FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2120872600> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2120872600 endingPage "2043" @default.
• W2120872600 startingPage "2039" @default.
• W2120872600 abstract "No AccessJournal of UrologyAdult Urology1 Jun 2012The Impact of Real-Time Elastography Guiding a Systematic Prostate Biopsy to Improve Cancer Detection Rate: A Prospective Study of 353 Patients Marko Brock, Christian von Bodman, Rein Jüri Palisaar, Björn Löppenberg, Florian Sommerer, Thomas Deix, Joachim Noldus, and Thilo Eggert Marko BrockMarko Brock Department of Urology, Ruhr University Bochum, Marienhospital Herne, Herne, Germany More articles by this author , Christian von BodmanChristian von Bodman Department of Urology, Ruhr University Bochum, Marienhospital Herne, Herne, Germany More articles by this author , Rein Jüri PalisaarRein Jüri Palisaar Department of Urology, Ruhr University Bochum, Marienhospital Herne, Herne, Germany More articles by this author , Björn LöppenbergBjörn Löppenberg Department of Urology, Ruhr University Bochum, Marienhospital Herne, Herne, Germany More articles by this author , Florian SommererFlorian Sommerer Department of Pathology, Berufsgenossenschaftliche Universitätsklinik Bergmannsheil GmbH, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany More articles by this author , Thomas DeixThomas Deix Department of Urology, Ruhr University Bochum, Marienhospital Herne, Herne, Germany More articles by this author , Joachim NoldusJoachim Noldus Department of Urology, Ruhr University Bochum, Marienhospital Herne, Herne, Germany More articles by this author , and Thilo EggertThilo Eggert Department of Urology, Ruhr University Bochum, Marienhospital Herne, Herne, Germany More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2012.01.063AboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract Purpose: We evaluated whether real-time elastography guided biopsy improves prostate cancer detection compared to conventional systematic gray scale ultrasound guidance. Materials and Methods: A total of 353 consecutive patients suspicious for prostate cancer were prospectively randomized for real-time elastography (178) or gray scale ultrasound (175). Each patient enrolled in the study underwent a 10-core prostate biopsy. Six lateral prostate sectors (base, mid, apex) were scanned for cancer suspicious areas, defined as stiffer blue lesions using real-time elastography and hypoechoic lesions using gray scale ultrasound. Suspicious areas were sampled by a single targeted biopsy and considered representative of a defined prostate sector. If real-time elastography or gray scale ultrasound did not visualize a suspicious area in a sector, the biopsy core was taken systematically. Imaging findings were correlated with histopathological reports. Real-time elastography and gray scale ultrasound cases were compared in terms of cancer detection rate and imaging guidance accuracy. Results: Characteristics of patients undergoing real-time elastography and gray scale ultrasound, including age, prostate specific antigen, prostate volume and digital rectal examination, were not significantly different (p >0.05). Prostate cancer was detected in 160 of 353 patients (45.3%). The prostate cancer detection rate was significantly higher in patients who underwent biopsy with the real-time elastography guided approach compared to the gray scale ultrasound guided biopsy at 51.1% (91 of 178) vs 39.4% (69 of 175) (p = 0.027). Overall sensitivity and specificity to detect prostate cancer was 60.8% and 68.4% for real-time elastography vs 15% and 92.3% for gray scale ultrasound, respectively. Conclusions: Sensitivity to visualize and detect prostate cancer improved using real-time elastography in addition to gray scale ultrasound during prostate biopsy. Overall sensitivity did not reach levels to omit a systematic biopsy approach. References 1 : EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Eur Urol2008; 53: 68. Google Scholar 2 : High incidence of prostate cancer detected by saturation biopsy after previous negative biopsy series. Eur Urol2006; 50: 498. Google Scholar 3 : Prostate cancer detection rate in patients with repeated extended 21-sample needle biopsy. Eur Urol2009; 55: 600. Google Scholar 4 : Early detection of prostate cancer in 2007: Part 1: PSA and PSA kinetics. Eur Urol2008; 53: 468. Google Scholar 5 : Advances in magnetic resonance imaging: how they are changing the management of prostate cancer. Eur Urol2011; 59: 962. Google Scholar 6 : Detection of prostate cancer with a microbubble ultrasound contrast agent. Lancet2001; 357: 1849. Google Scholar 7 : Value of real-time elastography targeted biopsy for prostate cancer detection in men with prostate specific antigen 1.25 ng/ml or greater and 4.00 ng/ml or less. J Urol2010; 184: 913. Link, Google Scholar 8 : Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and elastography in imaging of prostate cancer. Curr Opin Urol2007; 17: 39. Google Scholar 9 : Evaluation of prostate cancer detection with ultrasound real-time elastography: a comparison with step section pathological analysis after radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol2008; 54: 1354. Google Scholar 10 : Comparison of sonoelastography guided biopsy with systematic biopsy: impact on prostate cancer detection. Eur Radiol2007; 17: 2278. Google Scholar 11 : Patterns of spread of adenocarcinoma in the prostate as related to cancer volume. Prostate2001; 49: 48. