FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2120666352> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2120666352 endingPage "94" @default.
• W2120666352 startingPage "91" @default.
• W2120666352 abstract "Despite an unprecedented widening of the theoretical and methodological scope in IR over the last 25 years, research explicitly informed by phenomenology is rare. Rejecting the idea of phenomenology as “rigorous science” and instead understanding phenomenology as an interpretive and hermeneutic undertaking (Gadamer 1979; Heidegger 1982, 2008), this contribution offers an alternative phenomenological reading on the problem of theorizing the intertwinement of (political) actors and their environments. One of the central and most general concerns driving phenomenological research is the emphasis on intentionality and the concomitant conception of the publicness of mind. This phenomenological core insight posits intentionality as a central feature of our experience and fundamental to the formation of meaning and intelligibility of the world surrounding us. Positing the mind as always already in the world (in the sense of an existential involvement) leads the way to a reconceptualization of intentionality (Sokolowski 2000:8) that questions the still widely adhered to ontological “split” between the thinking subject and the objective world (ibid.:11). Although scholarship in IR over the last 25 years has made some headway toward overcoming this divide, a coherent account of how the subsequent antinomies and aporias can be understood is still absent. The still protracted agent-structure debate would be a good example here (Wight 1999). While the contingency on which the relation between subjects and objects is built is (widely) recognized, a clear conceptualization of the nature, emergence, and ramifications of this intrinsic indeterminacy is so far lacking. Rather, we can observe ever more complex undertakings to secure starting points which threaten to negate the theoretical advances made by the very way they settle the indeterminate relation between subject and object. After all, it is still a widespread practice in IR to understand an event or actions by reference to objects that exist, making them intelligible by classifying them according to categories and various epistemological and conceptual tools. As Charles Taylor put it, this approach “offers us the picture of an agent who in perceiving the world takes in ‘bits’ of information from his or her surroundings and then ‘processes’ them in some fashion, in order to emerge with the ‘picture’ of the world he or she has, who then acts on the basis of this picture to fulfill his or her goals, through a ‘calculus’ of means and ends” (Taylor 2006:204)." @default.
• W2120666352 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2120666352 creator A5058682320 @default.
• W2120666352 date "2011-03-01" @default.
• W2120666352 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W2120666352 title "Intentionality and the Publicness of Mind" @default.
• W2120666352 cites W2098373888 @default.
• W2120666352 cites W2331389310 @default.
• W2120666352 cites W4211170446 @default.
• W2120666352 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-5687.2011.00122_3.x" @default.
• W2120666352 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W2120666352 type Work @default.
• W2120666352 sameAs 2120666352 @default.
• W2120666352 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W2120666352 countsByYear W21206663522012 @default.
• W2120666352 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2120666352 hasAuthorship W2120666352A5058682320 @default.
• W2120666352 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2120666352 hasConcept C127882523 @default.
• W2120666352 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2120666352 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2120666352 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2120666352 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2120666352 hasConcept C2777200700 @default.
• W2120666352 hasConcept C2778061430 @default.
• W2120666352 hasConcept C36790819 @default.
• W2120666352 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2120666352 hasConcept C84269361 @default.
• W2120666352 hasConcept C90734943 @default.
• W2120666352 hasConceptScore W2120666352C111472728 @default.
• W2120666352 hasConceptScore W2120666352C127882523 @default.
• W2120666352 hasConceptScore W2120666352C138885662 @default.
• W2120666352 hasConceptScore W2120666352C144024400 @default.
• W2120666352 hasConceptScore W2120666352C17744445 @default.
• W2120666352 hasConceptScore W2120666352C199539241 @default.
• W2120666352 hasConceptScore W2120666352C2777200700 @default.
• W2120666352 hasConceptScore W2120666352C2778061430 @default.
• W2120666352 hasConceptScore W2120666352C36790819 @default.
• W2120666352 hasConceptScore W2120666352C41895202 @default.
• W2120666352 hasConceptScore W2120666352C84269361 @default.
• W2120666352 hasConceptScore W2120666352C90734943 @default.
• W2120666352 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2120666352 hasLocation W21206663521 @default.
• W2120666352 hasOpenAccess W2120666352 @default.
• W2120666352 hasPrimaryLocation W21206663521 @default.
• W2120666352 hasRelatedWork W148021866 @default.
• W2120666352 hasRelatedWork W1987919963 @default.
• W2120666352 hasRelatedWork W2324271810 @default.
• W2120666352 hasRelatedWork W2382269345 @default.
• W2120666352 hasRelatedWork W2562063420 @default.
• W2120666352 hasRelatedWork W2884822660 @default.
• W2120666352 hasRelatedWork W2903804349 @default.
• W2120666352 hasRelatedWork W294757465 @default.
• W2120666352 hasRelatedWork W1906076211 @default.
• W2120666352 hasRelatedWork W3125918179 @default.
• W2120666352 hasVolume "5" @default.
• W2120666352 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2120666352 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2120666352 magId "2120666352" @default.
• W2120666352 workType "article" @default.