Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2122367691> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2122367691 endingPage "162" @default.
- W2122367691 startingPage "138" @default.
- W2122367691 abstract "Muchas prácticas médicas se continúan realizando sin conocer su efectividad ni el impacto real que tienen en la salud de los pacientes, por lo tanto es necesario fundamentar las recomendaciones profesionales en la evidencia científica. Propósito principal: realizar una revisión sistemática (RS) sobre el manejo terapéutico del reflujo vésico-ureteral primario (RVUP) en urología pediátrica. 1. Definir un tratamiento ideal para cada grado de RVUP, 2. Aclarar incertidumbres sobre diversos aspectos no abordables mediante estudios aislados. Se ha realizado una RS de los artículos aparecidos en todas las bases de datos disponibles, aplicando unos criterios de inclusión y exclusión de calidad mínima imprescindible. Tras la lectura crítica de más de 320 artículos y el estudio estadístico correspondiente de los datos agrupados, según el tipo de tratamiento y beneficios aportados, así como sus efectos indeseables y comparado nuestras conclusiones con las aportadas por el trabajo recogido recientemente en The Chocrane Library, hemos alcanzado las siguientes. El tratamiento médico y el quirúrgico presentan la misma efectividad en la resolución de los grados I, II y III de RVUP, recomendándose el primero de ellos como tratamiento inicial tras el diagnóstico. El manejo endoscópico es igual de efectivo que la cirugía abierta, con menores efectos secundarios, sin haber encontrado diferencias entre las distintas sustancias analizadas para la inyección. Para los reflujos de alto grado IV y V no existen evidencias suficientes que aconsejen o desaconsejen cualquiera de los tratamientos. El tratamiento quirúrgico abierto, para cualquier grado de RVU, sólo presenta superioridad con respecto al tratamiento médico en el número de episodios de pielonefritis aguda durante el seguimiento. Esta afirmación no es posible aplicarla para el tratamiento endoscópico. Many medical practices are being carried out unawares of their efficiency, or of their actual impact on the health of the patients, therefore it is necessary to consider the support of professional recommendations with scientific evidence. to perform a systematic review (SR) of the therapeutic management of primary VUR in pediatric urology. A systematic review has been performed, including scientific evidence-based medicine criteria, of the articles published in all of the available databases. Inclusion criteria concerning basic quality of the articles were considered essential, as well as exclusion criteria to be able to reject the articles. Subsequently, and following the critic reading of greater than 320 articles, statistical study of the grouped data was performed according to the type of treatment and to the benefits contributed by each treatment, and also to their undesirable effects. Finally we have made a comparison between our results and recent Cochrane Systematic Review. The following Conclusions were drawn from the results obtained and from the analysis of the texts. Both medical and surgical treatment present with similar effectiveness concerning resolution of grades I, II and III of VUR, and the former one is the recommended initial treatment following diagnosis. Endoscopic treatment is exactly as effective as open surgery for grades I, II and III with fewer undesirable effects secondary. There are no differences concerning the efficacy of the different injected substances. Not enough evidences exist for degrees IV and V that may recommend or advise against any of the treatments. In any degree of VUR, open surgical treatment is superior as far as medical treatment is concerned only regarding the number of acute pyelonephritis episodes during followup. This conclusion cannot be applied on endoscopic treatment." @default.
- W2122367691 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2122367691 creator A5016710293 @default.
- W2122367691 date "2005-01-01" @default.
- W2122367691 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
- W2122367691 title "Tratamiento del reflujo vesico-ureteral primario en la infancia: comparación de dos revisiones sistemáticas" @default.
- W2122367691 cites W113459969 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W123358989 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W130796137 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W13531969 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W146393550 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W1529081960 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W1533197343 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W1541048963 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W171198399 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W183276204 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W1915085672 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W1963792624 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W1963921051 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W1965230915 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W1965825010 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W1967061852 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W1967194491 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W1969053909 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W1969694768 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W1969721442 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W1972114044 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W1973324258 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W1975706289 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W1975990871 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W1977885819 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W1978799386 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W1979399945 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W1979443446 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W1983203513 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W1983369450 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W1983879695 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W1984854614 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W1984881978 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W1984932177 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W1985681933 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W1986905012 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W1989615539 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W1991335028 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W1991370920 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W1991481790 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W1991508087 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W1994716311 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W1995187941 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W1997655046 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W1998003688 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W1998340195 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W2000396101 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W2001351320 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W2001675451 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W2002143893 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W2002438249 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W2003014396 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W2004297683 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W2007025335 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W2007152469 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W2007220431 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W2007983399 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W2008879591 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W2010209319 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W2010430975 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W2011774927 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W2013690296 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W2015401057 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W2016917958 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W2017829567 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W2020804483 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W2021634917 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W2021834813 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W2024005413 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W2024233074 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W2024975356 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W2025743025 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W2026739018 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W2026748138 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W2026938058 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W2027184302 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W2027333075 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W2029527584 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W2032143844 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W2032215196 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W2032312813 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W2034056290 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W2034701590 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W2036441177 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W2038720084 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W2039597980 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W2040408808 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W2040521410 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W2042443329 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W2043135744 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W2043432298 @default.
- W2122367691 cites W2046644031 @default.