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 12 : Targeted biopsy of the prostate: the impact of color Doppler imaging and elastography on prostate cancer detection and Gleason score. Urology2007; 70: 1136. Google Scholar 13 : Repeat prostate biopsy–when, where, and how. Urol Oncol2009; 27: 312. Google Scholar 14 : Saturation biopsy of the prostate: why saturation does not saturate. Eur Urol2009; 56: 619. Google Scholar 15 : Biopsy schemes with the fewest cores for detecting 95% of the prostate cancers detected by a 24-core biopsy. Eur Urol2010; 57: 1. Google Scholar 16 : Elastic moduli of breast and prostate tissues under compression. Ultrason Imaging1998; 20: 260. Google Scholar 17 : Comparison of real-time elastography with grey-scale ultrasonography for detection of organ-confined prostate cancer and extra capsular extension: a prospective analysis using whole mount sections after radical prostatectomy. BJU Int2011; 108: E217. Google Scholar 18 : Impact of elastography in clinical diagnosis of prostate cancer: A comparison of cancer detection between B-mode sonography and elastography-guided 10-core biopsies. Urologe A2008; 47: 1212. Google Scholar 19 : Initial experiences with real-time elastography guided biopsies of the prostate. J Urol2005; 174: 115. Link, Google Scholar 20 : Contemporary impact of transrectal ultrasound lesions for prostate cancer detection. J Urol2004; 172: 512. Link, Google Scholar 21 : Sonoelastography of the prostate: comparison with systematic biopsy findings in 492 patients. Eur J Radiol2008; 65: 304. Google Scholar 22 : Needle biopsies on autopsy prostates: sensitivity of cancer detection based on true prevalence. J Natl Cancer Inst2007; 99: 1484. Google Scholar © 2012 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byGhai S, Eure G, Fradet V, Hyndman M, McGrath T, Wodlinger B and Pavlovich C (2016) Assessing Cancer Risk on Novel 29 MHz Micro-Ultrasound Images of the Prostate: Creation of the Micro-Ultrasound Protocol for Prostate Risk IdentificationJournal of Urology, VOL. 196, NO. 2, (562-569), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2016.Schiffmann J, Grindei M, Tian Z, Yassin D, Steinwender T, Leyh-Bannurah S, Randazzo M, Kwiatkowski M, Karakiewicz P, Hammerer P and Manka L (2016) Limitations of Elastography Based Prostate BiopsyJournal of Urology, VOL. 195, NO. 6, (1731-1736), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2016.Boehm K, Salomon G, Beyer B, Schiffmann J, Simonis K, Graefen M and Budaeus L (2014) Shear Wave Elastography for Localization of Prostate Cancer Lesions and Assessment of Elasticity Thresholds: Implications for Targeted Biopsies and Active Surveillance ProtocolsJournal of Urology, VOL. 193, NO. 3, (794-800), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2015. Volume 187Issue 6June 2012Page: 2039-2043 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2012 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.Keywordselasticity imaging techniquesbiopsyprostatic neoplasmsprostatectomyMetricsAuthor Information Marko Brock Department of Urology, Ruhr University Bochum, Marienhospital Herne, Herne, Germany More articles by this author Christian von Bodman Department of Urology, Ruhr University Bochum, Marienhospital Herne, Herne, Germany More articles by this author Rein Jüri Palisaar Department of Urology, Ruhr University Bochum, Marienhospital Herne, Herne, Germany More articles by this author Björn Löppenberg Department of Urology, Ruhr University Bochum, Marienhospital Herne, Herne, Germany More articles by this author Florian Sommerer Department of Pathology, Berufsgenossenschaftliche Universitätsklinik Bergmannsheil GmbH, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany More articles by this author Thomas Deix Department of Urology, Ruhr University Bochum, Marienhospital Herne, Herne, Germany More articles by this author Joachim Noldus Department of Urology, Ruhr University Bochum, Marienhospital Herne, Herne, Germany More articles by this author Thilo Eggert Department of Urology, Ruhr University Bochum, Marienhospital Herne, Herne, Germany More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ..." @default.
• W2120872600 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2120872600 creator A5000574183 @default.
• W2120872600 creator A5007929983 @default.
• W2120872600 creator A5027217943 @default.
• W2120872600 creator A5029615900 @default.
• W2120872600 creator A5042809581 @default.
• W2120872600 creator A5069773312 @default.
• W2120872600 creator A5070816897 @default.
• W2120872600 creator A5085138287 @default.
• W2120872600 date "2012-06-01" @default.
• W2120872600 modified "2023-10-11" @default.
