatedWork W2743628933 @default.
• W2120002178 hasRelatedWork W2883633197 @default.
• W2120002178 hasRelatedWork W3032316211 @default.
• W2120002178 hasRelatedWork W32439615 @default.
• W2120002178 hasRelatedWork W4247054811 @default.
• W2120002178 hasVolume "7" @default.
• W2120002178 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2120002178 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2120002178 magId "2120002178" @default.
• W2120002178 workType "article" @default.