• W2120872600 title "The Impact of Real-Time Elastography Guiding a Systematic Prostate Biopsy to Improve Cancer Detection Rate: A Prospective Study of 353 Patients" @default.
• W2120872600 cites W1597453574 @default.
• W2120872600 cites W1869340643 @default.
• W2120872600 cites W1965484495 @default.
• W2120872600 cites W1971442767 @default.
• W2120872600 cites W1999378436 @default.
• W2120872600 cites W2012318195 @default.
• W2120872600 cites W2013188260 @default.
• W2120872600 cites W2026832536 @default.
• W2120872600 cites W2049116989 @default.
• W2120872600 cites W2050973352 @default.
• W2120872600 cites W2065320744 @default.
• W2120872600 cites W2066620325 @default.
• W2120872600 cites W2067053628 @default.
• W2120872600 cites W2071027495 @default.
• W2120872600 cites W2093059233 @default.
• W2120872600 cites W2112942915 @default.
• W2120872600 cites W2120154978 @default.
• W2120872600 cites W2123230901 @default.
• W2120872600 cites W2126833097 @default.
• W2120872600 cites W2148760514 @default.
• W2120872600 cites W42274230 @default.
• W2120872600 cites W4248836268 @default.
• W2120872600 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2012.01.063" @default.
• W2120872600 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22498211" @default.
• W2120872600 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W2120872600 type Work @default.
• W2120872600 sameAs 2120872600 @default.
• W2120872600 citedByCount "97" @default.
• W2120872600 countsByYear W21208726002012 @default.
• W2120872600 countsByYear W21208726002013 @default.
• W2120872600 countsByYear W21208726002014 @default.
• W2120872600 countsByYear W21208726002015 @default.
• W2120872600 countsByYear W21208726002016 @default.
• W2120872600 countsByYear W21208726002017 @default.
• W2120872600 countsByYear W21208726002018 @default.
• W2120872600 countsByYear W21208726002019 @default.
• W2120872600 countsByYear W21208726002020 @default.
• W2120872600 countsByYear W21208726002021 @default.
• W2120872600 countsByYear W21208726002022 @default.
• W2120872600 countsByYear W21208726002023 @default.
• W2120872600 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2120872600 hasAuthorship W2120872600A5000574183 @default.
• W2120872600 hasAuthorship W2120872600A5007929983 @default.
• W2120872600 hasAuthorship W2120872600A5027217943 @default.
• W2120872600 hasAuthorship W2120872600A5029615900 @default.
• W2120872600 hasAuthorship W2120872600A5042809581 @default.
• W2120872600 hasAuthorship W2120872600A5069773312 @default.
• W2120872600 hasAuthorship W2120872600A5070816897 @default.
• W2120872600 hasAuthorship W2120872600A5085138287 @default.
• W2120872600 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2120872600 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2120872600 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2120872600 hasConcept C143753070 @default.
• W2120872600 hasConcept C143998085 @default.
• W2120872600 hasConcept C188816634 @default.
• W2120872600 hasConcept C19527891 @default.
• W2120872600 hasConcept C2775934546 @default.
• W2120872600 hasConcept C2777690781 @default.
• W2120872600 hasConcept C2780192828 @default.
• W2120872600 hasConcept C2985322473 @default.
• W2120872600 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2120872600 hasConceptScore W2120872600C121608353 @default.
• W2120872600 hasConceptScore W2120872600C126322002 @default.
• W2120872600 hasConceptScore W2120872600C126838900 @default.
• W2120872600 hasConceptScore W2120872600C143753070 @default.
• W2120872600 hasConceptScore W2120872600C143998085 @default.
• W2120872600 hasConceptScore W2120872600C188816634 @default.
• W2120872600 hasConceptScore W2120872600C19527891 @default.
• W2120872600 hasConceptScore W2120872600C2775934546 @default.
• W2120872600 hasConceptScore W2120872600C2777690781 @default.
• W2120872600 hasConceptScore W2120872600C2780192828 @default.
• W2120872600 hasConceptScore W2120872600C2985322473 @default.
• W2120872600 hasConceptScore W2120872600C71924100 @default.
• W2120872600 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W2120872600 hasLocation W21208726001 @default.
• W2120872600 hasLocation W21208726002 @default.
• W2120872600 hasOpenAccess W2120872600 @default.
• W2120872600 hasPrimaryLocation W21208726001 @default.
• W2120872600 hasRelatedWork W1979374145 @default.
• W2120872600 hasRelatedWork W2001634716 @default.
• W2120872600 hasRelatedWork W2023738390 @default.
• W2120872600 hasRelatedWork W2042932359 @default.
• W2120872600 hasRelatedWork W2108412422 @default.
• W2120872600 hasRelatedWork W2120872600 @default.
• W2120872600 hasRelatedWork W2141555400 @default.

• next